Dish With One Spoon

Last updated

A Dish With One Spoon, also known as One Dish One Spoon, is a law used by Indigenous peoples of the Americas since at least 1142 CE [1] to describe an agreement for sharing hunting territory among two or more nations. People are all eating out of the single dish, that is, all hunting in the shared territory. One spoon signifies that all Peoples sharing the territory are expected to limit the game they take to leave enough for others, and for the continued abundance and viability of the hunting grounds into the future. [2] [3] :37 Sometimes the Indigenous language word is rendered in English as bowl or kettle rather than dish. [4] :210

Contents

The phrase "Dish With One Spoon" is also used to denote the treaty or agreement itself. In particular, a treaty made between the Anishinaabe and Haudenosaunee nations at Montréal in 1701 [5] :614–621 as part of the Great Peace of Montreal is usually called the Dish With One Spoon treaty, and its associated wampum belt the Dish With One Spoon wampum. [4] :217–218 The treaty territory includes part of the current province of Ontario between the Great Lakes and extends east along the north shore of the St. Lawrence River up to the border with the current province of Quebec. [4] :218 Some claim it also includes parts of the current states of New York and Michigan. [6] :210

Other references

Indigenous Nations made agreements with neighboring nations to share hunting grounds since time immemorial, [4] :210 however the earliest documented reference to the concept occurs in the Haudenosaunee Great Law of Peace, which one may call the founding constitution of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy. [2] [7] :30–45 [8] :454–57 Haudenosaunee oral tradition states this founding was in time immemorial. [9] However, scholars Barbara Mann and Jerry Fields tie a number of oral history stories to the dates of solar eclipses and conclude the Confederacy was formed on August 31, 1142. In addition, they claim archaeological evidence of palisades built around villages and the earliest cultivation of corn supports a date between 900–1200 CE. [1] In the Great Law of Peace there is a specific entreaty to have "no knife near our dish" [2] so that the sharing is guaranteed to be without bloodshed. The Dish With One Spoon reference in the Great Law of Peace expressly mandates conserving the game roaming about in the hunting grounds, as well as requiring its sharing. [7] [8] :456–57 It also contains a promise to share equally in the harvests of the fields. [7] :43

In the late 18th century, Ojibwe and Dakota, traditional enemies, agreed to meet each year at the beginning of winter, smoke a peace pipe, and then throughout the hunting season exchange friendly visits, and hunt in the common territory without harming each other. [10] :267–68 Further south in the current state of Georgia, in the mid 18th century, the Creeks and Cherokee agreed to a peace treaty on Dish With One Spoon terms with the small difference that it specified a dividing line between their hunting territories with some parts being dedicated to each nation. [11] :121

Events leading up to the treaty

The fur trade generated a huge demand for beaver furs and specifically ones from northern climes which were more desirable because they were thicker. Haudenosaunee wanted the European goods available in trade, so they were almost continually fighting nations in those territories. [12] :539 Montagnais, Algonquin and some Haudenosaunee nations negotiated a peace in 1624 at Trois-Rivières and Québec to share the area for hunting. [13] French and Dutch colonial authorities did not like this peace that did not involve them because it portended a lessening of their economic power. Hence they fostered distrust among the Indigenous Nations which succeeded in breaking the peace within a few years. [4] :212 In September 1645, Wendat, Kichesipirini, Montagnais, and Mohawk negotiated another peace at Trois-Rivières to share the area for hunting, [14] :39 and renewed it in February 1646. [4] :214 This peace broke down almost immediately when Five Nations warriors raided north and westward into Wendat territory in the fall of 1646. [4] :214 It is probable that the Five Nations did that not only for the superior pelts, but also because they had almost rendered the beaver extinct in their home territory south of Lake Ontario. [6] :211 Five Nations raiding continued and intensified until the 1680s and 90s when the French mounted a serious military offensive against them. [6] :212–215 In the 1640s, the Mississaugas, an Anishinaabe Nation, in response to Haudenosaunee raiding and to avoid smallpox epidemics decimating sedentary agricultural tribes with whom they shared land, left their traditional territory on the north shore of Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River and fled north and west. In the 1670s, with help from the Odawa and Chippewa, they returned and contributed to the growing pressure from the French against the Haudenosaunee. [5] :565–577 [15] :10–13

