Colonial Defence Committee

Last updated

Sir Andrew Clarke, pictured in 1908, a long term secretary to the committee George Clarke, 1st Baron Sydenham of Combe.png
Sir Andrew Clarke, pictured in 1908, a long term secretary to the committee

The Colonial Defence Committee (CDC) was a standing committee of the British Colonial Office between 1885 and 1908. During the second half of the 19th century British Army troops were being progressively withdrawn from colonial garrisons, with the intention being that colonial governments would replace them with locally raised troops. Russian victory in the 1877–1878 Russo-Turkish War led to increased concerns for the security of the British colonies and a short-term Royal Commission looked into colonial defence. It was replaced by the CDC, which first met on 22 April 1885.

Contents

One of the CDC's first actions was to ask the colonial governments to report on the condition of defences, the number of troops and quantity of stores held. Concerned about a surprise attack they also offered advice to the colonial governors as to how to prepare and respond. The CDC asked each colony to prepare a local defence plan for review by the committee. The CDC made recommendations to the governors about improvements to the plans, such a recommendation resulted in the establishment of the Hong Kong Regiment. In some cases, as in Saint Helena, where local means were not sufficient the committee drew up plans for defences which were funded by the British government. The CDC continued the policy that land-based defence was the responsibility of the colonial governments, assisted by the maritime supremacy of the Royal Navy. It also recommended the standardisation of colonial troops' equipment and training to better allow them to deploy alongside the British Army. This was not welcomed by all colonial governments, who were concerned about involvement in foreign wars. The poor performance of the army in the 1899–1902 Second Boer War led to wide-ranging defence reform, including the establishment of the Committee of Imperial Defence (CID). The CID had more senior members than the CDC and more political clout. The CDC became sidelined and was absorbed into the CID, being renamed the Overseas Defence Committee in 1908.

Background and establishment

An 1890s depiction of Sir Robert H. Meade Portrait of Sir Robert Henry Meade (cropped).jpg
An 1890s depiction of Sir Robert H. Meade

In 1870–71, the government withdrew standing army garrisons from self-governing colonies of the British Empire. This was a key stage in the development of the Empire and removed a significant cost burden from central government. Colonial governments were expected to make their own arrangements to raise forces to carry out internal policing and border defence duties. The move also allowed the British Army to centralise its forces and become more efficient. [1]

The colonial governments were slow and reluctant to raise troops, the costs of which would fall upon colonial taxpayers. The colonies were hampered by the withdrawal of regular troops, which could have acted as models for colonial forces and provided advisers and trainers. Apart from ad hoc advice from Royal Navy officers stationed in adjacent seas or from a small number of officers seconded from the War Office the colonial governments had been left to their own devices. [1]

The British government was concerned that colonial defence was being neglected. [1] This was particularly worrisome during the Russian war scare of 1878–79, which followed Russian victory in the 1877–78 Russo-Turkish War. [2] During the war the Secretary of State for the Colonies Sir Michael Hicks Beach had appointed a special committee to inspect the defences of some key ports in the colonies. They found them deficient, requiring £265,000 (equivalent to £28,400,000in 2019) of improvements, and only 35–40 suitable cannons were found in Britain that could be sent to augment them. After the war ended the committee was disbanded. [2]

After the war Hicks-Beach remained concerned about the defence of the colonies and established the Royal Commission Appointed to Enquire into the Defence of British Possessions and Commerce Abroad under former Secretary of State for the Colonies Lord Carnarvon. The commission found many colonial governments were unable to answer their queries, requiring investigation by Royal Navy officers. [2]

The commission recommended that imperial garrisons in Barbados be withdrawn but colonial under-secretary Robert Henry Meade halted this, concerned that the colonial government lacked the necessary expertise to secure the ports. [2] Meade consulted with the permanent under secretary Sir Robert Herbert and military officers who agreed that a small Colonial Office standing committee was necessary to coordinate defence arrangements. The Colonial Defence Committee (CDC) was approved and met for the first time on 22 April 1885, to discuss the defence of Barbados. [3] It was composed of a mix of army and naval officers. [4] The first chairman was Sir Andrew Clarke, Inspector-General of Fortifications and one of its early secretaries was Captain George Clarke of the Royal Engineers. [3]

