DataWorks Plus

Last updated

DataWorks Plus LLC
Type Private
Founded2000;23 years ago (2000)
Key people
  • Brad Bylenga (CEO)
  • Todd Pastorini (EVP and GM)
Website dataworksplus.com

DataWorks Plus LLC is a privately held [1] biometrics systems integrator based in Greenville, South Carolina. The company started in 2000 and originally focused on mugshot management, adding facial recognition beginning in 2005. Brad Bylenga is the CEO, and Todd Pastorini is the EVP and GM. [2] [3] Usage of the technology by police departments has resulted in wrongful arrests. [4] [5]

Contents

Products

The company focuses on biometrics storage and matching, including fingerprints, palm prints, irises, tattoos, and mugshots. [2]

Face Watch can continuously detect on live video streams, recognizing faces on individual video frames and cataloging the timestamps. [1]

FACE Plus is their photo (still image) facial recognition program. It includes advanced filtering and can reconstruct a 3D model from photos to correct their angle, called pose correction. [1]

DataWorks uses facial recognition algorithms from NEC, [2] Rank One Computing (of Colorado, CEO Brendan Klare), [2] and Cognitec. [6] Both the NEC and Rank One algorithms showed algorithmic bias in a NIST study. [7] [2] DataWorks' EVP and GM, Todd Pastorini told New York Times that they don't formally measure the accuracy or bias, but "We've become a pseudo-expert in the technology". [2] [6]

Installations

California

DataWorks created the "California Facial Recognition Interconnect". This statewide face recognition network is used by the Los Angeles County Sheriff (9 million images), [8] [9] San Diego County Sheriff (2.5 million images), Sacramento County Sheriff (1.75 million images), San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department/Riverside County Sheriff's Department (2.7 million images), Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office (since 2012, 1 million images), San Francisco Police Department (1 million images; see below), and unidentified agencies in San Mateo County and San Joaquin County. [10] [6]

The Los Angeles County Sheriff, using Cognitec's algorithm, acquired in 2008 on a 7-year contract, and signed a 7-year, $3.5m contract extension in 2015. The contract renewal was approved unanimously by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. [11] In addition to Interconnect, Los Angeles County has access to fingerprinting, facial recognition, tattoo matching (2 million images or templates), composite drawing, and access to DMV images in the unrelated Cal-Photo. [12]

Other California uses

The San Diego County Sheriff's use of DataWorks is well established to at least 2007. A report discussed DataWorks installing a trial of Face Plus for facial recognition that year. The facial recognition system was in place and being upgraded to use Cognitec's algorithm in 2010. [13] [14]

The San Francisco Police's most recent 3-year contract was signed in 2017 for $150k per year. [15] It included what was labeled "FR Software" and a "Face Plus" server. It also included the "Mugshot database". [16] San Francisco banned government usage of facial recognition software beginning in May 2019. DataWorks's Pastorini said their tools don't use neural nets or machine learning like Microsoft's Face API or Amazon Rekognition, stating "the Amazon searches are not the best forensic searches". He said banning is unfortunate because there wasn't evidence of misuse in San Francisco.

San Jose Police Department has been using the DataWorks fingerprint biometric system from at least 2011. [10]

Florida

DataWorks says they have sold over 5000 fingerprint devices in the state of Florida. [1]

Michigan

DataWorks has worked with the Michigan DMV (Department of Public Safety) and the Michigan State Police since 2001. Their database contains at least 8 million criminal images and 32 million DMV photos. [2] DataWorks and Michigan State Police integrated with the FBI's Next Generation Identification facial recognition pilot. Later they added the Maryland Department of Public Safety's system to the FBI system. This system includes 25 agencies and over 1000 users. [17] [1]

