In the electric power industry, curtailment is an involuntary reduction of the electric generator output ("dispatch down") made to maintain the grid stability (for example, for the grid balancing). While curtailment is a standard technique that had been applied throughout the history of electric power production, in the 21st century it became an economic issue for the owners of wind and solar generators. These variable renewable energy plants, due to the absence of an expendable resource (like fuel), have quite low marginal cost of the electricity production, so curtailment affects the economics of the project in a much more significant way than in the case of conventional units. [1]
Curtailment is a loss of potentially useful energy, and may impact power purchase agreements. [2] [3] However, using all available energy may require costly methods such as building new power lines or storage, becoming more expensive than letting surplus power go unused. [4] [5] [6] [7]
After ERCOT built a new transmission line from the Competitive Renewable Energy Zone in West Texas to the central cities in the Texas Interconnection in 2013, curtailment was reduced from 8-16% to near zero. [8]
Curtailment of wind power in western China was around 20% in 2018. [9]
In 2018, curtailment in the California grid was 460 GWh, or 0.2% of generation. [10] Curtailment has since increased [4] [11] to 150-300 GWh/month in spring of 2020 and 2021, [12] [13] mainly solar power at noon as part of the duck curve. [14]
In Hawaii, curtailment reached 20% on the island of Maui in Hawaii in the second and third quarters of 2020. [15]
In Ireland, 1.2 TWh of wind power was curtailed in 2022. [16] In United Kingdom, 1.35 TWh of wind power was curtailed in early 2023. [17] In Australia, 4.5 TWh of solar and wind power was curtailed in 2024. [18]
From October 2022 to September 2024, 2.9% of solar power in Spain was curtailed. [19]
PG&E will effectively shut down projects during public safety power shutoff (PSPS) events, and then not pay the developer for the lost production
In most cases, it simply does not make economic sense to build all the infrastructure (e.g. transmission lines or energy storage) that would be required to utilize every last drop of renewable electricity
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)the cumulative annual load profile by hour of LDV fleets using its fast charging network — with rideshare vehicles currently making up the lion's share on a gigawatt-hour basis — aligns with the cumulative solar curtailment by hour on the CAISO system
load migration within the existing data center capacity during the curtailment hours in CAISO has the potential to reduce 113–239 KtCO 2e per year of GHG emissions and absorb up to 62% of the total curtailment with negative abatement costs in 2019