Early actions

The Russian crisis had caused panic in some colonies. The Governor of British Ceylon, James Robert Longden, had ordered the movement of 50,000 long tons (51,000 t) of coal and transported the colony's treasury inland. The CDC was determined to stop such overreactions in the future. A Local Defence Committee was established in all dependencies, to devise local defence plans which would be reviewed and approved by the CDC. [5] The focus was on the defence of the colonies in case of a widescale European war. [6]

One of the CDC's first decisions was to ascertain the current condition of colonial defences, on which there had been no regular reports made. [7] In August 1885 the CDC requested that colonial governments report on naval and land defences, the number of arms, ammunition and marine mines stored, the quantities of electrical and telegraph cable held and the number of troops, both colonial and imperial, in the colony. [8]

The CDC was concerned about a surprise assault on a colony and provided advice to colonial governors on actions to take in case of war. [8] The CDC warned governors that they should not permit more than two foreign warships into a harbour at once and no more than one foreign troopship. [8] They warned that any break in telegraph communications might indicate a state of war. Governors were advised to guard cable routes, set-up mines and implement black-out conditions. Food, coal and currency was also to be guarded. [8]

Defence plans

The Hong Kong Regiment Hong Kong Regiment.jpg
The Hong Kong Regiment

The first 19 local defence plans had been prepared by October 1891. Canada was among the slowest to prepare its plan, to the worry of the CDC particularly after the Venezuelan crisis of 1895, and began work only after the intervention of Colonial Secretary Joseph Chamberlain. [9] By October 1891 the CDC had reviewed some local plans and made the first 150 of its recommendations to governors. [10]

An early recommendation was made on 6 August 1888; that a battalion be added to the garrison at Hong Kong, doubling the infantry available there. This led to the raising of the Hong Kong Regiment of the British Indian Army for service. [11] Between 1895 and 1905 the CDC itself drew up plans for the defence of Jamestown, Saint Helena, which they considered vulnerable to attack from an organised expedition and whose loss would threaten trade in the South Atlantic. These measures were funded by the British government, due to the poor performance of the local economy. [12]

The Secretary of State for War of 1887–1892, Edward Stanhope, wanted to dissolve the CDC and replace it with a high-level Admiralty and War Office committee with more senior staff and a wider remit. This was successfully opposed by the Colonial Secretary, Lord Knutsford, who stated that if the War Office withdrew from the CDC he would find replacement members from retired officers. [10]

Colonial troops

In 1892 the CDC set out, at the request of the Colonial Office, Memorandum 57M that set out the principles of colonial defence. This stated that the defence of the colonies depended upon British supremacy at sea but also noted that it anticipated that the colonial forces could move from a defensive to an offensive role. [13]

CDC and War Office policy was that imperial troops should have no responsibility for the garrisoning of the colonies, which should be protected by colonial troops (who came under the aegis of the Colonial Office), but could be posted to imperial property such as Royal Navy coaling stations. This led to some peculiar effects, for example the officer commanding the garrison at the coaling station in Sierra Leone could not enter the colony proper without War Office permission and had no official communication with the colonial forces of the West African Frontier Force. [14]

The CDC urged that colonial troops standardise their equipment and training, to allow better compatibility on the battlefield. This would provide a pool of colonial troops, perhaps up to 10,000 each from Canada, Australia and South Africa, who could be called upon to serve alongside the British Army at short notice. These plans were resisted by some colonial governments, including Canada and Australia where there were significant factions opposed to involvement in foreign wars. [4] The War Office chose a compromise solution, a cautious programme of standardisation and professionalisation of the colonial forces was to be carried out but the colonies were not expected to make advance commitments that their troops could be deployed overseas. [15]

