Early Nationalists

Last updated

Indian National Congress
Leader W.C. Bonnerjee [1]
Rash Behari Ghosh


Moderates

Surendranath Banerjee
R. C. Dutt
Dadabhai Naoroji
Gopal Krishna Gokhale
Pherozeshah Mehta
Mahadev Govind Ranade
P. R. Naidu
S. Subramanian Iyer
Ananda Charlu
Madan Mohan Malaviya
A.O. Hume
William Wedderburn
Founder A.O. Hume [2]
Founded1885 (1885)
Dissolved1907 (1907)
Preceded by Landholders' Society
Succeeded by Assertive Nationalists
NewspaperDharma Marg Darshak (magazine)
Ideology Regain Self-government without violation

The Early Nationalists, [3] also known as the Moderates, [4] were a group of political leaders in India active between 1885 and 1907. Their emergence marked the beginning of the organised national movement in India. Some of the important moderate leaders were Pherozeshah Mehta and Dadabhai Naoroji. [5] With members of the group drawn from educated middle-class professionals including lawyers, teachers and government officials, many of them were educated in England.

Contents

They are known as "Early Nationalists" because they believed in demanding reforms while adopting constitutional and peaceful means to achieve their aims. [6] [7] The Early Nationalists had full faith in the British sense of justice, fair play, honesty, and integrity while they believed that British rule was a boon for India. [8] The Early Nationalists were staunch believers in open-minded and moderate politics. [9] [10]

Their successors, the "Assertives", existed from 1905 to 1919 and were followed by nationalists of the Gandhian era, which existed from 1919 until Indian Independence in 1947.

Origins of the name "Moderates"

The first session of the Early Nationalists of India in 1885 1st INC1885.jpg
The first session of the Early Nationalists of India in 1885

Focusing on demands for reform, the Early Nationalists adopted a constitutional and peaceful approach to achieve their objectives. They remained friendly towards the British Empire but believed that Indians should have a proper and legitimate role in the government of the country. Although they asked for constitutional and other reforms within the framework of British rule, they had full faith in that nation's sense of justice and fair play. [11] They further believed that continuation of the British connection with India was in the interests of both countries. At an early stage, the nationalists considered their association with England an advantage by considering British rule had done much good by removing various anomalies. Influenced by western thought, culture, education, literature and history, the demands of the early nationalists were not considered extreme but of a relatively moderate nature. [6] [8]

Methodology

The founder of Early Nationalism A. O. Hume (left) with Sir William Wedderburn (right) and Dadabhai Naoroji HumeWedderburnNaoroji.jpg
The founder of Early Nationalism A. O. Hume (left) with Sir William Wedderburn (right) and Dadabhai Naoroji

The Early Nationalists believed in patience and conciliation rather than confrontation, adopting orderly progress and constitutional means to realise their aims. To educate the people, to arouse political consciousness, and to create powerful public opinion in favour of their demands they organised annual sessions. Processions and meetings were held, speeches delivered and discussions held on various economic, social and political questions. Following these discussions, resolutions were adopted. They also drafted petitions and memorandums before submitting them to the government. The Early Nationalists wanted to convey their feelings to the government, so as to gradually bring the authorities around to their viewpoint. To influence the British government and to enlighten the British public and its political leaders, the Early Nationalists sent deputations of leading Indian leaders to England. In 1889, a British Committee of the Indian National Congress was founded and followed by a journal called India started by the Committee in 1890. [10]

Achievements

A. O. Hume, the founder of Indian National Congress (Moderates) A O Hume.jpg
A. O. Hume, the founder of Indian National Congress (Moderates)

In spite of their role as the most progressive force of the time, the Early Nationalists received widespread criticism over their lack of success. They were treated with contempt by the colonial administration and their demands were not fulfilled. [12]

In spite of such criticism, the Early Nationalists did achieve some of their goals. They created a national awakening among the people that made Indians conscious of the bonds of common political, economic, and cultural interests that united them. They also trained people in politics by popularising the ideas of democracy, civil liberties, secularism and nationalism . The Early Nationalists did pioneering work by exposing the true nature of British rule in India. They made the people realise the economic content and character of British colonialism. In doing so, they weakened the foundations of British rule in India. Their political and economic programmes established the idea that India must be ruled in the interest of the Indians. The efforts of the Early Nationalists also led to the implementation of various social reforms such as the appointment of a Public Service Commission. A resolution of the House of Commons (1893) allowing for simultaneous examination for the Indian Civil Service in London and India. Appointment of the Welby Commission on Indian Expenditure (1895). They also passed The Indian Councils Act of 1892. [13] These achievements served as the basis for nationalist movements in later years by extremist leaders. [14]

Objectives

The Early Nationalists wanted certain political and economic reforms with the view to unify the people of India.

