Compliment sandwich

Last updated
A diagram displaying feedback about a workshop in a sandwich shape. A background with + signs is for the positive evaluations; a background with ~ and - signs is for the negative evaluations. 2018-02-03 Wikidata Workshop Vienna WMAT-03.jpg
A diagram displaying feedback about a workshop in a sandwich shape. A background with + signs is for the positive evaluations; a background with ~ and - signs is for the negative evaluations.

A compliment sandwich, [1] praise sandwich, or feedback sandwich is a rhetorical technique to deliver criticism in a way that it is accepted by the criticized person.

Contents

It is named after the metaphor of a sandwich since it has three parts: [2]

  1. Praise of the addressee
  2. Expressing what the speaker dislikes about the person
  3. Further praise of the addressee

It was popularised in the 1980s by Mary Kay Ash, the founder of Mary Kay Cosmetics, who advised managers to sandwich any critical remarks between layers of praise. [3] Sandwich feedback has been recommended to sports trainers, [4] health-service managers, [5] online educators [6] and sales personnel. [7]

The intention of the sandwich device is to reduce defensiveness and discomfort, enhance useful communication and make the input better tolerated by the person receiving the coaching. [8] [9] [10] It also aims to preserve the criticized person's self-esteem to increase receptivity. [11] However, the outcome could be the complete opposite of the intention. The behaviour of praising before criticising can be misinterpreted as insincerity or merely instrumental, implying an inauthenticity or lack of trust, [12] leading to its colloquial name of crap sandwich. [13] Confusion and therefore backfire in productivity might be the case as the person criticized might misinterpret the feedback. [9] [14]

Mechanism

A direct quote from Aubrey Daniel in his book, Oops!: 13 Management Practices that Waste Time and Money: [14]

One of the easiest ways to encourage receptivity is to preface your criticism with a positive statement about the person’s job performance or character. Once you’ve fortified his ego, deliver the bad news. Ensure that he received the message and knows how to correct the situation. Then close the conversation with an affirmation.

The rationale has face validity, i.e. it intuitively works, but there is little empirical research evidencing it is more effective in correcting the behaviour than a straightforward approach or other feedback sequences. [9]

A study employing rigorous experimentation and counterbalancing methods find that the “positive–corrective–positive” feedback sequence is not the most effective. Instead, it was discovered that the “corrective–positive–positive” sequence is the most effective, while the “positive–positive–corrective” sequence is the least effective for delivering feedback when controlled for feedback timing. [9]

In another controlled laboratory experiment, students given sandwich feedback – which includes general positive statements before and after constructive advice – prepared more thoroughly for subsequent math tasks and significantly outperformed those who received no feedback or only corrective feedback. [15]

Criticism

The receiver might feel very confused as the constructive advice is overshadowed by those at the beginning (primacy effect) or those at the end (recency effect). That is, people are more likely to remember to first and last thing of any chunk of information. They might fail to recognize and recollect most important part of the feedback, and therefore the original intention of advising is not achieved. [8]

Over time, the employee might anticipate the negative feedback whenever the supervisors praise them. Such cases happen because the sandwich technique is learned through classical conditioning. Through which, the trustworthiness of the advice giver is diminished, and therefore the efficacy of giving any positive or constructive feedback shrinks. [8] [14]

The top and bottom of the sandwich might induce a further inaccurate self-assessment of the receiver. Given the Dunning-Kruger effect, people have such cognitive bias to overestimate their performance, stressing their positives might overinflate their self-esteem or self-efficacy, demolishing the effect of reinforcing that positive behaviour. [8]

The essential reason for the ineffectiveness of sandwiching is not the delivery of negative feedback itself, but rather the manner through which the supervisor conveyed those messages. [12] Baron observed there is no anger nor tension generated if the person is given constructive criticism (specific, considerate feedback that does not suggest the poor performance results from negative internal attributions such as the person being stupid or lazy) than destructive criticism. [8] [12] That is to say, if the feedback is authentic and it is delivered in a genuine manner, the outcome is more likely to be favorable.

