Conquest of Abundance

Last updated
Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction versus the Richness of Being
Conquest of Abundance.jpg
Author Paul Feyerabend
LanguageEnglish
Subjects History of science
Philosophy of Science
Epistemology
Publisher University of Chicago Press
Publication date
1999
Media typePrint (Hardcover and Paperback)
Pages285
ISBN 9780226245348
Preceded by Killing Time  
Followed byPhilosophy of Nature 

Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction versus the Richness of Being is the last book by the Austrian philosopher of science Paul Feyerabend, published posthumously by the University of Chicago Press in 1999. It is edited by Bert Terpstra and includes a foreword from Grazia Borrini-Feyerabend, Feyerabend's 4th and final wife. The book was uncompleted due to Feyerabend's death in 1994 and was written to fulfill a promise made to Borrini-Feyerabend. [1] The unfinished manuscript was published alongside several other previously published papers that engaged with the core themes of the book.

Contents

Translations

Conquest of Abundance has been translated into four languages: [2]

Content

Conquest of Abundance contains two sections. The first includes the unfinished manuscript while the second section republishes essays on themes related to the manuscript. The primary thesis of the manuscript is that the universe that surrounds us, which he calls ‘Being’, is more abundant than we usually admit. [3] By this, Feyerabend means that there are many more entities that populate various domains than are admitted into most scientific theories. Scientific theories use abstraction to simplify the phenomena which thereby reduce their empirical content. [4] Experiments in laboratories often create objects that omit many features that they possess outside of the lab. [5] Feyerabend's thesis is not just limited to science, as he uses examples from art history – specifically Brunelleschi's invention of perspective – to substantiate this position. [6]

We must reduce the abundance of Being in order to live our lives, but-- Feyerabend argues-- this can be done in multiple ways. He thus defends a kind of ontological pluralism. [7] In other words, Being is pliable enough to allow for many realities (but not all, as it offers resistance to some). The consequences of a given worldview or set of stories about reality are "not grounded in an 'objective' nature but come from a complicated interplay between an unknown and relatively pliable material and the researchers who affect and are affected and changed by the material [...] The 'subjective' side of knowledge, being inextricably intertwined with its material manifestations, cannot be just blown away. Far from merely stating what is already there, it creates conditions of existence, a world corresponding to these conditions and a life that is adapted to this world; all three support or 'establish' the conjectures that let to them." [8]

Because of the diversity of possible realities, choice plays an important role in what theories we accept. This leads Feyerabend to criticize those who impose their own view of what is real and desirable, regardless of the views and wishes of others. "Entire communities are displaced, their ways of life destroyed [...] they are unhappy, they protest, even revolt-- but this does not count. It is not as 'real' as the fact projected by an 'objective' economic science. [...] I suggest that we argue from the 'subjective', 'irrational', idiosyncratic kind of life we are in sympathy with, to what is to be regarded as real.[...this] is not motivated by a contempt for science but by the wish to subject it-- this product of relatively free agents-- to the judgement of other free agents, instead of being frightened by a petrified version of it." [9] Here Feyerabend defends what he calls ‘Aristotle's principle’, which states that what counts as real depends on what kind of life we want to live, [10] i.e., we can choose to live in a world that makes sense to us.

The open, changeable and ambiguous nature of Being is an empowering aspect of Conquest of Abundance. "...there is good sense in saying that every culture can in principle be any culture [...] scientific nature, too, is partly comprehensible, partly nonsensical; it can be extended, changed, supplemented with new ideas, habits, pieces of culture thus bringing to light others and perhaps more gentle aspects of Nature and, with that, of ourselves. Here progressive artists can play an important role. Rationalists -- and that includes many scientists and philosophers-- like to nail things down. They are confused by change and cannot tolerate ambiguity. But poets, painters, musicians cherish ambiguous words, puzzling designs, nonsensical movements, all instruments which are needed to dissolve the apparently so rigid and objective nature of scientists, to replace it by useful and changing appearances or artifacts and in this way to give us a feeling for the enormous and largely unfathomable powers that surround us."

Scholarly reception

Conquest of Abundance was generally well-received [11] [12] [13] and has been influential in contemporary debates about science and values. [14]

Related Research Articles

Abstraction is a process wherein general rules and concepts are derived from the usage and classification of specific examples, literal signifiers, first principles, or other methods.

