Demob suit

Last updated
"Mr C Stilwell returns to his home in Farnham, Surrey, after being "demobbed", and is greeted by his wife." Ministry of Information, c. 1945. Demobilisation of the British Army D26322.jpg
"Mr C Stilwell returns to his home in Farnham, Surrey, after being "demobbed", and is greeted by his wife." Ministry of Information, c.1945.

A demob suit was a suit of civilian clothes given to a man on his demobilisation from the British armed forces at the end of the Second World War. Although the suits were of good quality, the need to clothe millions of demobilising servicemen led to supply problems that caused some men to receive suits that were not of the correct size. As a result, the demob suit became a common subject in British comedy in the post-war years.

Contents

Etymology

The word "demob", short for demobilisation , came into use in the 1930s. [1] [ dubious ] Soldiers had received a set of civilian clothes on demobilisation at the end of the First World War, [2] however, the phrase "demob suit" only came into common use at the end of the Second World War. [3] [4] [5]

Background

Beginning on 18 June 1945, [6] millions of men were demobilised from the British armed services on a phased basis according to age and length of service. [7] A set of civilian clothes was essential in order to help them integrate into civilian life and because they normally no longer had their original clothes after years in uniform. Clothes rationing meant that it was not possible to buy a new suit from a shop without a large quantity of ration coupons and a long delay while the suit was made. [7]

Many separate demobilisation centres were run by the Army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force, alongside Civilian Clothing Depots. Army centres were run by the Royal Army Ordnance Corps. One Royal Air Force centre was at Uxbridge.

The suit

Some servicemen complained that their suit made them look like old-time gangsters. Resettlement Advice Centres 1946 screen cap.jpg
Some servicemen complained that their suit made them look like old-time gangsters.

At the demobilisation centre, men were issued with their civilian clothes. This was not in exchange for their service uniform which they were allowed to retain. The demob suit was just one part of a complete set of clothes. According to the Imperial War Museum, the full outfit included: [10]

A variety of other items are sometimes said to have been supplied, the list varying according to the source, including gloves, underwear, socks, and bowler hats. [11] In addition, men were given a special allocation of clothing coupons with which to buy any extra items they might need, a special cigarette ration, and a one-way rail warrant. Men could keep their service uniform and many left the distribution centres in uniform with a small suitcase containing their demob clothes. Towards the end of 1945, around 75,000 demob suits were being made each week. [7] One of the principal suppliers was Burtons, founded by Montague Burton, [12] leading to speculation that the phrase the full monty , meaning "everything" or "a complete set", originated in reference to a full set of demob clothes supplied by the firm. [13] [14] Other manufacturers included the Fifty Shilling Tailors and Simpsons of Piccadilly. [7]

Demob suits were made of the best quality material available in quantity at the time and were not utility clothes. [7] However, problems with distribution meant that the right sizes were not always in stock when the clothes were fitted and the style of what was available was not always what men wanted. These problems made the demob suit the subject of much ridicule and humour. One soldier described his trousers as "unfriendly", saying "they kept their distance from my feet, in mourning at half mast". [6] Another complained that his suit "looked as hostile and intimidating as the bloke pushing it my way". [15]

Men took pot luck[ colloquialism ] with what was available when their turn came. Sometimes only unusual sizes were available, although being a particularly difficult size could be an advantage as then a bespoke suit was ordered and delivered by mail which might be a better fit than one of the off-the-peg suits. [6] The fact that certain versions were very common and easily recognised made some men feel that they had substituted one uniform for another. [7] One remembered that he "walked proudly into town wearing my light grey pin-striped demob suit, looking around, I recognized all the ex-servicemen they were all back in uniform light grey pin-striped suits!". [6] Others were embarrassed to wear the suits. One reported that he rarely wore his to work as "both the pattern and the hue made it difficult to hide its patriotic origins". [16] Nonetheless, the suits were often the first that a man had owned and they remained in use for many years after the end of the war, being brought out whenever formal wear was required, such as at christenings or weddings. [6]