Alternatives

Aubrey Daniels (2001) indicated "'Always be positive' is the worst advice you could ever give or receive", when correcting worker conduct. Sincerity and straightforwardness are the key to effective communication. In Bressler, Von Bergen, & Campbell's article, they provide a guideline with 9 steps for correct correcting: [8]

  1. Plan the discussion, when possible.
  2. Keep positives and negatives separate.
  3. Time discipline so as not to be too soon or too late.
  4. Focus on the issue regarding employee behaviour.
  5. Connect the behavioural issue to how the issue impacts the business.
  6. State consequences if behaviour does not improve.
  7. Identify the proper and required behavioural change that the supervisor expects.
  8. Ask how the manager can help the worker.
  9. Express confidence in the employee's ability to improve.

Many others[ who? ] have provided an alternative framework or guideline for constructive criticism. [2] [3] [10] And for those who advocate for using a compliment sandwich, we can see that they recommend the technique with emphasis on the quality of parsing and criticising. Statements such as "be specific about the behaviour you want the employee to change" need to be well-timed, well-targeted, and well-said, and above all must reflect actual concerns. [5]

Flawed metaphor

The middle 'layer' of a sandwich gives the sandwich its name. A tomato sandwich, for example, is a layer of tomato between two layers of bread. Thus a 'compliment sandwich', interpreted literally, would be a criticism, followed by a compliment, and ending with a criticism.

See also

Related Research Articles

Organization development (OD) is the study and implementation of practices, systems, and techniques that affect organizational change. The goal of which is to modify a group's/organization's performance and/or culture. The organizational changes are typically initiated by the group's stakeholders. OD emerged from human relations studies in the 1930s, during which psychologists realized that organizational structures and processes influence worker behavior and motivation.

A performance appraisal, also referred to as a performance review, performance evaluation, (career) development discussion, or employee appraisal, sometimes shortened to "PA", is a periodic and systematic process whereby the job performance of an employee is documented and evaluated. This is done after employees are trained about work and settle into their jobs. Performance appraisals are a part of career development and consist of regular reviews of employee performance within organizations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism</span> Practice of judging the merits and faults of something

Criticism is the construction of a judgement about the negative or positive qualities of someone or something. Criticism can range from impromptu comments to a written detailed response. Criticism falls into several overlapping types including "theoretical, practical, impressionistic, affective, prescriptive, or descriptive".

Expectancy theory proposes that an individual will behave or act in a certain way because they are motivated to select a specific behavior over others due to what they expect the result of that selected behavior will be. In essence, the motivation of the behavior selection is determined by the desirability of the outcome. However, at the core of the theory is the cognitive process of how an individual processes the different motivational elements. This is done before making the ultimate choice. The outcome is not the sole determining factor in making the decision of how to behave.

Staffing is the process of finding the right worker with appropriate qualifications or experience and recruiting them to fill a job position or role. Through this process, organizations acquire, deploy, and retain a workforce of sufficient quantity and quality to create positive impacts on the organization's effectiveness. In management, staffing is an operation of recruiting the employees by evaluating their skills and knowledge before offering them specific job roles accordingly.

Goal setting involves the development of an action plan designed in order to motivate and guide a person or group toward a goal. Goals are more deliberate than desires and momentary intentions. Therefore, setting goals means that a person has committed thought, emotion, and behavior towards attaining the goal. In doing so, the goal setter has established a desired future state which differs from their current state thus creating a mismatch which in turn spurs future actions. Goal setting can be guided by goal-setting criteria such as SMART criteria. Goal setting is a major component of personal-development and management literature. Studies by Edwin A. Locke and his colleagues, most notably, Gary Latham have shown that more specific and ambitious goals lead to more performance improvement than easy or general goals. Difficult goals should be set ideally at the 90th percentile of performance, assuming that motivation and not ability is limiting attainment of that level of performance. As long as the person accepts the goal, has the ability to attain it, and does not have conflicting goals, there is a positive linear relationship between goal difficulty and task performance.

Feedback is what occurs when outputs of a system are routed back as inputs as part of a chain of cause-and-effect that forms a circuit or loop.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Employee engagement</span> Relationship between an organization and its employees

Employee engagement is a fundamental concept in the effort to understand and describe, both qualitatively and quantitatively, the nature of the relationship between an organization and its employees. An "engaged employee" is defined as one who is fully absorbed by and enthusiastic about their work and so takes positive action to further the organization's reputation and interests. An engaged employee has a positive attitude towards the organization and its values. In contrast, a disengaged employee may range from someone doing the bare minimum at work, up to an employee who is actively damaging the company's work output and reputation.

