Water pollution in New Zealand

Last updated

A sign warning of water pollution on the Waimakariri River, 2004 Water pollution sign on the Waimakariri River.JPG
A sign warning of water pollution on the Waimakariri River, 2004

Water pollution in New Zealand is an increasing concern for those who use and care for waterways and for New Zealand regulatory bodies. [1] An increase in population is linked to an increase in water pollution, due to a range of causes such as rural land use, industrial use and urban development. [2] Fresh water quality is under pressure from agriculture, hydropower, urban development, pest invasions and climate change. [3] While pollution from point sources has been reduced, diffuse pollution such as nutrients, pathogens and sediments development and from stormwater in towns is not under control. There are more than 800 water quality monitoring sites around New Zealand that are regularly sampled. [4]

Contents

As of January 2019, Auckland is the region with New Zealand's most polluted waterways, with 62% of rivers and lakes graded poor by the Ministry for the Environment for swimming, and 0% of rivers and lakes graded as good. [5]

In 2018, waterways across New Zealand have been showing improvements across a number of water quality measures, as monitored by LAWA data. [6]

Negative Impacts of Water Pollution In New Zealand

Water pollution in New Zealand has several negative impacts on the environment, economy, and public health. Some of these impacts include:

  1. Ecological Damage: Pollutants from agriculture, urban runoff, and industrial discharges degrade water quality in rivers, lakes, and coastal areas. This pollution harms aquatic ecosystems, leading to reduced biodiversity, fish kills, and disruption of food chains.
  2. Health Risks: Contaminated water sources pose risks to human health through the consumption of polluted water or consumption of contaminated seafood. Waterborne diseases such as giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis can result from microbial contamination.
  3. Economic Costs: Water pollution affects industries such as fisheries and tourism, which rely on clean water and healthy ecosystems. The economic impact includes costs for water treatment, loss of recreational opportunities, and damage to the tourism industry's reputation.
  4. Cultural Impacts: For indigenous Māori communities, water pollution affects their cultural practices and traditional uses of water bodies, impacting cultural identity and wellbeing. [7]

Water quality guidelines

Guideline standards for water quality are published by MfE. [8]

e.coli / 100ml
< 130no calculated risk level
131–260above NCRL
261–550substantial elevation of Campylobactor infection
> 550above level of significant risk of infection

Water pollution by sector

Agriculture

Agriculture is a major use of lowland areas of New Zealand and has affected water quality. The expansion of intensive dairy production has resulted in greater levels of nitrogen in soil, surface and groundwater. [9]

In 1993, the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research summarised available data on the quality of water in rivers. They concluded that "Some lowland river reaches in agriculturally developed catchments are in poor condition" reflecting "agriculturally derived diffuse and point source waste inputs in isolation or in addition to urban or industrial waste inputs". The key contaminants identified in lowland rivers were dissolved inorganic nitrogen, dissolved reactive phosphorus, sediment and coliforms. Small streams in some dairy farming areas such as the Waikato and Canterbury were identified as being in relatively poor condition. [10]

Sediment from erosion of hills and river banks is also a source of pollution of waters. The sediments loading from high intensity, increasing frequency storm and high rainfall events has led to millions of tonnes of sediment changing fluvial systems in NZ waterways. This sediment contains high organic contents from forest litter which is changing sedimentation patterns and increasing organic bed loads and deposition in NZ lakes and shallow coastal waters.

Since 2005 increased dairy farming rates of grazing animals have outstripped riparian planting and the ability of some Regional Councils to manage and mitigate impacts on the quality of water, and there is some evidence of urea use leading to nitrogen levels in waterways. Horticulture, arable farming and plantation forestry generally have less effect than dairy farming. [4]

In 2001 Fish and Game New Zealand started the high-profile dirty dairying campaign to highlight the effect of pollution from farming intensification on the ecological health of freshwater environments. As a reaction to this campaign Fonterra, the largest dairy company in New Zealand, along with a number of government agencies instigated the Dairying and Clean Streams Accord to address water pollution due to dairy farming. The aim of the Accord is to limit the access of stock to waterways. Fonterra exports the majority of its produce, and encourages farmers to limit environmental impacts as a method of getting environmentally aware consumers to purchase their products. The increase in research into sustainable farming and reducing fertilizer use, increasing the planting of native shrubs, grasses, flaxes and trees along the margins of streams. These techniques help intercept run off of manure, sediments and fertilizer and use them to enhance growth of the planted zones.