Postmodern philosophy is a philosophical movement that arose in the second half of the 20th century as a critical response to assumptions allegedly present in modernist philosophical ideas regarding culture, identity, history, or language that were developed during the 18th-century Age of Enlightenment. Postmodernist thinkers developed concepts like difference, repetition, trace, and hyperreality to subvert "grand narratives", univocity of being, and epistemic certainty. Postmodern philosophy questions the importance of power relationships, personalization, and discourse in the "construction" of truth and world views. Many postmodernists appear to deny that an objective reality exists, and appear to deny that there are objective moral values.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scientific method</span> Interplay between observation, experiment and theory in science

The scientific method is an empirical method for acquiring knowledge that has characterized the development of science since at least the 17th century.

Philosophy of science is the branch of philosophy concerned with the foundations, methods, and implications of science. Amongst its central questions are the difference between science and non-science, the reliability of scientific theories, and the ultimate purpose and meaning of science as a human endeavour. Philosophy of science focuses on metaphysical, epistemic and semantic aspects of scientific practice, and overlaps with metaphysics, ontology, logic, and epistemology, for example, when it explores the relationship between science and the concept of truth. Philosophy of science is both a theoretical and empirical discipline, relying on philosophical theorising as well as meta-studies of scientific practice. Ethical issues such as bioethics and scientific misconduct are often considered ethics or science studies rather than the philosophy of science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Imre Lakatos</span> Hungarian philosopher of mathematics and science

Imre Lakatos was a Hungarian philosopher of mathematics and science, known for his thesis of the fallibility of mathematics and its "methodology of proofs and refutations" in its pre-axiomatic stages of development, and also for introducing the concept of the "research programme" in his methodology of scientific research programmes.

Relativism is a family of philosophical views which deny claims to objectivity within a particular domain and assert that valuations in that domain are relative to the perspective of an observer or the context in which they are assessed. There are many different forms of relativism, with a great deal of variation in scope and differing degrees of controversy among them. Moral relativism encompasses the differences in moral judgments among people and cultures. Epistemic relativism holds that there are no absolute principles regarding normative belief, justification, or rationality, and that there are only relative ones. Alethic relativism is the doctrine that there are no absolute truths, i.e., that truth is always relative to some particular frame of reference, such as a language or a culture. Some forms of relativism also bear a resemblance to philosophical skepticism. Descriptive relativism seeks to describe the differences among cultures and people without evaluation, while normative relativism evaluates the word truthfulness of views within a given framework.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Feyerabend</span> Austrian philosopher of science (1924–1994)

Paul Karl Feyerabend was an Austrian philosopher best known for his work in the philosophy of science. He started his academic career as lecturer in the philosophy of science at the University of Bristol (1955–1958); afterwards, he moved to the University of California, Berkeley, where he taught for three decades (1958–1989). At various points in his life, he held joint appointments at the University College London (1967–1970), the London School of Economics (1967), the FU Berlin (1968), Yale University (1969), the University of Auckland, the University of Sussex (1974), and, finally, the ETH Zurich (1980–1990). He gave lectures and lecture series at the University of Minnesota (1958-1962), Stanford University (1967), the University of Kassel (1977) and the University of Trento (1992).

Scientism is the view that science and the scientific method are the best or only way to render truth about the world and reality.

In philosophy of science and epistemology, the demarcation problem is the question of how to distinguish between science and non-science. It also examines the boundaries between science, pseudoscience and other products of human activity, like art and literature and beliefs. The debate continues after more than two millennia of dialogue among philosophers of science and scientists in various fields. The debate has consequences for what can be termed "scientific" in topics such as education and public policy.

Commensurability is a concept in the philosophy of science whereby scientific theories are said to be "commensurable" if scientists can discuss the theories using a shared nomenclature that allows direct comparison of them to determine which one is more valid or useful. On the other hand, theories are incommensurable if they are embedded in starkly contrasting conceptual frameworks whose languages do not overlap sufficiently to permit scientists to directly compare the theories or to cite empirical evidence favoring one theory over the other. Discussed by Ludwik Fleck in the 1930s, and popularized by Thomas Kuhn in the 1960s, the problem of incommensurability results in scientists talking past each other, as it were, while comparison of theories is muddled by confusions about terms, contexts and consequences.