The City of Detroit and Detroit Police Department, with access to at least 500k mugshots, signed a 3-year $1m contract with DataWorks for "FACE Watch Plus real-time video surveillance". [1] [18] It consumes feeds from Project Green Light, which is a network of over 500 cameras on public and private property. [19] It includes cameras on stoplights as well as gas stations, pharmacies, health clinics, churches, apartments, hotels, and (beginning in 2018) schools. [20] The 2017 DataWorks contract references being used for 100 video feeds. Additionally, the Crime Intelligence Unit is licensed to use the Michigan's Statewide Network of Agency Photos (SNAP) with DataWorks, adding access to DMV photos. DataWorks is integrated with Motorola's Command Central Aware Console. [21] [22]

In a June 29, 2020 meeting, Detroit's police chief said Dataworks failed to make a correct identification 96% of the time. In a report, the Detroit police tally indicated they had used the Dataworks facial recognition for 70 images by June 22, year-to-date (2020). At least 68 of the 70 were on Black people, and 65 of the 70 were on men. Dataworks' Pastorini said they don't keep statistics, nor do they tell their customers how to use their software. [23]

In February 2023, a Black woman, eight months pregnant, was arrested for carjacking based on a DataWorks facial recognition match.. [4] This was the third wrongful arrest in Detroit using the technology [5]

Chicago

The Chicago Police Department and Chicago Transit Authority are using "FACE Watch Plus" (realtime recognition) on Chicago's security camera network, which includes approximately 20,000 video cameras. This is integrated with Genetec's Omnicast. DataWorks noted they provide both "Real Time Screening" and "Facial Recognition". Their system includes 7 million criminal photos and states they use "the system primarily to solve crimes using probes generate dfrom street cameras, Facebook, and other sources." [20] [17] [1] [2]

Others

In Maryland, DataWorks created a statewide system integrating DMV photos (7 million) and criminal photos (2 million) from Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services. The FBI's facial recognition system is also integrated. They also supplied three mobile license plate recognition systems purchased in 2007 for $60k. [24] [1] [25] [2]

In Pennsylvania, on their JNET (Justice Network) system, DataWorks created the JNET Facial Recognition System (JFRS), which is integrated with PENN DOT's DMV photos (from MorphoTrust) and the Commonwealth Photo Imaging System (CPIN). This is used by the Pennsylvania State Police, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, and Philadelphia Police Department. [1] During the George Floyd Protests in June 2020, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania police commissioner Thomas Carter asked for images showing vandalism and assault on a police officer, stating "Hopefully, we can pick her image up. If we can, we can do facial recognition". [26]

South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) and South Carolina DMV uses the FACE Plus system, which includes the state's 8.5 million DMV images. Charleston County, South Carolina Sheriff is also a customer. [17] [1] [27]

The New York Police Department uses facial recognition from DataWorks Plus. [28]

A national system upgrade in New Zealand is scheduled to be completed by late 2020 for an estimated NZ$5 million. It would include facial recognition from security camera still images, criminal images, firearms license holders, missing persons, and registered sex offenders. DataWorks's Pastorini said "we don't make accuracy statements" when asked about the reliability of the system. NZ's Privacy Commissioner wasn't even aware of the installation. When asked, Pastorini said he wasn't familiar with New Zealand's Privacy Act. [25] [29] [30]

DataWorks Plus claims "over 1000 agencies", which includes the Virginia State Police, Wake County CCBI and Raleigh Police Department, Miami Dade Police Department, Collier County Sheriff's Office (Naples, Florida), Columbus Police Department (Ohio), Irving, Texas Police Department, and the New Jersey/New York High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area. [1] [6] [26]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Facial recognition system</span> Technology capable of matching a face from an image against a database of faces

A facial recognition system is a technology potentially capable of matching a human face from a digital image or a video frame against a database of faces. Such a system is typically employed to authenticate users through ID verification services, and works by pinpointing and measuring facial features from a given image.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Automatic number-plate recognition</span> Optical character recognition technology

Automatic number-plate recognition is a technology that uses optical character recognition on images to read vehicle registration plates to create vehicle location data. It can use existing closed-circuit television, road-rule enforcement cameras, or cameras specifically designed for the task. ANPR is used by police forces around the world for law enforcement purposes, including checking if a vehicle is registered or licensed. It is also used for electronic toll collection on pay-per-use roads and as a method of cataloguing the movements of traffic, for example by highways agencies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Facial composite</span> Graphical representation of one or more eyewitnesses memories of a face

A facial composite is a graphical representation of one or more eyewitnesses' memories of a face, as recorded by a composite artist. Facial composites are used mainly by police in their investigation of crimes. These images are used to reconstruct the suspect's face in hope of identifying them. Facial reconstruction can also be used in archeological studies to get a visualization of ancient mummies or human remains.

