In mathematics, a complex torus is a particular kind of complex manifold M whose underlying smooth manifold is a torus in the usual sense (i.e. the cartesian product of some number N circles). Here N must be the even number 2n, where n is the complex dimension of M.
All such complex structures can be obtained as follows: take a lattice Λ in a vector space V isomorphic to Cn considered as real vector space; then the quotient group
is a compact complex manifold. All complex tori, up to isomorphism, are obtained in this way. For n = 1 this is the classical period lattice construction of elliptic curves. For n > 1 Bernhard Riemann found necessary and sufficient conditions for a complex torus to be an algebraic variety; those that are varieties can be embedded into complex projective space, and are the abelian varieties.
The actual projective embeddings are complicated (see equations defining abelian varieties) when n > 1, and are really coextensive with the theory of theta-functions of several complex variables (with fixed modulus). There is nothing as simple as the cubic curve description for n = 1. Computer algebra can handle cases for small n reasonably well. By Chow's theorem, no complex torus other than the abelian varieties can 'fit' into projective space.
One way to define complex tori [1] is as a compact connected complex Lie group . These are Lie groups where the structure maps are holomorphic maps of complex manifolds. It turns out that all such compact connected Lie groups are commutative, and are isomorphic to a quotient of their Lie algebra whose covering map is the exponential map of a Lie algebra to its associated Lie group. The kernel of this map is a lattice and .
Conversely, given a complex vector space and a lattice of maximal rank, the quotient complex manifold has a complex Lie group structure, and is also compact and connected. This implies the two definitions for complex tori are equivalent.
One way to describe a g-dimensional complex torus [2] : 9 is by using a matrix whose columns correspond to a basis of the lattice expanded out using a basis of . That is, we write
so
We can then write the torus as
If we go in the reverse direction by selecting a matrix , it corresponds to a period matrix if and only if the corresponding matrix constructed by adjoining the complex conjugate matrix to , so
is nonsingular. This guarantees the column vectors of span a lattice in hence must be linearly independent vectors over .
For a two-dimensional complex torus, it has a period matrix of the form
for example, the matrix
forms a period matrix since the associated period matrix has determinant 4.
For any complex torus of dimension it has a period matrix of the form
where is the identity matrix and where . We can get this from taking a change of basis of the vector space giving a block matrix of the form above. The condition for follows from looking at the corresponding -matrix
since this must be a non-singular matrix. This is because if we calculate the determinant of the block matrix, this is simply
which gives the implication.
For example, we can write a normalized period matrix for a 2-dimensional complex torus as
one such example is the normalized period matrix
since the determinant of is nonzero, equal to .
To get a period matrix which gives a projective complex manifold, hence an algebraic variety, the period matrix needs to further satisfy the Riemann bilinear relations. [3]
If we have complex tori and of dimensions then a homomorphism [2] : 11 of complex tori is a function
such that the group structure is preserved. This has a number of consequences, such as every homomorphism induces a map of their covering spaces
which is compatible with their covering maps. Furthermore, because induces a group homomorphism, it must restrict to a morphism of the lattices
In particular, there are injections
and
which are called the analytic and rational representations of the space of homomorphisms. These are useful to determining some information about the endomorphism ring which has rational dimension .
The class of homomorphic maps between complex tori have a very simple structure. Of course, every homomorphism induces a holomorphic map, but every holomorphic map is the composition of a special kind of holomorphic map with a homomorphism. For an element we define the translation map
sending Then, if is a holomorphic map between complex tori , there is a unique homomorphism such that
showing the holomorphic maps are not much larger than the set of homomorphisms of complex tori.
One distinct class of homomorphisms of complex tori are called isogenies. These are endomorphisms of complex tori with a non-zero kernel. For example, if we let be an integer, then there is an associated map
sending which has kernel
isomorphic to .
There is an isomorphism of complex structures on the real vector space and the set
and isomorphic tori can be given by a change of basis of their lattices, hence a matrix in . This gives the set of isomorphism classes of complex tori of dimension , , as the Double coset space
Note that as a real manifold, this has dimension
this is important when considering the dimensions of moduli of Abelian varieties, which shows there are far more complex tori than Abelian varieties.
