Crowds (adolescence)

Last updated

Crowds are large groups of adolescents defined by their shared image and reputation. [1] Crowd membership is externally imposed and not a direct consequence of interaction with other members of the crowd.

Contents

Definition

Crowds are large groups of adolescents socially connected by a shared image and reputation, [1] especially within the setting of a single school. It is possible for a single person to belong to more than one crowd if their image matches the crowds’ criteria. [1] [2] Because membership in a crowd depends on peers' perceptions, crowds in any given peer group will correspond to the local preconceived "types" of adolescents. Specific stereotypes vary from place to place, but many remain consistent, based on peer status, socioeconomic status, residential area, activities, social characteristics, or a combination of attributes (jocks, nerds, populars, and druggies are among the most commonly observed). [3] [4] [5] Crowds are very different from cliques: while cliques are relatively small, close-knit groups based on frequent interaction and collectively determined membership, members of a crowd may not even know each other. Crowd membership reflects external assessments and expectations, providing a social context for identity exploration and self-definition as adolescents internalize or reject their crowd identities.

Because crowd membership is initially outwardly imposed, it is possible for an adolescent's peers to classify them as belonging to a crowd they may not consider themselves part of. [6] Members of some crowds are more aware of and comfortable with their crowd designation than others; members of stigmatized or low-status groups, in particular, may resist or deny their undesirable categorization. [6] Usually, however, adolescents embrace their crowd affiliation, using it to define themselves and advertise where they fit in their peer group's social structure. [7] [8]

Crowds and identity development

Crowds serve an essential purpose in adolescent identity development, shaping individual values, behavior, and personal and peer expectations. "[One's group] is often tantamount to one's own provisional identity;" [9] the individual defines herself by the crowd she sees herself fitting into. Different crowds expose the individual to different norms. These norms encourage adolescents to interact with some people while avoiding others and reward certain behaviors while discouraging others, a process of normative social influence. [8] [9] [10] [11] For example, a member of a "preppy" crowd might be rewarded for dressing in a fashion for which a member of an "emo" crowd would be teased, and vice versa.

Crowd effects on norms of interaction:

Often crowds reinforce the behaviors that originally caused an individual to be labeled part of that crowd, which can positively or negatively influence the individual (toward academic achievement or drug use, for example). These pressures are often linked to the stereotypes members of crowds hold about themselves and members of other crowds: unity by denigration of the outgroup (see social identity theory). [9]

Racial crowds and sub-crowds

Adolescents' perception of crowd differences may depend on how closely related the adolescent observer is to a particular crowd. The basic, recurring crowd divisions (jocks, geeks, partiers) have been most often studied in predominantly white high schools, but they also exist for minority students. [14] In multiracial schools, students seem to divide along ethnic lines first, then into these archetypical crowds within their own ethnicity. However, one ethnic group may not notice the further divisions in other ethnic groups after the first, race-based split. [14] For instance, black students see themselves as divided into jocks, geeks, emos, stoners, popular kids, and so on, but white students may see them as just one crowd defined solely by ethnicity, "the black kids." Sometimes crowd membership transcends race, however, and adolescents are classified as "jocks" or "geeks" regardless of race. [15] [16] This seems to vary and depend heavily on the context of the individual school.

Stereotypes, stigma, and cross-crowd friendships

While crowds are structured around prototypical caricatures of their members, real adolescents rarely match these extremes. Furthermore, not all adolescents agree on the characteristics typical of a stereotype. [9] In other words, regular manifestation of just a few central characteristics of a crowd is a sufficient basis for classification as a member of that crowd. Thus, not all "jocks" neglect their schoolwork, though that is part of the typical jock stereotype, and a person interested in fashion could still be considered a "geek."

Often a crowd is stigmatized by one or more other crowds. This can affect adolescents' willingness to associate with members of that crowd, or even other crowds similar to it. For example, people may avoid being seen as a "brain," a middle-status crowd, because of the similarity between brains and "nerds," a lower-status crowd. [8]

Shared interests form the basis of many friendships, so often adolescents are drawn to members of their own crowds, [9] especially if their crowd is defined by activities rather than more superficial characteristics such as race or socioeconomic status. However, interests can be shared across crowd divisions. Accordingly, while an adolescent's closest friends are almost always part of the same clique (i.e., they interact frequently within the same small friend group), they are not always part of the same crowd, especially if multiple crowds have similar lifestyles. [9] [17]

