EEA and Norway Grants

Last updated

The EEA Grants and Norway Grants represent the contributions of Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway to reducing social and economic disparities in the European Economic Area (EEA) and strengthening bilateral relations with 15 EU countries in Central and Southern Europe. [1] Through the Grants, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway are also contributing to strengthening fundamental European values such as democracy, tolerance and the rule of law. [2] [3] [4] [5]

Contents

Background [6] [7]

The EEA and Norway Grants have their basis in the EEA Agreement. [8] Under this agreement, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway are part of the European Single Market (ESM), which enables the free movement of goods, services, capital and people in the internal market. The EEA Agreement sets out the common goals involved in working together to reduce social and economic disparities in Europe and strengthen cooperation between European countries.

Ever since the EEA Agreement entered into force, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway have contributed to social and economic progress in several countries of the EU and EEA. These contributions have been channelled through the Financial Mechanism (1994–1998), the Financial Instrument (1999–2003) and the EEA and Norway Grants (2004–2009, 2009–2014, 2014–2021). In total, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein provided €3.3 billion through consecutive grant schemes between 1994 and 2014. A further contribution of €2.8 billion was made available in the 2014–2021 funding period. The three donor countries contribute according to their size and gross domestic product (GDP). Consequently, Norway provides 97.7%, Iceland 1.6%, and Liechtenstein 0.7% of the funding for the 2014–2021 EEA and Norway Grants combined.

Since 2004, there have been two separate mechanisms: the EEA Grants and the Norway Grants. The EEA Grants are financed by the three donor countries: Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway; while the Norway Grants are solely financed by Norway. [2]

Eligibility

The eligibility for the EEA and Norway Grants mirrors the criteria set for the EU Cohesion Fund aimed at member states where the gross national income (GNI) per inhabitant is less than 90% of the EU average. For the 2014–2021 funding period, these countries are Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. Countries that have entered the EU before 2004 are inelegible for receiving funding under the Norway Grants; Greece and Portugal, therefore, only receive EEA Grants funding. [1] [9]

Process

First, the EU and the three Donor States agree on a Memorandum Of Understanding (MoU) for the total contribution and distribution of funding per beneficiary state. Country allocations are based on population size and GDP per capita. [10] Second, Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway negotiate with each beneficiary state to agree on which programs to establish, their objectives, and the size of the allocation to each one.

The agreements are based on national needs and priorities in the beneficiary states and the scope for cooperation with the donor states. The European Commission is consulted during the negotiations to avoid duplication and to ensure funding is targeted where it will have the greatest impact. Programmes implemented under the EEA and Norway Grants must comply with EU rules and standards.

The funds provided by the EU and the EEA and Norway Grants are complementary. Each National Focal Point is responsible for overall management of programs in its beneficiary country. The Programme Operators develop and manage programs, often in cooperation with a partner from the donor states, and award funding to projects. [11] [12]

Bilateral cooperation

One of the two main goals of the EEA and Norway Grants is to increase cooperation and relations between the beneficiary and donor countries. Partnerships between entities from the beneficiary countries and their counterparts in Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway are a fundamental part of the Grants and offer an opportunity to tackle common European challenges. [13]

Bilateral partnerships between public and private institutions in the donor and beneficiary countries are widely encouraged. Cooperation between people and institutions at administrative and political levels and in the private sector, academia and civil society is a prerequisite to strengthen bilateral relations. [14]

EEA and Norway Grants 2014–2021

For the period from 2014 to 2021, €2.8 billion has been set aside under the Grants. The EEA Grants (€1.55 billion) are jointly financed by Iceland (3%), Liechtenstein (1%) and Norway (96%) and available in all 15 countries. The Norway Grants (€1.25 billion) are solely financed by Norway and available in the 13 countries that joined the EU after 2003. The contribution of each donor country is based on their gross domestic product (GDP).

Figure 2. Total allocation 2. Norway Grants 2014-2021 Norway Grants - 2014-2021.png
Figure 2. Total allocation 2. Norway Grants 2014–2021
Figure 1. Total allocation EEA Grants 2014-2021 EEA Grants - 2014-2021.png
Figure 1. Total allocation EEA Grants 2014–2021

Areas of support

The five Priority Sectors (PSs) and related 23 Programme Areas (PAs) funded in the 2014–2021 period [15] reflect the priorities set out in the 'Europe 2020 Strategy' – the European Union's ten-year growth strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth – and the EU's 11 cohesion policy objectives. They aim at contributing to growth and jobs, tackling climate change and energy dependence while reducing poverty and social exclusion. They also promote bilateral and international cooperation. [16]

A new feature of the EEA and Norway Grants 2014–2021 is the establishment of the Fund for Youth Employment [17] (€65.5 million) and the Fund for Regional Cooperation [18] (€34.5 million), which support European cross-border and transnational project initiatives to find solutions to some of Europe's common challenges.