The treaty

New York colonial documents show that various tribes met in their hunting grounds in the late 1690s to start discussing peace, [4] :216 and in the summer of 1700, representatives of various Anishinaabe and other western nations met with a Haudenosaunee council in Onondaga to discuss peace. At that meeting the western nations requested to be part of the Covenant Chain and to share hunting grounds in accordance with the Dish With One Spoon principle. [6] :217–218 That was followed by a meeting of chiefs from the Five Nations and 19 other nations at Montréal in September, at which a wampum belt described as "making one joint kettle when we shall meet", most probably the Dish With One Spoon belt, was presented by the Haudenosaunee. [4] :217 All parties agreed to a larger meeting in Montréal the following year at which the Great Peace of Montreal was signed on August 4. [4] :217 [6] :229–230 A couple of weeks earlier on July 19, the Haudenosaunee had concluded an agreement with the British at Albany where, in an attempt to ensure the protection of the British, they conveyed the entire territory to them. Scholars argue that the two sides had differing understandings of the terms of the conveyance, with the Haudenosaunee expecting only British protection of the territory and the British expecting to be able to extend New York into it. [6] :227–229

After the treaty

The Montréal treaty proved to be long lasting, and there are many references to it and to the Dish With One Spoon wampum in the historical record. A few examples:

In 1765, Daniel Claus, Deputy Superintendent General of Indian Affairs, wrote to Sir William Johnson, British Superintendent of Indian Affairs, reminding him of the 1701 treaty at which the French governor had told the agreeing Indigenous Nations that "the Woods, and Hunting Grounds could be no otherwise than in common, and free to one Nation as to another." [4] :219

In 1793 Six Nations chief Joseph Brant wrote to Indian Affairs superintendent Alexander McKee explaining that the Indian Affairs Department's claim that some part of the country near Grand River belongs to the Six Nations is in error, because about a hundred years earlier there was an agreement to share the lands with other Indigenous Peoples for hunting purposes, [4] :220 and there is a Dish With One Spoon wampum which supports his position. [16] Brant's claim is supported by Mississauga oral tradition which states that the land north of eastern Lake Erie, all of Lake Ontario, and the western north shore of the St. Lawrence River has been Mississauga territory since time immemorial and they agreed to share it in the Dish With One Spoon treaty. [5] :1636

In 1824, Wendat chief Tsaouenhohi told the Legislative Assembly of Lower Canada that about two hundred years earlier seven nations had concluded a treaty to eat with the same spoon from the same bowl. [17] Given that only 123 years had elapsed since the Montréal treaty, it is not clear whether Tsaouenhohi was referring to it or to one of the earlier treaties in the mid 17th century.

During a treaty gathering in 1840, Six Nations wampum keeper John Skanawati Buck [18] [ dubious ] presented four wampum belts, including one which commemorated the Dish With One Spoon. [4] :221–222 Buck stated it represented the first treaty, to share hunting grounds, made between the Anishinaabe and the Six Nations many years earlier in Montréal. [19] Mississauga oral tradition differs, claiming that the treaty was only made with the Mohawks. [5] :613 The belt was kept at Six Nations of the Grand River by Buck until his death in 1893, [4] :225 [20] :222–223 after which time the belts in his possession were dispersed, with some sold to traders and collectors. The belt was later recorded to be in possession of Evelyn H.C. Johnson who donated it to the Royal Ontario Museum in 1922. [4] :225 [20] :224–226

In 1915, Seth Newhouse, an Onondaga chief, wrote to King George V protesting that the restrictive game laws of the province of Ontario were making it impossible for his people to get enough sustenance from hunting and asking the King to send to them a picture of himself holding the treaty document so they could use it to challenge those laws. The Indian Affairs Department intercepted the letter and it was not delivered. [4] :224–225

