Dogs That Cannot Touch Each Other

Last updated

Dogs That Cannot Touch Each Other is an art installation created by Chinese artists Sun Yuan & Peng Yu in 2003. The installation consists of a series of enclosed treadmills, each with a pair of American Pit Bull Terriers placed facing each other. The treadmills are turned on, causing the dogs to run towards each other but never allowing them to make physical contact due to the transparent barriers.

Contents

The piece sparked significant debate and criticism regarding animal cruelty and ethical treatment of animals in the name of art. As a result, the exhibition was canceled in several locations, most notably the Guggenheim Museum.

Installation

The art installation comprises eight enclosed, nonmotorized treadmills, each with an American Pit Bull Terrier obtained from a provincial breeding and training institute for fighting dogs. The dogs were brought to the Beijing art space in separate limousines, with human trainers ensuring their separation due to territorial and aggressive tendencies. The dogs are positioned facing each other and harnessed in place before the treadmills are activated. The dogs unsuccessfully attempt to run towards each other, exhausting themselves in the process. [1] The performance is structured into three seven-minute segments, alternating between running and rest, aiming to emulate human athletic competition and establish an equivalence between human and animal sports. [2] [3]

The preparation of the dogs for the running was described as integral to the overall spectacle of Dogs That Cannot Touch Each Other. In the intermission, human trainers took meticulous care of the dogs, providing water and massaging them to relax their muscles, treating the dogs with the same level of attention as star athletes, as explained by scholar Meiling Cheng. [2] According to Yu, the dogs were examined by veterinarians before and after the performance. [4] The primary objective was to establish an equivalence between human and animal sports by employing dogs specifically bred for aggression, using them as a prop to comment on human savagery. Cheng notes that the machines used in the performance were deemed highly effective for training fighting dogs, with the dogs' regular coach going on to purchase four treadmills from the artists after the conclusion of the show. [2]

Criticism

The installation has faced disapproval and condemnation from art critics and animal welfare advocates. Animal rights groups expressed strong disapproval of the installation. PETA President Ingrid Newkirk wrote that "the animals in these exhibits are not willing participants, and no one should force sentient beings into stressful situations for 'art' or 'sport.'" [5] The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) declared that “the ASPCA fully supports artistic expression, but strongly oppose any use of animals in art or entertainment if it results in pain or distress to the animals, which is clearly the case in this video." [1] The American Kennel Club stated that dogfighting “should not be displayed in any manner and certainly not as art.” [4]

In an interview with Paul Gladston, Sun responded to allegations of abuse by saying:

Were the dogs being abused? The answer should be no. These dogs are naturally pugnacious. We only separated them and let them run on the treadmill, which became a sport for the dogs. For those who consider this animal abuse, I don’t understand what they are protesting about. In fact, human nature and animal nature are the same. China hosted the Olympic Games in Beijing in 2008. What is the goal of this type of sporting event? Actually, it is a conversion of actual fighting into regulated competition. It’s agreeable to most people because most people are supportive of the convention of the Olympic Games. [6]

Guggenheim controversy

The installation stirred a significant controversy at the Guggenheim Museum, ignited by The New York Times ' September 20, 2017 article, "Where the Wild Things Are: China’s Art Dreams at the Guggenheim." The article, previewing the upcoming exhibition "Art and China after 1989: Theater of the World," which contained about 150 works, [4] expressed concerns about a seven-minute video of the original installation of Dogs That Cannot Touch Each Other staged at a Beijing museum in 2003, sparking a swift public reaction. Critics and animal-rights supporters labeled it as animal abuse and began circulating petitions and social media campaigns urging for it to be removed, as well as for the removal of two other works involving animals. [7] In a letter to the Guggenheim, PETA wrote that “people who find entertainment in watching animals try to fight each other are sick individuals whose twisted whims the Guggenheim should refuse to cater to." [1] Protesters demonstrated outside the Guggenheim [4] and a Change.org petition calling for the removal of the works in the exhibition garnered signatures from nearly 600,000 people before the removal of the works was announced. [8]

