This article needs additional citations for verification .(April 2014) |
Dramatic Interpretation (often shortened to "Dramatic Interp," "Drama" or just "DI") is an event in National Speech and Debate Association (and NSDA-related) high school forensics competitions. In the National Christian Forensics and Communications Association and the National Catholic Forensic League, the event is combined with Humorous Interpretation to create the Dramatic Performance event. It consists of a piece from any published work, edited to fit within a 10-minute span with a 30-second grace period (it does not have a minimum and cannot be above 10:30). [1]
In a typical round of DI, five to seven performers will each perform a "cutting" (excerpt) from a readily available, published (copyrighted or non-copyrighted) play, novel, or short story. As the name suggests, the cuttings are invariably from non-comedic (e.g., dramatic) works. Some performers select monologues, others may adopt the roles of many different characters, changing their tone, manner, and the position of their body to indicate a change in character.
After all of the competitors have performed, the judge (or judges) in the round will rank them from best to worst, and assign each of them a score. Contestants who score well will "break" out of preliminary rounds and continue to advance through octo/quarter/semi/final rounds if they continue to score well.
National Speech and Debate Association Nationals was hosted in Salt Lake City, Utah in 2016. National Champions are awarded a scholarship of US$1,000. [2] To receive the title a competitor must have the lowest cumulative score throughout the duration of the tournament. The Dramatic Interpretation competitor to receive the lowest cumulative score in the final round is awarded the BAMA Bowl and a US$500 scholarship. [3] The National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA) National Tournament is the largest academic competition in the world. [4] [5] [6]
Year | Competitor | Academic Institution |
---|---|---|
1931 | Kathryn Harney | Peoria-Manual, Illinois |
1932 | Pauline Crockett | California, Pennsylvania |
1933 | Denton Snyder | Humboldt, Iowa |
1934 | Donald Swanson | Webster City, Iowa |
1935 | Mary Ann Porterfield | Topeka, Kansas |
1936 | Caleb Peterson | Peekskill, New York |
1937 | Virginia Kraft | Mediapolis, Iowa |
1938 | Jack Edwards | Hollywood, California |
1939 | Ben Morris | Oklahoma City-Classen, Oklahoma |
1940 | James Lee | Santa Rosa, California |
1941 | Jean Swidensky | Oklahoma City-Central, Oklahoma |
1946 | Rae June Decker | DuQuoin, Illinois |
1947 | Beulah Meacham | Canton-McKinley, Ohio |
1948 | Ralph Jensen | Kenosha, Wisconsin |
1949 | Carolyn Parks | Santa Rosa, California |
1950 | Carolyn Parks | Santa Rosa, California |
1951 | Sue Routsong | Dayton-Oakwood, Ohio |
1955 | Shirley Shubin | Los Angeles HS, California |
1956 | Dan McCall | Modesto, California |
1957 | April Shawhan | Dayton-Fairmont, Ohio |
1958 | Karen McPeek | Euclid, Ohio |
1959 | Alan Haufrect | Houston-Bellaire, Texas |
1960 | Albertha Hillmon | Stockton Edison, California |
1961 | Paul Bernath | Houston-Jesse Jones, Texas |
1962 | Joe Rowlette | West Plains, Missouri |
1963 | Andy Fichter | Delaware-Hayes, Ohio |
1964 | Camille Waters | Houston-Bellaire, Texas |
1965 | Suzanne Abernathy | Paris-Grove, Tennessee |
1966 | Joan Rue | Lexington-Clay, Kentucky |
1967 | Brent Mintz | Houston-Bellaire, Texas |
1968 | Ruben Delgado | Stockton Edison, California |
1969 | Darren Kelley | Anaheim-Loara, California |
1970 | John Wall | Campbellsville, Kentucky |
1971 | John Leamer | Fairmont East HS, Kettering, Ohio |
1972 | Annalee Jefferies | Houston-Bellaire HS, Texas |
1973 | Mark Ferguson | Perry HS, Ohio |
1974 | Robert Rosenberg | Toledo-DeVilbiss HS, Ohio |
1975 | Darryl Bowdre | McAlester HS, Oklahoma |
1976 | Lynne Joyner | Bellevue Newport HS, Washington |