Transactional leadership is a type of leadership style that focuses on the exchange of skills, knowledge, resources, or effort between leaders and their subordinates. This leadership style prioritizes individual interests and extrinsic motivation as means to obtain a desired outcome. It relies on a system of penalties and rewards to achieve short-term goals.

Behavioural change theories are attempts to explain why human behaviours change. These theories cite environmental, personal, and behavioural characteristics as the major factors in behavioural determination. In recent years, there has been increased interest in the application of these theories in the areas of health, education, criminology, energy and international development with the hope that understanding behavioural change will improve the services offered in these areas. Some scholars have recently introduced a distinction between models of behavior and theories of change. Whereas models of behavior are more diagnostic and geared towards understanding the psychological factors that explain or predict a specific behavior, theories of change are more process-oriented and generally aimed at changing a given behavior. Thus, from this perspective, understanding and changing behavior are two separate but complementary lines of scientific investigation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Onboarding</span> Management jargon

Onboarding or organizational socialization is the American term for the mechanism through which new employees acquire the necessary knowledge, skills, and behaviors to become effective organizational members and insiders. In standard English, this is referred to as "induction". In the United States, up to 25% of workers are organizational newcomers engaged in onboarding process.

Control is a function of management that helps to check errors and take corrective actions. This is done to minimize deviation from standards and ensure that the stated goals of the organization are achieved in a desired manner.

Organizational dissent is the "expression of disagreement or contradictory opinions about organizational practices and policies". Since dissent involves disagreement it can lead to conflict, which if not resolved, can lead to violence and struggle. As a result, many organizations send the message – verbally or nonverbally – that dissent is discouraged. However, recent studies have shown that dissent serves as an important monitoring force within organizations. Dissent can be a warning sign for employee dissatisfaction or organizational decline. Redding (1985) found that receptiveness to dissent allows for corrective feedback to monitor unethical and immoral behavior, impractical and ineffectual organizational practices and policies, poor and unfavorable decision making, and insensitivity to employees' workplace needs and desires. Furthermore, Eilerman argues that the hidden costs of silencing dissent include: wasted and lost time, reduced decision quality, emotional and relationship costs, and decreased job motivation. Perlow (2003) found that employee resentment can lead to a decrease in productivity and creativity which can result in the organization losing money, time, and resources.

Organizational behavior management (OBM) is a subdiscipline of applied behavior analysis (ABA), which is the application of behavior analytic principles and contingency management techniques to change behavior in organizational settings. Through these principles and assessment of behavior, OBM seeks to analyze and employ antecedent, influencing actions of an individual before the action occurs, and consequence, what happens as a result of someone's actions, interventions which influence behaviors linked to the mission and key objectives of the organization and its workers. Such interventions have proven effective through research in improving common organizational areas including employee productivity, delivery of feedback, safety, and overall morale of said organization.

Corrective feedback is a frequent practice in the field of learning and achievement. It typically involves a learner receiving either formal or informal feedback on their understanding or performance on various tasks by an agent such as teacher, employer or peer(s). To successfully deliver corrective feedback, it needs to be nonevaluative, supportive, timely, and specific.

Work motivation is a person's internal disposition toward work. To further this, an incentive is the anticipated reward or aversive event available in the environment. While motivation can often be used as a tool to help predict behavior, it varies greatly among individuals and must often be combined with ability and environmental factors to actually influence behavior and performance. Results from a 2012 study, which examined age-related differences in work motivation, suggest a "shift in people's motives" rather than a general decline in motivation with age. That is, it seemed that older employees were less motivated by extrinsically related features of a job, but more by intrinsically rewarding job features. Work motivation is strongly influenced by certain cultural characteristics. Between countries with comparable levels of economic development, collectivist countries tend to have higher levels of work motivation than do countries that tend toward individualism. Similarly measured, higher levels of work motivation can be found in countries that exhibit a long versus a short-term orientation. Also, while national income is not itself a strong predictor of work motivation, indicators that describe a nation's economic strength and stability, such as life expectancy, are. Work motivation decreases as a nation's long-term economic strength increases. Currently work motivation research has explored motivation that may not be consciously driven. This method goal setting is referred to as goal priming.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Varieties of criticism</span>

There are many varieties of positive and negative effects of criticism. This article describes common types that occur regularly in everyday life. For other criteria that classify criticisms, see Criticism § Classifications. For more subject-specific information, see the pages on topics such as art, film, literature, theatre, or architecture.