Fencing off streams and riparian planting has been shown to improve water quality, though this is more effective at reducing pollution from surface runoff (such as from phosphorus) rather than contaminants such as nitrogen which reach the waterway by seeping through the soil. [11] [12] Fencing prevent stock from depositing feces directly into waterways and trampling the banks; planting reduces surface runoff. One study of fencing a waterway on a deer farm reduced contaminants, including the indicator bacterium E. coli , by 55–84%, but nitrate concentrations doubled, and suspended sediment was increased from animals creating tracks along the fences. [13]

Over the past decade, regional councils have increasing imposed more regulatory requirements on farmers to reduce their environmental impacts. A number of councils - including Environment Canterbury, Horizons Regional Council and Hawke's Bay Regional Council require most farms to have Farm Environment Plans in place, with some farms in Otago and Waikato also required to have Farm Environment Plans in place. The plans require farmers to manage environmental risks around activities such as farm dairy effluent, erosion, discharges into waterways (through planting and fencing intensively stocked areas), irrigation and the application of nutrients. Some councils have also imposed nutrient limits on farmers.

In 2016, a controversial video by Greenpeace highlighted the contribution of dairy farming to river pollution, stating that over 60 percent of monitored rivers are unsafe to swim in. [14] This video advertisement was appealed by DairyNZ, but the Advertising Standards Authority found in favour of Greenpeace. [15]

The changes to introduce stricter environmental controls on farmers have been cited as contributing to recent trends showing waterway improvements by Horizons Regional Council and Environment Canterbury. [16] [17] They have also been cited as contributing to analysis completed by the Cawthorne Institute showing waterway quality is now improving for many water quality measures based on an analysis of LAWA sites. [18]

Domestic

Surface water drain cover in Rotorua showing advisory fish symbol Surface water drain in Rotorua.jpg
Surface water drain cover in Rotorua showing advisory fish symbol

Urban runoff is polluted with detergents, waste oil, litter and fecal matter. Some stormwater drains have a fish logo painted on the curb to highlight stormwater pollution.

Industry

Industrial processing frequently involves the discharge of process waste-water to waterways. For example, Fonterra has been discharging wastewater containing milk condensate into the Tui River, a tributary of the Mangatainoka River, and is applying for resource consents to continue doing so. [19] The Tasman Pulp and Paper Mill, now owned by Norske Skog, has been discharging waste into the Tarawera River since 1955. [20]

Recreation

High numbers of visitors to parks and other areas where there are no toilets is increasing the chance of pollution from human waste. In alpine areas, where anaerobic digestion of fecal matter is slow, the Department of Conservation have sewerage holding tanks on the toilets at backcountry huts. The sewerage is flown out by helicopter for treatment elsewhere. Freedom camping, a popular activity in some areas, is suspected of causing water pollution due to the incorrect disposal of human waste.

Urban areas

The most significant source of water pollution in urban areas is due to sewerage. Broken sewers and faulty connections allow sewerage to enter stormwater systems. [4] Also, during flooding sewerage pumping stations are inundated with the floodwaters and sewerage is released.

Water run-off from roads contains pollutants such as zinc, copper, lead and hydrocarbons from vehicle wear, vehicle emissions and from the road surface itself. [4] Urban areas have large amounts of paved surface therefore there is a higher likelihood that water contaminated with organic matter will not be filtered through soils.

Sediment run-off from exposed soils in new subdivisions does occur and if it occurs due to breaches of the resource consent prosecution may result. To limit sediment run-off during earthworks straw bales and stormwater settling ponds are used. These are completely inadequate in high rainfall events where the interceptors are overwhelmed and silt laden waters flow into streams and rivers.

