Credo quia absurdum

Last updated • 6 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

Credo quia absurdum is a Latin phrase that means "I believe because it is absurd", originally misattributed to Tertullian in his De Carne Christi . It is believed to be a paraphrasing of Tertullian's "prorsus credibile est, quia ineptum est" which means "it is completely credible because it is unsuitable", or "certum est, quia impossibile" which means "it is certain because it is impossible". Early modern, Protestant and Enlightenment rhetoric against Catholicism and religion more broadly resulted in this phrase being changed to "I believe because it is absurd", displaced from its original anti-Marcionite context into a personally religious one. [1] Tertullian's phrase originated in a rebuttal to Marcion's view that a human death for the divine Son of God would be paradoxical and thus ought to be rejected. [2]

Contents

History of the phrase

Origins

The original phrase, before being transmuted through Enlightenment rhetoric to its modern form "I believe because it is absurd", appeared in Tertullian's work De Carne Christi (c.203–206), read by scholars as "I believe because it is unfitting". The context is a defense of the tenets of orthodox Christianity against docetism:

Latin text: et mortuus est dei filius: [prorsus] credibile est, quia ineptum est.

et sepultus resurrexit: certum est, quia impossibile.

English translation: and the Son of God died; it is [utterly] credible, because it is unfitting;

and he was buried and rose again; it is certain, because it is impossible. [1]

The consensus of Tertullian scholars is that the reading "I believe because it is absurd" sharply diverges from Tertullian's own thoughts, given the priority placed on reasoned argument and rationality in his writings. [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] :esp. 28,48–64 In the same work, Tertullian later writes "But here again, I must have some reasons." [9] Elsewhere, he writes that the new Christian “should believe nothing but that nothing should be rashly believed.” [10] Scholars note further examples of where Tertullian acts by following a method of reasoned argument. [8] :34 The meaning of the phrase may relate to 1 Corinthians 1:17–31, [11] where something foolish to a human may be a part of God's wisdom, [12] or Tertullian may be repeating an idea rehearsed in Aristotle's Rhetoric , where Aristotle argues that something is more credibly true if it is an incredible claim, on the reason that it would not have been made up if it were truly so incredible to the human mind. [13] [14] Eric Osborn concludes that "the classic formula credo quia absurdum (even when corrected to quia ineptum) does not represent the thought of Tertullian." [8]

Transmission into the early modern era and modern use

No notice was given to this maxim throughout the classical and medieval periods, [15] however, the maxim first began to receive attention and then undergo change during the early modern era. In 1521, the humanist scholar Beatus Rhenanus produced an edition of Tertullian's De carne Christi. [16] The only French translation of this work to appear in the 17th century was Louis Giry's 1661 edition. [17] According to Peter Harrison, the first time that the maxim was quoted was in Thomas Browne's highly influential religious classic Religio Medici (The Religion of a Doctor), ensuring that the maxim received a wide audience at this time, and Browne also shifted the context of Tertullian's phrase from a discourse against Marcion to personal faith, and also shifted the wording of the phrase from its original certum est, quia impossibile ("It is certain, because it is impossible") to "I believe, because it is impossible." [1] Many of Browne's contemporaries criticized him and Tertullian for this maxim, including Henry More, Edward Stillingfleet, Robert Boyle, and John Locke. As Protestant anti-Catholic polemic and rhetoric grew, many writers began associating certain Catholic doctrines (and later broadly to Christianity itself by some other writers), especially transubstantiation, with this maxim. The maxim was then brought to a French audience through Pierre Bayle's highly influential 1697 Dictionnaire Historique et Critique , which catalogued controversies of philosophical and religious nature as well as historical events and persons related to them. [1] Then Voltaire, in his anonymously published Le Dîner du comte de Boulainvillier (1767), took the maxim to the next step and shifted the phrase from "I believe because it is impossible" to "I believe because it is absurd". Voltaire also attributed it to Augustine instead of Tertullian, a much more central figure in Christian history. [18] The maxim would continue to be attributed to Augustine until Gaston de Flotte noted the original Latin and misattribution by Voltaire, however, the rhetorical appeal of the maxim was great enough that it continued to be widely used, even to the present day, [1] including being used by figures like Sigmund Freud, Ernst Cassirer, Max Weber, Richard Dawkins, Jerry Coyne and even Simon Blackburn's Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. [19] [20]