The Facial Images National Database (FIND) was a project managed by the United Kingdom's National Policing Improvement Agency. The database was a collection of mugshots both from still and from video image sources. It was also designed to keep track of scars, tattoos, and similar markings on persons within the database to increase efficiency in identification. It was intended that FIND would provide national access to images of individuals who have been arrested for a criminal offence, linking the image with the criminal data held on the Police National Computer.

Big Brother Watch is a non-party British civil liberties and privacy campaigning organisation. It was launched in 2009 by founding director Alex Deane to campaign against state surveillance and threats to civil liberties. It was founded by Matthew Elliott. Since January 2018, Silkie Carlo is the Director.

ISO/IEC 19794 Information technology—Biometric data interchange formats—Part 5: Face image data, or ISO/IEC 19794-5 for short, is the fifth of 8 parts of the ISO/IEC standard ISO/IEC 19794, published in 2005, which describes interchange formats for several types of biometric data. ISO/IEC 19794-5 defines specifically a standard scheme for codifying data describing human faces within a CBEFF-compliant data structure, for use in facial recognition systems. Modern biometric passport photos should comply with this standard. Many organizations and have already started enforcing its directives, and several software applications have been created to automatically test compliance to the specifications.

Paolo Cirio is a conceptual artist, hacktivist and cultural critic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ring (company)</span> Home security products manufacturer

Ring LLC is a manufacturer of home security and smart home devices owned by Amazon. It manufactures a titular line of smart doorbells, home security cameras, and alarm systems. It also operates Neighbors, a social network that allows users to discuss local safety and security issues, and share footage captured with Ring products. Via Neighbors, Ring may also provide footage and data to law enforcement agencies to assist in investigations.

IDEMIA is a multinational technology company headquartered in Courbevoie, France. It provides identity-related security services, and sells facial recognition and other biometric identification products and software to private companies and governments.

ID.me is an American online identity network company that allows people to provide proof of their legal identity online. ID.me digital credentials can be used to access government services, healthcare logins, or discounts from retailers. The company is based in McLean, Virginia.

DeepFace is a deep learning facial recognition system created by a research group at Facebook. It identifies human faces in digital images. The program employs a nine-layer neural network with over 120 million connection weights and was trained on four million images uploaded by Facebook users. The Facebook Research team has stated that the DeepFace method reaches an accuracy of 97.35% ± 0.25% on Labeled Faces in the Wild (LFW) data set where human beings have 97.53%. This means that DeepFace is sometimes more successful than human beings. As a result of growing societal concerns Meta announced that it plans to shut down Facebook facial recognition system, deleting the face scan data of more than one billion users. This change will represent one of the largest shifts in facial recognition usage in the technology’s history. Facebook planned to delete by December 2021 more than one billion facial recognition templates, which are digital scans of facial features. However, it did not plan to eliminate DeepFace which is the software that powers the facial recognition system. The company has also not ruled out incorporating facial recognition technology into future products, according to Meta spokesperson.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Megvii</span> Chinese technology company

Megvii is a Chinese technology company that designs image recognition and deep-learning software. Based in Beijing, the company develops artificial intelligence (AI) technology for businesses and for the public sector.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Police surveillance in New York City</span>

The New York City Police Department (NYPD) actively monitors public activity in New York City, New York, United States. Historically, surveillance has been used by the NYPD for a range of purposes, including against crime, counter-terrorism, and also for nefarious or controversial subjects such as monitoring political demonstrations, activities, and protests, and even entire ethnic and religious groups.

