Combined Federal Campaign

Last updated
Logo for the Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) Combined Federal Campaign logo 2018.png
Logo for the Combined Federal Campaign (CFC)

The Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) is the workplace giving program of the federal government of the United States. The program is authorized by executive order 12353 (as amended) of March 23, 1982, and is overseen by the United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM). Issued by President Reagan, the order states that a CFC objective is "to lessen the burdens of government and of local communities in meeting needs of human health and welfare ..." According to OPM's website, the mission of the CFC "is to promote and support philanthropy through a program that is employee focused, cost-efficient, and effective in providing all federal employees the opportunity to improve the quality of life for all". [1]

Contents

The federal regulations that govern the CFC are at 5 CFR §950. [2]

Origins

In 1957, President Dwight D. Eisenhower promulgated procedures for a program of charitable solicitation in the federal workplace and established the "President's Committee on Fund-Raising Within the Federal Service" to review and modify the fund-raising program (Executive Order No. 10728, 22 Fed. Reg. 7219, Establishing the President's Committee on Fund-Raising Within the Federal Service, Sept. 6, 1957). [3]

In 1961, President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order 10927, "Abolishing the President's Committee on Fund-Raising Within the Federal Service and Providing for the Conduct of Fund-Raising Activities," which gave authority to the United States Civil Service Commission to organize nonprofit solicitations of federal government employees: [4]

... The Chairman of the Civil Service Commission is authorized to consult with appropriate interested persons and organizations, the national voluntary agencies, and the executive departments and agencies concerned. Such arrangements shall (1) permit true voluntary giving and reserve to the individual the option of disclosing his gift or keeping it confidential; (2) designate specific periods during which solicitations may be conducted; and (3) provide for not more than three solicitations annually, except in cases of emergency or disaster appeals for which specific provision may be made by the Chairman of the Civil Service Commission.

—  John F. Kennedy, Executive Order 10927
Former logo for the Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) US-CombinedFederalCampaign-Logo.svg
Former logo for the Combined Federal Campaign (CFC)

Kennedy's executive order was eventually replaced [5] by President Ronald Reagan's 1982 executive order 12353, "Charitable Fundraising," which created the modern Combined Federal Campaign under the United States Office of Personnel Management. [6]

Organization

The CFC consists of a number of local committees and a central Office of the CFC. The overall program is overseen by the Office of Personnel Management.

Before 2014, administration was very decentralized. While collecting contributions via payroll deduction was centralized, most of the publicity and distribution of funds was the responsibility of the local committees. Circa 2014, there were 163 such committees. Most of those committees relied on local United Way charities to perform the actual work. [7] In 2014, OPM issued rules to centralize administration of the CFC. [8] OPM argued centralized administration would reduce expenses and eliminate redundant, paper-heavy functions. [7] The first campaign under the new structure took place in 2017. The new structure gave a single charity responsibility for distributing contributions. A reduced number of regional CFC committees were responsible for promoting the campaign. In 2020, there were 36 such CFC zones. [9]

In 2015, OPM awarded a contract to administer the CFC to The Give Back Foundation, a charity based in Madison, Wisconsin. The Give Back Foundation subcontracted to Total Administrative Service Corporation (TASC), a for-profit corporation that runs the day-to-day operations of the CFC. [10] OPM renewed the contract in 2021. [11]

Administrative costs

The CFC spends a portion of contributions on administrative costs. The 2014 rule changes included charging each charity an annual application fee, and if the application was approved, an additional listing fee. Although OPM intended these new fees to cover the entire cost, it continued to need to deduct money from contributions to meet administrative expenses.

According to the OPM, historically, campaign costs have averaged ten percent. [12] However, costs increased and contributions decreased in the period when administration was centralized. Administrative costs for the 2017 campaign were 25%. [8] In 2019, the CFC continued to charge application fees, listing fees, and distribution fees. The distribution fees that year were 19% of pledges. [note 1] [9]

Participation

At the Main Treasury Building, in the Cash Room, a CFC award ceremony At the Main Treasury Building, in the Cash Room 05.jpg
At the Main Treasury Building, in the Cash Room, a CFC award ceremony

Contributions to the CFC totaled $12.9 million in 1964, $82.8 million in 1979, and peaked at $282.6 million in 2009. In 2011, CFC pledges totaled $272.7 million with 24% of the federal workforce participating and an average employee pledge of $284.27. [13] In 2012, OPM began the process restructuring the CFC, by establishing the CFC-50 commission, followed by draft rules in 2013. The vast majority of CFC stakeholders that submitted comments in the public comment period opposed key aspects of the proposed rules. The CFC donations began to decline in this period. In the last year of the historical structure with charities operating the CFC, 2016, donations to the CFC totaled $167 million with employee participation at 10.7 percent. Under the first year of OPM's new centralized structure, donations dropped 39% to $101 million and employee participation dropped to 4.3%.

