CongressEdits

Last updated

@congressedits
Screenshot of @congressedits Tweet 1045422483082551302.png
A Tweet by @congressedits, showing an edit made to the article Devil's Triangle (disambiguation) that insults Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh
Type of site
 Twitter bot account, later relaunched on Mastodon
Available inEnglish
OwnerEd Summers
URL botsin.space/@congressedits
LaunchedJuly 8, 2014 (2014-07-08)
Current statusActive

CongressEdits (@congressedits) is a social media bot account created on July 8, 2014 that posts changes to Wikipedia articles that originate from IP addresses within the ranges assigned to the United States Congress. [1] The changes could be made by anyone using a computer on the U.S. Capitol complex's computer network, including both staff of U.S. elected representatives and senators as well as visitors such as journalists, constituents, tourists, and lobbyists. CongressEdits has been called a watchdog by NBC News. [2]

Contents

The account began on Twitter until it was suspended in October 2018, making its tweets only accessible through archival services. CongressEdits can now be found on Mastodon. [3]

History

CongressEdits was written by and was run by Ed Summers, a web developer, who was inspired by a friend's tweet about Parliament WikiEdits, run by Tom Scott, [4] [5] which performs the same function for the staffers of Parliament of the United Kingdom. [6] It has since been credited for inspiring additional bots for Australia, [7] Canada, [8] South Africa, [9] Switzerland, [10] The Netherlands, [11] Israel, [12] Chile, [13] [14] Italy [15] and Greece. [16] Summers wrote that his "hope for @congressedits wasn't to expose inanity, or belittle our elected officials." [17] He emphasized that he did not see edits to such articles as Step Up 3D , It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia , or Horse head mask as "something to make fun of," and points to "substantial edits like changing a Congressperson's party affiliation from Democrat to Independent." [18] Ultimately, he wanted to see Congressional staffers log in to Wikipedia, identifying themselves to use their knowledge of the issues and history to help make Wikipedia better. [14] Summers wrote that he saw the project "as a potentially useful transparency tool". [6]

Tweets since November 6, 2017 included screenshots of the specific changes made to the article. [19]

CongressEdits was credited with bringing to light edits to Senate Intelligence Committee report on CIA torture by a United States Senate shared address on December 9 and 10, 2014, which removed the phrase "(a euphemism for torture)", with revision notes of "removing bias"; however, these edits were soon reverted. [20]

In 2017, the bot revealed many instances of disruptive edits by apparent Congressional interns, [21] [22] [23] ranging from commentary on pop culture [24] [25] to inserting unsourced and controversial information about living people [26] to direct communication with followers of the account. [21] [26]

Source code

The code for the bot itself is open-source software, [27] and can be configured to watch for anonymous edits from any IP ranges or individual IP addresses. [28]

Controversy

On July 25, 2014, Wikipedia's co-founder Jimmy Wales told the BBC that the @congressedits Twitter feed may have been counterproductive. Referring to a Wikipedia administrator's 10-day editing block, imposed on July 24 against a shared address within the range assigned to the U.S. House of Representatives, for disruptive editing, Wales said, "There is a belief from some of the [Wikipedia] community that it only provoked someone—some prankster there in the office—to have an audience now for the pranks, and actually encouraged them rather than discouraged them." [29]

In September and early October 2018, during the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court appointment hearings, Republican senators were doxxed by Congressional IP editors who inserted home addresses and phone numbers into Wikipedia articles. The private information was tweeted to the bot's approximately 65,000 followers before it was removed from the articles. [30] Following additional doxxing by Congressional IP editors, Twitter suspended the account. [31]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russian Wikipedia</span> Russian-language edition of Wikipedia

The Russian Wikipedia is the Russian-language edition of Wikipedia. As of May 2024, it has 1,981,757 articles. It was started on 11 May 2001. In October 2015, it became the sixth-largest Wikipedia by the number of articles. It has the sixth-largest number of edits (138 million). In June 2020, it was the world's sixth most visited language Wikipedia.

Some edits to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia by staff of the United States Congress have created controversy, notably in early to mid-2006. Several such instances, such as those involving Marty Meehan, Norm Coleman, Conrad Burns, and Joe Biden, received significant media attention. Others, such as those involving Gil Gutknecht, were reported but received less widespread coverage.