Amazon Rekognition is a cloud-based software as a service (SaaS) computer vision platform that was launched in 2016. It has been sold to, and used by a number of United States government agencies, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Orlando, Florida police, as well as private entities.

Clearview AI is an American facial recognition company, providing software to law enforcement and government agencies and other organizations. The company's algorithm matches faces to a database of more than 20 billion images indexed from the Internet, including social media applications. Founded by Hoan Ton-That and Richard Schwartz, the company maintained a low profile until late 2019, when its usage by law enforcement was reported. It is used in the U.S. by police forces and has been used in the apprehension of murders, terrorists, child abusers, and rioters. Clearview's practices have lead to fines by EU nations for violating privacy laws and investigations in the U.S. and other countries as well. Clearview's facial recognition algorithms are among the best in the world. In 2021, Time magazine listed Clearview AI as one of the 100 most influential companies of the year.

Hoan Ton-That is an Australian entrepreneur. He is the co-founder and chief executive officer of Clearview AI, a United States-based technology company that creates facial recognition software.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hyper-surveillance</span> Form of surveillance

Hyper-surveillance is the intricate surveillance of an entire or a substantial fraction of a population in order to monitor that group of citizens that specifically utilizes technology and security breaches to access information. As the reliance on the internet economy grows, smarter technology with higher surveillance concerns and snooping means workers to have increased surveillance at their workplace. Hyper surveillance is highly targeted and intricate observation and monitoring among an individual, group of people, or faction.

The GeorgetownCenter on Privacy and Technology is a think tank at Georgetown University in Washington, DC dedicated to the study of privacy and technology. Established in 2014, it is housed within the Georgetown University Law Center. The goal of the Center is to conduct research and empower legal and legislative advocacy around issues of privacy and surveillance, with a focus on how such issues affect groups of different social class and race. In May 2022, the Center's founding director Alvaro Bedoya was confirmed as a commissioner of the United States Federal Trade Commission.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fawkes (image cloaking software)</span>

Fawkes is a facial image cloaking software created by the SAND Laboratory of the University of Chicago. It is a free tool that is available as a standalone executable. The software creates small alterations in images using artificial intelligence to protect the images from being recognized and matched by facial recognition software. The goal of the Fawkes program is to enable individuals to protect their own privacy from large data collection. As of May 2022 Fawkes v1.0 has surpassed 840,000 downloads. Eventually the SAND Laboratory hopes to implement the software on a larger scale to combat unwarranted facial recognition software.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xinjiang Police Files</span> 2022 leaked documents