Today

For some organizations, it is now customary in Canada to acknowledge at meetings and other events that the event is taking place on territory which was and may still be Indigenous territory. [21] The Dish With One Spoon has been incorporated into many territorial acknowledgements for organizations and institutions in the Toronto area, including the Council of Ontario Universities [22] and ministries of the Toronto Conference of the United Church of Canada. [21] Today, some see the treaty as a covenant that applies to all those living in Southern Ontario, including Indigenous Peoples not party to the original treaty, as well as settlers and newcomers. [23] [24]

The belt currently resides at the Royal Ontario Museum. [3] :41 It is mostly made of white whelk shells with a small area of purple quahog clam shells in the center of the belt representing the dish. [25]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wyandot people</span> Native American ethnic group

The Wyandot people are Indigenous peoples of the Northeastern Woodlands of North America, and speakers of an Iroquoian language, Wyandot.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Algonquin people</span> Indigenous people of Eastern Canada

The Algonquin people are an Indigenous people who now live in Eastern Canada. They speak the Algonquin language, which is part of the Algonquian language family. Culturally and linguistically, they are closely related to the Odawa, Potawatomi, Ojibwe, Mississaugas, and Nipissing, with whom they form the larger Anicinàpe (Anishinaabeg). Algonquins call themselves Omàmiwinini or the more generalised name of Anicinàpe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mississaugas</span> Subtribe of the First Nations people in southern Ontario, Canada

The Mississaugas are a group of First Nations peoples located in southern Ontario, Canada. They are a sub-group of the Ojibwe Nation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Peace of Montreal</span> 1701 peace treaty between New France and First Nations

The Great Peace of Montreal was a peace treaty between New France and 39 First Nations of North America that ended the Beaver Wars. It was signed on August 4, 1701, by Louis-Hector de Callière, governor of New France, and 1300 representatives of 39 Indigenous nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wampum</span> Traditional shell bead of the Eastern Woodlands Indigenous tribes of North America

Wampum is a traditional shell bead of the Eastern Woodlands tribes of Native Americans. It includes white shell beads hand-fashioned from the North Atlantic channeled whelk shell and white and purple beads made from the quahog or Western North Atlantic hard-shelled clam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Onondaga people</span> Ethnic group

The Onondaga people are one of the five original nations of the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy in the Northeastern Woodlands. Their historical homelands are in and around present-day Onondaga County, New York, south of Lake Ontario.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Six Nations of the Grand River</span> Indian reserve in Ontario, Canada

Six Nations is demographically the largest First Nations reserve in Canada. As of the end of 2017, it has a total of 27,276 members, 12,848 of whom live on the reserve. These nations are the Mohawk, Cayuga, Onondaga, Oneida, Seneca and Tuscarora. Some Lenape live in the territory as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neutral Confederacy</span> Historic Indigenous peoples of the Northeastern Woodlands

The Neutral Confederacy was a tribal confederation of Iroquoian peoples. Its heartland was in the floodplain of the Grand River in what is now Ontario, Canada. At its height, its wider territory extended toward the shores of lakes Erie, Huron, and Ontario, as well as the Niagara River in the east. To the northeast were the neighbouring territories of Huronia and the Petun Country, which were inhabited by other Iroquoian confederacies from which the term Neutrals Attawandaron was derived. The five-nation Iroquois Confederacy was across Lake Ontario to the southeast.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wendake</span> Indian reserve in Quebec, Canada

Wendake is the current name for two urban reserves, Wendake 7 and Wendake 7A, of the Huron-Wendat Nation in the Canadian province of Quebec. They are enclaves entirely surrounded by the La Haute-Saint-Charles borough of Quebec City, within the former city of Loretteville. One of the Seven Nations of Canada, the settlement was formerly known as Village-des-Hurons, and also as (Jeune)-Lorette.

The Huron-Wendat Nation is an Iroquoian-speaking nation that was established in the 17th century. In the French language, used by most members of the First Nation, they are known as the Nation Huronne-Wendat. The French gave the nickname “Huron” to the Wendat, meaning “boar's head” because of the hairstyle of Huron men. Wendat (Quendat) was their confederacy name, meaning “people of the island” or "dwellers on a peninsula."