For complex manifolds , in particular complex tori, there is a construction [2] : 571 relating the holomorphic line bundles whose pullback are trivial using the group cohomology of . Fortunately for complex tori, every complex line bundle becomes trivial since .
Starting from the first group cohomology group
we recall how its elements can be represented. Since acts on there is an induced action on all of its sheaves, hence on
The -action can then be represented as a holomorphic map . This map satisfies the cocycle condition if
for every and . The abelian group of 1-cocycles is called the group of factors of automorphy. Note that such functions are also just called factors.
For complex tori, these functions are given by functions
which follow the cocycle condition. These are automorphic functions, more precisely, the automorphic functions used in the transformation laws for theta functions. Also, any such map can be written as
for
which is useful for computing invariants related to the associated line bundle.
Given a factor of automorphy we can define a line bundle on as follows: the trivial line bundle has a -action given by
for the factor . Since this action is free and properly discontinuous, the quotient bundle
is a complex manifold. Furthermore, the projection induced from the covering projection . This gives a map
which induces an isomorphism
giving the desired result.
In the case of complex tori, we have hence there is an isomorphism
representing line bundles on complex tori as 1-cocyles in the associated group cohomology. It is typical to write down the group as the lattice defining , hence
contains the isomorphism classes of line bundles on .
From the exponential exact sequence
the connecting morphism
is the first Chern class map, sending an isomorphism class of a line bundle to its associated first Chern class. It turns out there is an isomorphism between and the module of alternating forms on the lattice , . Therefore, can be considered as an alternating -valued 2-form on . If has factor of automorphy then the alternating form can be expressed as
for and .
For a normalized period matrix
expanded using the standard basis of we have the column vectors defining the lattice . Then, any alternating form on is of the form
where a number of compatibility conditions must be satisfied.
For a line bundle given by a factor of automorphy , so and , there is an associated sheaf of sections where
with open. Then, evaluated on global sections, this is the set of holomorphic functions such that
which are exactly the theta functions on the plane. Conversely, this process can be done backwards where the automorphic factor in the theta function is in fact the factor of automorphy defining a line bundle on a complex torus.
For the alternating -valued 2-form associated to the line bundle , it can be extended to be -valued. Then, it turns out any -valued alternating form satisfying the following conditions
is the extension of some first Chern class of a line bundle . Moreover, there is an associated Hermitian form satisfying
for any .
For a complex torus we can define the Neron-Serveri group as the group of Hermitian forms on with
Equivalently, it is the image of the homomorphism
from the first Chern class. We can also identify it with the group of alternating real-valued alternating forms on such that .
For [4] an elliptic curve given by the lattice where we can find the integral form by looking at a generic alternating matrix and finding the correct compatibility conditions for it to behave as expected. If we use the standard basis of as a real vector space (so ), then we can write out an alternating matrix
and calculate the associated products on the vectors associated to . These are
Then, taking the inner products (with the standard inner product) of these vectors with the vectors we get
so if , then
We can then directly verify , which holds for the matrix above. For a fixed , we will write the integral form as . Then, there is an associated Hermitian form
given by
where
For a Hermitian form a semi-character is a map such that
hence the map behaves like a character twisted by the Hermitian form. Note that if is the zero element in , so it corresponds to the trivial line bundle , then the associated semi-characters are the group of characters on . It will turn out this corresponds to the group of degree line bundles on , or equivalently, its dual torus, which can be seen by computing the group of characters whose elements can be factored as maps showing a character is of the form for some fixed dual lattice vector . This gives the isomorphism of the set of characters with a real torus. The set of all pairs of semi-characters and their associated Hermitian form , or semi-character pairs, forms a group where
This group structure comes from applying the previous commutation law for semi-characters to the new semicharacter :
It turns out this group surjects onto and has kernel , giving a short exact sequence
This surjection can be constructed through associating to every semi-character pair a line bundle .
For a semi-character pair we can construct a 1-cocycle on as a map
defined as
The cocycle relation
can be easily verified by direct computation. Hence the cocycle determines a line bundle
where the -action on is given by
Note this action can be used to show the sections of the line bundle are given by the theta functions with factor of automorphy . Sometimes, this is called the canonical factor of automorphy for . Note that because every line bundle has an associated Hermitian form , and a semi-character can be constructed using the factor of automorphy for , we get a surjection
Moreover, this is a group homomorphism with a trivial kernel. These facts can all be summarized in the following commutative diagram
where the vertical arrows are isomorphisms, or equality. This diagram is typically called the Appell-Humbert theorem.
