Dairying and Clean Streams Accord

Last updated

The Dairying and Clean Streams Accord is an agreement signed in 2003 in New Zealand between Fonterra, Ministry for the Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and regional councils. The Accord was prompted by the high-profile "dirty dairying" campaign by Fish and Game New Zealand which highlighted water pollution of lakes, rivers and streams due to the intensification of dairy farming in parts of New Zealand. [1]

Contents

In 2014 the Dairying and Clean Streams Accord was succeeded by the Sustainable Dairying: Water Accord. [2]

Purpose

The stated purpose of the accord is to provide "a statement of intent and framework for actions to promote sustainable dairy farming in New Zealand. It focuses on reducing the impacts of dairying on the quality of New Zealand streams, rivers, lakes, ground water and wetlands." [3] The goal is to ensure that water is suitable for fish, drinking by stock and swimming (in designated areas).

Politically the accord was intended to prevent further regulation of the dairy industry following Fish and Game New Zealand’s dirty dairying campaign begun in 2003. [4]

The performance targets are: [3]

Progress

Progress reports on achieving the performance targets are prepared annually. The 2006-2007 report, released in February 2008, notes 83% compliance for the target of excluding cattle from waterways, 97% for bridging waterways, 93% for correct dairy farm effluent treatment and a 64-97% for preventing nutrient losses. [5] The integrity of this data was later questioned when a 2012 independent report commissioned by MAF indicated that while Fonterra’s survey of farmers suggests that nationally 84% of properties have stock excluded from waterways, an independent audit by the Ministry of Primary Industries revealed a position that only 42% of farms nationally had stock exclusion. [6] A scientist at the University of Waikato described the 2006/2007 report as self-congratulatory and accused the Government of a lack of leadership. [7]

Almost ten years later, a 2018 report from Forest and Bird found that regional councils had 425 reported cases of serious non-compliance in 2016-17, and this was likely a significant under-reporting. [8]

Criticism

In December 2002, the farming lobby group, Federated Farmers, initially opposed the accord since they considered that Fonterra was going beyond their brief and they had not consulted farmers. [9] However, since then, the Dairy and Clean Stream Accord has become "the cornerstone of dairying's defences against accusations it's doing nothing to protect the environment". [10]

In a report jointly released by Fish and Game New Zealand and Forest and Bird the Accord is criticised for failing to improve water quality. [11] The main reason given for this is that the Accord does not focus on measurable improvements in water quality. Other faults mentioned in the report are; a lack of independent auditing of the self-reporting by farmers, a failure to meet the principal targets, inconsistency in reporting progress, and the use of incorrect measures in the progress reports. A Federated Farmers review was critical of the report and claimed it was poorly constructed, was written as a campaign tool, made unfounded suppositions and contained "leaps in logic". [12] The review, written by Federated Farmers including a staff member who has a diploma in communications and public relations, could be open to criticism. [13]

The 2008/2009 report, released in March 2010, was criticised by Fonterra, Federated Farmers and the Minister of Agriculture David Carter saying that it revealed unacceptable levels of effluent management. [14]

In June 2010, an editorial in the Dominion Post argued that the self-regulated approach of the Clean Streams Accord was not working and that the Minister for the Environment Nick Smith must enact more effective measures such as rules, as there are some farmers who regard “environmental standards as an inconvenience in the pursuit of higher production and higher profits”. [15]

See also

Related Research Articles

Fonterra New Zealand multinational dairy co-operative

Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited is a New Zealand multinational publicly traded dairy co-operative owned by around 10,500 New Zealand farmers. The company is responsible for approximately 30% of the world's dairy exports and with revenue exceeding NZ$17.2 billion, is New Zealand's largest company.

This is a timeline of environmental history of New Zealand. It includes notable events affecting the natural environment of New Zealand as a result of human activity.

Central Plains Water

Central Plains Water, or, more fully, the Central Plains Water Enhancement Scheme, is a large-scale proposal for water diversion, damming, reticulation and irrigation for the Central Plains of Canterbury, New Zealand. Construction started on the scheme in 2014.