Constitutional reforms

Believing that India should eventually move towards democratic self-government, the Early Nationalists wanted a larger share in the governing of India. They did not seek immediate attainment of their goal as they feared that the government would suppress their activities. Instead they aimed at winning freedom through a gradual process. [15]

Their constitutional demands were:

  1. Abolition of the India Council Act.
  2. Expansion of the legislative council and Legislative Assemblies, both Central and Provincial.
  3. Increase in the membership of Indians by including some members elected by local bodies like chambers of commerce, universities, etc. in these councils and by giving greater powers to them. They demanded Indian control over the public purse and raised the slogan "No taxation without representation".
  4. By the beginning of the 20th century, they demanded for Swaraj (self-rule) within the British Empire similar to the self-governing colonies in Canada and Australia.
  5. Adequate representation of Indians in the executive council of the Viceroy and those of the governors. [11]
  6. Reformation and expansion of the legislative councils created by the act of 1861. They demanded an increase in the membership of these councils and all legislative and financial matters including the Budget should be submitted to these councils.
  7. The members of the legislative councils to be directly elected by the people of India.
  8. A complete separation of the executive and judicial branches of administration.
  9. Complete self government modelled on self governing British colonies like Australia and Canada.

Administrative reforms

The Moderates made the following demands in the administrative sphere:

  1. Demand for simultaneous Indian Civil Service examinations in England and India.
  2. Complete separation of the executive and the judiciary. They made this demand to protect Indians from arbitrary acts by the police and the bureaucracy.
  3. Increase in the powers of the municipal bodies and reduction of official control over them.
  4. Repeal of the Arms Act and License Act.
  5. Wider employment of Indians in the higher grades of administrative services.
  6. Spread of primary education among the masses.
  7. Improvement of the police system to make it honest, efficient and popular. [11]

Defence of civil rights

The Early Nationalists defended civil rights whenever the British government tried to curtail them. Their struggle for freedom became an integral part of the national movement from the very beginning. In 1897, Tilak and many other leaders were arrested and tried for making provocative speeches. [8] [11] The Early Nationalists demanded the Abolition of the Preventive Detention Act and restoration of individual liberties and right to assemble and to form associations. They also wanted the Removal of the restrictions imposed by the British Government on the freedom of speech, and the freedom of the press. [8]

Criticism

The methods used by the Early Nationalists of passing resolutions and sending petitions were seen as inadequate by critics who argued that they depended on the generosity of the British instead of relying on their own strength and directly challenging colonial rule. Some historians have argued that the Early Nationalists misunderstood the British government and believed the fundamentally diametric interests of both the colonial administration and the nationalist movement could be resolved in favor of the latter. [6] [8] The Early Nationalists failed to draw the masses into the mainstream of the national movement such that their area of influence remained limited to urban educated Indians. In particular, their leadership comprised only members of professional groups such as lawyers, [16] doctors, journalists and teachers.

Response from the colonial administration

Lord Dufferin Lord Dufferin.jpg
Lord Dufferin

In the beginning, the British colonial administration looked upon the actions of the Early Nationalists favourably, and expressed no animosity towards them. Furthermore, a few government officials attended the first session of the Early Nationalists and took part in its deliberations. The Nationalists were invited to a garden party held by the Viceroy of India, Lord Dufferin in Calcutta in 1886 and another hosted by the Governor of Chennai in 1887. Official attitudes soon changed; Lord Dufferin tried to divert the National Movement by suggesting to Allan Hume that the Early Nationalists should devote themselves to social rather than political affairs. [17]

However, rather than emerging as a useful tool in the hands of the colonial administration, the Early Nationalists gradually became the focus of Indian nationalism. [6] In 1887, Dufferin attacked the Early Nationalists in a speech and ridiculed it as representing only a microscopic minority of the Indian people. Colonial officials in India criticised the Nationalists and characterised its leaders as "disloyal babus" and "violent villains". The next year Lord Dufferin published the Report on the Conditions of the Lower Classes of Population in Bengal (known as the Dufferin Report), which highlighted the plight of the poor in Bengal, which was then used by the Early Nationalists to counter the claim that British rule had been beneficial to the poorest members of Indian society. [18] Finally, in 1890 government employees were forbidden to participate in deliberations with the Early Nationalists or attend their meetings. [17] [19]

