External links
- World Religions and Spirituality Project, a database of new religious movements operated by Dr. Bromley with contributions from other experts in the field.
David G. Bromley | |
|---|---|
| Born | 1941 (age 83–84) |
| Occupation(s) | Professor, author |
| Academic background | |
| Alma mater | |
| Academic work | |
| Institutions | Virginia Commonwealth University |
David G. Bromley (born 1941) is a professor of sociology at Virginia Commonwealth University,Richmond,VA and the University of Virginia,Charlottesville,VA,specialized in sociology of religion and the academic study of new religious movements. He has written extensively about cults,new religious movements,apostasy,and the anti-cult movement. [1]
Bromley received his B.A. in sociology (1963) from Colby College. He then obtained his M.A. (1966) and Ph.D. (1971) from Duke University.
He began his professional teaching career at the University of Virginia,where he taught from 1968 to 1974. He then taught at the University of Texas at Austin (1976–1980),and University of Hartford (1980–1983). Since 1983 he has held his professorial post at the University of Virginia and also at Virginia Commonwealth University.
His primary area of teaching and research is sociology of religion,with a specialization in the academic study of new religious movements. He was also director of the Institute for Social Research at the University of Hartford and chairman of Department of Sociology and Anthropology at the University of Virginia.
From 1992 to 1995,Bromley was the editor of the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,published by the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion,and was between 1991 and 2003 one of the editors of Religion and the Social Order,an annual serial published by the Association for the Sociology of Religion. [2]
Regarding the definition of new religious movements,Bromley distinguishes them from other religious groups based on the concept of "alignment" with both dominant social institutions and dominant cultural patterns in a given society. While dominant religious groups are aligned with both,sectarian religious groups reject the dominant social institutions but at the same time accept at least some of the dominant cultural patterns. New religious movements reject both dominant social institutions and cultural patterns,and are in turn rejected by mainline institutions and cultural agencies as cults. For instance,according to Bromley the Amish are a sectarian religious group rather than a new religious movement because they operate outside the dominant institutions of modern society,yet accept key elements of the dominant Christian cultural pattern. [3]
Bromley has written about the rise of an anti-cult movement in the 1970s and 1980s,and the accompanying controversies involving allegations of brainwashing and deprogramming. He defined the anti-cult movement in 1981 as the amalgam of groups who embrace the brainwashing theory. [4] [5]
Bromley has also written about apostasy,cults and religions. [6] His theory of apostasy is based on the notion of allegiance. In its dealings with the larger society,Bromley argues,religious groups can be either allegiant,contestant,or subversive of mainline values and institutions. Those who leave allegiant groups are "defectors",and the allegiant groups,protected by their popularity,may dismiss them as "problem individuals". Groups perceived by the society as "subversive" have "apostates",who claim that the movements they have left are dangerous or criminal,and are taken seriously by mainline institutions and media. Somewhere in the middle are "whistleblowers",who expose negative features not previously well-known of contestant (and sometimes also of allegiant) religious groups. [7]
Within the academic study of new religious movements,Bromley has been described as somewhat sympathetic of groups labeled as cults,such as by Canadian sociologist Stephen A. Kent,who objected to Bromley's definition of ex-members of cults as "apostates" as leading to disregarding the value of the information they can supply. According to Kent ex-members sometimes provide better information about these movements than the NRM Studies scholars. [8]
Bromley has expressed opposition to the claims of brainwashing and the practice of deprogramming. Bromley compared these social conflicts to witch-hunts of the late Middle Ages,and has claimed that civil liberties guaranteeing religious freedom were threatened. He has criticized the tactics of anti-cultists and their claims over brainwashing in several books and articles coauthored with Anson Shupe,such as Strange Gods,Moonies in America,and The New Vigilantes. [9]
Source [10]