Later commentary

The phrase does not express the Catholic Faith, as explained by Pope Benedict XVI: "The Catholic Tradition, from the outset, rejected the so-called 'fideism', which is the desire to believe against reason. Credo quia absurdum (I believe because it is absurd) is not a formula that interprets the Catholic faith." [21]

The phrase is thus sometimes associated with the doctrine of fideism, that is, "a system of philosophy or an attitude of mind, which, denying the power of unaided human reason to reach certitude, affirms that the fundamental act of human knowledge consists in an act of faith, and the supreme criterion of certitude is authority" according to the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia , which later states, "It is not surprising, therefore, that the Church has condemned such doctrines". [22]

The phrase has also been used, though often in different interpretations, by some existentialists. For example, Nietzsche, arguably the earliest existentialist and nonetheless already venturing far beyond this influential set of currents, posited:

Many have no doubt attained to that humility which says: credo quia absurdum est and sacrificed their reason to it: but, so far as I know, no one has yet attained to that humility which says: credo quia absurdus sum, though it is only one step further. [23]

The phrase inspired a celebrated bon mot by H.L. Mencken: "Tertullian is credited with the motto Credo quia absurdum—'I believe because it is impossible'. Needless to say, he began life as a lawyer." It has also been adopted as the motto for The Ancient and Honorable Order of E Clampus Vitus in modern times, and was used as an example of zen in D. T. Suzuki's book, Introduction to Zen Buddhism (which was based on essays he wrote in 1914):

"A noted Christian Father of the early Middle Ages once exclaimed: "O poor Aristotle! Thou who has discovered for the heretics the art of dialectics, the art of building up and destroying, the art of discussing all things and accomplishing nothing!" So much ado about nothing, indeed! See how philosophers of all ages contradict one another after spending all their logical acumen and analytical ingenuity on the so-called problems of science and knowledge. No wonder the same old wise man, wanting to put a stop once for all to all such profitless discussions, has boldly thrown the following bomb right into the midst of those sand-builders: "Certum est quia impossible est"; or, more logically, Credo quia absurdum est. I believe because it is irrational; is this not an unqualified confirmation of Zen?" [24]

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>A Modest Proposal</i> 1729 satirical essay by Jonathan Swift

A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People from Being a Burthen to Their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Beneficial to the Publick, commonly referred to as A Modest Proposal, is a Juvenalian satirical essay written and published anonymously by Anglo-Irish writer and clergyman Jonathan Swift in 1729. The essay suggests that poor people in Ireland could ease their economic troubles by selling their children as food to the elite. Swift's use of satirical hyperbole was intended to mock hostile attitudes towards the poor and anti-Catholicism among the Protestant Ascendancy as well as the Dublin Castle administration's policies in general. In English writing, the phrase "a modest proposal" is now conventionally an allusion to this style of straight-faced satire.

The Apostles' Creed, sometimes titled the Apostolic Creed or the Symbol of the Apostles, is a Christian creed or "symbol of faith".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nicene Creed</span> Statement of belief adopted at the First Ecumenical Council in 325

The Nicene Creed, also called the Creed of Constantinople, is the defining statement of belief of Nicene Christianity and in those Christian denominations that adhere to it. The original Nicene Creed was first adopted at the First Council of Nicaea in 325. According to a popular view forwarded by the Council of Chalcedon of 451, the Creed was amended in 381 by the First Council of Constantinople as "consonant to the holy and great Synod of Nice." However, there are some who comment on these ancient Councils who say "there is a failure of evidence" for this position since no one between the years of 381–451 thought of it in this light. Nonetheless, the amended form is presently referred to as the Nicene Creed or the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tertullian</span> Roman Christian theologian and writer (c. 155 – c. 220)

Tertullian was a prolific early Christian author from Carthage in the Roman province of Africa. He was the first Christian author to produce an extensive corpus of Latin Christian literature and was an early Christian apologist and a polemicist against heresy, including contemporary Christian Gnosticism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voltaire</span> French writer, historian, and philosopher (1694–1778)

François-Marie Arouet, known by his nom de plumeM. de Voltaire, was a French Enlightenment writer, philosopher (philosophe), satirist, and historian. Famous for his wit and his criticism of Christianity and of slavery, Voltaire was an advocate of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and separation of church and state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pascal's wager</span> Argument that posits human beings bet with their lives that God either exists or does not

Pascal's wager is a philosophical argument advanced by Blaise Pascal (1623–1662), seventeenth-century French mathematician, philosopher, physicist, and theologian. This argument posits that individuals essentially engage in a life-defining gamble regarding the belief in the existence of God.