All the programmes under the EEA and Norway Grants 2014–2021 will run until 30 April 2024.

Cooperation and external partners

The Donor Programme Partners (DPPs) play a strategic role in programme planning and implementation, as well as in facilitating project partnership. In the 2014–2021 funding period, there are 21 DPPs involved (two from Iceland, one from Liechtenstein and 18 from Norway). [19]

The Donor Programme Partners are mostly public bodies with national mandates in their respective fields and with extensive international experience. These DPPs were designated on the initiative of the donor countries.

Intergovernmental organisations and actors play an important role in the EEA and Norway Grants, as they monitor compliance with international conventions and treaties across Europe. These organisations provide assistance in areas linked to human rights, democracy and the rule of law. In order to ensure that the programmes and projects of the EEA and Norway Grants are aligned with European and international standards, the donors have established strategic partnerships with three European partners, which act as International Partner Organisations (IPOs) in the 2014–2021 funding period:

EEA and Norway Grants 2009–2014

For the 2009–2014 period, €1.8 billion was set aside under the Grants. The EEA Grants (€993.5 million), jointly financed by Iceland (3%), Liechtenstein (1%) and Norway (96%), were available in 16 countries. The Norway Grants (€804.6 million), solely financed by Norway, were available in the 13 countries that joined the EU after 2003. Spain received only transitional funding in the 2009–2014 period. After joining the EU in 2013, Croatia became a member of the EEA in 2014, and consequently a beneficiary country of the EEA and Norway Grants. [2] [24]

Table 1. EEA and Norway Grants 2009–2014 funding [25]

CountryEEA GrantsNorway GrantsTotal allocated% Incurred*
Bulgaria €78 600 000€48 000 000€126 600 00079.49%
Croatia €5 000 000€4 600 000€9 600 00063.33%
Cyprus €3 850 000€4 000 000€7 850 00096.38%
Czech Republic €61 400 000€70 400 000€131 800 00084.13%
Estonia €23 000 000€25 600 000€48 600 00097.12%
Greece €63 400 000€0€63 400 00086.28%
Hungary €70 100 000€83 200 000€153 300 00057.76%
Latvia €34 550 000€38 400 000€72 950 00087.66%
Lithuania €38 400 000€45 600 000€84 000 00095.26%
Malta €2 900 000€1 600 000€4 500 00098.76%
Poland €266 900 000€311 200 000€578 100 00091.69%
Portugal €57 950 000€0€57 950 00090.51%
Romania €190 750 000€115 200 000€305 950 00082.21%
Slovakia €38 350 000€42 400 000€80 750 00079.80%
Slovenia €12 500 000€14 400 000€26 900 00091.37%
Spain €45 850 000€0€45 850 00089.46%
Total€993 500 000€804 600 000€1 798 100 00085.11%

*% incurred of eligible expenditure amount. Data extracted on 5 September 2019 and subject to change.

Cooperation

Cooperation through bilateral programmes and projects provides an arena for exchange of knowledge, mutual learning from best practices and developing joint policies. 23 Donor Programme Partners (DPPs) [26] were involved in the 2009–2014 funding period (20 from Norway, two from Iceland and one from Liechtenstein). In addition, the Council of Europe participated as a DPP on some of the programmes. [21]

More than 30% of the 7,000 projects funded in this period had a Donor Project Partner involved. There were nearly 1,000 partners from the donor countries (185 from Iceland, 11 from Liechtenstein and 780 from Norway). [27]

Results

The End Review of he EEA and Norway Grants 2009-2014 [28] sheds light on the Grants support in 16 EU countries. The following independent evaluations and reviews were conducted for the 2009–2014 funding period:

The EEA and Norway Grants' results and data portal [37] provides more information about the programmes and projects funded during the 2009–2014 period.

EEA and Norway Grants 2004–2009 [7]

With the expansion of the EU in 2004, ten new countries – Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia – not only joined the EU, but also the European Economic Area (EEA).

This enlargement required a substantial increase in the contributions towards European cohesion. Most of the new member states were considerably below the EU average in terms of their social and economic development.