Decline

H.O. Arnold-Forster in 1899 Hugh Arnold-Forster, 1899.jpg
H.O. Arnold-Forster in 1899

The good performance of colonial troops in the 1899-1902 Second Boer War spurred British politicians such as Archibald Primrose, 5th Earl of Rosebery to look for the increased use of colonial forces in British wars. However, with the government focussed on reform of the imperial troops under Reginald Brett, 2nd Viscount Esher's War Office Reconstitution Committee, the Royal Commission on the South African War and the Royal Commission on Militia and Volunteers; together with the 1904 establishment of the Committee of Imperial Defence (CID) left the CDC sidelined. It was ill equipped to engage in political negotiation with the colonies over the deployment of colonial troops. [16] The CDC found it could play little part in an argument between British and Canadian politicians over the command of the Canadian militia, which eventually saw London agree for the British general in command to be replaced by a Canadian military council. [17] In a similar case the CDC and the CID could not persuade the British government that Australia, which contributed a subsidy towards Royal Navy vessels, should not be allowed any control over the deployment of the naval force. [18]

The CDC was essentially a committee of military experts, while the CID had more senior personnel and included political figures. The Secretary of War 1903-1905 H. O. Arnold-Forster, had recommended the disbandment of the CDC when a CID proposal to reduce the imperial West Indies garrison had stalled awaiting CDC approval. This was opposed by the Colonial Office and General James Grierson, the Director of Military Operations. [19] Arnold-Fisher was partly successful and the CDC became an arm of the CID; in 1908 was renamed the Overseas Defence Committee. [20] [19]

Legacy

The CDC is considered the father of the more influential CID (upon its founding the CID had chosen Clarke as its first secretary). It was the first British government body to provide a continual assessment of the defence of the colonies and one of the few to consider both land and sea defence at a time when army and naval policies were sometimes at odds. In common with British cabinet practice of the 19th century no minutes or agendas of meetings of the CDC were kept, though its memoranda survive. [21] In 1909 one of the recommendations of the CDC came to fruition when a meeting with Dominion governments saw an agreement reached for their armed forces to receive standardised War Office training with a view towards becoming a "homogenous Imperial Army". [15]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Armed Forces</span> Combined military forces of the United Kingdom

The British Armed Forces are the military forces responsible for the defence of the United Kingdom, its Overseas Territories and the Crown Dependencies. They also promote the UK's wider interests, support international peacekeeping efforts and provide humanitarian aid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">War Office</span> British Government department, 1857 to 1964

The War Office has referred to several British government organisations in history, all relating to the army. It was a department of the British Government responsible for the administration of the British Army between 1857 and 1964, when its functions were transferred to the new Ministry of Defence (MoD). It was at that time, equivalent to the Admiralty, responsible for the Royal Navy (RN), and the Air Ministry, which oversaw the Royal Air Force (RAF). The name 'War Office' is also given to the former home of the department, located at the junction of Horse Guards Avenue and Whitehall in central London. The landmark building was sold on 1 March 2016 by HM Government for more than £350 million, on a 250 year lease for conversion into a luxury hotel and residential apartments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quartering Acts</span> Laws forcing American colonists to house British soldiers (1760s–70s)

The Quartering Acts were two or more Acts of British Parliament requiring local governments of Britain's North American colonies to provide the British soldiers with housing and food. Each of the Quartering Acts was an amendment to the Mutiny Act and required annual renewal by Parliament. They were originally intended as a response to issues that arose during the French and Indian War and soon became a source of tensions between the inhabitants of the Thirteen Colonies and the government in London. These tensions would later lead toward the American Revolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1904 Canadian federal election</span>

The 1904 Canadian federal election was held on November 3, 1904 to elect members of the House of Commons of Canada of the 10th Parliament of Canada. Prime Minister Sir Wilfrid Laurier led the Liberal Party of Canada to a third term in government, with an increased majority, and over half of the popular vote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Imperial Federation</span> Proposed unification of the British Empire

The Imperial Federation was a series of proposals in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to create a federal union to replace the existing British Empire, presenting it as an alternative to colonial imperialism. No such proposal was ever adopted, but various schemes were popular in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and other colonial territories. The project was championed by Unionists such as Joseph Chamberlain as an alternative to William Gladstone's proposals for home rule in Ireland.