Water pollution by region

Regions of New Zealand. .mw-parser-output .col-begin{border-collapse:collapse;padding:0;color:inherit;width:100%;border:0;margin:0}.mw-parser-output .col-begin-small{font-size:90%}.mw-parser-output .col-break{vertical-align:top;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .col-break-2{width:50%}.mw-parser-output .col-break-3{width:33.3%}.mw-parser-output .col-break-4{width:25%}.mw-parser-output .col-break-5{width:20%}@media(max-width:720px){.mw-parser-output .col-begin,.mw-parser-output .col-begin>tbody,.mw-parser-output .col-begin>tbody>tr,.mw-parser-output .col-begin>tbody>tr>td{display:block!important;width:100%!important}.mw-parser-output .col-break{padding-left:0!important}} 1 Northland 2 Auckland 3 Waikato 4 Bay of Plenty 5 East Cape 6 Hawke's Bay 7 Taranaki 8 Manawatu-Whanganui 9 Wellington 10 Tasman 11 Nelson 12 Marlborough 13 West Coast 14 Canterbury 15 Otago 16 Southland Regions of NZ Numbered.svg
Regions of New Zealand.

Regional councils have the responsibility to address water use and misuse issues as set out in the Resource Management Act, a significant Act of Parliament that regulates natural and physical resources such as land, air and water. Differing land use and climate means that water pollution varies across the regions.

In 2020, the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management set safe "bottom line" levels for nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment and E. coli in New Zealand's rivers, lakes, and estuaries. A study by Our Land and Water National Science Challenge measured these levels throughout the country at 850 long-term water monitoring sites across 650,000 river segments, 961 lakes and 419 estuaries. [21] It found that almost every region in New Zealand exceeded bottom line levels in one or more contaminants. More than three quarters of land in the country was contributing too much E. coli to fresh water, and agricultural land had excessive nitrogen loads, with Southland needing to reduce its nitrate pollution by 41 percent and Canterbury by 44 percent. [22] [23]

Water trends for selected regions (as of 2004) [24]
RegionAllocation and abstraction[ clarification needed ]Water
quantity		Surface water qualityGroundwater
quality		Future
demand
Surface waterGround waterSurface waterGround waterMicro biologicalInorganicMicro biologicalInorganicProposed irrigation schemes
CanterburyIncreasingIncreasingUncertainUncertainUncertainUncertainUncertainDecreasingIncreasing
Hawke's BayIncreasingIncreasingSteadyDecreasingUncertainUncertainUncertainDecreasingIncreasing
WaikatoIncreasingIncreasingUncertainUncertainDecreasingDecreasingUncertainDecreasingSteady
SouthlandSteadyIncreasingSteadySteadyUncertainUncertainDecreasingUncertainUncertain

The above table is an aggregate of water trends in the regions and it shows no trends in water quality improvement or the related issue of water abstraction. However, there are observed improvements in water quality for some water bodies in some cases.

Bay of Plenty

The Tarawera River, nicknamed "the black drain", has had a history of water pollution, predominantly due to industrial activity. In 2009, the Tasman Mill gained permission to continue polluting the river for the next 25 years. [25]

Between 1950 and 1989, the Whakatane Sawmill dumped contaminated sawdust, bark, scrap timber, and chemicals in and around Whakatane and the Rangitaiki Plains, including the Kopeopeo Canal, which has been called New Zealand's most polluted waterway. [26] These wastes came from the timber treatment mill, where PCP had been used as a wood preservative. The PCP was contaminated with dioxin and furan (PCDD/PCDFs), resulting in dioxin-contaminated sediment. Remediation efforts on the canal (sparked initially by Ngāti Awa campaigner Joe Harawira) received international recognition in 2019. [27]

Canterbury

Excess E. coli pollution in New Zealand from Snelder et al. 2023 Excell E coli load Snelder et al 2023.jpg
Excess E. coli pollution in New Zealand from Snelder et al. 2023

Historically much of Canterbury has been dry land and arable farming but there has been a huge increase in dairy farming in the region. Dairy farming in Canterbury requires large amounts of irrigation since the average rainfall is too low to support dairy cow pastures.

