Council of Metz (863)

Last updated

The Council of Metz of 863 was arranged by Pope Nicholas I to discuss the divorce case of Lothar II, king of Lotharingia, and his wife Theutberga. The council was mainly attended by Lothar II's supporters, and thus concluded the divorce case in his favour; this decision was later overruled by Pope Nicholas I who suspected foul play. It was the fourth and final council called during the reign of Lothar II. No documents from the council survive, but as the council was controversial it is discussed in other medieval sources such as the letters of Pope Nicholas I, the Annals of St Bertin, the Annals of Fulda and the Liber Pontificalis . [1]

Contents

Background

Divorce case

Lothar II and Theutberga were married in 855 in a political alliance to secure the kingdom, when Lothar was a young king. Prior to this, he had an undefined relationship with a noble woman named Waldrada, who bore him children, most notably a son named Hugh. By 857 Lothar deemed his marriage to Theutberga undesirable, though it is not clear exactly why, and accused her of incest and abortion. In 858, a champion succeeded in a trial by ordeal to prove Theutberga's innocence, but two councils in 860 held by Lothar in Aachen nominally proved her guilt through her confession to Archbishop Gunther of Cologne.

At this point the trial became of interest to the rest of the Carolingian empire and the Pope because Theutberga sought sanctuary with Charles the Bald, Lothar's uncle who ruled West Francia. Hincmar of Rheims, a famous archbishop of Charles the Bald, also became involved at this point. In 862 Lothar held a further council at Aachen which stated that the marriage between Lothar II and Theutberga had ended, and Waldrada was now his wife. [2]

Pope Nicholas I's involvement

The Council of Metz was arranged by Pope Nicholas I long before it actually took place. In November of 862, Nicholas wrote to the bishops assembled at Metz informing they had to investigate the divorce case against Theutberga and make a just ruling. Nicholas justified his involvement as Theutberga had appealed to him for assistance and it was under his remit of pastoral care. He is clear that the council's decision will not be final though as, if he believes the ruling is wrong, he could order another council to take place. [3]

In early 863 he also sent letters to the bishops and archbishops of the Carolingian empire and his papal legates. In his letter to the bishops and archbishops of the Carolingian empire instructs them all to assemble at Metz to discuss the divorce case as he thinks that Lothar II is at fault and needs to be brought to justice. [4] In his letter to his legates Nicholas outlines the lines of enquiry the legates must take at the council; most notably this was checking on Theutberga's welfare and if she is held under duress, questioning Lothar's claim of union to Waldrada, and challenging the idea Lothar was forced to marry Theutberga by her brother. [5] Most notably given the ambiguity of Carolingian marriage, Nicholas defines a valid marriage as a public ceremony conducted by a priest, with the exchange of a bridal gift. [1]

Council

Attendees

Despite Nicholas' wishes, all but one of the Lotharingian bishops attended, but none of the bishops from the rest of the empire. [6] Notably Hincmar was unable to attend, perhaps because he was purposely invited too late because he was critical of the divorce. Lothar II attended, but Theutberga did not attend because she was also not invited in time. The only attendees from outside Lotharingia were Bishop Radoald of Porto and Bishop Johannes of Ficcocle, who were the papal legates. [7] The council was presided over by Archbishop Gunther of Cologne and Archbishop Theutgard of Trier, who both later travelled to Rome to inform Pope Nicholas I of their decision. [1]

Conclusion

As the documents from the council do not survive, we cannot determine exactly what was argued. However, Lothar II was dominant, claiming he was already married to Waldrada, Theutberga was guilty and the decision from the Council of Aachen in 862 should be upheld. The attending bishops signed a document stating that the marriage of Theutberga and Lothar II was annulled, and Lothar was free to remarry. This document was then taken to Rome for Pope Nicholas to ratify, and only then would the judgement be valid. [7]

Controversy

The decision of the council was against ecclesiastical law, as it was impossible to pass judgement against Theutberga if she was not present. It is not clear if Lothar II threatened or bribed bishops in order for them to sign the concluding document, but these were the same bishops who sided with Lothar in the 862 Council of Aachen. [7] Lothar II was also accused of bribing Archbishop Gunther into helping him establish a scheme to frame Theutberga. [8] Furthermore, the Annals of St Bertin suggest that the papal legates were bribed by Lothar II and did not conduct a full investigation. [9]