Black market sales

Clothes rationing meant that there was plenty of demand for the suits and the other items on the black market. Spivs (small time criminals dealing in illicit goods) lurked outside distribution centres and offered men £10 for each set of clothes, which some accepted. Questions were asked in Parliament but the government could do nothing as the clothes belonged to the ex-servicemen as soon as they signed for them. [6]

Official British Ministry of Information pictures of the demobilisation clothing depot, Olympia, London:

In fiction

J.B. Priestley titled his 1945 novel about three returning servicemen facing the challenges of post-war life, Three Men In New Suits. [17] Anthony Powell, who had a successful military career during the war and may have gone through the process himself, used a scene set in the demob centre at Olympia as the conclusion to his 1968 novel The Military Philosophers , "Rank on rank, as far as the eye could scan, hung flannel trousers and tweed coats, drab mackintoshes and grey suits with a white line running through the material", asking whether the massed ranks of empty coats on their hangers somehow symbolised the dead. [18]

In comedy

The demob suit became a popular subject in British comedy after the Second World War as a topic to which millions of people could relate. There was obvious comic potential in a suit that was either too large or too small. The British physical comedian Norman Wisdom, whose suits were always too tight and who had been demobilised himself in 1946, was described by one critic as "Pagliacci in a demob suit". [19] An obituary of Wisdom spoke of his "ill-fitting, half-mast demob suit". [20] Frankie Howerd, one of a whole generation of British comedians who started their career immediately after demobilisation, performed in a badly fitting demob suit, probably because he had nothing else to wear. [21]

See also

Notes and references

  1. Ayto, John. (2006). Movers and Shakers: A Chronology of Words that Shaped Our Age (Revised ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p.  90. ISBN   978-0-19-861452-4.
  2. Sigsworth, Eric M. (1990). Montague Burton: The Tailor of Taste. Manchester: Manchester University Press. p. 41. ISBN   978-0-7190-2364-4.
  3. "demob suit" Collins Dictionaries . Retrieved 3 January 2015.
  4. Cumming, Valerie; C. W. Cunnington; P. E. Cunnington (2010). The Dictionary of Fashion History. Berg. p. 65. ISBN   978-1-84788-533-3.
  5. Partridge, Eric.; Victor, Terry.; Dalzell, Tom. (Eds.) (2006). The New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English: Volume I, A-I. Abingdon: Routledge. p. 572. ISBN   978-0-415-25937-8.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Turner, Barry; Tony Rennell. (2014). When Daddy Came Home: How War Changed Family Life Forever. Random House. pp. 36–39. ISBN   978-1-4735-0515-5.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Jobling, Paul. (2014). Advertising Menswear: Masculinity and Fashion in the British Media since 1945. London: Bloomsbury. p. 24. ISBN   978-1-4725-5811-4.
  8. Herriot, James. (1979). All Things Wise and Wonderful. London: Pan Books. p. 581. ISBN   978-1-4472-2428-0.
  9. Milton, Keith. (2008). Travels of a Nig Nog. Keith Milton. p. 210. ISBN   978-1-4092-2368-9.
  10. Jacket, civilian (Demob suit). Imperial War Museum. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  11. Powell, Vince. (2010). From Rags to Gags: The Memoirs of a Comedy Writer. Andrews UK. p. 48. ISBN   978-1-907792-38-0.
  12. Burtons Demob Suit. BBC, 2010. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
  13. "The Full Monty" The Phrase Finder. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
  14. "monty" Oxford Dictionaries. Retrieved 4 January 2014.
  15. Diss, Dave. (2005). Dizzy. Lewes: The Book Guild. p. 376. ISBN   978-1-85776-927-2.
  16. Kettenacker, Lothar; Torsten Riotte. (2011). The Legacies of Two World Wars: European Societies in the Twentieth Century. Berghahn Books. p. 240. ISBN   978-0-85745-223-8.
  17. Robert L. Caserio; Clement Hawes. (Eds.) (2012). The Cambridge History of the English Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 1180. ISBN   978-1-316-17510-1.
  18. Powell, Anthony. (1991) The Military Philosophers. London: Arrow, pp. 241–242 ISBN   0-09-947248-1
  19. Macnab, Geoffrey. (2000). Searching for Stars: Stardom and Screen Acting in British Cinema. London: Cassell. p. 98. ISBN   978-1-4411-8425-2.
  20. "Norman Wisdom: Tribute to a Comedy Legend" Archived 2015-01-06 at the Wayback Machine Andrew Collins, Sabotage Times, 5 October 2010. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
  21. Carpenter, Humphrey (2004). Spike Milligan: The Biography. London: Hodder & Stoughton. p. 44. ISBN   978-1-4447-1788-4.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Suit</span> Western business attire of matching jacket and trousers

