Copyscape

Last updated
Copyscape
Copyscape-logo.png
Type of site
Plagiarism detection
Available in Multilingual
FoundedJuly 10, 2004 (2004-07-10)
Area servedWorldwide
Industry Digital content
URL copyscape.com
CommercialYes
RegistrationOptional

Copyscape is an online plagiarism detection service that checks whether similar text content appears elsewhere on the web. [1] [2] [3] It was launched in 2004 by Indigo Stream Technologies, Ltd.

Contents

Copyscape is used by content owners to detect cases of "content theft", in which content is copied without permission from one site to another. [4] [5] It is also used by content publishers to detect cases of content fraud, in which old content is repackaged and sold as new original content. [6]

History

Copyscape was launched in 2004 by Indigo Stream Technologies, Ltd., co-founded in 2003 by Gideon Greenspan. [7] According to an interview with Greenspan, the company originally developed an alerting service called Google Alert, out of which the Copyscape service grew as an expansion. [8]

Functionality

Given the URL or text of the original content, Copyscape returns a list of web pages that contain similar text to all or parts of this content. [9] It also shows the matching text highlighted on the found web page. Copyscape banners can be placed on a web page to warn potential plagiarists not to steal content. Copysentry monitors the web and sends notifications by email when new copies are found, and Copyscape Premium verifies the originality of content purchased by online content publishers.

Copyscape uses the Google Web API to power its searches. [10] Copyscape uses a set of algorithms to identify copied content that has been modified from its original form.

Reported use in plagiarism cases

Copyscape's use has been reported in cases involving online plagiarism:

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet Archive</span> American nonprofit digital archive

The Internet Archive is an American nonprofit digital library founded in 1996 by Brewster Kahle. It provides free access to collections of digitized materials including websites, software applications, music, audiovisual, and print materials. The Archive also advocates for a free and open Internet. As of February 4, 2024, the Internet Archive held more than 44 million print materials, 10.6 million videos, 1 million software programs, 15 million audio files, 4.8 million images, 255,000 concerts, and over 835 billion web pages in its Wayback Machine. Its mission is committing to provide "universal access to all knowledge".

Electronic publishing includes the digital publication of e-books, digital magazines, and the development of digital libraries and catalogues. It also includes the editing of books, journals, and magazines to be posted on a screen.

Fictitious or fake entries are deliberately incorrect entries in reference works such as dictionaries, encyclopedias, maps, and directories, added by the editors as copyright traps to reveal subsequent plagiarism or copyright infringement. There are more specific terms for particular kinds of fictitious entry, such as Mountweazel, trap street, paper town, phantom settlement, and nihilartikel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maxim Institute</span> Public policy think tank in New Zealand

The Maxim Institute is a research and public policy think tank based in Auckland, New Zealand. The Institute's work is oriented toward a conservative perspective on its issues of primary concern, which are now education policy, tax and welfare policy. Although initially identifiable as a social conservative organisation, its policy statements have emphasised fiscal restraint within tax and welfare policy since its former director, Bruce Logan, left in 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turnitin</span> Internet-based plagiarism-prevention service

Turnitin is an Internet-based similarity detection service run by the American company Turnitin, LLC, a subsidiary of Advance Publications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open Library</span> Online project for book data of the Internet Archive

Open Library is an online project intended to create "one web page for every book ever published". Created by Aaron Swartz, Brewster Kahle, Alexis Rossi, Anand Chitipothu, and Rebecca Malamud, Open Library is a project of the Internet Archive, a nonprofit organization. It has been funded in part by grants from the California State Library and the Kahle/Austin Foundation. Open Library provides online digital copies in multiple formats, created from images of many public domain, out-of-print, and in-print books.

Bruce Logan is a New Zealand conservative Christian author who has been involved in, and is in opposition to liberal social policies within his country for over two decades.

WebCite is an intermittently available archive site, originally designed to digitally preserve scientific and educationally important material on the web by taking snapshots of Internet contents as they existed at the time when a blogger or a scholar cited or quoted from it. The preservation service enabled verifiability of claims supported by the cited sources even when the original web pages are being revised, removed, or disappear for other reasons, an effect known as link rot.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copyfraud</span> False copyright claims to public-domain content

A copyfraud is a false copyright claim by an individual or institution with respect to content that is in the public domain. Such claims are unlawful, at least under US and Australian copyright law, because material that is not copyrighted is free for all to use, modify and reproduce. Copyfraud also includes overreaching claims by publishers, museums and others, as where a legitimate copyright owner knowingly, or with constructive knowledge, claims rights beyond what the law allows.