1977 | Michael Mandell | Logansport HS, Indiana |
1978 | Andrew Sattee | Pine Crest Prep. HS, Florida |
1979 | Steven Young | New Richmond HS, Wisconsin |
1980 | Solveig Olsen | Sioux Falls-Lincoln, South Dakota |
1981 | Darrell Johnson | Okmulgee, Oklahoma |
1982 | Greg Dolph | Chesterton HS, Indiana |
1983 | Robert Strain | San Antonio-Roosevelt, Texas |
1984 | Geoff Abbott | Sioux Falls-O’Gorman HS, South Dakota |
1985 | Andy Thornton | San Antonio-Churchill HS, Texas |
1986 | David Getzendaner | Kansas City-Park Hill, Missouri |
1987 | Lance Harshbarger | Shawnee Mission-South HS, Kansas |
1988 | Brenda McElroy | Milton Academy, Massachusetts |
1989 | Greg Wilson | Hanks HS, Texas |
1990 | Dan Sklar | Glenbrook North HS, Illinois |
1991 | Demond Wilson | Vines HS, Texas |
1992 | Colin Stokes | San Antonio-Churchill, Texas |
1993 | Chris Conner | Kinkaid School, Texas |
1994 | Danny Beaty | Miami Valley School, Ohio |
1995 | Susan Bohannon | Albuquerque Academy, New Mexico |
1996 | Jelena Moore | James Logan HS, California |
1997 | Michael Washington | Plano Sr. HS, Texas |
1998 | Michael Urie | Plano Sr. HS, Texas |
1999 | John Egan | Eagan HS, Minnesota |
2000 | Esther Etuk | Newman Smith HS, Texas |
2001 | Aimee DeShayes | Syosset HS, New York |
2002 | Krystyn Spratt | Apple Valley HS, Minnesota |
2003 | Pierre Clark | James Logan HS, California |
2004 | D’Angelo Lacy | Creekview HS, Texas |
2005 | Cory D. Stewart | Eastview HS, Minnesota |
2006 | Blake Williams | The Montgomery Academy, Alabama |
2007 | Nana Amoah, Jr. | Edison HS, Virginia |
2008 | Stephen Elrod | Bellarmine College Prep, California |
2009 | Jane Bruce | Ogden HS, Utah |
2010 | Michael Carone | Monsignor Farrell HS, New York |
2011 | Jamaque Newberry | Nova HS, Florida |
2012 | Deshawn Weston | Grand Prairie HS, Texas |
2013 | Anthony Nadeau | Royal Palm Beach HS, Florida |
2014 | Abigail Onwunali | Hastings HS, Texas |
2015 | Daniel Williams | Holy Cross School, Louisiana |
2016 | Izabella Czejdo | McDowell HS, Pennsylvania |
2017 | Chase Garrett | Southside HS, South Carolina |
2018 | Kimberly Lee | Summit HS, New Jersey |
2019 | Jacob Foster | Comeaux HS, Louisiana |
2020 | Semaj Lee | Apple Valley HS, Minnesota |
2021 | Giana Martinez | L. C. Anderson HS, Texas |
2022 | Logan Green | Hattiesburg HS, Mississippi |
2023 | Kylan Williams | Comeaux HS, Louisiana |
2024 | Karla Rivera | Harlingen HS South, Texas |
Dramatic Interpretation falls under the jurisdiction of events under the category defined as “Interpretation” by the National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA). These events are Humorous Interpretation, Duo Interpretation, and Program Oral Interpretation. Events that do not fall under the jurisdiction of the following rules include, but are not limited to Poetry, Prose, and Storytelling. The National Speech and Debate Associations rules are organized into categories of length, material, material availability, performance, re-use, and website approval submission process. [7]
The set time limit is ten minutes with a thirty-second period in which a student may go overtime with no penalty, colloquially referred to as a 'grace period.'According to National Speech and Debate Association rules, a student who exceeds the ten minute and thirty-second time limit cannot be awarded the rank of 1st in the round. There is no minimum time limit. [8]
A student may choose from a single work of literature to perform. Acceptable forms of literature include: [9]
In Dramatic Interpretation, Duo Interpretation, and Humorous Interpretation performers are not permitted to use any type of "physical objects or costuming." [10] In addition, students may not:
Students may not perform the same work of literature at any National Speech and Debate Association tournament if they have already done so in a separate contestant year.
All piece selection is subject to online year-round review.