The Committee of Imperial Defence was an important ad hoc part of the Government of the United Kingdom and the British Empire from just after the Second Boer War until the start of the Second World War. It was responsible for research, and some co-ordination, on issues of military strategy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lawrence H. Gipson</span> American historian

Lawrence Henry Gipson was an American historian, who won the 1950 Bancroft Prize and the 1962 Pulitzer Prize for History for volumes of his magnum opus, the fifteen-volume history of "The British Empire Before the American Revolution", published 1936–70. He was a leader of the "Imperial school" of historians who studied the British Empire from the perspective of London, and generally praised the administrative efficiency and political fairness of the Empire.

The Cape Colonial Forces (CCF) were the official defence organisation of the Cape Colony in South Africa. Established in 1855, they were taken over by the Union of South Africa in 1910, and disbanded when the Union Defence Forces were formed in 1912.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mahdist War</span> 1881–1899 Sudanese revolt against Anglo-Egyptian rule

The Mahdist War was a war between the Mahdist Sudanese, led by Muhammad Ahmad bin Abdullah, who had proclaimed himself the "Mahdi" of Islam, and the forces of the Khedivate of Egypt, initially, and later the forces of Britain. Eighteen years of war resulted in the creation of Anglo-Egyptian Sudan (1899–1956), a de jure condominium of the British Empire and the Kingdom of Egypt in which Britain had de facto control over Sudan. The Sudanese launched several unsuccessful invasions of their neighbours, expanding the scale of the conflict to include not only Britain and Egypt but also the Italian Empire, the Congo Free State and the Ethiopian Empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colonial forces of Australia</span>

Until Australia became a Federation in 1901, each of the six colonies were responsible for their own defence. From 1788 until 1870 this was done with British regular forces. In all, 24 British infantry regiments served in the Australian colonies. Each of the Australian colonies gained responsible government between 1855 and 1890, and while the Colonial Office in London retained control of some affairs, and the colonies were still firmly within the British Empire, the Governors of the Australian colonies were required to raise their own colonial militia. To do this, the colonial Governors had the authority from the British crown to raise military and naval forces. Initially these were militias in support of British regulars, but British military support for the colonies ended in 1870, and the colonies assumed their own defence. The separate colonies maintained control over their respective militia forces and navies until 1 March 1901, when the colonial forces were all amalgamated into the Commonwealth Forces following the creation of the Commonwealth of Australia. Colonial forces, including home raised units, saw action in many of the conflicts of the British Empire during the 19th century. Members from British regiments stationed in Australia saw action in India, Afghanistan, the New Zealand Wars, the Sudan conflict, and the Boer War in South Africa.

The Hindu–German Conspiracy(Note on the name) was a series of attempts between 1914 and 1917 by Indian nationalist groups to create a Pan-Indian rebellion against the British Empire during World War I. This rebellion was formulated between the Indian revolutionary underground and exiled or self-exiled nationalists in the United States. It also involved the Ghadar Party, and in Germany the Indian independence committee in the decade preceding the Great War. The conspiracy began at the start of the war, with extensive support from the German Foreign Office, the German consulate in San Francisco, and some support from Ottoman Turkey and the Irish republican movement. The most prominent plan attempted to foment unrest and trigger a Pan-Indian mutiny in the British Indian Army from Punjab to Singapore. It was to be executed in February 1915, and overthrow British rule in the Indian subcontinent. The February mutiny was ultimately thwarted when British intelligence infiltrated the Ghadarite movement and arrested key figures. Mutinies in smaller units and garrisons within India were also crushed.

