Dynastic race theory

Purported Mesopotamian ruler on the Egyptian Gebel el-Arak Knife. Naqada II period of Egyptian prehistory (3500—3200 BCE), Abydos, Egypt. Rather than showing a local ruler, this figure may have been derived from an imported Mesopotamian cylinder seal.

The dynastic race theory was the earliest thesis to attempt to explain how predynastic Egypt developed into the sophisticated monarchy of Dynastic Egypt. The theory holds that the earliest roots of the ancient Egyptian dynastic civilisation were imported by invaders from Mesopotamia who then founded the First Dynasty and brought culture to the indigenous population. This theory had strong supporters in the Egyptological community in the first half of the 20th century, but has since lost mainstream support. ^{[2] [3] [4] [5] [6]}

Origins

In the early 20th century, Egyptologist Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie deduced that skeletal remains found at pre-dynastic sites at Naqada (Upper Egypt) indicated the presence of two different races, with the Dynastic Race, also referred to as the "Followers of Horus", ^[7] differentiated physically by a noticeably larger skeletal structure and cranial capacity. ^[8] Petrie concluded that the physical differences of the remains in conjunction with the previously unknown burial styles, uncharacteristic tomb architecture, and abundance of foreign artifacts, implied this race must have been an invading ruling elite that was responsible for the seemingly sudden rise of Egyptian civilization. Based on plentiful cultural evidence, Petrie determined that the invader race had come from Mesopotamia, and imposed themselves on the native Badarian culture to become their rulers. Petrie adduced new architectural styles—the distinctly Mesopotamian "niched-facade" architecture—pottery styles, cylinder seals and a few artworks, as well as numerous Predynastic rock and tomb paintings depicting Mesopotamian style boats, symbols, and figures.

Naqada I statuettes (c. 4000—3600 BCE)

Naqada II statuettes (c. 3650—3300 BCE)

This came to be called the "dynastic race theory" ^{[9] [10]} The theory further argued that the Mesopotamians then conquered both Upper and Lower Egypt and founded the First Dynasty. Predynastic and First Dynasty burial sites similar to Naqada were also found at Abydos, Sakkara, and Hieraconpolis. ^[7]

Versions of the Dynastic race model were adopted by scholars as L. A. Waddell, ^[11] and Walter Bryan Emery, a former Chair of Egyptology at University College London.

Decline

The dynastic race theory is no longer an accepted thesis in the field of predynastic archaeology. While there is clear evidence the Naqada II culture borrowed abundantly from Mesopotamia, the most commonly held view today is that the achievements of the First Dynasty were the result of a long period of cultural and political development. ^[12] Such borrowings are much older than the Naqada II period, ^[13] the Naqada II period had a large degree of continuity with the Naqada I period, ^[14] and the changes which did happen during the Naqada periods happened over significant amounts of time. ^[15]

A version of the theory has been revived by some modern scholars, most notably David Rohl. ^[16]

Physical types in Pre-Dynastic art, according to Petrie: 1)2) Prehistoric Egyptians 3)4) People from the east or north, with spotted robe and headdress 5) Curly-head people (conquered) 6) Chief of the Fayum Lake 7)8) Dynastic race.

Modern Egyptology largely maintains the view that "state formation occurred as a mainly indigenous process", although significant differences in morphology indicated migration along the Nile Valley also took place. ^[19] The Dynastic Race theory has been largely replaced by the theory Egypt was a hydraulic empire.

In Afrocentrism

In the 1950s, when the Dynastic Race Theory was widely accepted by mainstream scholarship, the Senegalese scholar Cheikh Anta Diop was publicising his theory that the Ancient Egyptians were "Black Africans." Diop "paid special attention to the emergence of the Dynastic Race Theory", and claimed that European scholars supported this theory to avoid having to admit that the Ancient Egyptians were black and to characterise them as "Semitic" or "Caucasian". ^[20] Other prominent Afrocentrists, including Martin Bernal, later also argued against the dynastic race theory in favour of a "Black Egyptian" model. ^[21] Afrocentrists particularly condemn the alleged dividing of African peoples into racial clusters as being new versions of the Dynastic Race Theory and the Hamitic hypothesis. ^[22]

See also

• Ancient Egyptian race controversy

References

1. Smith, William Stevenson, curator of the Egyptian Department of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. (1967). "Two Archaic Egyptian Sculptures". Boston Museum Bulletin. 65 (340): 75–76. ISSN   0006-7997. The bearded figure on the other side of the handle, wearing a kind of turban and a long skirt, and quelling two rearing lions which flank him, might well have been derived from such a figure on an imported Mesopotamian cylinder seal, and need not reflect the presence in Egypt of an actual person from abroad.
2. Wilkinson, Toby (1999). Early dynastic Egypt. London: Routledge. p. 15. ISBN   0415186331.
3. Smith, Stuart Tyson. Redford, Donald (ed.). p28 (1 February 2001). "Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt - Volume 3".
4. Yurco, Frank (1996). "An Egyptological Review". (1996). Black Athena revisited. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. pp. 62–100. ISBN   0807845558.
5. Zakrzewski, Sonia R. (2007). Population continuity or population change: Formation of the ancient Egyptian state. Highfield, Southampton: Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton.
6. • Pg33-"Early Nile Valley populations were primarily coextensive with indigenous African populations. Linguistic and archaeological data provide key supporting evidence for a primarily African origin".Shomarka Keita and A.J. Boyce "The Geographic and Origins and Population Relationships of Early Ancient Egyptians". Celenko Theodore (ed). (1996). Egypt in Africa. Indianapolis, Ind.: Indianapolis Museum of Art. pp. 20–33. ISBN   0936260645.
7. Emery, W.B. Archaic Egypt, Penguin Books, 1987 0-14-020462-8
8. Derry, D.E., The Dynastic Race in Egypt, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, vol 42, 1956
9. Mary R. Lefkowitz, Guy MacLean Rogers, Black Athena Revisited, pg65
10. Early dynastic Egypt, by Toby A. H. Wilkinson, pg 15
11. Egyptian Civilization Its Sumerian Origin and Real Chronology, by L. A. Waddell
12. Early Dynastic Egypt (Routledge, 1999), p.15
13. Redford, Donald B., Egypt, Israel, and Canaan in Ancient Times (Princeton: University Press, 1992), p. 13.
14. Gardiner, Alan. Egypt of the Pharaohs (Oxford: University Press, 1961), p. 392.
15. Shaw, Ian. and Nicholson, Paul, The Dictionary of Ancient Egypt (London: British Museum Press, 1995), p. 228.
16. Legend – The Genesis of Civilisation, by David Rohl ::: http://www.davidrohl.com/dynastic_race_11.html
17. Smith, William Stevenson (1967). "Two Archaic Egyptian Sculptures". Boston Museum Bulletin. 65 (340): 76. ISSN   0006-7997.
18. Petrie, William Matthew Flinders (1853-1942) (1939). The making of Egypt. The Sheldon Press. pp. 67–68, and Plate XXXVII.
19. Sonia R. Zakrzewski: Population continuity or population change: Formation of the ancient Egyptian state - Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton (2003)
20. Epic encounters: culture, media, and U.S. interests in the Middle East – 1945-2000 by Melani McAlister
21. Heresy in the University: the Black Athena controversy and the Responsibilities of American Intellectuals. By Jacques Berlinerblau, pg 158
22. History of Philosophy (3 Vols. Set), by William Turner, pg 8