Failure

Some of the younger elements within the Indian National Congress were dissatisfied with the achievements of the Early Nationalists and vociferous critics of the methods of peaceful constitutional agitation that they promulgated. [9] Young members advocated the adoption of European revolutionary methods to counter British colonial rule while mainstream Early Nationalists remained loyal to the Crown, with their desire to regain self-government lacking conviction. The Early Nationalists failed to attain their objectives, giving rise to another group of leaders known as Assertive or Extremist Nationalists. [6] [8] The most prominent leaders of the Assertive Nationalists were Bal Gangadhar Tilak, Lala Lajpat Rai and Bipin Chandra Pal, who are known collectively as the Lal-Bal-Pal trio. [20]

Prominent leaders who fought for independence

Surendranath Banerjee

Surendranath Banerjee Surendranath Banerjee.jpg
Surendranath Banerjee

To create an all-India political organisation, Banerjee convened the Indian National Conference in 1883 at Kolkata. Banerjee merged the Indian National Conference with the Indian National Congress in 1886 as both organisations had similar objectives. He presided over two sessions of the Congress in 1895 and 1902. [6]

Gopal Krishna Gokhale

Gopal Krishna Gokhale GKGokhale.jpg
Gopal Krishna Gokhale

Gopal Krishna Gokhale, known as "The Political Guru of Gandhi" as he was the one who guided Mahatma Gandhi to travel around India in order to fight against the British, was one of the social and political leaders during the Indian Independence Movement against the British Empire in India. Gokhale was a senior leader of the Indian National Congress and founder of the Servants of India Society. Through the Society as well as the Congress and other legislative bodies he served in, Gokhale campaigned for Indian self-rule and also social reform. He was the leader of the moderate faction of the Congress party that advocated reforms by working with existing government institutions.

A. O. Hume

While the Early Nationalists moved towards the formation of an all-India political body, Englishman A. O. Hume, a retiree from the Indian Civil Service, saw the need for an organisation that would draw the government's attention to current administrative drawbacks and suggest the means to rectify them. In 1884 Hume, in consultation with the Indian leaders, laid the foundations of Indian National Union but it was postponed due to an outbreak of plague in Pune. Later on, at the suggestion of Dadabhai Naoroji, the name was changed to "Indian National Congress" and the foundation of the organisation laid on 28 December 1885. [17]

Dadabhai Naoroji

Dadabhai Naoroji in 1892. Dadabhai Naoroji, 1892.jpg
Dadabhai Naoroji in 1892.

Dadabhai Naoroji, popularly known as the "Grand Old Man of India", [21] took an active part in the foundation of the Indian National Congress and was elected its President thrice, in 1886, 1893 and after the Moderate phase in 1906. [6] [22] He spent a major part of his life in Britain.He founded the London Indian Society which he used to create the awareness among the British people about the plight of the Indians. His book Poverty and UnBritish Rule in India explored how India was economically exploited by the British government.

Sessions

Year of sessionSessionPlaceName of the president
18851st Mumbai W. C. Banerjee [23]
18862nd Kolkata Dadabhai Naoroji [21]
18873rd Chennai Justice Badruddin Tyabji [24]
18884th Allahabad George Yule [24]
18895th Mumbai Sir William Wedderburn [25]
18906thKolkata Mr. Pherozeshah Mehta [26]
18917th Nagpur P Ananda Charlu [27]
18928thAllahabadW. C. Banerjee
18939th Lahore Mr. Dadabhai Naoroji
189410thChennai Alfred Webb [28]
189511th Poona Surendranath Banerjee [29]
189612thKolkataRahmatullah Sayani [30]
189713th Amraoti M. C. Shankaran Nair [31]
189814thChennaiA. M. Bose [32]
189915th Lucknow Romesh Chunder Dutt
190016thLahoreN. G. Chandarverkar [33]
190117thKolkata D. E. Wacha [ citation needed ]
190218th Ahmedabad Surendranath Banerjee
190319thChennai Lalmohan Ghosh
190420thMumbai Sir Henry Cotton
190521st Banaras Gopal Krishna Gokhale [15]
190622ndKolkataDadabhai Naoroji

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian independence movement</span> Independence movement to end British rule over India

The Indian Independence Movement, was a series of historic events in South Asia with the ultimate aim of ending British rule in India. It lasted until 1947, when the Indian Independence Act 1947 was passed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gopal Krishna Gokhale</span> Indian political leader and social reformer (1866–1915)

Gopal Krishna Gokhale was an Indian political leader and a social reformer during the Indian independence movement and political mentor of Indian freedom fighter Mahatma Gandhi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dadabhai Naoroji</span> Indian politician leader, scholar and writer (1825–1917)

Dadabhai Naoroji, was an Indian political leader, merchant, scholar and writer who served as 2nd, 9th, and 22nd President of the Indian National Congress from 1886 to 1887, 1893 to 1894 and 1906 to 1907.