Plagiarism detection or content similarity detection is the process of locating instances of plagiarism or copyright infringement within a work or document. The widespread use of computers and the advent of the Internet have made it easier to plagiarize the work of others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Derivative work</span> Concept in copyright law

In copyright law, a derivative work is an expressive creation that includes major copyrightable elements of a first, previously created original work. The derivative work becomes a second, separate work independent from the first. The transformation, modification or adaptation of the work must be substantial and bear its author's personality sufficiently to be original and thus protected by copyright. Translations, cinematic adaptations and musical arrangements are common types of derivative works.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copyright infringement</span> Illegal usage of copyrighted works

Copyright infringement is the use of works protected by copyright without permission for a usage where such permission is required, thereby infringing certain exclusive rights granted to the copyright holder, such as the right to reproduce, distribute, display or perform the protected work, or to produce derivative works. The copyright holder is usually the work's creator, or a publisher or other business to whom copyright has been assigned. Copyright holders routinely invoke legal and technological measures to prevent and penalize copyright infringement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plagiarism</span> Using another authors work as if it was ones own original work

Plagiarism is the representation of another person's language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions as one's own original work. Although precise definitions vary depending on the institution, in many countries and cultures plagiarism is considered a violation of academic integrity and journalistic ethics, as well as social norms around learning, teaching, research, fairness, respect, and responsibility. As such, a person or entity that is determined to have committed plagiarism is often subject to various punishments or sanctions, such as suspension, expulsion from school or work, fines, imprisonment, and other penalties.

<i>Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc.</i> U.S. copyright law case, 2015

Authors Guild v. Google 804 F.3d 202 was a copyright case heard in federal court for the Southern District of New York, and then the Second Circuit Court of Appeals between 2005 and 2015. It concerned fair use in copyright law and the transformation of printed copyrighted books into an online searchable database through scanning and digitization. It centered on the legality of the Google Book Search Library Partner project that had been launched in 2003.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CSS box model</span> Model used for styling websites

In web development, the CSS box model refers to how HTML elements are modeled in browser engines and how the dimensions of those HTML elements are derived from CSS properties. It is a fundamental concept for the composition of HTML webpages. The guidelines of the box model are described by web standards World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) specifically the CSS Working Group. For much of the late-1990s and early 2000s there had been non-standard compliant implementations of the box model in mainstream browsers. With the advent of CSS2 in 1998, which introduced the box-sizing property, the problem had mostly been resolved.

Kindle Direct Publishing is Amazon.com's e-book publishing platform launched in November 2007, concurrently with the first Amazon Kindle device. Originally called Digital Text Platform, the platform allows authors and publishers to publish their books to the Amazon Kindle Store.

<i>Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc.</i> Case in American intellectual property law

Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc., 647 F.3d 1218, is a case in American intellectual property law involving personal jurisdiction in the context of internet contacts.

PlagTracker is a Ukrainian-based online plagiarism detection service that checks whether similar text content appears elsewhere on the web. It was launched in 2011 by Devellar.

PlagScan is a plagiarism detection software, mostly used by academic institutions. PlagScan compares submissions with web documents, journals and internal archives. The software was launched in 2009 by Markus Goldbach and Johannes Knabe of Cologne, Germany.

Content ID is a digital fingerprinting system developed by Google which is used to easily identify and manage copyrighted content on YouTube. Videos uploaded to YouTube are compared against audio and video files registered with Content ID by content owners, looking for any matches. Content owners have the choice to have matching content blocked or to monetize it. The system began to be implemented around 2007. By 2016, it had cost $60 million to develop and led to around $2 billion in payments to copyright holders. By 2018, Google had invested at least $100 million into the system.

References

  1. Gilbertson, Scott (November 17, 2006). "Copyscape: Track Stolen Content". Wired . Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  2. Keener, Matt (December 26, 2014). "16 Productivity Tools Nobody Can Live Without". Time . Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  3. Mills, Elinor (February 8, 2007). "Steal this post". USA Today . Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  4. Mapes, Diane (September 10, 2009). "Steal this story? Beware Net's plagiarism 'cops'". NBC News . Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  5. Welch, Maura (May 8, 2006). "Online plagiarism strikes blog world". The Boston Globe . Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  6. Klein, Karen E. (March 3, 2008). "Scanning for Scammers Before You Buy In". Bloomberg Businessweek . Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  7. "Gideon Greenspan" . Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  8. Weinberg, Tamar (April 21, 2016). "Interview with Gideon Greenspan, Co-Founder and CTO Copyscape". Host Advice. Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  9. Klein, Karen E. (March 3, 2008). "Scanning for Scammers Before You Buy In". Bloomberg Businessweek . Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  10. Delaney, Kevin J. (December 18, 2006). "Copyright Tool Will Scan Web For Violations". The Wall Street Journal . Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  11. "Brayton Purcell LLP v. Recordon & Recordon, 361 F.Supp.2d 1135". United States District Court for the Northern District of California . March 18, 2005. Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  12. Bailey, Jonathan (August 6, 2009). "9th Circuit Finds for PI Firm Over Theft of Firm's Web Site Content". Plagiarism Today. Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  13. Festa, Paul (April 11, 2005). "Apple accused of copyright wrongs". CNET . Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  14. Bersvendsen, Arve (April 6, 2005). "Apple and copyright violations". Virtuelvis. Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  15. "The Fundy Post: Sorry Seems to be The Hardest Word". Scoop News. November 3, 2005. Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  16. Middleton, Julie (November 4, 2005). "Maxim back in gun over plagiarism". The New Zealand Herald . Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  17. Stiennon, Richard (December 9, 2005). "Copyscape, a very interesting twist on IP protection". ZDNet . Retrieved July 25, 2019.