Fideism is a term used to name a standpoint or an epistemological theory which maintains that faith is independent of reason, or that reason and faith are hostile to each other and faith is superior at arriving at particular truths. The word fideism comes from fides, the Latin word for faith, and literally means "faith-ism". Philosophers have identified a number of different forms of fideism. Strict fideists hold that reason has no place in discovering theological truths, while moderate fideists hold that though some truth can be known by reason, faith stands above reason.

<i>Apologeticus</i> Book by Tertullianus

Apologeticus is a text attributed to Tertullian according to Christian tradition, consisting of apologetic and polemic. In this work Tertullian defends Christianity, demanding legal toleration and that Christians be treated like all other sects of the Roman Empire. It is in this treatise that one finds the sentence "Plures efficimur, quotiens metimur a vobis: semen est sanguis Christianorum," which has been liberally and apocryphally translated as "the blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church". Alexander Souter translated this phrase as "We spring up in greater numbers the more we are mown down by you: the blood of the Christians is the seed of a new life," but even this takes liberties with the original text. "We multiply when you reap us. The blood of Christians is seed," is perhaps a more faithful, if less poetic, rendering.

De gustibus non est disputandum, or de gustibus non disputandum est, is a Latin maxim meaning "In matters of taste, there can be no disputes". The phrase is commonly rendered in English as "There is no accounting for taste(s)."

Absurdity is the state or condition of being unreasonable, meaningless, or so unsound as to be irrational. "Absurd" is the adjective used to describe absurdity, e.g., "Tyler and the boys laughed at the absurd situation." It derives from the Latin absurdum meaning "out of tune". The Latin surdus means "deaf", implying stupidity. Absurdity is contrasted with being realistic or reasonable In general usage, absurdity may be synonymous with nonsense, meaninglessness, fancifulness, foolishness, bizarreness, wildness. In specialized usage, absurdity is related to extremes in bad reasoning or pointlessness in reasoning; ridiculousness is related to extremes of incongruous juxtaposition, laughter, and ridicule; and nonsense is related to a lack of meaningfulness. Absurdism is a concept in philosophy related to the notion of absurdity.

<i>Philosophical Fragments</i> 1844 Christian philosophical work by Søren Kierkegaard

Philosophical Fragments is a Christian philosophical work written by Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard in 1844. It was the second of three works written under the pseudonym Johannes Climacus; the other two were De omnibus dubitandum est in 1841 and Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments in 1846.

De Carne Christi is a polemical work by Tertullian against the Gnostic Docetism of Marcion, Apelles, Valentinus and Alexander. It purports that the body of Christ was a real human body, born from the virginal body of Mary, but not by way of human procreation. Among other justifications for the incarnation of Christ, it states that "the choice of 'foolish' flesh is part of [God's] conscious rejection of conventional wisdom" and that "Without true incarnation, there can be no true redemption... God must have flesh, in order to have a real death and real resurrection.".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trivialism</span> Logical theory

Trivialism is the logical theory that all statements are true and, consequently, that all contradictions of the form "p and not p" are true. In accordance with this, a trivialist is a person who believes everything is true.

Connexive logic is a class of non-classical logics designed to exclude the paradoxes of material implication. The characteristic that separates connexive logic from other non-classical logics is its acceptance of Aristotle's thesis, i.e. the formula, as a logical truth. Aristotle's thesis asserts that no statement follows from its own denial. Stronger connexive logics also accept Boethius' thesis, which states that if a statement implies one thing, it does not imply its opposite.

Credo ut intelligam, alternatively spelled credo ut intellegam, is a Latin sentence of Anselm of Canterbury. The sentence is a reference to Isaiah 7:9. The sentence translates as: "I believe so that I may understand".

<i>Reductio ad absurdum</i> Argument that leads to a logical absurdity

In logic, reductio ad absurdum, also known as argumentum ad absurdum or apagogical arguments, is the form of argument that attempts to establish a claim by showing that the opposite scenario would lead to absurdity or contradiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter Harrison (historian)</span> Australian historian and philosopher

Peter D. Harrison is Professor Emeritus of History and Philosophy at the University of Queensland and a Professorial Research Fellow at the University of Notre Dame, Australia.