The Covenant Chain was a series of alliances and treaties developed during the seventeenth century, primarily between the Iroquois Confederacy (Haudenosaunee) and the British colonies of North America, with other Native American tribes added. First met in the New York area at a time of violence and social instability for the colonies and Native Americans, the English and Iroquois councils and subsequent treaties were based on supporting peace and stability to preserve trade. They addressed issues of colonial settlement, and tried to suppress violence between the colonists and Indian tribes, as well as among the tribes, from New England to the Colony of Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Two Row Wampum Treaty</span> 1613 Treaty between Iroquois Indians and Dutch Government

The Two Row Wampum Treaty, also known as Guswenta or Kaswentha and as the Tawagonshi Agreement of 1613 or the Tawagonshi Treaty, is a mutual treaty agreement, made in 1613 between representatives of the Five Nations of the Haudenosaunee and representatives of the Dutch government in what is now upstate New York. The agreement is considered by the Haudenosaunee to be the basis of all of their subsequent treaties with European and North American governments, and the citizens of those nations, including the Covenant Chain treaty with the British in 1677 and the Treaty of Canandaigua with the United States in 1794.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tessouat</span>

Tessouat was an Algonquin chief from the Kitchesipirini nation. His nation lived in an area extending from Lake of Two Mountains to modern-day Pembroke, Ontario.

The Saugeen Ojibway Nation Territory, also known as Saugeen Ojibway Nation, SON and the Chippewas of Saugeen Ojibway Territory, is the name applied to Chippewas of Nawash Unceded First Nation and Saugeen First Nation as a collective, represented by a joint council. The collective First Nations are Ojibway (Anishinaabe) peoples located on the eastern shores of Lake Huron on the Bruce Peninsula in Ontario, Canada. Though predominantly Ojibway, due to large influx of refugees from the south and west after the War of 1812, the descendants of the Chippewas of Saugeen Ojibway Territory also have ancestry traced to Odawa and Potawatomi peoples.

The 1764 Treaty of Fort Niagara is one of the first treaty agreements made between First Nations and The Crown. It is a notable example of The Crown's recognition of Indigenous sovereignty in the years preceding the American Revolution. However, the agreement was recorded in wampum and no paper document was signed; Canadian law does not recognize the legality of the agreement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iroquois</span> Indigenous confederacy in North America

The Iroquois, also known as the Five Nations or the Six Nations and by the endonym Haudenosaunee, are an Iroquoian-speaking confederacy of Native Americans and First Nations peoples in northeast North America and Upstate New York. They were known during the colonial years to the French as the "Iroquois League", and later as the "Iroquois Confederacy". The English called them the "Five Nations", including the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca. After 1722, the Iroquoian-speaking Tuscarora from the southeast were accepted into the confederacy, which became known as the Six Nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tadodaho</span>

Tadodaho was a Native American Hoyenah (sachem) of the Onondaga nation before the Deganawidah and Hiawatha formed the Iroquois League. According to oral tradition, he had extraordinary characteristics and was widely feared, but he was persuaded to support the confederacy of the Five Nations.

Between 1665 and 1670, seven Iroquois settlements on the north shore of Lake Ontario in present-day Ontario, collectively known as the "Iroquois du Nord" villages, were established by Senecas, Cayugas, and Oneidas. The villages consisted of Ganneious, Kente, Kentsio, Ganaraske, Ganatsekwyagon, Teiaiagon, and Quinaouatoua. The villages were all abandoned by 1701.

Hannah Claus is a multidisciplinary visual artist of English and Kanien'kehá:ka (Mohawk) ancestries and is a member of the Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte First Nation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flag of the Iroquois Confederacy</span> Indigenous peoples flag

The flag of the Iroquois Confederacy or Haudenosaunee flag is the flag used to represent the six nations of the Iroquois. It is a purple flag with four connected white squares and an eastern white pine tree in the center.