An anonymous post, is an entry on a textboard, anonymous bulletin board system, or other discussion forums like Internet forum, without a screen name or more commonly by using a non-identifiable pseudonym. Some online forums such as Slashdot do not allow such posts, requiring users to be registered either under their real name or utilizing a pseudonym. Others like JuicyCampus, AutoAdmit, 2channel, and other Futaba-based imageboards thrive on anonymity. Users of 4chan, in particular, interact in an anonymous and ephemeral environment that facilitates rapid generation of new trends.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WikiScanner</span> Defunct database linking Wikipedia edits to institutions

WikiScanner was a publicly searchable database that linked anonymous edits on Wikipedia to the organizations where those edits apparently originated. It did this by cross-referencing the edits with data on the owners of the associated block of IP addresses, though it did not investigate edits made under a username. It was created by Virgil Griffith and released on August 13, 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Block (Internet)</span> Restriction on accessing an online resource

On the Internet, a block or ban is a technical measure intended to restrict access to information or resources. Blocking and its inverse, unblocking, may be implemented by the owners of computers using software.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia</span> Blacklist of Wikipedia in the UK

On 5 December 2008, the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF), a British watchdog group, blacklisted content on the English Wikipedia related to Scorpions' 1976 studio album Virgin Killer, due to the presence of its controversial cover artwork, depicting a young girl posing nude, with a faux shattered-glass effect obscuring her genitalia. The image was deemed to be "potentially illegal content" under English law which forbids the possession or creation of indecent photographs of children. The IWF's blacklist are used in web filtering systems such as Cleanfeed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident</span> 2005 editorial controversy on Wikipedia

In May 2005, an unregistered editor posted a hoax article onto Wikipedia about journalist John Seigenthaler. The article falsely stated that Seigenthaler had been a suspect in the assassinations of U.S. President John F. Kennedy and U.S. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy.

Threatening the government officials of the United States is a felony under federal law. Threatening the president of the United States is a felony under 18 U.S.C. § 871, punishable by up to 5 years of imprisonment, that is investigated by the United States Secret Service. Threatening other officials is a Class D or C felony, usually carrying maximum penalties of 5 or 10 years under 18 U.S.C. § 875, 18 U.S.C. § 876 and other statutes, that is investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. When national boundaries are transcended by such a threat, it is considered a terrorist threat.

A series of incidents in 2009 led to Church of Scientology–owned networks being blocked from making edits to Wikipedia articles relating to Scientology. The Church of Scientology has long had a controversial history on the Internet and had initiated campaigns to manipulate material and remove information critical of itself from the web. From early in Wikipedia's history, conflict arose regarding the website's coverage of Scientology. Disputes began in earnest in 2005, with users disagreeing about whether or not to describe Scientology as an abusive cult or religion, and continued through the decade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vandalism on Wikipedia</span> Malicious editing of Wikipedia

On Wikipedia, vandalism is editing the project in an intentionally disruptive or malicious manner. Vandalism includes any addition, removal, or modification that is intentionally humorous, nonsensical, a hoax, offensive, libelous or degrading in any way.

The WikiLeaks-related Twitter court orders were United States Department of Justice 2703(d) orders accompanied by gag orders issued to Twitter in relation to ongoing investigations of WikiLeaks issued on 14 December 2010. The U.S. government sent Twitter a subpoena for information about Julian Assange and several other WikiLeaks-related persons, including Chelsea Manning. Twitter appealed against the accompanying gag order in order to be able to disclose its existence to its users, and was ultimately successful in its appeal.

Conflict-of-interest (COI) editing on Wikipedia occurs when editors use Wikipedia to advance the interests of their external roles or relationships. The type of COI editing that compromises Wikipedia the most is paid editing for public relations (PR) purposes. Several Wikipedia policies and guidelines exist to combat conflict of interest editing, including Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

A Twitter bot is a type of software bot that controls a Twitter account via the Twitter API. The social bot software may autonomously perform actions such as tweeting, retweeting, liking, following, unfollowing, or direct messaging other accounts. The automation of Twitter accounts is governed by a set of automation rules that outline proper and improper uses of automation. Proper usage includes broadcasting helpful information, automatically generating interesting or creative content, and automatically replying to users via direct message. Improper usage includes circumventing API rate limits, violating user privacy, spamming, and sockpuppeting. Twitter bots may be part of a larger botnet. They can be used to influence elections and in misinformation campaigns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wikipediocracy</span> Website for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia

Wikipediocracy is a website for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia. Its members have brought information about Wikipedia's controversies to the attention of the media. The site was founded in March 2012 by users of Wikipedia Review, another site dedicated to criticism of Wikipedia.

Ashley Feinberg is an American journalist, covering politics, media, and technology. She is known for her internet sleuthing, through which she has uncovered information about the online activity of public figures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wikipedia bots</span> Internet bots that perform tasks in Wikipedia

Wikipedia bots are Internet bots that perform simple, repetitive tasks on Wikipedia. One prominent example of an internet bot used in Wikipedia is Lsjbot, which generated millions of short articles across various language editions of Wikipedia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taylor Lorenz</span> American technology reporter

Taylor Lorenz is an American journalist. She is a columnist for The Washington Post. She was previously a technology reporter for The New York Times, The Daily Beast, and Business Insider, and social media editor for the Daily Mail. She is particularly known for covering Internet culture.