Responding to the controversy, the Guggenheim released a statement on September 21, acknowledging concerns and characterizing the artwork as "intentionally challenging and provocative," aiming to examine systems of power and control. The statement urged viewers to "consider why the artists produced it and what they may be saying about the social conditions of globalization and the complex nature of the world we share." [2]

As the controversy intensified, the museum, in an uncommon move, removed three works, including Dogs That Cannot Touch Each Other, from the exhibition on September 25. The two other works removed were Theater of the World by Huang Yong Ping, a structure with insects and lizards that may eat each other under warming lamps, and A Case Study of Transference by Xu Bing, a video featuring pigs stamped with characters copulating in front of a live audience. [5] The decision was attributed to "explicit and repeated threats of violence" and concerns for the safety of staff, visitors, and participating artists. While expressing dismay at withholding artworks, the museum emphasized that "freedom of expression has always been and will remain a paramount value of the Guggenheim." [1] [2]

Before the criticism started, curator Alexandra Munroe, who organized the exhibition, discussed the anticipated pushback in an interview with Artnet News' Andrew Goldstein. Munroe acknowledged the challenging reception of "Theater of the World" since its 1993 premiere. Despite the historical difficulties, she mentioned the Guggenheim's decision to showcase the work, emphasizing its role in introducing visitors to a visceral realism present in other significant pieces within the exhibition. [9]

Reception of the museum's removal of the video

The Guggenheim's communication about the artwork's context was criticized for its vagueness, particularly as the exhibition aimed to showcase less-known Chinese conceptual art in the United States. The controversy highlighted broader issues about how museums navigate and present challenging material in the contemporary socio-political landscape. Several artists criticized the Guggenheim for withdrawing the controversial artworks, expressing worries about potential threats to artistic expression and free speech. [9] In a CNN opinion piece, art critic J.J. Charlesworth observed that the Guggenheim's invocation of freedom of expression appeared feeble at best and noted that critics of the exhibition displayed little regard for the principle of free speech, with few showing enthusiasm to support the museum's defense. He highlighted that freedom of expression became negotiable when it challenges the values cherished by protestors. [1] Chinese conceptual artist and activist Ai Weiwei, frequently subject to Chinese government censorship, expressed his viewpoint by stating "when an art institution cannot exercise its right for freedom of speech, that is tragic for a modern society." He also noted that pressuring museums to remove certain works "shows a narrow understanding about not only animal rights but also human rights." [1] [9]

Writing for ARTnews, Ben Davis argues that the criticism of the video, which he refers to as a "historical document of an event that took place 14 years ago," should be viewed in the context of a broader historical and cultural perspective. While acknowledging the potential repugnance of the treatment of animals in the video, Davis contends that "the treatment of animals in it is representative of an actual, pronounced strand of Chinese artistic practice, one that was historically important and needs to be understood." He introduces scholar Meiling Cheng's perspective, emphasizing the caution needed when applying Euro-American values to China due to radical socioeconomic differences. Davis highlights the evolving attitudes towards animal welfare in China, particularly in urban areas, and places the controversial artwork within the significant rural-to-urban transformations during the exhibition's time frame, noting the cultural shifts that influenced recent Chinese art's focus on animal-based work. [2]

Gary Comstock, a philosophy professor at North Carolina State University and a board member of the Culture & Animals Foundation, argues that the Guggenheim's decision to remove the controversial works represents an "unusual conflation of human and animal rights". He specifically objects to the removal of the footage of Dogs That Cannot Touch Each Other, stating that while it captures morally questionable behavior, it does not justify suppression, as the harm inflicted on the dogs was not extreme or fatal, and there is no evidence of ongoing harm by the artists. Comstock contends that the video of the performance serves as a valuable historical record that sparks conversations about the human-animal bond and cultural differences in the treatment of companion animals and that the video does not harm viewers or the dogs further, as the harm has already occurred. While he deems it "bad art" based on aesthetic judgment, he emphasizes that this is not a moral assessment. Comstock also suggests that the artists might have questionable intentions, and he condemns any future attempts to subject sentient animals to similar treatment. [10]