References

  1. 1 2 Mann, Barbara A.; Fields, Jerry L. (1997). "A sign in the sky: dating the League of the Haudenosaunee". American Indian Culture & Research Journal. 21 (2): 105–163. doi:10.17953/aicr.21.2.k36m1485r3062510.
  2. 1 2 3 Gibson, John Arthur; Goldenweiser, Alexander (1992). Woodbury, Hanni; Henry, Reg; Webster, Harry (eds.). Concerning the League: The Iroquois League Tradition as Dictated in Onondaga. Winnipeg: Algonquian and Iroquoian Linguistics. pp. 457–460.
  3. 1 2 Simpson, Leanne (2008). "Looking after Gdoo-naaganinaa: Precolonial Nishnaabeg Diplomatic and Treaty Relationships". Wíčazo Ša Review. 23 (2): 29–42. doi:10.1353/wic.0.0001.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Lytwyn, Victor P. (1997). "A Dish with One Spoon: The Shared Hunting Grounds Agreement in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Valley Region". Papers of the Twenty-eighth Algonquian Conference. 28: 210–227.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Williams, Doug (2018). Michi Saagig Nishnaabeg: This is Our Territory (Kindle ed.). Winnipeg: ARP Books. ISBN   9781927886090.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Brandão, José António; Starna, William (1996). "The Treaties of 1701: A Triumph of Iroquois Diplomacy". Ethnohistory. 43 (2): 210. doi:10.2307/483396. JSTOR   483396.
  7. 1 2 3 Hill, Susan M. (2017). The Clay We Are Made Of: Haudenosaunee Land Tenure on the Grand River. Winnipeg, Manitoba: University of Manitoba Press. ISBN   978-0-88755717-0.
  8. 1 2 King, Joyce Tekahnawiiaks (2007). "The Value of Water and the Meaning of Water Law for the Native Americans Known as the Haudenosaunee". Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy. 16: 454–59.
  9. "Haudenosaunee Confederacy" . Retrieved 26 October 2018.
  10. Warren, William W. (1984). History of the Ojibway People . St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society. pp.  267–68. ISBN   087351162X.
  11. Moulton, Gary E., ed. (1985). The Papers of Chief John Ross. Vol. 1. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
  12. Richter, Daniel (1983). "War and Culture: The Iroquois Experience". The William and Mary Quarterly. 40 (4): 539. doi:10.2307/1921807. JSTOR   1921807.
  13. Champlain, Samuel de (1933). Biggar, H.P. (ed.). The works of Samuel de Champlain v. 5: 1620-1629. Toronto: Champlain Society. ISBN   9781442617810.
  14. Trelease, Allen W. (1962). "The Iroquois and the Western Fur Trade: A Problem in Interpretation". The Mississippi Valley Historical Review. 49 (1): 32–51. doi:10.2307/1889464. JSTOR   1889464.
  15. Johnston, Darlene (2006). Connecting People to Place: Great Lakes Aboriginal History in Cultural Context. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. SSRN   1864900.
  16. Simcoe, John Graves. Cruikshank, E. W. (ed.). The correspondence of Lieutenant Governor John Graves Simcoe. Vol. 5. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. p. 67.
  17. Sioui, Georges E. (1992). For an Amerindian Autohistory: An Essay on the Foundations of a Social Ethic. MQUP. p. 90. ISBN   9780773563667.
  18. Fine-Dare, Kathleen Sue (2002). Grave Injustice: The American Indian Repatriation Movement and NAGPRA. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press. pp.  93. ISBN   9780803269088.
  19. Jones, Peter (Kahkewāquonāby) (1861). History of the Ojebway Indians: with especial reference to their Conversion to Christianity. London: A. W. Bennett. pp.  118–119.
  20. 1 2 Tooker, Elisabeth (1998). "A Note on the Return of Eleven Wampum Belts to the Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy on Grand River, Canada". Ethnohistory. 45 (2): 219–236. doi:10.2307/483059. JSTOR   483059.
  21. 1 2 "Territorial Acknowledgements". Toronto Conference of the United Church of Canada. Retrieved August 13, 2017.
  22. "Acknowledgement of Traditional Land". Council of Ontario Universities. Retrieved August 13, 2017.
  23. "Land Acknowledgement". Ryerson School of Journalism. Retrieved August 13, 2017.
  24. "Reclaiming/Renaming". Ogimaa Mikana. Retrieved August 13, 2017 via Tumblr.
  25. Nahwegahbow, Barb (2014). "Wampum holds power of earliest agreements". Windspeaker. Ammsa. 32 (1).