The Ōpāwaho / Heathcote River has been subjected to a number of recent pollution incidents.

Environment Canterbury recently introduced strict new environmental requirements for the region's farmers, requiring most farms to develop Farm Environment Plans showing how farms will take action to mitigate risks like nutrient leaching, soil erosion, effluent risks and protect waterways through actions such as fencing off waterways and undertaking riparian planting. The plans are independently audited. Since the introduction of these new rules, waterways are now showing improvement s across a number of measures.

Southland

In Southland effluent from dairy sheds used for more than 50 cows needs a resource consent. Environment Southland recommends effluent is spread at a rate of eight hectares per 100 cows and should not applied to wet soils. [28] In 2012, Otago Regional Council carried out 19 prosecutions for incidents of pollution, twice as many as in 2011. The majority of the pollution incidents were of dairy effluent. [29]

Taranaki

In Taranaki, there are 1400 dairy sheds where the dairy effluent drains into streams instead of being sprayed to land, according to data from Taranaki Regional Council's 2012 State of the Environment report. [30] In 2012, the president of the New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society expressed surprise at the number of consented dairy discharges to streams, given most other regional councils prosecute dairy farmers who allow dairy effluent to enter waterways. [31] In 2019, Taranaki Regional Council reported that freshwater quality had deteriorated, with only two of the fifteen sites tested meeting the standards for swimmability. [32]

Waikato

The Waikato has had a long history of dairy farming and has some of the most productive soils in the country. Water quality, especially as shown by the indicators of conductivity and pH, in the Waikato region is deteriorating. [33]

The Waikato River has a high level of pollution due to various point and non-point sources.

West Coast

The West Coast receives a high rainfall so any potential pollution will be diluted to some degree.

Until recently untreated sewage was being discharged into the Grey River but government funding was made available to build a sewage treatment plant.[ citation needed ]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water pollution</span> Contamination of water bodies

Water pollution is the contamination of water bodies, with a negative impact on their uses. It is usually a result of human activities. Water bodies include lakes, rivers, oceans, aquifers, reservoirs and groundwater. Water pollution results when contaminants mix with these water bodies. Contaminants can come from one of four main sources. These are sewage discharges, industrial activities, agricultural activities, and urban runoff including stormwater. Water pollution may affect either surface water or groundwater. This form of pollution can lead to many problems. One is the degradation of aquatic ecosystems. Another is spreading water-borne diseases when people use polluted water for drinking or irrigation. Water pollution also reduces the ecosystem services such as drinking water provided by the water resource.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Waipā River</span> River in New Zealand

The Waipā River is in the Waikato region of the North Island of New Zealand. The headwaters are in the Rangitoto Range east of Te Kūiti. It flows north for 115 kilometres (71 mi), passing through Ōtorohanga and Pirongia, before flowing into the Waikato River at Ngāruawāhia. It is the Waikato's largest tributary. The Waipā's main tributary is the Puniu River.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agricultural wastewater treatment</span> Farm management for controlling pollution from confined animal operations and surface runoff

Agricultural wastewater treatment is a farm management agenda for controlling pollution from confined animal operations and from surface runoff that may be contaminated by chemicals in fertilizer, pesticides, animal slurry, crop residues or irrigation water. Agricultural wastewater treatment is required for continuous confined animal operations like milk and egg production. It may be performed in plants using mechanized treatment units similar to those used for industrial wastewater. Where land is available for ponds, settling basins and facultative lagoons may have lower operational costs for seasonal use conditions from breeding or harvest cycles. Animal slurries are usually treated by containment in anaerobic lagoons before disposal by spray or trickle application to grassland. Constructed wetlands are sometimes used to facilitate treatment of animal wastes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nonpoint source pollution</span> Pollution resulting from multiple sources