Coverage of American politics in Wikipedia is a subject that has received substantial attention from the media. Since its founding in 2001, Wikipedia has provided coverage of five United States presidential elections, and six mid-term elections at the federal level, as well as numerous "off-year" state elections and special elections.

References

  1. ↑ Mak, Tim (July 14, 2014). "@CongressEdits Helps You Track Your Congressman's Vanity in Real Time". The Daily Beast.
  2. ↑ Wagstaff, Keith (July 15, 2014). "Twitter Watchdog Keeps Tabs on Wikipedia Edits from Congress". NBC News. Retrieved July 16, 2014.
  3. ↑ "congressedits (@congressedits)". Mastodon . Archived from the original on February 11, 2018. Retrieved January 1, 2022.
  4. ↑ Guardian Staff (July 30, 2014). "How to find out when UK politicians are editing Wikipedia pages". The Guardian. Retrieved February 19, 2021.
  5. ↑ "Parliament WikiEdits". Twitter.com. Retrieved July 16, 2014.
  6. 1 2 Gallagher, Sean (July 11, 2014). "@Congressedits tweets anonymous Wikipedia edits from Capitol Hill". Ars Technica. Retrieved July 16, 2014.
  7. ↑ "AussieParl WikiEdits". Twitter.com. July 12, 2014. Retrieved July 16, 2014.
  8. ↑ "Gov. of Canada Edits". Twitter.com. July 21, 2014. Retrieved July 21, 2014.
  9. ↑ "ParliZA WikiEdits". Twitter.com. Retrieved July 16, 2014.
  10. ↑ "swissgovedit". Twitter.com. Retrieved July 23, 2014.
  11. ↑ "Tweede Kamer Edits". Twitter.com. Retrieved July 19, 2014.
  12. ↑ "Israeli Government Edits". Twitter.com. Retrieved July 19, 2014.
  13. ↑ "Congreso Edita". Twitter.com. Retrieved July 16, 2014.
  14. 1 2 Willis, Derek (July 14, 2014). "With Twitter's Help, Watch Congress Edit Wikipedia". The New York Times.
  15. ↑ "Parlamento Wiki". Twitter.com. Retrieved July 30, 2013.
  16. ↑ "VouliEdits". Twitter.com. Retrieved July 31, 2014.
  17. ↑ "why @congressedits?". Inkdroid.org. Retrieved July 15, 2014.
  18. ↑ "@Congressedits Hopes to See More Wikipedians in Congress". TechPresident. Retrieved July 16, 2014.
  19. ↑ "congress-edits (@congressedits)". Twitter. Status ID: 927650736963506177. Archived from the original on November 10, 2017. Retrieved December 21, 2017.
  20. ↑ "Senate staffer tries to scrub 'torture' reference from Wikipedia's CIA torture article". Mashable. December 10, 2014. Retrieved December 10, 2014.
  21. 1 2 "congress-edits on Twitter". Twitter. Archived from the original on December 15, 2019. Retrieved September 27, 2018.
  22. ↑ Uberti, David (July 15, 2014). "6 Wikipedia edits made from Capitol Hill". Columbia Journalism Review.
  23. ↑ Garber, Megan (July 15, 2014). "Okay, Who Edited the 'Choco Taco' Wikipedia Page From Congress?". The Atlantic.
  24. ↑ "congress-edits on Twitter". Twitter. Archived from the original on October 17, 2017.
  25. ↑ Hughes, Sarah Anne (July 14, 2014). "Congress Edits On Wikipedia: It's Always Sunny, Corpus Christi, And Horse Head Mask". DCist. Archived from the original on July 16, 2014.
  26. 1 2 "congress-edits on Twitter". Twitter. Archived from the original on September 28, 2018.
  27. ↑ "anon project, formerly congressedits, at github.com". GitHub . Retrieved July 15, 2014.
  28. ↑ Connors, Devin (July 14, 2014). "@CongressEdits Twitter Bot Highlights Anonymous Congress Wikipedia Edits". The Escapist. Archived from the original on March 2, 2021. Retrieved April 9, 2021.
  29. ↑ Miller, Joe (July 25, 2014). "Wikipedia blocks 'disruptive' page edits from US Congress". BBC. Retrieved July 26, 2014.
  30. ↑ "Judiciary Committee Members Doxxed During Kavanaugh Testimony". September 28, 2018.
  31. ↑ Tully-McManus, Katherine (October 3, 2018). "Tensions Over Kavanaugh Drive Senate Into Tightened Security". Roll Call . Archived from the original on November 25, 2018. Retrieved October 4, 2018.

Notes

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.