The number of participating charities was estimated in 2012 at more than 20,000 nonprofit organizations worldwide. [13] Organizations wishing to participate must submit a new charity application annually. [14] Beginning in 2017, OPM began charging charities upfront fees in order to participate in the CFC. Application and listing fees were tiered based on the size and nature of the charity. Application fees collected from charities totaled $3,498,745 and listing fees totaled $5,766,385. 8,573 charities opted to pay the upfront fees and participate in the CFC. After the 2017 CFC campaign concluded, OPM announced that, pursuant to provisions in the new rules, a 16.5% distribution fee (totaling $16,772,233) would be charged on donations to cover the cost of the CFC. Early reports are that the number of charities participating in 2018 will drop by approximately 9%

Screening of Charities

The CFC requires participating charities to meet certain requirements. From time to time, the CFC has been criticized both for requirements both too restrictive and too lenient.

Terrorist screening controversy

In 2004, the program added a new requirement that all organizations participating in the CFC must certify that they screen all of their employees against government-created blacklists, intended to identify people involved in "terrorist activities". This resulted in the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) resigning from the CFC July 31, 2004, because such checks violate their principles. In November 2004, the ACLU and 12 other non-profit organizations filed a lawsuit challenging this policy. Since then, in November 2005, the OCFCO has put out revised requirements. The new regulation requires that each federation, federation member, and un-affiliated organization applying for participation in the CFC must, as a condition of participation, complete a certification that it is in compliance with all statutes, Executive orders, and regulations restricting or prohibiting U.S. persons from engaging in transactions and dealings with countries, entities, or individuals subject to economic sanctions administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). In essence, the charities have to certify that the organizations that they support are not considered terrorist organizations by the US Government. While the ACLU was not in the CFC for 2005, these revised requirements seem to have satisfied most of the charities who complained. In 2007, the ACLU returned to the CFC.

Charities failing to pay taxes

In 2006, Federal regulators released a report finding the CFC had allowed charities to participate despite being behind on payroll taxes or otherwise engaging in illegal activities. The CFC said a federal law prevented it from screening charities for tax compliance, however in 2006 it said it was taking steps to assure participating charities actually were recognized by the IRS as tax exempt. [15]

Charities with high overhead costs

Prior to 2006, the CFC restricted charities with fundraising and other overhead costs exceeding 25% of revenue. It did not prohibit such charities from participating, but required them to explain those costs. Starting in 2006, it dropped this screening, citing burden administering the rule, as well as lawsuits from charities affected by the rule. [16]

Notes

  1. ↑ Changes in reporting complicate comparing costs from year to year. Distribution fees are not the same as total cost, and pledges are not the same as contributions.

Related Research Articles

American Civil Liberties Union Legal advocacy organization in the United States

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is a nonprofit organization founded in 1920 "to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties guaranteed to every person in this country by the Constitution and laws of the United States". The ACLU works through litigation and lobbying, and has over 1,800,000 members as of July 2018, with an annual budget of over $300 million. Affiliates of the ACLU are active in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. The ACLU provides legal assistance in cases where it considers civil liberties to be at risk. Legal support from the ACLU can take the form of direct legal representation or preparation of amicus curiae briefs expressing legal arguments when another law firm is already providing representation.

Office of Management and Budget Office within the Executive Office of the President of the United States

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is the largest office within the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP). OMB's most prominent function is to produce the president's budget, but it also examines agency programs, policies, and procedures to see whether they comply with the president's policies and coordinates inter-agency policy initiatives.

United Way Nonprofit organization

United Way is an international network of over 1,800 local nonprofit fundraising affiliates. United Way was the largest non-profit organization in the United States by donations from the public, prior to 2016.

The Hunger Project (THP), founded in 1977 with the stated goal of ending world hunger in 25 years, is an organization committed to the sustainable end of world hunger. It has ongoing programs in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, where it implements programs aimed at mobilizing rural grassroots communities to achieve sustainable progress in health, education, nutrition, and family income. THP is a 501(c)(3) non-profit charitable organization incorporated in the state of California.

United States Office of Personnel Management United States federal government agency

The United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is an independent agency of the United States Federal Government that manages the US civilian service. The agency provides federal human resources policy, oversight and support, and tends to healthcare (FEHB) and life insurance (FEGLI) and retirement benefits for federal government employees, retirees and their dependents.

The Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program is a system of "managed competition" through which employee health benefits are provided to civilian government employees and annuitants of the United States government. The government contributes 72% of the weighted average premium of all plans, not to exceed 75% of the premium for any one plan.

The competitive service is a part of the United States federal government civil service. Applicants for jobs in the competitive civil service must compete with other applicants in open competition under the merit system administered by the Office of Personnel Management, unlike applicants in the excepted service and Senior Executive Service. There are several hiring authorities for the competitive service, including "traditional" competitive examining, as well as expedited procedures such as Direct Hire Authority and the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act.

Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 United States legislation

The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, (CSRA), reformed the civil service of the United States federal government, partly in response to the Watergate scandal. The Act abolished the U.S. Civil Service Commission and distributed its functions primarily among three new agencies: the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), and the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA).

Global Impact is a non-profit organization that works with international charities based in the United States and administers four of the largest Combined Federal Campaigns (CFC), including the Combined Federal Campaign of the National Capital Area, and the Combined Federal Campaign-Overseas. The CFC is a program to raise money from federal employees for local, national, and international charities. Global Impact affiliated charities include CARE, Doctors Without Borders, Heifer International, Save the Children, the U.S. Fund for UNICEF and World Vision. In 2016, Global Impact launched a counterpart organization in the United Kingdom—Global Impact UK.

The United States federal civil service is the civilian workforce of the United States federal government's departments and agencies. The federal civil service was established in 1871. U.S. state and local government entities often have comparable civil service systems that are modeled on the national system, in varying degrees.

Howard Weizmann was deputy director of the United States Office of Personnel Management. During his tenure, he led efforts to reform the Federal hiring process and worked to help modernize the Federal pension system. He also was responsible for the oversight of the Combined Federal Campaign (CFC) which manages the annual charitable contributions process for the Federal government. Previous to his appointment, Weizmann served as president of the Private Sector Council (PSC), part of the Partnership for Public Service, a not-for-profit organization that pairs private sector advisers with federal employees to improve agency performance management.

Oklahoma Office of Personnel Management

The Oklahoma Office of Personnel Management (OPM) was an agency of the government of Oklahoma which was dissolved in 2011. OPM managed the civil service of the state government. OPM previously provided comprehensive human resource services to all state agencies and employees, as well as information for individuals interested in state service careers. OPM, together with the Oklahoma Merit Protection Commission, was responsible for administering and enforcing the State Merit System.

The Federal Salary Council (FSC) is an advisory body of the executive branch of the United States government. Established under the provisions of Title 5, section 5304(e) of the United States Code, the FSC provides recommendations on the locality pay program, created by the Federal Employees Pay Comparability Act of 1990 (FEPCA). The locality pay program provides for localized pay differentials, also known as "comparability payments," for federal employees paid under the pay scale of the United States federal civil service who work in the United States and its territories and possessions. Section 1911 of Public Law 111-84, the Non-Foreign Area Retirement Equity Assurance Act of 2009, phased in locality pay for employees in the non-foreign areas as identified in Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Alaska and Hawaii are separate locality-pay areas with separate pay tables. Other non-foreign areas are included as part of the "Rest of U.S." locality pay area.

Secretary of State of South Carolina Elected position

The secretary of state of South Carolina is an elected position that is responsible to maintain clear records of statewide corporations, supply to the public with customer service, and administrate the Solicitation of Charitable Funds Act.

National Finance Center USDA human resources and payroll accountants

The National Finance Center (NFC) is a federal government agency division under the United States Department of Agriculture that provides human resources, financial and administrative services for agencies of the United States federal government. NFC's customer base is composed of more than 130 federal organizations, representing all three branches of the government.

The Federal Wage System (FWS) in the United States was developed to make the pay of federal blue-collar workers comparable to prevailing private sector rates in each local wage area. The FWS is a partnership worked out between the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), other Federal agencies, and labor organizations.

Senior Executive Service Accountability Act

The Senior Executive Service Accountability Act is a bill that would make it less difficult to fire or suspend members of the Senior Executive Service (SES).