In intercollegiate forensics, a competitor may use one or more theatrical scripts to craft a dramatic narrative involving one or multiple characters. [11] The dramatic material can originate from a variety of sources, ranging from stage, screen, to radio. [12] Unlike dramatic interpretation performances at the high school level, collegiate competitors are required to use a manuscript throughout their performance. [13]
Year | Competitor | Academic Institution |
---|---|---|
1978 | Scott Schaeffer | DePaul University |
1979 | Terry Kiel | Minnesota State University, Mankato |
1980 | Steve Geck | St. Cloud State University |
1981 | Mark Fredo | PennWest Clarion |
1982 | Michael Eckert | George Mason University |
1983 | Philip Shelburne | Southern Utah University |
1984 | Greg Dolph | Bradley University |
1985 | Greg Dolph | Bradley University |
1986 | Greg Dolph | Bradley University |
1987 | Vincent Bly | Kansas State University |
1988 | Florence Woodard | Howard University |
1989 | Sarah Braun | Bradley University |
1990 | Paige Petrucka | Southern Utah University |
1991 | Zoe Brown | University of Alabama |
1992 | Jason Davidson | Bradley University |
1993 | August Benassi | Bradley University |
1994 | Dustin Abraham | Arizona State University |
1995 | Andrew Greene | California State University, Los Angeles |
1996 | Esther Austin | California State University, Chico |
1997 | Eduardo Maytorena | California State University, Los Angeles |
1998 | Sara Mayer | University of Texas at Austin |
1999 | Jill Valentine | Bradley University |
2000 | Paige White | University of Alabama |
2001 | Ryan Knowles | University of La Verne |
2002 | Javon Johnson | California State University, Los Angeles |
2003 | Scott Boras | University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire |
2004 | Tatiana Simonian | California State University, Los Angeles |
2005 | Robert Hawkins | San Francisco State University |
2006 | Ashley Brasfield | Western Kentucky University |
2007 | Sonequa Martin | University of Alabama |
2008 | Julia Kolsrud | Arizona State University |
2009 | Nick Bateman | George Mason University |
2010 | Amanda Voirol | Bradley University |
2011 | Kane Kennedy | James Madison University |
2012 | Kaybee Brown | Lone Star College-North Harris |
2013 | Kaybee Brown | Bradley University |
2014 | Robi Mahan | Illinois State University |
2015 | Karlee Currin | University of Nebraska Omaha |
2016 | Abigail Onwunali | University of Texas at Austin |
2017 | Caleb Merritt | Hastings College |
2018 | Marianna Garcia | University of Texas at Austin |
2019 | Sarah Courville | University of Texas at Austin |
2021 | Paige Allbright | Western Kentucky University |
2022 | Emily Feazel | Seton Hall University |
2023 | Kaylee Frazier | University of Texas at Austin |
2024 | David Jacobson | University of Minnesota Twin Cities |
Due to COVID-19, the 2020 tournament was canceled, resulting in no champion. [14]
Year | Competitor | Academic Institution |
---|---|---|
2008 | Emambu Atabong | Bradley University |
2009 | Vanessa Carranza | Bradley University |
2010 | Jerome Davis | Western Kentucky University |
2011 | Elle Pratt | Bradley University |
2012 | Jasmine McLeod | California State University, Long Beach |
2013 | Ben Davis | North Central College |
2014 | Austin Groves | Western Kentucky University |
2015 | Huy Pham | Ball State University |
2016 | Abigail Onwunali | University of Texas at Austin |
2017 | Abigail Onwunali | University of Texas at Austin |
2018 | Marianna Garcia | University of Texas at Austin |
2019 | Sarah Courville | University of Texas at Austin |
2021 | Cheriaca Huntley | George Mason University |
2022 | Paige Allbright | Western Kentucky University |
2023 | Gavin Millard | Eastern Michigan University |
2024 | Cecilia Alali | Western Kentucky University |
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2020 tournament was canceled. However, the NFA permitted competitors in their senior year to submit recordings of their speeches for an asynchronous competition. The top performing student in each category was ranked as the Performance of Highest Distinction. [15] The Performance of Highest Distinction in Dramatic Interpretation was awarded to Trijae from Bradley University. [16]
The National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA) is the largest interscholastic speech and debate organization serving middle school and high school students in the United States. It was formed as the National Forensic League in 1925 by Bruno Ernst Jacob.
Lincoln–Douglas debate is a type of one-on-one competitive debate practiced mainly in the United States at the high school level. It is sometimes also called values debate because the format traditionally places a heavy emphasis on logic, ethical values, and philosophy. The Lincoln–Douglas debate format is named for the 1858 Lincoln–Douglas debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas, because their debates focused on slavery and the morals, values, and logic behind it. LD debates are used by the National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA) competitions, and also widely used in related debate leagues such as the National Christian Forensics and Communication Association, the National Catholic Forensic League, the National Educational Debate Association, the Texas University Interscholastic League, Texas Forensic Association, Stoa USA and their affiliated regional organizations.