The Khilafat movement (1919–22) was a political campaign launched by Indian Muslims in British India over British policy against Turkey and the planned dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire after World War I by Allied forces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian Councils Act 1909</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Indian Councils Act 1909, commonly known as the Morley–Minto or Minto–Morley Reforms, was an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that brought about a limited increase in the involvement of Indians in the governance of British India. Named after Viceroy Lord Minto and Secretary of State John Morley, the act introduced elections to legislative councils and admitted Indians to councils of the Secretary of State for India, the viceroy, and to the executive councils of Bombay and Madras states. Muslims were granted separate electorates according to the demands of the Muslim League.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian Home Rule movement</span> Anti-colonial movement in British India

The Indian Home Rule movement was a movement in British India on the lines of the Irish Home Rule movement and other home rule movements. The movement lasted around two years between 1916–1918 and is believed to have set the stage for the independence movement under the leadership of Annie Besant and Bal Gangadhar Tilak to the educated English speaking upper class Indians. In 1920 All India Home Rule League changed its name to Swarajya Sabha.

The Swaraj Party, established as the Congress-Khilafat Swaraj Party, was a political party formed in India on 1 January 1923 after the Gaya annual conference in December 1922 of the National Congress, that sought greater self-government and political freedom for the Indian people from the British Raj.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian nationalism</span> Territorial nationalist movement

Indian nationalism is an instance of territorial nationalism, which is inclusive of all of the people of India, despite their diverse ethnic, linguistic and religious backgrounds. Indian nationalism can trace roots to pre-colonial India, but was fully developed during the Indian independence movement which campaigned for independence from British rule. Indian nationalism quickly rose to popularity in India through these united anti-colonial coalitions and movements. Independence movement figures like Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru spearheaded the Indian nationalist movement. After Indian Independence, Nehru and his successors continued to campaign on Indian nationalism in face of border wars with both China and Pakistan. After the Indo-Pakistan War of 1971 and the Bangladesh Liberation War, Indian nationalism reached its post-independence peak. However by the 1980s, religious tensions reached a melting point and Indian nationalism sluggishly collapsed. Despite its decline and the rise of religious nationalism; Indian nationalism and its historic figures continue to strongly influence the politics of India and reflect an opposition to the sectarian strands of Hindu nationalism and Muslim nationalism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Partition of Bengal (1905)</span> 1905 territorial reorganization of the Bengal Presidency by the British Raj

The first Partition of Bengal (1905) was a territorial reorganization of the Bengal Presidency implemented by the authorities of the British Raj. The reorganization separated the largely Muslim eastern areas from the largely Hindu western areas. Announced on 16 July 1905 by Lord Curzon, then Viceroy of India, and implemented West Bengal for Hindus and East Bengal for Muslims, it was undone a mere six years later. The nationalists saw the partition as a challenge to Indian nationalism and as a deliberate attempt to divide the Bengal Presidency on religious grounds, with a Muslim majority in the east and a Hindu majority in the west. The Hindus of West Bengal complained that the division would make them a minority in a province that would incorporate the province of Bihar and Orissa. Hindus were outraged at what they saw as a "divide and rule" policy, even though Curzon stressed it would produce administrative efficiency. The partition animated the Muslims to form their own national organization along communal lines. To appease Bengali sentiment, Bengal was reunited by King George V in 1911, in response to the Swadeshi movement's riots in protest against the policy.

The Liberal Party of India was a political organization espousing liberalism in the politics of India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Indian National Congress</span>

The Indian National Congress was established when 72 representatives from all over the country met at Bombay in 1885. Prominent delegates included Dadabhai Naoroji, Surendranath Banerjee, Badruddin Tyabji, Pherozeshah Mehta, W. C. Banerjee, S. Ramaswami Mudaliar, S. Subramania Iyer, and Romesh Chunder Dutt. The Englishman Allan Octavian Hume, a former British civil servant, was one of the founding members of the Indian National Congress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Purna Swaraj</span> Proclamation of Indian independence from the British Empire published on 26 Jan. 1930