The Reynolds cancer charities refer to the four "sham charities": the Cancer Fund of America, Inc. (CFA), Cancer Support Services Inc. (CSS), Children’s Cancer Fund of America Inc. (CCFOA), and The Breast Cancer Society Inc. (BCS) that began operations in 1984 and were shut down in 2016. They were run by James T. Reynolds, James Reynold II, Kyle Effler, Rose Perkins, Kristina Reynolds and other Reynolds family members and friends. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) described the Reynolds cancer charities as "one of the largest charity fraud cases ever". They were listed as among America's worst charities, based on high management costs, high salaries to directors, and low (1%–2.5%) proportion of income disbursed to beneficiaries. The investigation of the Reynolds' sham charities, initiated by the FTC and all fifty states plus the District of Columbia, resulted in "one of the largest actions brought to date [2015] by enforcers against charity fraud." The May 2015 historic civil suit, alleged that CFA, CSS, CCFOA, and BCS had collected more than $187 million in donations from consumers and that an "overwhelming majority" of the money went to "the perpetrators, their families and friends", and for-profit fundraisers contracted by the charities. Reynolds' and associates contracted about ten of these for-profit solicitors who "earned more than 80 cents of every dollar donated" [to CFA] for a total of $80.4 million."

Katherine Archuleta

Katherine L. Archuleta is an American teacher and a political executive. She was the director of the United States Office of Personnel Management. President Barack Obama appointed her on May 23, 2013. She was sworn in on November 4, 2013. She had previously served as National Political Director for Obama's 2012 reelection campaign. Prior to that, she had been executive director of the National Hispanic Cultural Center Foundation in New Mexico, had co-founded the Latina Initiative, had worked at a Denver law firm, and had worked in the Clinton Administration as chief of staff to the Secretary of Transportation, Federico Peña. She became embroiled in controversy after the disclosure of a massive national security breach in June 2015. The hack involved the theft of millions of federal employee records and included security-clearance details dating back 15 years, which prompted lawmakers from both political parties to demand that she resign. On July 10, 2015, Archuleta tendered her resignation.

The Human Resources University was part of the United States Office of Personnel Management which serves as the national focal point for the development and delivery of human resources training to enhance the capabilities of the Federal workforce. HRU provided services to Federal human resources contractor personnel as well. Since inception HRU had more than 50,000 registered students from across the Federal government. In April 2014 HRU received some publicity for saving the Federal government over $100 million in cost savings in training costs.

References

PD-icon.svg This article incorporates  public domain material from websites or documents ofthe National Archives and Records Administration .

  1. ↑ "Combined Federal Campaign". U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
  2. ↑ "Code of Federal Regulations. Title 5. Chapter I. Subchapter B. Part 950".
  3. ↑ Fundraising, Ethics Counselor's Deskbook (PDF), 2013, retrieved 2014-09-12
  4. ↑ Kennedy, John F. (March 18, 1961), Executive Order 10927, Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project, retrieved January 29, 2014
  5. ↑ Executive Orders Disposition Tables, John F. Kennedy – 1961, U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, retrieved January 29, 2014
  6. ↑ Reagan, Ronald (March 18, 1961), Executive Order 12353, Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project, retrieved January 29, 2014
  7. 1 2 Donovan, Doug (2014-04-24). "United Way Plans to Ask Congress to Reverse New Rules Governing Federal Charity Drive". Chronicle of Philanthropy. Vol. 26, no. 11. p. 14.
  8. 1 2 Strauss, Marshal (2018-11-13). "SPECIAL REPORT: The Ailing CFC: One More Canary in the Workplace Giving Coal Mine?". Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly. Archived from the original on 2020-10-20. Retrieved 2021-12-18.
  9. 1 2 2020 Charity Listing (PDF). Combined Federal Campaign of the National Capital Area. 2020. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2021-05-22.
  10. ↑ Audit of the 2017 Combined Federal Campaign Report Number 3A-CF-00-19-031 (PDF). US Office of Personnel Management, Office of the Inspector General. June 18, 2020. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-07-08.
  11. ↑ "TASC Announces Positive Participation Spike for U.S. Federal Government Combined Federal Campaign Program". PR Newswire. May 10, 2021.
  12. ↑ "Frequently Asked Questions : Combined Federal Campaign : CFC Donations - OPM.gov". U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Archived from the original on 2021-12-18. Retrieved 2021-12-18.
  13. 1 2 Federal Advisory Committee Report on the Combined Federal Campaign (PDF), CFC-50 Commission Report U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 2012, retrieved January 29, 2014.
  14. ↑ Combined Federal Campaign Information for Charities, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, retrieved January 29, 2014.
  15. ↑ "CFC Contributors Beware". Charity Navigator. 2007-10-03. Archived from the original on 2007-10-11. Retrieved 2021-12-17.
  16. ↑ Barr, Stephen (2007-04-10). "New Rules Have Charities Clamoring to Participate in Workplace Drive". The Washington Post.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.