Criminal Procedure Act 1865

Last updated

Criminal Procedure Act 1865 [1]
Act of Parliament
Royal Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (variant 1, 1952-2022).svg
Long title An Act for amending the Law of Evidence and Practice on Criminal Trials.
Citation 28 & 29 Vict. c. 18
Territorial extent  England & Wales, Northern Ireland, Republic of Ireland
Dates
Royal assent 9 May 1865
Other legislation
Amended by
Status: Amended
Text of statute as originally enacted
Text of the Criminal Procedure Act 1865 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk.

The Criminal Procedure Act 1865 (28 & 29 Vict. c. 18), commonly known as Denman's Act, [2] is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

Contents

This act was retained for the Republic of Ireland by section 2(2)(a) of, and Part 4 of schedule 1 to, the Statute Law Revision Act 2007.

In the Republic of Ireland, section 16 of the Criminal Justice Act 2006 is without prejudice to sections 3 to 6 of this act. [3]

Preamble

The preamble was repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act 1893.

Section 1 – Provisions of sect. 2. of this Act to apply to trials commenced on or after July 1, 1865

In England and Wales and Northern Ireland, this section now reads:

The provisions of section two of this Act shall apply to every trial.. . ; and the provisions of sections from three to eight, inclusive, of this Act shall apply to all courts of judicature, as well criminal as all others, and to all persons having, by law or by consent of parties, authority to hear, receive, and examine evidence.

The words omitted were repealed for England and Wales by section 10(2) of, and Part III of Schedule 3 to, the Criminal Law Act 1967 and for Northern Ireland by Part II of Schedule 2 to the Criminal Law Act (Northern Ireland) 1967.

The words "for felony or misdemeanour" were repealed for the Republic of Ireland by section 16 of, and the Third Schedule to, the Criminal Law Act 1997.

Section 2 – Summing up of evidence in cases of felony and misdemeanor

In England and Wales and Northern Ireland, this section now reads:

If any prisoner or prisoners, defendant or defendants, shall be defended by counsel, but not otherwise, it shall be the duty of the presiding judge, at the close of the case for the prosecution, to ask the counsel for each prisoner or defendant so defended by counsel whether he or they intend to adduce evidence; and in the event of none of them thereupon announcing his intention to adduce evidence, the counsel for the prosecution shall be allowed to address the jury a second time in support of his case, for the purpose of summing up the evidence against such prisoner or prisoners, or defendant or defendants; and upon every trial.. ., whether the prisoners or defendants, or any of them, shall be defended by counsel or not, each and every such prisoner or defendant, or his or their counsel respectively, shall be allowed, if he or they shall think fit, to open his or their case or cases respectively; and after the conclusion of such opening or of all such openings, if more than one, such prisoner or prisoners, or defendant or defendants, or their counsel, shall be entitled to examine such witnesses as he or they may think fit, and when all the evidence is concluded to sum up the evidence respectively; and the right of reply, and practice and course of proceedings, save as hereby altered, shall be as at present.

The words omitted were repealed for England and Wales by section 10(2) of, and Part III of Schedule 3 to, the Criminal Law Act 1967 and for Northern Ireland by Part II of Schedule 2 to the Criminal Law Act (Northern Ireland) 1967.

The words "for felony or misdemeanour" were repealed for the Republic of Ireland by section 16 of, and the Third Schedule to, the Criminal Law Act 1997.

This section is modified by section 3 of the Criminal Evidence Act 1898, section 42(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1948 and section 1(1) of the Criminal Procedure (Right of Reply) Act 1964.

In the Republic of Ireland, this section is restricted by section 24(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1984.

"Counsel"

This expression is defined by section 9.

Section 3 – How far witness may be discredited by the party producing

In England and Wales and Northern Ireland, this section reads:

A party producing a witness shall not be allowed to impeach his credit by general evidence of bad character; but he may, in case the witness shall in the opinion of the judge prove adverse, contradict him by other evidence, or, by leave of the judge, prove that he has made at other times a statement inconsistent with his present testimony; but before such last-mentioned proof can be given the circumstances of the supposed statement, sufficient to designate the particular occasion, must be mentioned to the witness, and he must be asked whether or not he has made such statement.