Crowd-hopping

Further emphasizing the flexible nature of crowd membership, some adolescents are not stably linked to one specific crowd—some individuals are associated with multiple crowds, while others are not stably linked to any crowds and "float" among several. These appear more closely attached to individuals outside the peer group (family, dropout friends, friends from a non-school organization, etc.). Others may consciously work to change crowd affiliations to express different interests or achieve a change in social status. [6] The crowd with which an adolescent desires to be identified is far less stable than the personal attributes by which the adolescent is likely to be categorized by peers. [6] Accordingly, adolescents who change crowd membership (a process known as "crowd-hopping") tend to have lower self-esteem, perhaps because they have not yet found an environment and peer group that supports them. It is likely that they continue changing crowd membership until they find a fulfilling niche. [6]

The rise of crowds

Crowds first emerge in middle or junior high school, when children transition from stable, self-contained classroom peer groups into larger schools, where they interact with a more varied body of peers with less adult guidance. Crowds emerge to group students by caricature and structure interactions between students of each type. [9] Early crowds are often based on social status, especially among girls, with a small group of well-known children being "popular" and the rest "unpopular." To maintain their own status, popular girls will avoid the overtures of less-popular children, which actually makes them disliked. [12] Many children stop attempting to gain entry into the popular crowd and make friends with other children instead, giving rise to new crowds. [9]

The stereotypes on which crowd definitions are based change over time as adolescents shift from grouping people by abstract characteristics rather than activities ("geeks" rather than "the kids who read a lot"). With age, adolescents become more conscious of crowd divisions and the social hierarchy. [1] Distinctions between crowds also become more nuanced, developing from simple popular/unpopular dichotomies to less hierarchical structures in which there are more than two levels of social acceptability, often with several crowds at each level. [18] [19] As seen in cross-crowd friendships, some crowds interact with each other more readily than others. [9] This transition to a more fluid social structure allows adolescents to change their status over time by changing crowds, remaining in a crowd that undergoes a change in status, or gaining the confidence and perspective to reject the assumptions of the social hierarchy. [9] [18] Willingness to do so reflects a growing sense of personal identity distinct from crowd membership.

The decline of crowds

Adolescents’ attitudes toward crowds change over time—while ninth-graders are willing to discriminate against members of other crowds, twelfth-graders are less likely to do so. [19] Adolescents also develop more multifaceted self-concepts and reject crowd labels as simplistic attempts to describe an entire personality. [9] Across the high school years, crowd significance as a basis for affiliation wanes, [19] as does the influence of crowds on an individual's behavior. [1] In fact, some studies [20] indicate that the importance of crowds peaks at age 12 or 13. By the end of high school, adolescents often feel constrained by impersonal, crowd-derived identities. [21] This, combined with the splintering off of romantic couples from the rest of the crowd, [22] may account for the decline of crowd significance over time.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Socialization</span> Lifelong process of inheriting and disseminating norms, customs and ideologies

In sociology, socialization or socialisation is the process of internalizing the norms and ideologies of society. Socialization encompasses both learning and teaching and is thus "the means by which social and cultural continuity are attained".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adolescence</span> Human transition from puberty to adult

Adolescence is a transitional stage of physical and psychological development that generally occurs during the period from puberty to adulthood. Adolescence is usually associated with the teenage years, but its physical, psychological or cultural expressions may begin earlier or end later. Puberty now typically begins during preadolescence, particularly in females. Physical growth and cognitive development can extend past the teens. Age provides only a rough marker of adolescence, and scholars have not agreed upon a precise definition. Some definitions start as early as 10 and end as late as 25 or 26. The World Health Organization definition officially designates an adolescent as someone between the ages of 10 and 19.

Peer pressure is the direct or indirect influence on peers, i.e., members of social groups with similar interests, experiences, or social statuses. Members of a peer group are more likely to influence a person's beliefs, values, and behavior. A group or individual may be encouraged and want to follow their peers by changing their attitudes, values or behaviors to conform to those of the influencing group or individual. For the individual affected by peer pressure, this can have both a positive or negative influence on them.