Financial Mechanism EEA Norway.jpg

The EEA and Norway Grants made available €1.3 billion for the 2004–2009 period. [38] The EEA Grants (€672 million) supported 15 beneficiary states in Central and Southern Europe. The Norway Grants provided an additional €567 million to the ten countries that joined the EU in 2004. Apart from these two mechanisms, Norway allocated €68 million through the Norwegian bilateral cooperation programmes with Bulgaria and Romania, once the two states joined the EU in 2007. [39]

Norway, as the largest donor, provided close to 97% of the total funding in 2004–2009. [40]

Areas of support

From 2004 to 2009, 1250 projects were awarded financial support through the EEA and Norwegian Financial Mechanisms. These projects were funded under the following areas of support:

Cooperation

More than one in five supported projects were partnership projects between entities in the beneficiary states, and Iceland, Liechtenstein or Norway.

Results

The End review of the EEA and Norway Grants 2004–2009 concluded that "the EEA and Norway Grants 2004–2009 have contributed to reducing disparities in Europe […] and the benefits locally have been significant". [41] [42]

Financial Instrument 1999–2003

In the period from 1999 to 2003, Greece, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Portugal and Spain received €119.6 million from the EEA EFTA States (Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway). Projects were supported within the fields of environmental protection, urban renewal, pollution in urban areas, protection of cultural heritage, transport, education and training, and academic research. About 93% of the funding was spent on projects related to environmental protection. [43] [7]

Financial Mechanism 1994–1998

The Financial Mechanism 1994–1998 covers Greece, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Portugal and Spain. The projects were supported within the fields of environmental protection, education and training, and transport. In addition to the €500 million in project support, interest rebates were granted on loans amounting to €1.5 billion in the European Investment Bank (EIB). [7]

Finland, Sweden and Austria, which until 1994 had been members of EFTA, left the association to join the EU. The European Commission took over the responsibilities for the contributions of these three countries to the Financial Mechanism 1994–1998. [44]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Free Trade Association</span> Regional trade organization and free trade area

The European Free Trade Association (EFTA) is a regional trade organization and free trade area consisting of four European states: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. The organization operates in parallel with the European Union (EU), and all four member states participate in the European Single Market and are part of the Schengen Area. They are not, however, party to the European Union Customs Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Environment Agency</span> Agency of the European Union

The European Environment Agency (EEA) is the agency of the European Union (EU) which provides independent information on the environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign relations of Nepal</span> Overview of relations

Though the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) is the government agency responsible for the conduct of foreign relations of Nepal, historically, it is the Office of Prime Minister (PMO) that has exercised the authority to formulate and conduct policies related to Nepal's foreign affairs. As a landlocked country wedged between two larger and far stronger powers, Nepal has tried to maintain good relations with both of its neighbors, People's Republic of China and Republic of India. Nepal's relationship with China, India, and the United States has remained utmost priority for successive Nepali governments. The relationship between Nepal and India however was significantly hampered during the 2015 Nepal blockade by pro-Indian anti-Nepal protestors, where the Government of Nepal accused India of using "Russia-Ukraine" tactics to cause unrest along Nepal's southern border using ethnically Indian residents of Nepal. India strictly denied the allegation and said the unrest were solely due to Madheshi protesters. For the most part though, Nepal has traditionally maintained a non-aligned policy and enjoys friendly relations with its neighboring countries and almost all the major countries of the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Economic Area</span> European free trade zone established in 1994

The European Economic Area (EEA) was established via the Agreement on the European Economic Area, an international agreement which enables the extension of the European Union's single market to member states of the European Free Trade Association. The EEA links the EU member states and three EFTA states into an internal market governed by the same basic rules. These rules aim to enable free movement of persons, goods, services, and capital within the European single market, including the freedom to choose residence in any country within this area. The EEA was established on 1 January 1994 upon entry into force of the EEA Agreement. The contracting parties are the EU, its member states, and Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.

The European Union has a number of relationships with foreign states. According to the European Union's official site, and a statement by Commissioner Günter Verheugen, the aim is to have a ring of countries, sharing EU's democratic ideals and joining them in further integration without necessarily becoming full member states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Multi-speed Europe</span> Political idea

Multi-speed Europe or two-speed Europe is the idea that different parts of the European Union should integrate at different levels and pace depending on the political situation in each individual country. Indeed, multi-speed Europe is currently a reality, with only a subset of EU countries being members of the eurozone and of the Schengen area. Like other forms of differentiatedintegration such as à la carte and variable geometry, "multi-speed Europe" arguably aims to salvage the "widening and deepening of the European Union" in the face of political opposition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Health Insurance Card</span>