Nonpoint source (NPS) pollution refers to diffuse contamination of water or air that does not originate from a single discrete source. This type of pollution is often the cumulative effect of small amounts of contaminants gathered from a large area. It is in contrast to point source pollution which results from a single source. Nonpoint source pollution generally results from land runoff, precipitation, atmospheric deposition, drainage, seepage, or hydrological modification where tracing pollution back to a single source is difficult. Nonpoint source water pollution affects a water body from sources such as polluted runoff from agricultural areas draining into a river, or wind-borne debris blowing out to sea. Nonpoint source air pollution affects air quality, from sources such as smokestacks or car tailpipes. Although these pollutants have originated from a point source, the long-range transport ability and multiple sources of the pollutant make it a nonpoint source of pollution; if the discharges were to occur to a body of water or into the atmosphere at a single location, the pollution would be single-point.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rivers of New Zealand</span> Overview of rivers in New Zealand

The rivers of New Zealand are used for a variety of purposes and face a number of environmental issues. In the North Island's hill country they are deep, fast flowing and most are unnavigable. Many in the South Island are braided rivers. The navigable ones were used for mass transport in the country's early history.

The Dairying and Clean Streams Accord is an agreement signed in 2003 in New Zealand between Fonterra, Ministry for the Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and regional councils. The Accord was prompted by the high-profile "dirty dairying" campaign by Fish and Game New Zealand which highlighted water pollution of lakes, rivers and streams due to the intensification of dairy farming in parts of New Zealand.

In New Zealand "dirty dairying" refers to damage to the ecological health of New Zealand's freshwater environment by the intensification of dairy farming, and also to the high profile campaign begun in 2002 by the Fish and Game Council to highlight and combat this.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agriculture in New Zealand</span> Overview of agriculture in New Zealand

In New Zealand, agriculture is the largest sector of the tradable economy. The country exported NZ$46.4 billion worth of agricultural products in the 12 months to June 2019, 79.6% of the country's total exported goods. The agriculture, forestry and fisheries sector directly contributed $12.653 billion of the national GDP in the 12 months to September 2020, and employed 143,000 people, 5.9% of New Zealand's workforce, as of the 2018 census.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Waitetuna River</span> River in New Zealand

The Waitetuna River is a river of the Waikato Region of New Zealand's North Island. It flows generally northwest from its sources southwest of Whatawhata to reach the southeastern coast of the Raglan Harbour.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dairy farming in New Zealand</span> Overview article

Dairy farming in New Zealand began during the early days of colonisation by Europeans. The New Zealand dairy industry is based almost exclusively on cattle, with a population of 4.92 million milking cows in the 2019–20 season. The income from dairy farming is now a major part of the New Zealand economy, becoming an NZ$13.4 billion industry by 2017.

CraFarms is a group of companies of which Allan, Beth and Frank Crafar were Directors. Crafar Farms was New Zealand's largest family-owned dairy business. The family business owned 22 dry stock and dairy farms with approximately 20,000 cows in various regions of the North Island, and was put into receivership in October 2009. Crafar Farms was involved in multiple prosecutions for pollution offences and incidents of poor animal welfare from 2007 to 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water pollution in Canterbury Region</span> Overview of the water pollution in Canterbury, New Zealand

Water pollution in Canterbury, New Zealand has become a major environmental issue, largely due to pollution from agricultural sources, but also industrial and urban sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water pollution in the West Coast Region</span> Overview of the water pollution in the West Coast, New Zealand

Water pollution is an environmental issue on the West Coast of New Zealand. Water resources and water pollution come under the jurisdiction of the Resource Management Act and is controlled by the regional councils - for the West Coast it is the West Coast Regional Council.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water pollution in the United States</span> Overview of water pollution in the United States of America

Water pollution in the United States is a growing problem that became critical in the 19th century with the development of mechanized agriculture, mining, and manufacturing industrys—although laws and regulations introduced in the late 20th century have improved water quality in many water bodies. Extensive industrialization and rapid urban growth exacerbated water pollution as a lack of regulation allowed for discharges of sewage, toxic chemicals, nutrients, and other pollutants into surface water. According to the US geographical survey, the water area of the United States is approximately 264,837 square miles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water in New Zealand</span> Water supply and distribution in New Zealand