A suit, lounge suit, or business suit is a set of clothes comprising a suit jacket and trousers of identical textiles generally worn with a collared dress shirt, necktie, and dress shoes. A skirt suit is similar, but with a matching skirt instead of trousers. It is currently considered semi-formal wear or business wear in contemporary Western dress codes, however when the suit was originally developed it was considered an informal or more casual option compared to the prevailing clothing standards of aristocrats and businessmen. The lounge suit originated in 19th-century Britain as sportswear and British country clothing, which is why it was seen as more casual than citywear at that time, with the roots of the suit coming from early modern Western Europe formal court or military clothes. After replacing the black frock coat in the early 20th century as regular daywear, a sober one-coloured suit became known as a lounge suit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zoot suit</span> Mens suit style of the 1940s

A zoot suit is a men's suit with high-waisted, wide-legged, tight-cuffed, pegged trousers, and a long coat with wide lapels and wide padded shoulders. It is most notable for its use as a cultural symbol among the Hepcat and Pachuco subcultures. Originating among African Americans it would later become popular with Mexican, Filipino, Italian, and Japanese Americans in the 1940s.

A tailcoat is a knee-length coat characterised by a rear section of the skirt, with the front of the skirt cut away.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frock coat</span> Mens formal knee-length coat

A frock coat is a formal men's coat characterised by a knee-length skirt cut all around the base just above the knee, popular during the Victorian and Edwardian periods (1830s–1910s). It is a fitted, long-sleeved coat with a centre vent at the back and some features unusual in post-Victorian dress. These include the reverse collar and lapels, where the outer edge of the lapel is often cut from a separate piece of cloth from the main body and also a high degree of waist suppression around the waistcoat, where the coat's diameter round the waist is less than round the chest. This is achieved by a high horizontal waist seam with side bodies, which are extra panels of fabric above the waist used to pull in the naturally cylindrical drape. As was usual with all coats in the 19th century, shoulder padding was rare or minimal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rationing in the United Kingdom</span> Government-controlled distribution of scarce goods in the United Kingdom

Rationing was introduced temporarily by the British government several times during the 20th century, during and immediately after a war.

Semi-formal wear or half dress is a grouping of dress codes indicating the sort of clothes worn to events with a level of formality between informal wear and formal wear. In the modern era, the typical interpretation for men is black tie for evening wear and black lounge suit for day wear, corresponded by either a pant suit or an evening gown for women.

Burton is a British online clothing retailer and former high street retailer specialising in men's clothing and footwear. The company was a constituent of the FTSE 100 Index, but became a trading name of Arcadia Group Brands Ltd, part of the Arcadia Group. Sir Philip Green acquired the Arcadia Group in 2002, and it became the sole owner of Burton. In 2021, Boohoo.com acquired the brand after Arcadia went into administration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prison uniform</span> Outfit worn by incarcerated people

A prison uniform is a set of standardized clothing worn by prisoners. It usually includes visually distinct clothes worn to indicate the wearer is a prisoner, in clear distinction from civil clothing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1945–1960 in Western fashion</span> Costume and fashion in the post-war years 1945-1960

Fashion in the years following World War II is characterized by the resurgence of haute couture after the austerity of the war years. Square shoulders and short skirts were replaced by the soft femininity of Christian Dior's "New Look" silhouette, with its sweeping longer skirts, fitted waist, and rounded shoulders, which in turn gave way to an unfitted, structural look in the later 1950s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1930–1945 in Western fashion</span> Costume and fashion from the 1930s to the end of World War II