<i>Against Method</i> 1975 book by Paul Feyerabend

Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge is a 1975 book by Austrian philosopher of science Paul Feyerabend. The central thesis of the book is that science should become an anarchic enterprise. In the context of the work, the term "anarchy" refers to epistemological anarchy, which does not remain within one single prescriptive scientific method on the grounds that any such method would restrict scientific progress. The work is notable in the history and philosophy of science partially due to its detailed case study of Galileo's hypothesis that the earth rotates on its axis and has since become a staple reading in introduction to philosophy of science courses at undergraduate and graduate levels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental philosophy</span> Branch of philosophy

Environmental philosophy is the branch of philosophy that is concerned with the natural environment and humans' place within it. It asks crucial questions about human environmental relations such as "What do we mean when we talk about nature?" "What is the value of the natural, that is non-human environment to us, or in itself?" "How should we respond to environmental challenges such as environmental degradation, pollution and climate change?" "How can we best understand the relationship between the natural world and human technology and development?" and "What is our place in the natural world?" Environmental philosophy includes environmental ethics, environmental aesthetics, ecofeminism, environmental hermeneutics, and environmental theology. Some of the main areas of interest for environmental philosophers are:

Inductivism is the traditional and still commonplace philosophy of scientific method to develop scientific theories. Inductivism aims to neutrally observe a domain, infer laws from examined cases—hence, inductive reasoning—and thus objectively discover the sole naturally true theory of the observed.

Reification is a fallacy of ambiguity, when an abstraction is treated as if it were a concrete real event or physical entity. In other words, it is the error of treating something that is not concrete, such as an idea, as a concrete thing. A common case of reification is the confusion of a model with reality: "the map is not the territory".

<i>Killing Time</i> (autobiography) 1994 autobiography by Paul Feyerabend

Killing Time: The Autobiography of Paul Feyerabend is an autobiography by philosopher Paul Feyerabend. The book details, amongst other things, Feyerabend's youth in Nazi-controlled Vienna, his military service, notorious academic career, and his multiple romantic conquests. The book's title, Killing Time is a play on the homophone Feierabend, a German compound noun meaning 'the workday's end and the evening following it'.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism of science</span> Critical observation of science

Criticism of science addresses problems within science in order to improve science as a whole and its role in society. Criticisms come from philosophy, from social movements like feminism, and from within science itself.

Paul Hoyningen-Huene is a German philosopher who specializes in general philosophy of science and research ethics. He is best known for his Neo-Kantian interpretation of Thomas S. Kuhn's ideas. Hoyningen-Huene, until 2014, held the chair for theoretical philosophy, particularly philosophy of science at Leibniz Universität Hannover (Germany) and was director of the Center for Philosophy and Ethics of Science.

Conservation is an endeavor including “the preservation, maintenance, sustainable use, restoration, and enhancement of the natural environment”.

Farewell to Reason is a 1987 book by the Austrian philosopher of science Paul Feyerabend. The book includes some reprinted essays published in other venues and was published by Verso Books, which also published Against Method and Science in a Free Society. The primary goal of the book is to trace the historical origins of "rationalism" and argue for a version of relativism and cultural diversity.

<i>Gran conquista de Ultramar</i>

The Gran conquista de Ultramar is a late 13th-century Castilian chronicle of the Crusades for the period 1095–1271. It is a work of compilation, translation and prosification of Old French and Old Occitan sources, mixing historical material with legends drawn from the epic chansons de geste. It was produced under royal patronage by Sancho IV and probably his father, Alfonso X.

References

  1. Feyerabend, Paul (1999). Conquest of Abundance. University of Chicago Press. p. 1.
  2. "The Works of P. K. Feyerabend".
  3. Feyerabend, Paul (1999). Conquest of Abundance. University of Chicago Press. p. 7.
  4. Feyerabend, Paul (1999). Conquest of Abundance. University of Chicago Press. p. 5.
  5. Feyerabend, Paul (1999). Conquest of Abundance. University of Chicago Press. p. 5.
  6. Feyerabend, Paul (1999). Conquest of Abundance. University of Chicago Press. p. 91.
  7. Feyerabend, Paul (1999). Conquest of Abundance. University of Chicago Press. p. 16.
  8. Feyerabend, Paul (1999). Conquest of Abundance. University of Chicago Press. pp. 145–146.
  9. Feyerabend, Paul (1999). Conquest of Abundance. University of Chicago Press. p. 201.
  10. Feyerabend, Paul (1999). Conquest of Abundance. University of Chicago Press. p. 251.
  11. Downes, Stephen (2002). "Book Review: Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction versus the Richness of Being, The Worst Enemy of Science? Essays in Memory of Paul Feyerabend". Science, Technology, & Human Values. 27 (1): 160–164. doi:10.1177/016224390202700107. S2CID   143617488.
  12. Jacobs, Struan (2006). "Book Review: Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction Versus the Richness of Being". Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 36 (3): 386–389. doi:10.1177/0048393106289800. S2CID   141894880.
  13. Preston, John (2000). "Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction versus the Richness of Being". Philosophy. 75 (294): 618–622.
  14. Brown, Matthew J. (2020). Science and Moral Imagination: A New Ideal for Science and Values. University of Pittsburgh Press.