Water is relatively abundant in New Zealand due to the temperate climate and maritime weather patterns. In recent years, water pollution and draw-down of aquifers have become important environmental issues in New Zealand.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fracking in New Zealand</span>

Fracking has been carried out in New Zealand for over 27 years, mostly in Taranaki and also in coal seams in Waikato and Southland. Concerns have been raised about its negative effects and some local government jurisdictions have called for a moratorium on fracking but this has been rejected by the government. The environmental effects of fracking are regulated by the Resource Management Act (RMA) through the requirement for resource consents.

Savick Brook is a watercourse in Lancashire, England, which runs from the outskirts of Longridge westward north of Preston to the River Ribble.

Water quality in Taranaki is a notable environmental issue for many stakeholders with concerns about the potential impact from dairy farming in New Zealand and petrochemical industries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Susie Wood</span> New Zealand microbiologist and marine scientist (born 1976)

Susanna Wood is a New Zealand scientist whose research focuses on understanding, protecting and restoring New Zealand's freshwater environments. One of her particular areas of expertise is the ecology, toxin production, and impacts of toxic freshwater cyanobacteria in lakes and rivers. Wood is active in advocating for the incorporation of DNA-based tools such as metabarcoding, genomics and metagenomics for characterising and understanding aquatic ecosystems and investigating the climate and anthropogenic drivers of water quality change in New Zealand lakes. She has consulted for government departments and regional authorities and co-leads a nationwide programme Lakes380 that aims to obtain an overview of the health of New Zealand's lakes using paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Wood is a senior scientist at the Cawthron Institute. She has represented New Zealand internationally in cycling.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Our Land and Water</span> Primary-production research programme in New Zealand (2016–2024)

Our Land and Water was one of New Zealand's eleven collaborative research programmes known as National Science Challenges. Running from 2016 to 2024, the focus of Our Land and Water (OLW) research was enhancing the productivity of New Zealand farms while improving the quality of land and water.