The most characteristic North American fashion trend from the 1930s to 1945 was attention at the shoulder, with butterfly sleeves and banjo sleeves, and exaggerated shoulder pads for both men and women by the 1940s. The period also saw the first widespread use of man-made fibers, especially rayon for dresses and viscose for linings and lingerie, and synthetic nylon stockings. The zipper became widely used. These essentially U.S. developments were echoed, in varying degrees, in Britain and Europe. Suntans became fashionable in the early 1930s, along with travel to the resorts along the Mediterranean, in the Bahamas, and on the east coast of Florida where one can acquire a tan, leading to new categories of clothes: white dinner jackets for men and beach pajamas, halter tops, and bare midriffs for women.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Montague Burton</span>

Sir Montague Maurice Burton was the founder of Burton Menswear, one of Britain's largest chains of clothes shops.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The full monty</span> British slang phrase

"The full monty" is a British slang phrase of uncertain origin. It means "everything which is necessary, appropriate or possible; 'the works'". Similar North American phrases include "the whole kit and caboodle", "the whole nine yards", "the whole ball of wax", "the whole enchilada", "the whole shebang", or "[going] the whole hog".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trousers as women's clothing</span>

Trousers or pants are a staple of historical and modern fashion. Throughout history, the role of trousers is a constant change for women. The first appearance of trousers in recorded history is among nomadic steppe-people in Western Europe. Steppe people were a group of nomads of various different ethnic groups that lived in the Eurasian grasslands. Archaeological evidence suggests that men and women alike wore trousers in that cultural context. However, for much of modern history, the use of trousers has been restricted to men. This norm was enforced in many regions due to social customs and laws. There are, however, many historical cases of women wearing trousers in defiance of these norms such as the 1850s women rights movement, comfort, freedom of movement, fashion, disguise, attempts to evade the gender pay gap, and attempts to establish an empowered public identity for women. Especially in the 20th and 21st centuries, the customs and laws restricting this manner of dress have relaxed dramatically, reflecting a growing acceptance and normalisation of the practice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trousers</span> Clothing for the legs and lower body

Trousers, slacks, or pants are an item of clothing worn from the waist to anywhere between the knees and the ankles, covering both legs separately. In the United Kingdom, the word pants generally means underwear and not trousers. Shorts are similar to trousers, but with legs that come down only to around the area of the knee, higher or lower depending on the style of the garment. To distinguish them from shorts, trousers may be called "long trousers" in certain contexts such as school uniform, where tailored shorts may be called "short trousers" in the UK.

Each branch of the Confederate States armed forces had its own service dress and fatigue uniforms and regulations regarding them during the American Civil War, which lasted from April 12, 1861, until May 1865.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Demobilisation of the British Armed Forces after the Second World War</span> Demobilisation of British Armed Forces after Second World War

At the end of the Second World War, there were approximately five million servicemembers in the British Armed Forces. The demobilisation and reassimilation of this vast force back into civilian life was one of the first and greatest challenges facing the postwar British government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Demobilisation of the Australian military after World War II</span>

The demobilisation of the Australian military after World War II involved discharging almost 600,000 men and women from the military, supporting their transition to civilian life and reducing the three armed services to peacetime strengths. Planning for the demobilisation process began in 1942 and thousands of servicemen and women were discharged in the last years of the war in response to shortages of labour in the domestic war economy. The general demobilisation of the military began in October 1945 and was completed in February 1947. The demobilisation process was largely successful, but some military personnel stationed in the South West Pacific complained that their repatriation to Australia was too slow.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shalwar kameez</span> Trousers and tunic worn in South Asia

Shalwar kameez is a traditional combination dress worn by women, and in some regions by men, in South Asia, and Central Asia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CC41</span>

The CC41 Utility logo was an identifying mark of products produced and sold as part of the British Government's Second World War Utility Clothing Scheme.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Utility clothing</span> World War II clothing rationing in the UK

The Utility Clothing Scheme was a programme introduced in the United Kingdom during the Second World War. In response to the shortage of clothing materials and labour due to wartime austerity, the Government's Board of Trade put the Utility Clothing Scheme in place in order to standardise the production, sale, and purchase of clothing in wartime. The Scheme embodied a variety of measures to ensure the availability of fabric, clothing, and shoes, which were proposed to ensure availability, no matter of the consumer’s socioeconomic circumstances.