"Adverse"

See Greenough v Eccles (1859) 5 CB (NS) 786, (1859) 33 LT (OS) 19, (1859) 5 Jur (NS) 766 (decided under section 22 of the Common Law Procedure Act 1854).

"Inconsistent"

See Jackson v Thomason (1861) 31 LJQB 11

Section 4 – As to proof of contradictory statements of adverse witness

In England and Wales and Northern Ireland, this section reads:

If a witness, upon cross-examination as to a former statement made by him relative to the subject matter of the indictment or proceeding, and inconsistent with his present testimony, does not distinctly admit that he has made such statement, proof may be given that he did in fact make it; but before such proof can be given the circumstances of the supposed statement, sufficient to designate the particular occasion, must be mentioned to the witness, and he must be asked whether or not he has made such statement. [4]

Sections 4 and 5 re-enact sections 23 and 24 of the Common Law Procedure Act 1854. [2]

Section 5 – Cross-examinations as to previous statements in writing

In England and Wales and Northern Ireland, this section reads:

A witness may be cross-examined as to previous statements made by him in writing, or reduced into writing, relative to the subject matter of the indictment or proceeding, without such writing being shown to him; but if it is intended to contradict such witness by the writing, his attention must, before such contradictory proof can be given, be called to those parts of the writing which are to be used for the purpose of so contradicting him: Provided always, that it shall be competent for the judge, at any time during the trial, to require the production of the writing for his inspection, and he may thereupon make such use of it for the purposes of the trial as he may think fit. [5]

This section is exactly reproduced in the Evidence Ordinance (Laws of Hong Kong c 8) [6]

Section 7 – As to proof by attesting witnesses

This section reads:

It shall not be necessary to prove by the attesting witness any instrument to the validity of which attestation is not requisite, and such instrument may be proved as if there had been no attesting witness thereto. [7]

Section 8 – As to comparison of disputed writing

This section reads:

Comparison of a disputed writing with any writing proved to the satisfaction of the judge to be genuine shall be permitted to be made by witnesses; and such writings, and the evidence of witnesses respecting the same, may be submitted to the court and jury as evidence of the genuineness or otherwise of the writing in dispute.

Section 9 - "Counsel"

This section reads:

The word "counsel" in this Act shall be construed to apply to attorneys in all cases where attorneys are allowed by law or by the practice of any court to appear as advocates.

References to attorneys

In England and Wales, these must be construed as references to solicitors of the Senior Courts. [8]

In Northern Ireland, these must be construed as references to solicitors of the Court of Judicature. [9]

Section 10 – Not to apply to Scotland

This section provides that the act does not apply to Scotland.

See also

Related Research Articles

Perjury is the intentional act of swearing a false oath or falsifying an affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning matters material to an official proceeding.

The right to silence is a legal principle which guarantees any individual the right to refuse to answer questions from law enforcement officers or court officials. It is a legal right recognized, explicitly or by convention, in many of the world's legal systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Offences Against the Person Act 1861</span> UK criminal statute

The Offences against the Person Act 1861 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. It consolidated provisions related to offences against the person from a number of earlier statutes into a single Act. For the most part these provisions were, according to the draftsman of the Act, incorporated with little or no variation in their phraseology. It is one of a group of Acts sometimes referred to as the Criminal Law Consolidation Acts 1861. It was passed with the object of simplifying the law. It is essentially a revised version of an earlier consolidation act, the Offences Against the Person Act 1828, incorporating subsequent statutes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Justice Act 2003</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Justice Act 2003 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is a wide-ranging measure introduced to modernise many areas of the criminal justice system in England and Wales and, to a lesser extent, in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Large portions of the act were repealed and replaced by the Sentencing Act 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Lunatics Act 1800</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Lunatics Act 1800 was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain that required and established a set procedure for the indefinite detention of mentally ill offenders. It was passed through the House of Commons in direct reaction to the trial of James Hadfield, who attempted to assassinate King George III.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Malicious Damage Act 1861</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Malicious Damage Act 1861 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. It consolidated provisions related to malicious damage from a number of earlier statutes into a single Act. For the most part these provisions were, according to the draftsman of the Act, incorporated with little or no variation in their phraseology. It is one of a group of Acts sometimes referred to as the Criminal Law Consolidation Acts 1861. It was passed with the object of simplifying the law. It is essentially a revised version of an earlier consolidation Act, the Malicious Injuries to Property Act 1827, incorporating subsequent statutes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treason Act 1945</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Treason Act 1945 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

Obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception was formerly a statutory offence in England and Wales and Northern Ireland. It was replaced with the more general offence of fraud by the Fraud Act 2006. The offence still subsists in certain other common law jurisdictions which have copied the English criminal model.