As mentioned before, a character on the lattice can be expressed as a function
for some fixed dual vector . If we want to put a complex structure on the real torus of all characters, we need to start with a complex vector space which embeds into. It turns out that the complex vector space
of complex antilinear maps, is isomorphic to the real dual vector space , which is part of the factorization for writing down characters. Furthermore, there is an associated lattice
called the dual lattice of . Then, we can form the dual complex torus
which has the special property that that dual of the dual complex torus is the original complex torus. Moreover, from the discussion above, we can identify the dual complex torus with the Picard group of
by sending an anti-linear dual vector to
giving the map
which factors through the dual complex torus. There are other constructions of the dual complex torus using techniques from the theory of Abelian varieties. [1] : 123–125 Essentially, taking a line bundle over a complex torus (or Abelian variety) , there is a closed subset of defined as the points of where their translations are invariant, i.e.
Then, the dual complex torus can be constructed as
presenting it as an isogeny. It can be shown that defining this way satisfied the universal properties of , hence is in fact the dual complex torus (or Abelian variety).
From the construction of the dual complex torus, it is suggested there should exist a line bundle over the product of the torus and its dual which can be used to present all isomorphism classes of degree 0 line bundles on . We can encode this behavior with the following two properties
where the first is the property discussed above, and the second acts as a normalization property. We can construct using the following hermitian form
and the semi-character
for . Showing this data constructs a line bundle with the desired properties follows from looking at the associated canonical factor of , and observing its behavior at various restrictions.
In mathematics, the special unitary group of degree n, denoted SU(n), is the Lie group of n × n unitary matrices with determinant 1.
In mathematics, a modular form is a (complex) analytic function on the upper half-plane, , that satisfies:
In mathematics, a Cayley graph, also known as a Cayley color graph, Cayley diagram, group diagram, or color group, is a graph that encodes the abstract structure of a group. Its definition is suggested by Cayley's theorem, and uses a specified set of generators for the group. It is a central tool in combinatorial and geometric group theory. The structure and symmetry of Cayley graphs makes them particularly good candidates for constructing expander graphs.
In mathematics, particularly in operator theory and C*-algebra theory, the continuous functional calculus is a functional calculus which allows the application of a continuous function to normal elements of a C*-algebra.
The representation theory of groups is a part of mathematics which examines how groups act on given structures.
In mathematics, a character group is the group of representations of a group by complex-valued functions. These functions can be thought of as one-dimensional matrix representations and so are special cases of the group characters that arise in the related context of character theory. Whenever a group is represented by matrices, the function defined by the trace of the matrices is called a character; however, these traces do not in general form a group. Some important properties of these one-dimensional characters apply to characters in general:
In mathematics, specifically in algebraic geometry, the Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch theorem is a far-reaching result on coherent cohomology. It is a generalisation of the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem, about complex manifolds, which is itself a generalisation of the classical Riemann–Roch theorem for line bundles on compact Riemann surfaces.
In algebraic geometry, the Néron–Severi group of a variety is the group of divisors modulo algebraic equivalence; in other words it is the group of components of the Picard scheme of a variety. Its rank is called the Picard number. It is named after Francesco Severi and André Néron.
The Lorentz group is a Lie group of symmetries of the spacetime of special relativity. This group can be realized as a collection of matrices, linear transformations, or unitary operators on some Hilbert space; it has a variety of representations. This group is significant because special relativity together with quantum mechanics are the two physical theories that are most thoroughly established, and the conjunction of these two theories is the study of the infinite-dimensional unitary representations of the Lorentz group. These have both historical importance in mainstream physics, as well as connections to more speculative present-day theories.
In mathematics, a local system on a topological space X is a tool from algebraic topology which interpolates between cohomology with coefficients in a fixed abelian group A, and general sheaf cohomology in which coefficients vary from point to point. Local coefficient systems were introduced by Norman Steenrod in 1943.