Duo Interpretation, or often simply called Duo Interp, or just Duo, is an official speech event of Stoa USA, the National Speech and Debate Association, the National Catholic Forensics League, National Christian Forensics and Communications Association, American Forensics Association, and the National Forensics Association. The event involves a pair of performers acting out a literary piece or program under certain constraints, including not making eye contact nor touching their partner, and not using props. Pieces used often include published books, movies, short stories, plays, or poems. Participants may cut anything out of their piece, but cannot add any dialogue. This event can either be dramatic or humorous.
Congressional Debate is a competitive interscholastic high school debate event in the United States. The National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA), National Catholic Forensic League (NCFL) and many state associations and national invitational tournaments offer Congressional Debate as an event. Each organization and tournament offers its own rules, although the National Speech and Debate Association has championed standardization since 2007, when it began to ask its districts to use one of a number of procedures for qualification to its National Tournament.
Individual events in speech include public speaking, limited preparation, acting and interpretation are a part of forensics competitions. These events do not include the several different forms of debate offered by many tournaments. These events are called individual events because they tend to be done by one person unlike debate which often includes teams. This distinction however is not entirely accurate any more given the addition of duo interpretation events and forms of single person debate. Competitive speech competitions and debates comprise the area of forensics. Forensics leagues have a number of speech events, generally determined by geographical region or league preference. While there are several key events that have been around a long time, there are several experimental events around the country every year that can be limited to individual tournaments. Forensics leagues in the United States includes the National Speech and Debate Association, the National Christian Forensics and Communications Association, the American Forensics Association, the National Forensics Association, the Interstate Oratorical Association and Stoa USA. Organized competitions are held at the high-school and collegiate level. Outside of the rules for each event provided by the individual leagues, there are several cultural norms within each region that are not written into law but are almost always followed. Rules for time limits vary by event and by individual tournaments, but there are penalties in every event for exceeding the time limits though the severity of the penalty widely varies.
Humorous Interpretation is an event in competitive middle and high school forensics leagues such as the National Christian Forensics and Communications Association and the National Speech and Debate Association. It consists of a piece from any published work, edited to fit within a 10-minute span with a 30-second grace period. It is judged based upon how the person portrays his or her characters and whether the piece is humorous. Ideally proper portrayal of characters should achieve a comedic effect to the judge. Humorous Interpretation and Dramatic Interpretation pieces are often used for the National Catholic Forensic League category of Dramatic Performance, which has similar rules but allows for a wider variety of pieces.
Original Oratory is a competitive event in the National Speech and Debate Association, Stoa USA, National Catholic Forensic League, and other high school forensic competitions in which competitors deliver an original, factual speech on a subject of their choosing. Though the rules for the category change from organization to organization, a speech must generally be written and memorized by the performer and should be no more than ten minutes in length, and at most only 150 words can be quoted. The finished speech must be approved by the National Speech and Debate Association. This speech is frequently highly persuasive and is normally about a slightly controversial topic. An orator is given free choice of subject and judged solely on the effectiveness of development and presentation.
Public forum debate is a form of competitive debate where debaters use their evidence and impacts to outweigh the benefits and harms of the opposing side. The topics for public forum have to do with current-day events relating to public policy. Debaters work in pairs of two, and speakers alternate for every speech. It is primarily competed by middle and high school students, but college teams exist as well. Invented in the US, public forum is one of the most prominent American debate events, alongside Policy debate and Lincoln-Douglas debate; it is also practiced in China and India, and has been recently introduced to Romania. Individuals give short speeches that are interspersed with 3 minute "Crossfire" sections, questions and answers between opposed debaters. The winner is determined by a judge who also serves as a referee. The debate centers on advocating or rejecting a position, "resolve", or "resolution", which is usually a proposal of a potential solution to a current events issue. Public Forum is designed to be accessible to the average citizen.
Extemporaneous Speaking is a speech delivery style/speaking style, and a term that identifies a specific forensic competition. The competition is a speech event based on research and original analysis, done with a limited-preparation; in the United States those competitions are held for high school and college students. In a Extemporaneous Speech competition, enrolled participants prepare for thirty minutes on a question related to current events and then give a seven-minute speech responding to that question. The extemporaneous speaking delivery style, referred to as "off-the-cuff", is a type of delivery method for a public presentation, that was carefully prepared and practiced but not memorized.