Attorney at law or attorney-at-law, usually abbreviated in everyday speech to attorney, is the preferred term for a practising lawyer in certain jurisdictions, including South Africa, Sri Lanka, the Philippines, and the United States. In Canada, it is used only in Quebec as the English term for avocat. The term has its roots in the verb to attorn, meaning to transfer one's rights and obligations to another.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Official Secrets Act 1920</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Official Secrets Act 1920 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forgery Act 1861</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Forgery Act 1861 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. It consolidated provisions related to forgery from a number of earlier statutes into a single Act. For the most part these provisions were, according to the draftsman of the Act, incorporated with little or no variation in their phraseology. It is one of a group of acts sometimes referred to as the Criminal Law Consolidation Acts 1861. It was passed with the object of simplifying the law. It is essentially a revised version of an earlier consolidation act, the Forgery Act 1830, incorporating subsequent statutes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Accessories and Abettors Act 1861</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Accessories and Abettors Act 1861 is a mainly repealed Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. It consolidated statutory English criminal law related to accomplices, including many classes of encouragers (inciters). Mainly its offences were, according to the draftsman of the Act, replacement enactments with little or no variation in phraseology. It is one of a group of Acts sometimes referred to as the Criminal Law Consolidation Acts 1861. It was passed with the object of simplifying the law. It collected the relevant parts of Peel's Acts and others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Libel Act 1843</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Libel Act 1843, commonly known as Lord Campbell's Libel Act, was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It enacted several important codifications of and modifications to the common law tort of libel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Statute of Frauds Amendment Act 1828</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Statute of Frauds Amendment Act 1828, commonly known as Lord Tenterden's Act, was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. Lord Tenterden served as Lord Chief Justice of the King's Bench between 1818 and 1832. Its purpose was for "rendering a written Memorandum necessary to the Validity of certain Promises and Engagements".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Punishment of Offences Act 1837</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Punishment of Offences Act 1837 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. It abolished the death penalty for a number of statutory offences and replaced it with transportation for life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unlawful Drilling Act 1819</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Unlawful Drilling Act 1819, also known as the Training Prevention Act is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It was one of the Six Acts passed after the Peterloo massacre.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Procedure Act 1853</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Procedure Act 1853 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It makes provision for the giving of evidence by prisoners otherwise than at their own trial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1976</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1976 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It made provision in relation to rape and related offences. Except for subsections (1) and (2) and (4) and (6) of section 7, the whole Act is repealed. Section 7(2) now provides the definition of the expression "a rape offence" in relation to court martial proceedings. The other remaining provisions are purely supplemental.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forgery of Foreign Bills Act 1803</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Forgery of Foreign Bills Act 1803 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. Prior to its repeal in 2013, it created offences of forgery of foreign instruments in Scotland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Perjury Act 1911</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Perjury Act 1911 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It creates the offence of perjury and a number of similar offences.

References

  1. The citation of this act by this short title was authorised by section 1 of, and the first schedule to, the Short Titles Act 1896.
  2. 1 2 Archbold Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice. 1999. Paragraph 8-124 at page 1035
  3. The Criminal Justice Act 2006, section 16(6)
  4. "Criminal Procedure Act 1865". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 21 February 2014.
  5. "Criminal Procedure Act 1865". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 21 February 2014.
  6. Lui Mei Lin v R [1989] 1 AC 288, [1989] 2 WLR 175, [1989] 1 All ER 359, 88 Cr App R 296, [1989] Crim LR 364, PC, per Lord Roskill
  7. "Criminal Procedure Act 1865". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 21 February 2014.
  8. The Solicitors Act 1974, section 89(6) as read with section 87(1)
  9. The Judicature (Northern Ireland) Act 1978, section 105(2)