The 1921 Imperial Conference met in London from 20 June to 5 August 1921. It was chaired by British prime minister David Lloyd George.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1902 Colonial Conference</span>

The 1902 Colonial Conference followed the conclusion of the Boer War and was held on the occasion of the coronation of King Edward VII. As with the previous conference, it was called by Secretary of State for the Colonies Joseph Chamberlain who opened it on 30 June 1902.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prospect Camp, Bermuda</span> Military installation manned by the Royal Garrison Artillery

Prospect Camp, also referred to as Prospect Garrison, was the main infantry camp of the Bermuda Garrison, the military force stationed in the Imperial fortress of Bermuda. It also contained Fort Prospect, Fort Langton, and Fort Hamilton, as well as being the base for mobile artillery batteries, manned by the Royal Artillery. Outlying parts of the camp were disposed of in the early decades of the Twentieth Century as the garrison in Bermuda was reduced. The core area, including the barracks, passed to the local government when the garrison was withdrawn in 1957.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1904 Japanese general election</span>

General elections were held in Japan on 1 March 1904. The Rikken Seiyūkai party remained the largest in the House of Representatives, winning 133 of the 379 seats.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1907 Romanian general election</span>

General elections were held in the Kingdom of Romania in June 1907.

The Uganda Volunteer Reserve was a military unit of the Uganda Protectorate. The UVR was established in March 1903 with support from the British government's Colonial Defence Committee (CDC). The CDC promoted the establishment of such forces in the self-governing parts of the British Empire from which regular British Army troops had been withdrawn. The UVR was organised around "rifle corps" of a minimum of 15 men. Initially only one corps was established, at Entebbe, but a second, at Kampala, was established in June 1914. The members of the UVR were required to attend rifle practice annually and were unpaid, except for a bonus for meeting a minimum marksmanship standard.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">St. George's Garrison, Bermuda</span> British military post

St. George's Garrison was the first permanent military camp of the Bermuda Garrison established in the British colony and Imperial fortress of Bermuda, with construction of Old Military Road and the original Royal Barracks commencing during the war between Britain and France that followed the French Revolution. It would remain in use until 1957, when it was transferred to the civil (colonial) government with most of the other Admiralty and War Office properties in Bermuda.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Imperial fortress</span> One of four key British colonial military outposts

Lord Salisbury described Malta, Gibraltar, Bermuda, and Halifax as Imperial fortresses at the 1887 Colonial Conference, though by that point they had been so designated for decades. Later historians have also given the title "imperial fortress" to St. Helena and Mauritius.