Group dynamics is a system of behaviors and psychological processes occurring within a social group, or between social groups. The study of group dynamics can be useful in understanding decision-making behaviour, tracking the spread of diseases in society, creating effective therapy techniques, and following the emergence and popularity of new ideas and technologies. These applications of the field are studied in psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science, epidemiology, education, social work, leadership studies, business and managerial studies, as well as communication studies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social group</span> Two or more humans who interact with one another

In the social sciences, a social group is defined as two or more people who interact with one another, share similar characteristics, and collectively have a sense of unity. Regardless, social groups come in a myriad of sizes and varieties. For example, a society can be viewed as a large social group. The system of behaviors and psychological processes occurring within a social group or between social groups is known as group dynamics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Youth culture</span> Norms, values, practices and shared symbolic systems of children, adolescents and young adults

Youth culture refers to the societal norms of children, adolescents, and young adults. Specifically, it comprises the processes and symbolic systems that are shared by the youth and are distinct from those of adults in the community.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peer group</span> Primary group of people with similar interests, age, background, or social status

In sociology, a peer group is both a social group and a primary group of people who have similar interests (homophily), age, background, or social status. The members of this group are likely to influence the person's beliefs and behaviour.

In the psychology of self, one's self-concept is a collection of beliefs about oneself. Generally, self-concept embodies the answer to the question "Who am I?".

Adolescent cliques are cliques that develop amongst adolescents. In the social sciences, the word "clique" is used to describe a group of 2 to 12 "who interact with each other more regularly and intensely than others in the same setting". Cliques are distinguished from "crowds" in that their members socially interact with one another more than the typical crowd. Crowds, on the other hand, are defined by reputation. Although the word 'clique' or 'cliquey' is often used in day-to-day conversation to describe relational aggression or snarky, gossipy behaviors of groups of socially dominant teenage girls, that is not always accurate. Interacting with cliques is part of normative social development regardless of gender, ethnicity, or popularity. Although cliques are most commonly studied during adolescence, they exist in all age groups.

Relational aggression, alternative aggression, or relational bullying is a type of aggression in which harm is caused by damaging someone's relationships or social status.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Youth subculture</span> Subcultures associated with young people

Youth subculture is a youth-based subculture with distinct styles, behaviors, and interests. Youth subcultures offer participants an identity outside of that ascribed by social institutions such as family, work, home and school. Youth subcultures that show a systematic hostility to the dominant culture are sometimes described as countercultures.

Identity formation, also called identity development or identity construction, is a complex process in which humans develop a clear and unique view of themselves and of their identity.

Belongingness is the human emotional need to be an accepted member of a group. Whether it is family, friends, co-workers, a religion, or something else, some people tend to have an 'inherent' desire to belong and be an important part of something greater than themselves. This implies a relationship that is greater than simple acquaintance or familiarity.

Unpopularity is the opposite of popularity. Therefore, it is the quality of lacking acceptance or approval by one's peers or society as a whole.

Religious identity is a specific type of identity formation. Particularly, it is the sense of group membership to a religion and the importance of this group membership as it pertains to one's self-concept. Religious identity is not necessarily the same as religiousness or religiosity. Although these three terms share a commonality, religiousness and religiosity refer to both the value of religious group membership as well as participation in religious events. Religious identity, on the other hand, refers specifically to religious group membership regardless of religious activity or participation.

A clique, in the social sciences, is a group of individuals who interact with one another and share similar interests. Interacting with cliques is part of normative social development regardless of gender, ethnicity, or popularity. Although cliques are most commonly studied during adolescence and middle childhood development, they exist in all age groups. They are often bound together by shared social characteristics such as ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Examples of common or stereotypical adolescent cliques include athletes, nerds, and "outsiders".

The elaboration principle is when "non-group" members form relationships with an "in-group" member and later are incorporated into the existing "in-group."

Peer contagion refers to the "mutual influence that occurs between an individual and a peer", and "includes behaviors and emotions that potentially undermine one's own development or cause harm to others". Peer contagion refers to the transmission or transfer of deviant behavior from one adolescent to another. It can take many forms, including aggression, bullying, weapon carrying, disordered eating, drug use, gender dysphoria, and depression. It can happen in natural settings where peer dealings occur as well as in intervention and education programs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Child Identity</span>

Child Identity is not only a psychological structure, but also a complex subject of contemporary humanitarian science. Identity formation is a complex process that is never completed. When we research the problems of identity we want to answer questions 'Who we are?', 'Do we choose our identity?', 'Is identity given to us or do we create our own?', etc. In a world of change, children are faced with many questions and struggles as they sort out their multiple identities. Children begin to ask identity questions at an early age. Who am I? Who is my family? Where do I belong? Why does my family celebrate some holidays and not others? These are all standard questions children ask to determine how they fit into their world.