Art history professor Stephen F. Eisenman, in a piece for ARTnews , dismissed the notion that freedom of expression was relevant to the controversy. He expressed outrage at a well-regarded institution showcasing videotapes of artworks that feature "animal use, abuse, and torture.” Jessica Scott-Reid, writing for New York Daily News, rebuked the perceived privilege of art and artists. While acknowledging the art world's distinct realm, she emphasized that "art is still expected to abide by the law, if not of the land then of humanity.” [1]

Best Friends Animal Society criticized the Guggenheim for neglecting the inherent cruelty in the showcased piece and removing it solely due to safety concerns, without addressing the cruelty in its creation or display. They assert that the exhibit constitutes plain animal abuse, highlighting the dogs' lack of consent and denouncing Sun's justifications. They question the ethical implications of presenting such work, drawing parallels to scenarios involving human subjects, and encourage readers to voice their objections to the Guggenheim curator, Alexandra Munroe, whom they label as "out-of-touch." [11]

See also

Further reading

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation</span> American non-profit museum operator

The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation is a nonprofit organization founded in 1937 by philanthropist Solomon R. Guggenheim and his long-time art advisor, artist Hilla von Rebay. The foundation is a leading institution for the collection, preservation, and research of modern and contemporary art and operates several museums around the world. The first museum established by the foundation was The Museum of Non-Objective Painting, in New York City. This became The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in 1952, and the foundation moved the collection into its first permanent museum building, in New York City, in 1959. The foundation next opened the Peggy Guggenheim Collection in Venice, Italy, in 1980. Its international network of museums expanded in 1997 to include the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao in Bilbao, Spain, and it expects to open a new museum, Guggenheim Abu Dhabi, in the United Arab Emirates after its construction is completed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Performance art</span> Artwork created through actions of an artist or other participants

Performance art is an artwork or art exhibition created through actions executed by the artist or other participants. It may be witnessed live or through documentation, spontaneously developed or written, and is traditionally presented to a public in a fine art context in an interdisciplinary mode. Also known as artistic action, it has been developed through the years as a genre of its own in which art is presented live. It had an important and fundamental role in 20th century avant-garde art.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yoshitomo Nara</span> Japanese artist

Yoshitomo Nara is a Japanese artist. He lives and works in Nasushiobara, Tochigi Prefecture, though his artwork has been exhibited worldwide. Nara has had nearly 40 solo exhibitions since 1984. His art work has been housed at the MoMA and the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA). His most well-known and repeated subjects are "big-headed girls" with piercing eyes, who one Nara scholar describes as having "childlike expressions [that] resonate with adult emotions, [their] embodiment of kawaii (cuteness) carries a dark humor, and any explicit cultural references are intertwined with personal memories."

Sue Coe is an English artist and illustrator working primarily in drawing, printmaking, and in the form of illustrated books and comics. Her work is in the tradition of social protest art and is highly political. Coe's work often includes animal rights commentary, though she also creates work that centralizes the rights of marginalized peoples and criticizes capitalism. Her commentary on political events and social injustice are published in newspapers, magazines and books. Her work has been shown internationally in both solo and group exhibitions and has been collected by various international museums. She lives in Upstate New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ann Hamilton (artist)</span> American visual artist

Ann Hamilton is an American visual artist who emerged in the early 1980s known for her large-scale multimedia installations. After receiving her BFA in textile design from the University of Kansas in 1979, she lived in Banff, Alberta, and Montreal, Quebec, Canada before deciding to pursue an MFA in sculpture at Yale in 1983. From 1985 to 1991, she taught on the faculty of the University of California at Santa Barbara. Since 2001, Hamilton has served on the faculty of the Department of Art at the Ohio State University. She was appointed a Distinguished University Professor in 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Huang Yong Ping</span> French artist

Huáng Yǒng Pīng was a Chinese-French contemporary artist and one of the most well known Chinese avant-garde artists of his time. Born in Xiamen, he was recognized as the most controversial and provocative artist of the Chinese art scene of the 1980s.