In mathematics, the Schur orthogonality relations, which were proven by Issai Schur through Schur's lemma, express a central fact about representations of finite groups. They admit a generalization to the case of compact groups in general, and in particular compact Lie groups, such as the rotation group SO(3).
In mathematics, the Abel–Jacobi map is a construction of algebraic geometry which relates an algebraic curve to its Jacobian variety. In Riemannian geometry, it is a more general construction mapping a manifold to its Jacobi torus. The name derives from the theorem of Abel and Jacobi that two effective divisors are linearly equivalent if and only if they are indistinguishable under the Abel–Jacobi map.
In mathematics, the Plancherel theorem for spherical functions is an important result in the representation theory of semisimple Lie groups, due in its final form to Harish-Chandra. It is a natural generalisation in non-commutative harmonic analysis of the Plancherel formula and Fourier inversion formula in the representation theory of the group of real numbers in classical harmonic analysis and has a similarly close interconnection with the theory of differential equations. It is the special case for zonal spherical functions of the general Plancherel theorem for semisimple Lie groups, also proved by Harish-Chandra. The Plancherel theorem gives the eigenfunction expansion of radial functions for the Laplacian operator on the associated symmetric space X; it also gives the direct integral decomposition into irreducible representations of the regular representation on L2(X). In the case of hyperbolic space, these expansions were known from prior results of Mehler, Weyl and Fock.
In mathematics, the Appell–Humbert theorem describes the line bundles on a complex torus or complex abelian variety. It was proved for 2-dimensional tori by Appell and Humbert, and in general by Lefschetz
In machine learning, the kernel embedding of distributions comprises a class of nonparametric methods in which a probability distribution is represented as an element of a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). A generalization of the individual data-point feature mapping done in classical kernel methods, the embedding of distributions into infinite-dimensional feature spaces can preserve all of the statistical features of arbitrary distributions, while allowing one to compare and manipulate distributions using Hilbert space operations such as inner products, distances, projections, linear transformations, and spectral analysis. This learning framework is very general and can be applied to distributions over any space on which a sensible kernel function may be defined. For example, various kernels have been proposed for learning from data which are: vectors in , discrete classes/categories, strings, graphs/networks, images, time series, manifolds, dynamical systems, and other structured objects. The theory behind kernel embeddings of distributions has been primarily developed by Alex Smola, Le Song , Arthur Gretton, and Bernhard Schölkopf. A review of recent works on kernel embedding of distributions can be found in.
In mathematics, the tensor product of representations is a tensor product of vector spaces underlying representations together with the factor-wise group action on the product. This construction, together with the Clebsch–Gordan procedure, can be used to generate additional irreducible representations if one already knows a few.
In mathematics, the moduli stack of elliptic curves, denoted as or , is an algebraic stack over classifying elliptic curves. Note that it is a special case of the moduli stack of algebraic curves . In particular its points with values in some field correspond to elliptic curves over the field, and more generally morphisms from a scheme to it correspond to elliptic curves over . The construction of this space spans over a century because of the various generalizations of elliptic curves as the field has developed. All of these generalizations are contained in .
This is a glossary of representation theory in mathematics.
In representation theory of mathematics, the Waldspurger formula relates the special values of two L-functions of two related admissible irreducible representations. Let k be the base field, f be an automorphic form over k, π be the representation associated via the Jacquet–Langlands correspondence with f. Goro Shimura (1976) proved this formula, when and f is a cusp form; Günter Harder made the same discovery at the same time in an unpublished paper. Marie-France Vignéras (1980) proved this formula, when and f is a newform. Jean-Loup Waldspurger, for whom the formula is named, reproved and generalized the result of Vignéras in 1985 via a totally different method which was widely used thereafter by mathematicians to prove similar formulas.
In mathematics, the representation theory of semisimple Lie algebras is one of the crowning achievements of the theory of Lie groups and Lie algebras. The theory was worked out mainly by E. Cartan and H. Weyl and because of that, the theory is also known as the Cartan–Weyl theory. The theory gives the structural description and classification of a finite-dimensional representation of a semisimple Lie algebra ; in particular, it gives a way to parametrize irreducible finite-dimensional representations of a semisimple Lie algebra, the result known as the theorem of the highest weight.