Fish & Game New Zealand is the collective brand name of 12 regional fish and game councils and the New Zealand Fish and Game Council which administer sports fishing and gamebird resources in New Zealand. Fish and game councils are regionally autonomous bodies governed by elected fish and game councillors, who are elected every three years by adult full season license-holders across the respective region. The New Zealand Fish and Game Council is made up of one representative from each of the regional councils. Councils employ managers and staff, and the New Zealand Fish and Game Council employs a director; the role is currently held by Bryce Johnson.

1080 usage in New Zealand

1080, the brand name given to the synthetic form of sodium fluoroacetate, is used in New Zealand in efforts to control populations of possums, rats, stoat and rabbits, which are invasive species in the New Zealand environment. Although the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment deemed the use of 1080 in New Zealand "effective and safe" in a 2011 re-evaluation and the substance is widely considered to be the most effective tool currently available for controlling possums over large areas, it remains a contentious issue, with the majority of the debate occurring between conservationists and livestock farmers on one side and hunters and animal-rights activists on the other.

Environment of New Zealand

The environment of New Zealand is characterised by an endemic flora and fauna which has evolved in near isolation from the rest of the world. The main islands of New Zealand span two biomes, temperate and subtropical ,complicated by large mountainous areas above the tree line. There are also numerous smaller islands which extend into the subantarctic. The prevailing weather systems bring significantly more rain to the west of the country. New Zealand's territorial waters cover a much larger area than its landmass and extend over the continental shelf and abyssal plateau in the South Pacific Ocean, Tasman Sea and Southern ocean.

In New Zealand "dirty dairying" refers to damage to the ecological health of New Zealand's freshwater environment by the intensification of dairy farming, and also to the high profile campaign begun in 2002 by the Fish and Game Council to highlight and combat this.

Fishing industry in New Zealand

As with other countries, New Zealand’s 200 nautical miles exclusive economic zone gives its fishing industry special fishing rights. It covers 4.1 million square kilometres. This is the sixth largest zone in the world, and is fourteen times the land area of New Zealand.

Agriculture in New Zealand Overview of agriculture in New Zealand

In New Zealand, agriculture is the largest sector of the tradable economy. The country exported NZ$46.4 billion worth of agricultural products in the 12 months to June 2019, 79.6% of the country's total exported goods. The agriculture, forestry and fisheries sector directly contributed $12.653 billion of the national GDP in the 12 months to September 2020, and employed 143,000 people, 5.9% of New Zealand's workforce, as of the 2018 census.

Dairy farming in New Zealand

Dairy farming in New Zealand began from small beginnings during the early days of colonisation by Europeans. The New Zealand dairy industry is based almost exclusively on cattle, with a population of 4.92 million milking cows in the 2019-20 season. The income from dairy farming is now a major part of the New Zealand economy, becoming an NZ$13.4 billion industry by 2017.

Water pollution in New Zealand Overview of the water pollution in New Zealand

Water pollution in New Zealand is an increasing concern for those who use and care for waterways and for New Zealand regulatory bodies. An increase in population is linked to an increase in water pollution, due to a range of causes such as rural land use, industrial use and urban development. Fresh water quality is under pressure from agriculture, hydropower, urban development, pest invasions and climate change. While pollution from point sources has been reduced, diffuse pollution such as nutrients, pathogens and sediments development and from stormwater in towns is not under control. There are more than 800 water quality monitoring sites around New Zealand that are regularly sampled.

CraFarms is a group of companies of which Allan, Beth and Frank Crafar were Directors. Crafar Farms was New Zealand's largest family-owned dairy business. The family business owned 22 dry stock and dairy farms with approximately 20,000 cows in various regions of the North Island, and was put into receivership in October 2009. Crafar Farms was involved in multiple prosecutions for pollution offences and incidents of poor animal welfare from 2007 to 2011.

Pollution in New Zealand Overview of pollution in New Zealand

Pollution is an environmental issue in New Zealand with a number of measures being taken to reduce its severity. New Zealand is sometimes viewed as being "clean and green" but this can be refuted due to pollution levels, among other factors. New Zealand does have a relatively low air pollution level, but some areas have high levels of plastic pollution.