Amicus Plato, sed magis amica veritas is a Latin phrase, translating to "Plato is my friend, but truth is a better friend ." The maxim is often attributed to Aristotle, as a paraphrase of the Nicomachean Ethics 1096a11–15.

The sacrifice of the intellect is a concept associated with Christian devotion, and particularly with the Jesuit order.

Fides quaerens intellectum, means "faith seeking understanding" or "faith seeking intelligence", is a Latin sentence by Anselm of Canterbury.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Harrison, Peter (2017). "'I Believe Because it is Absurd': The Enlightenment Invention of Tertullian's Credo". Church History. p. 339–364.
  2. Søes, Peter (2 January 2024). "Credible because it is silly: The Paradox of Tertullian revisited". Studia Theologica - Nordic Journal of Theology. 78 (1): 108–110. doi:10.1080/0039338X.2024.2341613. ISSN   0039-338X.
  3. Vianney Décarie, “Le Paradoxe de Tertullien,” Vigiliae Christianae 15, no. 1 (1961): 23–31
  4. Barnes, Timothy David. Tertullian: A Historical and Literary Study. Oxford University Press, 1985, esp. 210
  5. Robert D. Sider, “Credo quia absurdum?,” Classical World 73, no. 7 (1980): 417–419
  6. Justo L. González, “Athens and Jerusalem Revisited: Reason and Authority in Tertullian,” Church History, 43, no. 1 (1974): 17–25
  7. Guerra, Anthony (1991). "Polemical Christianity: Tertullian's Search for Certitude". The Second Century: A Journal of Early Christian Studies. 8 (2): 109–124.
  8. 1 2 3 Osborn, Eric (2003). Tertullian, First Theologian of the West. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Tertullian, De carne Christi 10, in Evans, Tertullian’s Treatise on the Incarnation, 38: "Et hic itaque causas requiro."
  10. Tertullian, Adversus Marcionem 5.1, in Tertullian: Adversus Marcionem, ed. and trans. Ernest Evans (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972), 509: "Qui nihil interim credam, nisi nihil temere credendum."
  11. 1 Corinthians 1:17–31
  12. Faith, Humor, and Paradox. Greenwood Publishing Group. 30 December 2002. pp. 25–27. ISBN   978-0-275-97895-2.
  13. Aristotle, Rhetoric 2.23, 1400a6–8, in Complete Works of Aristotle, trans. W. Rhys Roberts, ed. Jonathan Barnes (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2), 2:2231
  14. Moffatt, James (1916). "Aristotle and Tertullian". Journal of Theological Studies. 17 (66): 170–171. doi:10.1093/jts/os-XVII.1.170 via tertullian.org.
  15. Pearse, Roger. Witnesses to the Influence of Tertullian. (or, Who had read what?) Link
  16. Beatus Rhenanus, ed., Tertullianus Quintus Septiuius Florens Opera (Basel, 1521)
  17. Louis Giry, trans., De la Chair de Jésus-Christ, et de la Résurrection de la chair, ouvrages de Tertullien (Paris, 1661).
  18. [Voltaire], Le Dîner du comte de Boulainvilliers par Mr. St. Hyacinte (Amsterdam, 1767), 18: “C’est pourtant ce ridicule que St. Augustin a trouvé divin; il disoit, je le crois parce que cela est absurd, je le crois parce que cela est impossible.” (It is, however, this very ridicule that Augustine thought divine. He said: I believe because it is absurd, I believe because it is impossible).
  19. Harrison, Peter. 'I believe because it is absurd': Christianity's first meme. 12 April 2018, Accessed on November 18, 2018.
  20. Blackburn, Simon. Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 1996, 88.
  21. "General Audience of Pope Benedict XVI, November 21, 2012". vatican.va. 21 November 2012. Retrieved 16 September 2024.
  22. Sauvage, George Michael Julius Louis (1909). "Fideism"  . Catholic Encyclopedia . Vol. 6.
  23. Nietzsche, Friedrich (1881). Daybreak. pp. Book IV, Aphorism 417.
  24. Suzuki, D.T. Essays in Zen Buddhism. 1958. Link to book

Further reading