References

  1. ↑ Piddock, Gerald (2 January 2019). "Water pollution the number one concern for New Zealanders in new poll". Stuff.
  2. ↑ Our Freshwater 2020. Ministry for the Environment and Stats NZ. 16 April 2020.
  3. ↑ Gluckman, Sir Peter (12 April 2017). "New Zealand's Fresh Waters" (PDF). Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Environment Aotearoa 2015. Ministry for the Environment. October 2015. ISBN   978-0-478-41298-7.
  5. ↑ "Rivers and lakes in Auckland Region". Ministry for the Environment. Retrieved 16 January 2019.
  6. ↑ Taunton, Esther (29 April 2018). "Freshwater quality improving nationwide, report shows". Stuff.
  7. ↑ McClure, Tess (24 March 2023). "'Like you're in a horror movie': pollution leaves New Zealand wetlands irreversibly damaged". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 21 July 2024.
  8. ↑ Microbiological water quality guidelines for marine and freshwater recreational areas, MfE, June 2003, pp. H26
  9. ↑ "Environmental pressures rising in New Zealand". OECD. 21 March 2017.
  10. ↑ Smith, CM; Wilcock, RL; Vant, WN; Smith, DG; Cooper, AB (April 1993). "Freshwater quality in New Zealand and the influence of forestry, population driven land subdivision horticulture and large scale pastoral land uses such as agriculture". Consultancy Report No. MAF056. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research.
  11. ↑ O'Callaghan, Paul; Kelly-Quinn, Mary; Jennings, Eleanor; Antunes, Patricia; O'Sullivan, Matthew; Fenton, Owen; hUallacháin, Daire Ó. (1 March 2019). "The Environmental Impact of Cattle Access to Watercourses: A Review". Journal of Environmental Quality. 48 (2): 340–351. Bibcode:2019JEnvQ..48..340O. doi:10.2134/jeq2018.04.0167. PMID   30951116.
  12. ↑ Georgakakos, Christine B.; Morris, Chelsea K.; Walter, M. Todd (5 July 2018). "Challenges and Opportunities With On-Farm Research: Total and Soluble Reactive Stream Phosphorus Before and After Implementation of a Cattle-Exclusion, Riparian Buffer". Frontiers in Environmental Science. 6. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00071 . ISSN   2296-665X.
  13. ↑ McDowell, R. W. (6 November 2022). "The longevity of fencing out livestock as a method of decreasing contaminant concentrations in a headwater stream". Journal of Environmental Quality. 52 (1): 173–179. doi:10.1002/JEQ2.20417.
  14. ↑ Save Our Rivers (video). Greenpeace NZ. 2016. Archived from the original on 20 December 2021.
  15. ↑ "Greenpeace wins advert battle". The New Zealand Herald . 8 January 2017.
  16. ↑ "Improved water quality in Horizons Region shows more rivers more suitable for swimming". Horizons Regional Council. 15 February 2018.
  17. ↑ "Monitoring shows Canterbury's fresh water quality improving". Environment Canterbury. 14 November 2017.
  18. ↑ "New Zealand river water quality trends show cause for optimism". LAWA. 16 April 2018.
  19. ↑ Ray, Adam (18 May 2012). "Discharge hearing over Tui river". 3 News. Retrieved 4 November 2012.
  20. ↑ "Iwi not giving up fight against Tasman mill discharges". Radio New Zealand. 18 December 2010. Retrieved 18 December 2010.
  21. ↑ Steele, Monique (30 November 2023). "Freshwater contamination exceeding targets - study". RNZ. Retrieved 11 November 2024.
  22. ↑ Ton Snelder; Hugh G. Smith; David Russell Plew; Caroline Fraser (November 2023), Nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment and Escherichia coli in New Zealand's aquatic receiving environments: Comparison of current state to national bottom lines, AgResearch, doi:10.57935/AGR.26001403.V1, Wikidata   Q131147706
  23. ↑ McAleer, Annabel (7 November 2023). Research Findings Brief: Current state of water contaminants compared to bottom lines. Lincoln, NZ: AgResearch. doi:10.57935/AGR.26002357.v1.
  24. ↑ PCE (October 2004). Growing for good: Intensive farming, sustainability and New Zealand's environment. Wellington: Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. ISBN   1-877274-51-8 . Retrieved 18 September 2008.
  25. ↑ "Mill gets 25-year pollution consent". The New Zealand Herald. 16 October 2009. Retrieved 6 September 2013.
  26. ↑ "case study for dioxin". croesus-projects-ltd.
  27. ↑ "International award for local clean-up project | Scoop News". www.scoop.co.nz.
  28. ↑ "Farm Dairy Effluent" (PDF). Environment Southland. Archived from the original on 14 October 2008. Retrieved 13 September 2008.
  29. ↑ Fox, Rebecca (31 August 2012). "Number of farmers prosecuted more than doubles in 12 months". Otago Daily Times . Retrieved 31 August 2012. In the past year, more than twice as many Otago farmers have been prosecuted for offences - mainly relating to dairy effluent and pugging - than the year before.
  30. ↑ Stewart, Rachel (10 December 2012). "Woe betide those who question our water quality". Taranaki Daily News. Retrieved 11 December 2012. Taranaki has 1400 cow sheds discharging effluent into streams.
  31. ↑ Harvey, Helen (11 December 2012). "Taranaki Farmers' Effluent Policy Surprises Scientist". Taranaki Daily News. Retrieved 11 December 2012. The New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society president Waikato University Professor David Hamilton said many other regional councils prosecute anyone who discharges into waterways.
  32. ↑ Martin, Robin (11 June 2019). "Taranaki freshwater flunks latest report card". RNZ.
  33. ↑ The condition of rural water and soil in the Waikato region: risks and opportunities (PDF). 1825-0708. Environment Waikato. 2008. ISBN   978-0-9582940-0-3 . Retrieved 11 September 2008.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.