The Xinjiang Police Files are leaked documents from the Xinjiang internment camps, forwarded to anthropologist Adrian Zenz from an anonymous source. On May 24, 2022, an international consortium of 14 media groups published information about the files, which consist of over 10 gigabytes of speeches, images, spreadsheets and protocols dating back to 2018.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 "Professional Services Contract Between City of Detroit, Michigan And DataWorks Plus – contract no 6000801". MuckRock. 31 July 2017. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Kashmir Hill (24 June 2020). "Wrongfully Accused by an Algorithm". nytimes.com. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  3. ↑ "Dataworks Plus, LLC – GovTribe". GovTribe. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  4. 1 2 Kashmir Hill (6 August 2023). "Eight Months Pregnant and Arrested After False Facial Recognition Match". nytimes.com. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
  5. 1 2 Kelly Kasulis Cho (7 August 2023). "Woman sues Detroit after facial recognition mistakes her for crime suspect". Washington Post. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Gershgorn, Dave (1 August 2019). "California Police Are Sharing Facial Recognition Databases to ID Suspects". Medium. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  7. ↑ "NIST IR 8280: Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) Part 3: Demographic Effects" (PDF). nvlpubs.nist.gov. December 2019. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  8. ↑ Ali Winston (3 July 2015). "Los Angeles sheriff invests in new tech to expand biometric database". Reveal. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  9. ↑ Ali Winston (20 January 2015). "LA Facial Recognition Dataworks 01 2015 1". Reveal via documentcloud.org. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  10. 1 2 Aaron Cantú (10 December 2015). "Explore the defense industry's ties to police biosurveillance in California". MuckRock. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  11. ↑ "Board of Supervisors Statement of Proceedings" (PDF). file.lacounty.gov. 20 January 2015. p. 25. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  12. ↑ "APPROVE SOLE SOURCE AGREEMENT WITH DATAWORKS PLUS, LLC TO PROVIDE MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT SERVICES OF THE DATAWORKS DIGITAL MUGSHOT SYSTEM" (PDF). file.lacounty.gov. 20 June 2015. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  13. ↑ "TACIDS: Tactical Identification System Using Facial Recognition" (PDF). The Automated Regional Justice Information System. 2012. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  14. ↑ AUTOMATED REGIONAL JUSTICE INF. SYS. "GMS Progress Reports – Compilation" (PDF). eff.org. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  15. ↑ "SFPD Mugshot Upgrade to 5.124". MuckRock. 22 January 2019. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  16. ↑ "SFPD DataWorks Plus: Maintenance and Support Agreement". MuckRock. 1 July 2017. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  17. 1 2 3 Clare Garvie; Laura M. Moy (16 May 2019). "America Under Watch – Real-Time Facial Recognition in America". Georgetown Law, Center on Privacy & Technology. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  18. ↑ "2017 Detroit Dataworks Contract, contract 6000801". Detroit Free Press via Scribd. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  19. ↑ Aaron Mondry (8 July 2019). "Criticism mounts over Detroit Police Department's facial recognition software". Curbed Detroit. Retrieved 24 June 2020. In March this year during his State of the City address, Mayor Mike Duggan announced the "Neighborhood Real-Time Intelligence Program," a $9 million, state- and federally-funded initiative that would not only expand Project Green Light by installing surveillance equipment at 500 Detroit intersections—on top of the over 500 already installed at businesses—but also utilize facial recognition software to identify potential criminals.
  20. 1 2 Barber, Gregory (17 May 2019). "Some US Cities Are Moving Into Real-Time Facial Surveillance". Wired. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  21. ↑ Amy Harmon (8 July 2019). "As Cameras Track Detroit's Residents, a Debate Ensues Over Racial Bias". nytimes.com. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  22. ↑ Allie Gross (16 July 2019). "Experts: Duggan's denial of facial recognition software hinges on 3 words". Detroit Free Press. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  23. ↑ Jason Koebler (29 June 2020). "VICE - Detroit Police Chief: Facial Recognition Software Misidentifies 96% of the Time". vice.com. Retrieved 30 June 2020. "If we would use the software only [to identify subjects], we would not solve the case 95-97 percent of the time," Craig said. "That's if we relied totally on the software, which would be against our current policy … If we were just to use the technology by itself, to identify someone, I would say 96 percent of the time it would misidentify."
  24. ↑ "MD ALPR documents" (PDF). aclu.org. p. 30. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  25. 1 2 George Block (5 December 2019). "Privacy concerns over police's new 'state of the art' facial recognition system". Stuff. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  26. 1 2 Gershgorn, Dave (2 June 2020). "Facial Recognition Is Law Enforcement's Newest Weapon Against Protesters". Medium. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  27. ↑ "South Carolina Public Records Law Request: DataWorks, Charleston County Sheriff's Office". MuckRock. 11 November 2019. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  28. ↑ Joseph Goldstein; Ali Watkins (1 August 2019). "She Was Arrested at 14. Then Her Photo Went to a Facial Recognition Database". nytimes.com. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  29. ↑ George Block (19 December 2019). "Police facial recognition: US academic says Kiwis deserve answers". Stuff. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
  30. ↑ George Block (7 December 2019). "Police facial recognition: Privacy commissioner not consulted on new system". Stuff. Retrieved 24 June 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.