Liu Wei is a Chinese artist based in Beijing. He works in varied media – video, installation, drawing, sculpture, and painting – with no uniting stylistic tendency, though the Saatchi Gallery finds a uniting theme of "a sentiment of excess, corruption, and aggression reflective of cultural anxiety". Conceptualism, satire, and humor are the hallmarks of his works.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cai Guo-Qiang</span> Chinese installation artist

Cai Guo-Qiang is a Chinese artist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Doris Salcedo</span> Colombian installation and sculpture artist (born 1958)

Doris Salcedo is a Colombian-born visual artist and sculptor. Her work is influenced by her experiences of life in Colombia and is generally composed of commonplace items such as wooden furniture, clothing, concrete, grass, and rose petals. Salcedo's work gives form to pain, trauma, and loss, while creating space for individual and collective mourning. These themes stem from her own personal history. Members of her own family were among the many people who have disappeared in politically troubled Colombia. Much of her work deals with the fact that, while the death of a loved one can be mourned, their disappearance leaves an unbearable emptiness. Salcedo lives and works in Bogotá, Colombia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shu Lea Cheang</span> Taiwanese-American artist and filmmaker

Shu Lea Cheang is a Taiwanese-American artist and filmmaker who lived and worked in New York City in the 1980s and 1990s, until relocating to Europe in 2000. Cheang received a BA in history from the National Taiwan University in 1976 and an MA in Cinema Studies from New York University in 1979. Since the 1980s, as a multimedia and new-media artist, she has navigated topics of ethnic stereotyping, sexual politics, and institutional oppression with her radical experimentations in digital realms. She drafts sci-fi narratives in her film scenario and artwork imagination, crafting her own “science” fiction genre of new queer cinema. From homesteading cyberspace in the 1990s to her current retreat to post net-crash BioNet zone, Cheang takes on viral love, bio hack in her current cycle of works.

Diana Thater is an American artist, curator, writer, and educator. She has been a pioneering creator of film, video, and installation art since the early 1990s. She lives and works in Los Angeles, California.

Sun Yuan and Peng Yu are Chinese conceptual artists whose work has a reputation for being confrontational and provocative. They have lived and worked collaboratively in Beijing since the late 1990s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yang Fudong</span> Chinese contemporary artist

Yang Fudong is a Chinese contemporary artist. In the early 1990s, he began to work with film. He began creating films and videos using 35 mm film. Currently Yang directs films, creates photographs, and creates video installations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shilpa Gupta</span> Indian artist

Shilpa Gupta is a contemporary Indian artist based in Mumbai, India. Gupta's artistic practise encompasses a wide range of mediums, including manipulated found objects, video art, interactive computer-based installations, and performance.

Xiao Lu is a Chinese artist who works with Performance art and Installation art. She became famous in 1989, when she participated in the 1989 China/Avant-Garde Exhibition with her work, Dialogue. Just two hours after the exhibition opened, she suddenly shot her own work with a gun, causing an immediate shutdown of the exhibition. When the Tiananmen Square massacre occurred four months later, her actions were heavily politicized, referred to as “the first gunshots of Tiananmen”.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Angela Su</span> Hong Kong artist

Angela Su is a Hong Kong artist known for her biomorphic drawings, fictional films and hair embroideries, exploring the imagery of the body through metamorphosis, hybridity and transformation. She is a trained biochemist as well as a visual artist. In 2014, Su was featured in Art Radar on a list of influential Asian female artists making an impact on the international art stage. She represents Hong Kong in the Collateral Event at the 59th International Art Exhibition - La Biennale di Venezia, with a solo exhibition titled: Angela Su: Arise, Hong Kong in Venice.

Tayeba Begum Lipi is a Bangladeshi artist and the co-founder and trustee of Britto Arts Trust. She received a Grand Prize at the 11th Asian Art Biennale, Bangladesh 2004. Lipi is a multimedia artist who has engaged in paintings, prints, installations and videos. Her works have been featured in notable group exhibitions, including the 54th Venice Biennale (2011) and Colombo Art Biennale (2012). She was also the commissioner for the Bangladesh Pavilion at the 54th Venice Biennale (2011).