Cotton production in Egypt was insignificant before the 1800s, but production increased drastically in the years preceding the beginning of the 20th century. The increase was influenced by historical events such as the American Civil War, which disrupted the supply of cotton from the United States. The Egyptian cotton market declined in the 20th century, but is again on the rise as of 2023.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Gordon, Donald C. (1962). "The Colonial Defence Committee and Imperial Collaboration: 1885–1904". Political Science Quarterly. 77 (4): 526–545. doi:10.2307/2146245. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   2146245.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Gordon, Donald C. (1962). "The Colonial Defence Committee and Imperial Collaboration: 1885–1904". Political Science Quarterly. 77 (4): 527. doi:10.2307/2146245. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   2146245.
  3. 1 2 Gordon, Donald C. (1962). "The Colonial Defence Committee and Imperial Collaboration: 1885–1904". Political Science Quarterly. 77 (4): 528. doi:10.2307/2146245. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   2146245.
  4. 1 2 Delaney, Douglas E. (2016). "Army Apostles: Imperial Officers on Loan and the Standardization of the Canadian, Australian and New Zealand Armies, 1904–1914". War in History. 23 (2): 172. doi:10.1177/0968344514552436. ISSN   0968-3445. JSTOR   26059762. S2CID   159915394.
  5. ↑ Stigger, Philip (1995). "Major L. F. Knollys, C.M.G, 'professional' Aide-de-camp and Colonial Military Policeman". Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research. 73 (293): 43–44. ISSN   0037-9700. JSTOR   44224904.
  6. ↑ Ekoko, A. E. (1984). "British Colonial Interests and Imperial Defence in the Gold Coast and Nigeria, 1885–1898". Journal of the Historical Society of Nigeria. 12 (3/4): 63. ISSN   0018-2540. JSTOR   44715370.
  7. ↑ Gordon, Donald C. (1962). "The Colonial Defence Committee and Imperial Collaboration: 1885–1904". Political Science Quarterly. 77 (4): 529. doi:10.2307/2146245. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   2146245.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Gordon, Donald C. (1962). "The Colonial Defence Committee and Imperial Collaboration: 1885–1904". Political Science Quarterly. 77 (4): 530. doi:10.2307/2146245. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   2146245.
  9. ↑ Gordon, Donald C. (1962). "The Colonial Defence Committee and Imperial Collaboration: 1885–1904". Political Science Quarterly. 77 (4): 531. doi:10.2307/2146245. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   2146245.
  10. 1 2 Gordon, Donald C. (1962). "The Colonial Defence Committee and Imperial Collaboration: 1885–1904". Political Science Quarterly. 77 (4): 532. doi:10.2307/2146245. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   2146245.
  11. ↑ Chapple, J. L. (1978). "1721. The Hong Kong Regiment". Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research. 56 (227): 181–183. ISSN   0037-9700. JSTOR   44229396.
  12. ↑ Ekoko, A.E. (1983). "The Theory and Practice of Imperial Garrisons: the British Experiment in the South Atlantic 1881 – 1914". Journal of the Historical Society of Nigeria. 12 (1/2): 135. ISSN   0018-2540. JSTOR   41971357.
  13. ↑ Gordon, Donald C. (1962). "The Colonial Defence Committee and Imperial Collaboration: 1885–1904". Political Science Quarterly. 77 (4): 533–534. doi:10.2307/2146245. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   2146245.
  14. ↑ Ekoko, A.E. (1983). "The Theory and Practice of Imperial Garrisons: the British Experiment in the South Atlantic 1881 – 1914". Journal of the Historical Society of Nigeria. 12 (1/2): 141–142. ISSN   0018-2540. JSTOR   41971357.
  15. 1 2 Delaney, Douglas E. (2016). "Army Apostles: Imperial Officers on Loan and the Standardization of the Canadian, Australian and New Zealand Armies, 1904–1914". War in History. 23 (2): 173. doi:10.1177/0968344514552436. ISSN   0968-3445. JSTOR   26059762. S2CID   159915394.
  16. ↑ Gordon, Donald C. (1962). "The Colonial Defence Committee and Imperial Collaboration: 1885–1904". Political Science Quarterly. 77 (4): 535. doi:10.2307/2146245. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   2146245.
  17. ↑ Gordon, Donald C. (1962). "The Colonial Defence Committee and Imperial Collaboration: 1885–1904". Political Science Quarterly. 77 (4): 539. doi:10.2307/2146245. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   2146245.
  18. ↑ Gordon, Donald C. (1962). "The Colonial Defence Committee and Imperial Collaboration: 1885–1904". Political Science Quarterly. 77 (4): 541–542. doi:10.2307/2146245. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   2146245.
  19. 1 2 Gordon, Donald C. (1962). "The Colonial Defence Committee and Imperial Collaboration: 1885–1904". Political Science Quarterly. 77 (4): 543. doi:10.2307/2146245. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   2146245.
  20. ↑ Ekoko, A.E. (1983). "The Theory and Practice of Imperial Garrisons: the British Experiment in the South Atlantic 1881 – 1914". Journal of the Historical Society of Nigeria. 12 (1/2): 144. ISSN   0018-2540. JSTOR   41971357.
  21. ↑ Gordon, Donald C. (1962). "The Colonial Defence Committee and Imperial Collaboration: 1885–1904". Political Science Quarterly. 77 (4): 544. doi:10.2307/2146245. ISSN   0032-3195. JSTOR   2146245.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.