Impromptu speaking is a speech that a person delivers without predetermination or preparation. The speaker is most commonly provided with their topic in the form of a quotation, but the topic may also be presented as an object, proverb, one-word abstract, or one of the many alternative possibilities. While specific rules and norms vary with the organization and level of competition, the speeches tend to follow basic speech format and cover topics that are both humorous and profound.
The Texas Forensic Association (TFA) is an organization that provides and regulates competition in speech and debate (forensics) for Texas high school students. The association authorizes forensics competitions nearly every weekend in Texas for the duration of the forensics season, which lasts from early August until the end of February, with the State competition typically in the first or second week of March.
Grand National Speech and Debate Tournament is the premier public speaking event of the National Catholic Forensic League. It is held annually in the United States over Memorial Day weekend. One can qualify for the tournament by performing sufficiently well in a local qualifying tournament.
The National Forensic Association (NFA) is an American intercollegiate organization designed to promote excellence in individual events and debate. Founded in 1971, the NFA National Tournament is dedicated to a full range of literature interpretation, public address, limited preparation, and Lincoln-Douglas debate. The NFA sponsors the NFA National Tournament on an annual basis. The 2025 NFA National Tournament will be hosted by Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan.
The Florida Forensic League, Inc., or FFL, is a speech and debate organization offered to all schools in the state of Florida. It is the governing body for local and state speech and debate competitions in Florida, with higher-level competition under the auspices of the National Forensic League and the National Catholic Forensic League. The league was officially incorporated by the State of Florida on November 20, 2003, and began operations on January 1, 2004, although it existed some time before then in an unorganized fashion. Competitors in the league have been extremely successful at national tournaments.
The Tournament of Champions (TOC) is a national high school speech and debate tournament held at the University of Kentucky every year in a weekend in April. Tournament of Champions is considered to be the national championship of the “National Circuit", and is one of the most prestigious and competitive American high school speech and debate tournaments. Tournament of Champions currently holds competition in Policy debate, Lincoln–Douglas debate, Public Forum debate, Congressional Debate, World Schools Debate, Extemporaneous Speaking, Original Oratory, Informative Speaking, Dramatic Interpretation, Duo Interpretation, Humorous Interpretation, Oral Interpretation, and Program Oral Interpretation.
The Long Island Forensic Association is a non-profit organization which direct high school competitive speech events. It is affiliated with the New York State Forensics League.
The California High School Speech Association, or CHSSA, is a speech and debate organization offered to all schools in the state of California. It is the governing body for local and state speech and debate competitions in California, with higher-level competition under the auspices of the National Speech and Debate Association and the National Catholic Forensic League, and the Tournament of Champions. The league held its first championship tournament in 1958, and continues to hold championship tournaments every April.
Stoa USA, also referred to as Stoa, is a Christian homeschool forensics organization in the United States. It is one of the four major national high school forensics organizations: the others are the National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA), National Catholic Forensic League (NCFL), and the National Christian Forensics and Communications Association (NCFCA).
The American Forensic Association National Speech Tournament (AFA-NST) is an intercollegiate, individual events based forensics tournament held in conjunction with the first Saturday in April, beginning on the prior Friday and continuing through the subsequent Monday. In comparison to National Forensic Association Nationals, another prominent college-level individual events national tournament, the AFA-NST has significantly more stringent qualification procedures and a smaller, but more exclusive field of competition. The AFA-NST represents the culmination of the forensics season for many collegiate speech teams.
Competitive debate, also known as forensics or speech and debate, is an activity in which two or more people take positions on an issue and are judged on how well they defend those positions. The activity has been present in academic spaces in the United States since the colonial period. The practice, an import from British education, began as in-class exercises in which students would present arguments to their classmates about the nature of rhetoric. Over time, the nature of those conversations began to shift towards philosophical questions and current events, with Yale University being the first to allow students to defend any position on a topic they believed in. In the late nineteenth century, student-led literary societies began to compete with each other academically and often engaged in debates against each other. In 1906, the first intercollegiate debate league, Delta Sigma Rho, was formed, followed by several others. Competitive debate expanded to the secondary school level in 1920 with the founding of the National Speech and Debate Association, which grew to over 300,000 members by 1969. Technological advances such as the accessibility of personal computers in the 1990s and 2000s has led to debate cases becoming more complex and to evidence being more accessible. Competitors and coaches have made efforts to reduce discrimination in the debate community by introducing new arguments and recruiting debaters from underprivileged communities.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)