Art and China after 1989: Theater of the World is an exhibition that took place at Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in New York between October 6, 2017 – January 7, 2018. The exhibition presents works by seventy-one artists and artist collectives across China and worldwide, who define contemporary experience in and of China. Looking at a period between the Tiananmen Square Protests, which also coincides with the end of the Cold War, and the Beijing Olympics in 2008, the exhibition explores a time when "anything seemed possible" and artists from China sought visibility in the global art world. The curators of the exhibition write that the works in this exhibition respond to how China went through a radical transformation between 1989 and 2008, which had an unmatchable impact at the global level. The exhibition has been considered as "an invaluable window" onto the intersection of contemporary art, politics, and history, and as an opportunity to ask questions about the role of museums as sites of learning how one could be a global citizen today. It also traveled to Guggenheim Museum Bilbao and the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art in 2018 and 2019, respectively.

<i>Helena</i> (artwork) 2000 art installation by Marco Evaristti

Helena was an art installation by Marco Evaristti originally at the Trapholt museum in 2000. The art was a room with 10 blenders, each of which contained a goldfish. The fish were vulnerable to any visitor to the exhibit who chose to turn on a blender and kill them. During the exhibition two fish were killed in this way. Persons present at the initial exhibition of the installation noted that "numerous media representatives who were present...virtually encouraged the visitors to press the button in order to initiate a scandal”.

<i>Cant Help Myself</i> (Sun Yuan and Peng Yu) Kinetic sculpture

Can't Help Myself was a kinetic sculpture created by Sun Yuan and Peng Yu in 2016. The sculpture consisted of a robotic arm that could move to sweep up red, cellulose ether fluid leaking from its inner core, and make dance-like movements. It was commissioned by the Guggenheim museum with the intent of cultivating dialogue about the advancement of technology and industrialization, violent border control, and allusions to the nature of life.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Charlesworth, J. J. (2017-10-04). "Should the Guggenheim have pulled controversial animal artworks?". CNN. Retrieved 2023-12-11.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Davis, Ben (2017-09-29). "Why the Guggenheim's Controversial Dog Video Is Even More Disturbing Than You Think". Artnet News. Retrieved 2023-12-11.
  3. ↑ Baecker, Angie (2017-10-18). "In Defense of Difficult Art at the Guggenheim's Controversial Exhibition". Slate. ISSN   1091-2339 . Retrieved 2023-12-11.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Haag, Matthew (2017-09-26). "Guggenheim, Bowing to Animal-Rights Activists, Pulls Works From Show". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-12-11.
  5. 1 2 Wamsley, Laurel (September 26, 2017). "Citing Threats, Guggenheim Pulls 3 Works Involving Animals From Exhibition". NPR .
  6. ↑ Gladston, Paul (2015-08-21). Deconstructing Contemporary Chinese Art: Selected Critical Writings and Conversations, 2007-2014. Springer. p. 131. ISBN   978-3-662-46488-5.
  7. ↑ Haag, Matthew (2017-09-22). "Guggenheim Exhibit With Video of Dogs Trying to Fight Stirs Criticism". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-12-11.
  8. ↑ Scott-Reid, Jessica (2017-09-26). "The Guggenheim's reversal is only a partial animal-rights victory: The museum still doesn't understand what it did wrong". New York Daily News. Retrieved 2023-12-11.
  9. 1 2 3 Katz, Brigit (September 28, 2017). "What to Know About the Controversy Surrounding the Chinese Art Exhibit Coming to the Guggenheim". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 2023-12-11.
  10. ↑ Helmore, Edward (2017-09-29). "Can mistreated dogs ever be considered art?". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2023-12-11.
  11. ↑ ""Dogs That Cannot Touch Each Other"". Best Friends Animal Society - Save Them All. 2017-09-26. Retrieved 2023-12-11.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.