In second language acquisition, error treatment refers to the way teachers respond to learners' linguistic errors made in the course of learning a second language. Many error treatment studies seek to address issues like when, how, and by whom such errors should be corrected.

Praise as a form of social interaction expresses recognition, reassurance or admiration.

Coaching psychology is a field of applied psychology that applies psychological theories and concepts to the practice of coaching. Its aim is to increase performance, self-actualization, achievement and well-being in individuals, teams and organisations by utilising evidence-based methods grounded in scientific research. Coaching psychology is influenced by theories in various psychological fields, such as humanistic psychology, positive psychology, learning theory and social psychology.

References

  1. ↑ Moss, Simon; Francis, Ronald (2007). The Science of Management: Fighting Fads and Fallacies with Evidence-Based Practice. Australian Academic Press. ISBN   978-1-875378-78-4.
  2. 1 2 Appelo, Jurgen (2015-08-17). "Ditch The Praise Sandwich, Make Feedback Wraps". Forbes. Retrieved 3 May 2022.
  3. 1 2 Salama, Farah Yasser (2023-03-08). "Feedback Sandwich for Effective Communication". Making Business Matter (MBM). Retrieved 2024-03-19.
  4. ↑ Docheff, Dennis M. (December 1990). "The Feedback Sandwich". Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 61 (9): 17–18. doi:10.1080/07303084.1990.10604618. ISSN   0730-3084.
  5. 1 2 Dohrenwend, Anne (2002). "Serving Up the Feedback Sandwich". Family Practice Management. 9 (10): 43–46. PMID   12469676. S2CID   31429252.
  6. ↑ PhD, Dan Kulmala (2011-04-14). "To Increase Learner Achievement Serve Feedback Sandwiches". Faculty Focus | Higher Ed Teaching & Learning. Retrieved 2024-03-20.
  7. ↑ Ionescu, Gh Gh; Negrusa, Adina (2009). "Mary Kay Ash, the greatest female entrepreneur in American history and business ethics". Management & Marketing. 4 (4).
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Von Bergen, C. W.; Bressler, Martin S.; Campbell, Kitty (2014). "The sandwich feedback method: Not very tasty". Journal of Behavioral Studies in Business. 7– via Research Gate.[ predatory publisher ]
  9. 1 2 3 4 Henley, Amy J.; DiGennaro Reed, Florence D. (2015-10-02). "Should You Order the Feedback Sandwich? Efficacy of Feedback Sequence and Timing". Journal of Organizational Behavior Management. 35 (3–4): 321–335. doi:10.1080/01608061.2015.1093057. ISSN   0160-8061.
  10. 1 2 Schwarz, Roger (2013-04-19). "The "Sandwich Approach" Undermines Your Feedback". Harvard Business Review. ISSN   0017-8012 . Retrieved 2024-03-19.
  11. ↑ Nelson, Debra L.; Quick, James C. (2013). Organizational behavior: science, the real world, and you (8th ed.). Australia: South-Western Cengage Learning. ISBN   978-1-111-82586-7.
  12. 1 2 3 Baron, Robert A. (1988). "Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance". Journal of Applied Psychology. 73 (2): 199–207. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.199. ISSN   1939-1854. PMID   3384772.
  13. ↑ Green, Alison (22 August 2018). "Beware of Bosses Handing Out "Crap Sandwiches"". Slate. Retrieved 7 April 2024.
  14. 1 2 3 Daniels, Aubrey C. (2009). Oops! 13 management practices that waste time and money (and what to do instead). Atlanta, Ga: Performance Management Publications. ISBN   978-0-937100-17-2. OCLC   320968819.
  15. ↑ Prochazka, Jakub; Ovcari, Martin; Durinik, Michal (2020-08-01). "Sandwich feedback: The empirical evidence of its effectiveness". Learning and Motivation. 71: 101649. doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2020.101649. ISSN   0023-9690.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.