Reaction

Pope Nicholas I's judgement

Pope Nicholas I rejected the ruling of the Council of Metz, condemning it as heretical. [1] Following the council, later in 863, Archbishops Gunther and Theutgard travelled to Rome to present the council's document. Nicholas dismissed the document after consideration, as ‘a great deal in it was found to contain a profane baseness of language …which ensnared those archbishops for their frenzied trespassing beyond their episcopal rank'. [10] Nicholas I concluded that at the council the bishops had not enquired sufficiently into the case and the judgement was too hasty. He stated the council as not being worthy of the name synod and compared it to a brothel. [11]

Archbishops Gunther and Theutgard

Due to their heretical role in the Council of Metz and presenting Pope Nicholas I with the false document, Archbishops Gunther and Theutgard were excommunicated and deposed from office. Pope Nicholas I also threatened the bishops who had attended the Council of Metz with excommunication, if they did not publicly accept Nicholas' judgement. [1] Nicholas stated that ‘if we see you or them falling away from the rules established in the canons and by the Holy Fathers to favour one party for the sake of a favour from anyone whatsoever… we will not hesitate to pursue the matter'. [3] This sparked controversy, with some arguing that Nicholas acted within his remit, while Archbishops Gunther and Theutgard protested. [6]

Related Research Articles

Pope Nicholas I, called Nicholas the Great, was the bishop of Rome and ruler of the Papal States from 24 April 858 until his death. He is remembered as a consolidator of papal authority, exerting decisive influence on the historical development of the papacy and its position among the Christian nations of Western Europe. Nicholas I asserted that the pope should have suzerainty over all Christians, even royalty, in matters of faith and morals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Regino of Prüm</span>

Regino of Prüm or of Prum was a Benedictine monk, who served as abbot of Prüm (892–99) and later of Saint Martin's at Trier, and chronicler, whose Chronicon is an important source for late Carolingian history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lothair II</span> King of Lotharingia

Lothair II was the king of Lotharingia from 855 until his death in 869. He was the second son of Emperor Lothair I and Ermengarde of Tours. He was married to Teutberga, daughter of Boso the Elder.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles the Fat</span> Carolingian emperor from 881 to 888

Charles III, also known as Charles the Fat, was the emperor of the Carolingian Empire from 881 to 887. A member of the Carolingian dynasty, Charles was the youngest son of Louis the German and Hemma, and a great-grandson of Charlemagne. He was the last Carolingian emperor of legitimate birth and the last to rule a united kingdom of the Franks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baldwin I, Margrave of Flanders</span>

Baldwin I, also known as Baldwin Iron Arm, was the first margrave of Flanders, which evolved into the County of Flanders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hincmar</span> Archbishop of Reims

Hincmar, archbishop of Reims, was a Frankish jurist and theologian, as well as the friend, advisor and propagandist of Charles the Bald. He belonged to a noble family of northern Francia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judith of Flanders</span> Queen consort of Wessex

Judith of Flanders was a Carolingian princess who became Queen of Wessex by two successive marriages and later Countess of Flanders. Judith was the eldest child of the Carolingian emperor Charles the Bald and his first wife, Ermentrude of Orléans. In 856, she married Æthelwulf, King of Wessex. After her husband's death in 858, Judith married his son and successor, Æthelbald. King Ætheldbald died in 860. Both of Judith's first two marriages were childless. Her third marriage was to Baldwin I, Margrave of Flanders, with whom she had several children.

Teutberga was a queen of Lotharingia by marriage to Lothair II. She was a daughter of Bosonid Boso the Elder and sister of Hucbert, the lay-abbot of St. Maurice's Abbey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fulk (archbishop of Reims)</span> Roman Catholic archbishop

Fulk the Venerable was archbishop of Reims from 883 until his death. He was a key figure in the political conflicts of the West Frankish kingdom that followed the dissolution of the Carolingian Empire in the late ninth century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drogo of Metz</span>

Drogo, also known as Dreux or Drogon, was an illegitimate son of Frankish emperor Charlemagne by the concubine Regina.