Social emotional development represents a specific domain of child development. It is a gradual, integrative process through which children acquire the capacity to understand, experience, express, and manage emotions and to develop meaningful relationships with others. As such, social emotional development encompasses a large range of skills and constructs, including, but not limited to: self-awareness, joint attention, play, theory of mind, self-esteem, emotion regulation, friendships, and identity development.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Brown, B. (2004). Adolescents’ relationships with peers. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), ‘’Handbook of adolescent psychology.’’ New York: Wiley.
  2. ↑ Mory, M. (1994, February). "When people form or perceive sets, they tend to be fuzzy: The case of adolescent crowds." Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Diego.
  3. ↑ Arnett, J. J. (2002). "Adolescents in Western countries on the threshold of the 21st century." In B. Brown, R. Larson, & T. Saraswathi (eds.), The World's Youth: Adolescence in Eight Regions of the Globe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  4. ↑ Delsing, M. J. M. H., ter Bogt, Tom F. M., Engles, R. C. M. E., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2007). "Adolescents' peer crowd identification in the Netherlands: Structure and associations with problem behaviors." Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 467–480.
  5. ↑ Brown, B., & Klute, C. (2002). "Friendships, cliques, and crowds." In G. R. Adams & M. Berzonsky (eds.), Blackwell Handbook on Adolescence. New York: Blackwell Publishers.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Brown, B., Freeman, H., Huang, B., & Mounts, N. (1992, March). "'Crowd hopping': Incidence, correlates and consequences of change in crowd affiliation during adolescence." Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Washington, DC.
  7. ↑ Newman, B., & Newman, P. (2001). "Group identity and alienation: Giving the we its due." Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 515–538.
  8. 1 2 3 Brown, B.B., Lohr, M. J., & Trujillo, C. M. (1990). "Multiple crowds and multiple lifestyles: Adolescents' perceptions of peer group characteristics." In R. E. Muss (ed.), Adolescent Behavior and Society: A Book of Readings (pp. 30–36). New York: Random House.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Brown, B., Mory, M., & Kinney, D. (1994). "Casting crowds in a relational perspective: Caricature, channel, and context." In R. Montemayor, G. Adams, & T. Gullotta (eds.), Advances in Adolescent Development: Vol. 5. Personal Relationships During Adolescence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  10. ↑ Brown, B., Dolcini, M., & Leventhal, A. (1995, March). The Emergence of Peer Crowds: Friend or Foe to Adolescent Health? Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Washington, DC.
  11. ↑ Brown, B., & Larson, J. (2009). "Peer relationships in adolescence." In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of Adolescent Psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 74–103). New York: Wiley.
  12. 1 2 Eder, D. (1985). "The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents." Sociology of Education, 58, 154–165.
  13. 1 2 Lesko, N. (1988). Symbolizing Society: Stories, Rites, and Structures in a Catholic High School. Philadelphia: Falmer.
  14. 1 2 Brown, B., & Mounts, N. (1989, April). "Peer group structures in single versus multiethnic high schools." Paper presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City.
  15. ↑ Horvat, E. M., & Lewis, K. S. (2003). "Reassessing the 'burden of 'acting White'': The importance of peer group in managing academic success." Sociology of Education, 76, 265–280.
  16. ↑ Tyson, D., Darity, W., & Castellino, D. R. (2005). "It's not 'a Black thing.' Understanding the burden of acting White and other dilemmas of high achievement." American Sociological Review, 70, 582–605.
  17. ↑ Urberg, K., Degirmencioglu, S., Tolson, J., & Halliday-Scher, K. (1995). "The structure of adolescent peer networks." Developmental Psychology, 31, 540–547.
  18. 1 2 Kinney, D. (1993). "From nerds to normals: The recovery of identity among adolescents from middle school to high school." Sociology of Education, 66, 21–40.
  19. 1 2 3 Horn, S. S. (2003). Adolescents’ reasoning about exclusion from social groups. ‘’Developmental Psychology, 39’’ 363-371.
  20. ↑ Brown, B. B., Eicher, S. A., & Petrie, S. D. (1986). The importance of peer group ("crowd") affiliation in adolescence. ‘’Journal of Adolescence, 9,’’ 73-96.
  21. ↑ Larkin, R. W. (1979). ‘’Suburban youth in cultural crisis.’’ New York: Oxford.
  22. ↑ Kuttler, A. F., & La Greca, A. M. (2004). Linkages among adolescent girls’ romantic relationships, best friendships, and peer networks. ‘’Journal of Adolescence, 27,’’ 395-414.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.