The European Health Insurance Card (EHIC) is issued free of charge and allows anyone who is insured by or covered by a statutory social security scheme of the EEA countries, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom to receive medical treatment in another member state free or at a reduced cost, if that treatment becomes necessary during their visit, or if they have a chronic pre-existing condition which requires care such as kidney dialysis. The term of validity of the card varies according to the issuing country. Continued reciprocal healthcare access between the EU and the UK has been agreed, and the UK is issuing a new UK Global Health Insurance Card (GHIC) valid in the EU.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign relations of the European Union</span> Relations between the European Union and other countries

Although there has been a large degree of integration between European Union member states, foreign relations is still a largely intergovernmental matter, with the 27 members controlling their own relations to a large degree. However, with the Union holding more weight as a single bloc, there are at times attempts to speak with one voice, notably on trade and energy matters. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy personifies this role.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Free Trade Association Surveillance Authority</span>

The EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) monitors compliance with the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) in Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. ESA operates independently of the States and safeguards the rights of individuals and undertakings under the EEA Agreement, ensuring free movement, fair competition, and control of state aid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Norway–European Union relations</span> Bilateral relations

Norway is not a member state of the European Union (EU). However, it is associated with the Union through its membership of the European Economic Area (EEA), signed in 1992 and established in 1994. Norway was a founding member of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) in 1960, which was originally set up as an alternative to the European Economic Community (EEC), the main predecessor of the EU. Norway had considered joining both the EEC and the European Union, but opted to decline following referendums in 1972 and 1994. According to the European Social Survey conducted in 2018, 73.6% of Norwegians would vote 'No' in a Referendum to join the European Union. Norway has two land borders with EU member states: Finland and Sweden.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Icelandic nationality law</span> History and regulations of Icelandic citizenship

Icelandic nationality law details the conditions by which an individual is a national of Iceland. The primary law governing these requirements is the Icelandic Nationality Act, which came into force on 1 January 1953. Iceland is a member state of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA). All Icelandic nationals have automatic and permanent permission to live and work in any European Union (EU) or EFTA country.

Interreg is a series of programmes to stimulate cooperation between regions in and out of the European Union (EU), funded by the European Regional Development Fund. The first Interreg started in 1989. Interreg IV covered the period 2007–2013. Interreg V (2014–2020) covers all 27 EU member states, the EFTA countries, six accession countries and 18 neighbouring countries. It has a budget of EUR 10.1 billion, which represents 2.8% of the total of the European Cohesion Policy budget. Since the non EU countries don't pay EU membership fee, they contribute directly to Interreg, not through ERDF.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Directorate-General for International Partnerships</span> European Commission department

The Directorate-General for International Partnerships is the European Commission department responsible for international development policy. It operates under the authority of the European Commissioner for International Partnerships, Jutta Urpilainen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microstates and the European Union</span> Relationship overview

Currently, all of the European microstates have some form of relations with the European Union (EU).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ASEAN–European Union relations</span> Bilateral relations

The ASEAN–European Union relations are the bilateral foreign relations between the two organisations; the European Union (EU), and the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN). EU and ASEAN have been interacting with each other on the economic, trade, and political levels for more than four decades. The partnership between the EU and ASEAN dates back to 1972, when the EU established ties with ASEAN. The EU became an ASEAN Dialogue Partner in 1977.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kazakhstan–European Union relations</span> Bilateral relations

European Union–Kazakhstan relations are the international relations between the Republic of Kazakhstan and the common foreign policy and trade relations of the European Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pakistan–European Union relations</span> Bilateral relations

European Union–Pakistan relations are the international relations between the common foreign policy and trade relations of the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cross-border cooperation</span>

Cross-border cooperation is the collaboration between adjacent areas across borders. In the European Union this is one of the forms of territorial cooperation. The European model is very diverse with cooperation between border regions or municipalities, or through specific cooperation structures. These structures are usually composed by public authorities from different countries organized in working communities, euroregions or EGTCs.

The European Union's scientific collaboration beyond the bloc describes the European Union's frameworks for bilateral cooperation and specific projects in science and technology with countries and regional blocs situated beyond the European Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Passports of the EFTA member states</span>

Passports of the EFTA member states are passports issued by the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) member states Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. EFTA is in this article used as a common name for these countries.