Water pollution in Canterbury, New Zealand Overview of the water pollution in Canterbury, New Zealand

Water pollution in Canterbury, New Zealand has become a major environmental issue, largely due to pollution from agricultural sources, but also industrial and urban sources.

Water pollution in the West Coast, New Zealand Overview of the water pollution in the West Coast, New Zealand

Water pollution is an environmental issue on the West Coast of New Zealand. Water resources and water pollution come under the jurisdiction of the Resource Management Act and is controlled by the regional councils - for the West Coast it is the West Coast Regional Council.

Water in New Zealand Water supply and distribution in New Zealand

Water is relatively abundant in New Zealand due to the temperate climate and maritime weather patterns. In recent years, water pollution and draw-down of aquifers have become important environmental issues in New Zealand.

This is a list of notable events relating to the environment in 2003. They relate to environmental law, conservation, environmentalism and environmental issues.

Water quality in Taranaki is a notable environmental issue for many stakeholders with concerns about the potential impact from dairy farming in New Zealand and petrochemical industries.

Mike Joy (freshwater ecologist) New Zealand ecologist

Mike Joy is a New Zealand freshwater ecologist and science communicator. He is currently employed at the Institute for Governance and Policy Studies at Victoria University of Wellington.

The Sustainable Dairying: Water Accord is a voluntary agreement signed by leading participants of New Zealand's dairy industry in 2014. It serves as a successor to the 2003 Dairying and Clean Streams Accord.

References

  1. ↑ "A Monitoring and Reporting Strategy for the Dairying and Clean Streams Accord". Ministry for the Environment. April 2006. Archived from the original on 5 August 2012. Retrieved 17 September 2008.
  2. ↑ http://www.dairynz.co.nz/media/3286407/sustainable-dairying-water-accord-2015.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  3. 1 2 "Dairying and Clean Streams Accord" (PDF). 26 May 2003. Retrieved 12 March 2008.
  4. ↑ Swann, Alan (13 March 2009). "Fonterra's five biggest challenges: Part V – "Dirty Dairying"". The National Business Review. Archived from the original on 1 June 2010. Retrieved 3 August 2012. The accord was basically designed to pre-empt industry regulation following Fish and Game New Zealand’s Dirty Dairying campaign of the early 2000s
  5. ↑ "The Dairying and Clean Streams Accord: Snapshot of progress – 2006/2007" (PDF). February 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 October 2008. Retrieved 13 March 2008.
  6. ↑ "Fonterra must explain self-reporting inaccuracy | Scoop News".
  7. ↑ "Professor slams environmental performance report". Scoop. 28 February 2008. Retrieved 13 March 2008.
  8. ↑ "Major report highlights failure of councils to protect environment from dairying". Forest and Bird. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
  9. ↑ Pickering, Sid (23 December 2002). "Lobby group remains opposed to clean streams accord". Waikato Times.
  10. ↑ White, M. 2007. Fat Cows and Filthy Streams, North & South magazine, November 2007, pages 52-63. ACP Media Ltd, Albany, North Shore. Download from Fish and Game Archived 2008-10-15 at the Wayback Machine
  11. ↑ Deans, Neil; Kevin Hackwell (October 2008). "Dairying and Declining Water Quality" (PDF). Fish & Game New Zealand, Forest & Bird. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 October 2008. Retrieved 2 October 2008.
  12. ↑ Jessen, Melissa; Harcombe, Matt (2008). "Peer Review" (PDF). Federated Farmers. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 September 2011.
  13. ↑ Morgan, Jon (10 November 2008). "Review critical of pollution report". The Press.
  14. ↑ Watt, Emily (19 March 2010). "Minister turns hose on dirty dairying". Dominion Post. Retrieved 24 April 2010.
  15. ↑ Editorial (19 June 2010). "Smith must act to stop rivers turning into drains". The Dominion Post. Fairfax Media NZ Ltd. Retrieved 19 June 2010.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.