Gunther or Gunthar was Archbishop of Cologne in Germany from 850 until he was excommunicated and deposed in 863.

Hugh or Hugo was an illegitimate son of Lothair II, king of Lotharingia, by his mistress Waldrada. His father made him Duke of Alsace in 867.

Theotgaud was the archbishop of Trier from 850 until his deposition in 867. He was the abbot of Mettlach prior to his election in 847 to succeed his uncle, Hetto, as archbishop.

Hucbert was a Frank and son of the count Boso the Elder. Therefore, he was a Bosonid, and the namesake for the Huberterian branch of the family. His rise to power commenced under Lothair I but continued under Lothair II, reaching its apex when his sister Theutberga married Lothair II, a prince of the Carolingian dynasty, the imperial family of Francia. Hucbert also served as the lay-abbot of the Abbey of Saint Maurice-in-Valais. This gave him control over the Mons Iovis pass, the main route between Francia and Italy. Hucbert later gained power in the region of Transjurane Burgundy (859) which is what helped him later to find safety within the kingdom of Charles the Bald.

The De divortio Lotharii regis et Theutbergae reginae is an extended mid ninth-century treatise written by Hincmar, Archbishop of Reims, which survives in a single manuscript, Paris BnF. lat. 2866. The front few pages of this manuscript have been lost, and so this is an assumed title. It explores the issues arising from the attempt by Lothar II, king of Lotharingia (855–869), to rid himself of his wife Teutberga and replace her with his concubine, Waldrada. Hincmar is primarily concerned with defining what marriage is and how it may be ended, and with the duties of bishops and of kings. However, in the course of discussing these questions, he touches on many other issues too, and gives much detail on ninth-century politics and religious practice in Francia.

Hincmar, called the Younger, was the Bishop of Laon in the West Frankish Kingdom of Charles the Bald from 858 to 871. His career is remembered by a succession of quarrels with his monarch and his uncle, archbishop Hincmar of Rheims. After initial loyalty to Charles trouble occurred from 868 due to the allocation of benefices on the see's estates. The conflict grew dangerous as it became embroiled in the larger dispute of Lotharingian succession following Lothair II’s attempted divorce from his wife. Hincmar’s struggle against his king provides a Carolingian example of early Medieval clerical exemption.

Robert was the bishop of Le Mans from 857.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Odo I of Beauvais</span>

Odo I was a West Frankish prelate who served as abbot of Corbie in the 850s and as bishop of Beauvais from around 860 until his death in 881. He was a courtier and a diplomat, going on missions to East Francia and the Holy See.

Waldrada was the mistress, and later the wife, of Lothair II of Lotharingia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adventius (bishop of Metz)</span> Bishop of Metz

Adventius was the Bishop of Metz from 855 until his death in 875. He was a prominent figure within the courts of the Carolingian kings Lothar II (855–869) and Charles the Bald (840–877).

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Heidecker, Karl (2010). The Divorce of Lothar II : Christian Marriage and Political Power in the Carolingian World (Conjunctions of Religion & Power in the Medieval Past). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  2. Airlie, Stuart (1998). "Private bodies and the body politic in the divorce case of Lothar II". Past and Present. 161: 3–38.
  3. 1 2 862, November 23, Letter 3, pp. 268–70 In Paris, Bibliotheque nationale de France, Lat. 1557.
  4. 863 (early) (a), Letter 10, pp. 275–6 In Paris, Bibliotheque nationale de France, Lat. 1557
  5. 863 (early) (b), Letter 11, pp. 276–7
  6. 1 2 Reuter, Timothy (1992). The Annals of Fulda. Manchester University Press.
  7. 1 2 3 Hartmann, Wilfried (1998). Die Konzilien der Karolingiche Teilreich 860- 874.
  8. Chronicle of Regino of Prüm, in: Maclean, S. & Adalbert, 2009. History and politics in late Carolingian and Ottonian Europe : the chronicle of Regino of Prüm and Adalbert of Magdeburg, Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp.139-141
  9. Nelson, Janet (1991). The Annals of St-Bertin. Manchester University Press.
  10. Liber Pontificalis, tr. R. Davis, Lives of the Ninth-Century Popes, pp. 228-9
  11. 863, c. October 30, Letter 18, pp. 284–6

Bibliography