References

  1. 1 2 "Countries | EEA Grants". eeagrants.org. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
  2. 1 2 3 Aarø, Leif (2017). "EEA and Norway Grants – reducing social and economic disparities in Europe". Journal of Health Inequalities. 3 (1): 3–4. doi: 10.5114/jhi.2017.69154 . ISSN   2450-5927.
  3. Amnesty International (5 May 2015). "Project Partnerships through EEA and Norway Grants". Amnesty International Norway. Archived from the original on 21 April 2019.
  4. Johnsen, Tom O.; Rieker, Pernille (7 June 2015). "The EEA and Norway Grants: A Source of Soft Power?". Journal of European Integration. 37 (4): 417–432. doi:10.1080/07036337.2014.987139. ISSN   0703-6337. S2CID   55101982.
  5. Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2012). EEA and Norway Grants - Solidarity and cooperation in Europe. Norwegian Government. pp. 5–6.
  6. "The European Economic Area Agreement (EEA)". Government.no. 7 April 2015. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
  7. 1 2 3 4 "History | EEA Grants". eeagrants.org. Retrieved 23 March 2021.
  8. "The EEA Agreement | European Free Trade Association". www.efta.int. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
  9. "Which countries benefit?". Government.no. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
  10. "Resources | EEA Grants". eeagrants.org. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
  11. "About the EEA and Norway Grants". Government.no. 5 February 2020. Retrieved 6 March 2020.
  12. "Organisational Structure | EEA Grants". eeagrants.org. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
  13. Kruse, Stein-Erik; Kaya, Zozan (2013). Baseline study on bilateral relations - EEA and Norway Grants (PDF). EEA and Norway Grants.
  14. Financial Mechanism Committee (2012). Guideline for strengthened bilateral relations (PDF). EEA Grants and Norway Grants. p. 4.
  15. EEA and Norway Grants (2019). Blue Book: An overview of supported programme areas. EEA and Norway Grants.
  16. Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2015). "Agreement between Norway and EU on EEA and Norway Grants and tariff-free quotas for fish". Government.no. Archived from the original on 21 August 2015.
  17. "Fund for Youth Employment | EEA Grants". eeagrants.org. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
  18. "Fund for Regional Cooperation | EEA Grants". eeagrants.org. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
  19. "Donor Programme Partners | EEA Grants". eeagrants.org. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
  20. "European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights". European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
  21. 1 2 "Council of Europe and EEA and Norway Grants". Office of the Directorate General of Programmes. Retrieved 16 March 2021.
  22. "Good Governance | EEA Grants". eeagrants.org. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
  23. "OECD.org - OECD". www.oecd.org. Retrieved 17 March 2021.
  24. EEA and Norway Grants (2010). Blue book: An overview of supported programme areas (2009-2014). EEA and Norway Grants.
  25. Ecorys (2019). End review of the EEA and Norway Grants 2009-2014 Rapid assessment: final report. EEA and Norway Grants. p. 10.
  26. EEA and Norway Grants (2018). Donor Programme Partners by beneficiary country 2009-2014 (PDF). EEA and Norway Grants.
  27. ecoavantis. "Managing the grants". Annual report 2017-2018. Retrieved 18 March 2021.
  28. Nordic Consulting Group (2012). End Review - EEA and Norway Grants 2004 -2009. EEA and Norway Grants.
  29. Coffey International (2017). Rapid assessment of research programmes - Final report. EEA and Norway Grants.
  30. CREDA; Blomeyer & Sanz (2017). Rapid assessment on increasing Roma inclusion - Final report. EEA and Norway Grants.
  31. NCG Norway (2016). Rapid assessment of gender programmes - Final report. EEA and Norway Grants.
  32. COWI (2016). Mid-term evaluation of the support to strengthened bilateral relations - Final report. EEA and Norway Grants.
  33. Nordic Consulting Group (2016). Evaluation of Decent work and tripartite dialogue - Final report. EEA and Norway Grants.
  34. Centre for Strategy and Evaluation Services (2015). Mid-term review of the cultural heritage sector - Main report. EEA and Norway Grants.
  35. Creda Consulting (2014). Mid-term review of NGO programmes - Main report. EEA and Norway Grants.
  36. Ernst & Young (2011). Review of Risk Management. EEA and Norway Grants.
  37. "Data". EEA Grants . Archived from the original on 23 June 2018. Retrieved 18 March 2021.
  38. Nordic Consulting Group (2012). End Review - EEA and Norway Grants 2004 - 2009. EEA and Norway Grants. p. 4.
  39. Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2012). EEA and Norway Grants - Solidarity and cooperation in Europe. Norwegian Government. p. 22.
  40. Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2014). "Suspension of EEA and Norway Grants to Hungary". Government.no. Archived from the original on 15 July 2015.
  41. Nordic Consulting Group (2012). EEA and Norway Grants 2004-2009: End review. p. 7.
  42. Nordic Consulting Group (2012). EEA and Norway Grants 2004-2009: End review. EEA and Norway Grants. p. 53.
  43. EEA and Norway Grants (2009). Financial Instrument 1999-2003 - Final report.
  44. "Final report for the Financial Mechanism 1994-1998 | EEA Grants". eeagrants.org. Retrieved 23 March 2021.