The Declaration of Purna Swaraj was a resolution which was passed in 1930 because of the dissatisfaction among the Indian masses regarding the British offer of Dominion status to India. The word Purna Swaraj was derived from Sanskrit पूर्ण (Pūrṇa) 'Complete', and स्वराज (Svarāja) 'Self-rule or Sovereignty', or Declaration of the Independence of India, it was promulgated by the Indian National Congress, resolving the Congress and Indian nationalists to fight for Purna Swaraj, or complete self-rule/total independence from the British rule

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surendranath Banerjee</span> Indian nationalist leader (1848–1925)

SirSurendranath Banerjee, often known as Rashtraguru was Indian nationalist leader during the British Rule. He founded a nationalist organization called the Indian National Association to bring Hindus and Muslims together for political action. He was one of the founding members of the Indian National Congress. Surendranath supported Montagu–Chelmsford Reforms, unlike Congress, and with many liberal leaders he left Congress and founded a new organisation named Indian National Liberation Federation in 1919.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alfred Webb</span> Irish Parliamentary Party politician

Alfred John Webb was an Irish Quaker from a family of activist printers. He became an Irish Parliamentary Party politician and Member of Parliament (MP), as well as a participant in nationalist movements around the world. He supported Butt's Home Government Association and the United Irish League. At Madras in 1894, he became the third non-Indian to preside over the Indian National Congress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">India House</span> Student residence in London opened to promote nationalist views among Indian students in Britain

India House was a student residence that existed between 1905 and 1910 at Cromwell Avenue in Highgate, North London. With the patronage of lawyer Shyamji Krishna Varma, it was opened to promote nationalist views among Indian students in Britain. This institute used to grant scholarships to Indian youths for higher studies in England. The building rapidly became a hub for political activism, one of the most prominent for overseas revolutionary Indian nationalism. "India House" came to informally refer to the nationalist organisations that used the building at various times.

The Indian Home Rule Society (IHRS) was an Indian organisation founded in London in 1905 that sought to promote the cause of self-rule in British India. The organisation was founded by Shyamji Krishna Varma, with support from a number of prominent Indian nationalists in Britain at the time, including Bhikaji Cama, Dadabhai Naoroji and S.R. Rana, and was intended to be a rival organisation to the British Committee of the Indian National Congress that was the main avenue of the loyalist opinion at the time.

Hindu Revolution is a term in Hindu nationalism referring to a sociopolitical movement aiming to overthrow untouchability and casteism to unified social and political community to create the foundations of a modern nation.

The British Committee of the Indian National congress was an organization established in Britain by the Indian National Congress in 1889. Its purpose was to raise awareness of Indian issues to the public in Britain, to whom the Government of India was responsible. It followed the work of W.C. Bonnerjee and Dadabhoi Naoroji, who raised India related issues in the British parliament through the support of radical MPs like Charles Bradlaugh. William Wedderburn served as the first chairmanship and William Digby as secretary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legislatures of British India</span> Legislative bodies in the presidencies and provinces of British India (1861-1947)

The Legislatures of British India included legislative bodies in the presidencies and provinces of British India, the Imperial Legislative Council, the Chamber of Princes and the Central Legislative Assembly. The legislatures were created under Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom. Initially serving as small advisory councils, the legislatures evolved into partially elected bodies, but were never elected through suffrage. Provincial legislatures saw boycotts during the period of dyarchy between 1919 and 1935. After reforms and elections in 1937, the largest parties in provincial legislatures formed governments headed by a prime minister. A few British Indian subjects were elected to the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which had superior powers than colonial legislatures. British Indian legislatures did not include Burma's legislative assembly after 1937, the State Council of Ceylon nor the legislative bodies of princely states.

The Women's suffrage movement in India fought for Indian women's right to political enfranchisement in Colonial India under British rule. Beyond suffrage, the movement was fighting for women's right to stand for and hold office during the colonial era. In 1918, when Britain granted limited suffrage to women property holders, the law did not apply to British citizens in other parts of the Empire. Despite petitions presented by women and men to the British commissions sent to evaluate Indian voting regulations, women's demands were ignored in the Montagu–Chelmsford Reforms. In 1919, impassioned pleas and reports indicating support for women to have the vote were presented by suffragists to the India Office and before the Joint Select Committee of the House of Lords and Commons, who were meeting to finalize the electoral regulation reforms of the Southborough Franchise Committee. Though they were not granted voting rights, nor the right to stand in elections, the Government of India Act 1919 allowed Provincial Councils to determine if women could vote, provided they met stringent property, income, or educational levels.

References

  1. "Indian National Congress UK".
  2. Bevir, Marks (9 February 2013). "Theosophy and the Origins of the Indian National Congress". University of California, Berkeley . Retrieved 1 January 2003.
  3. Ralhan, Om Prakash, ed. (1995). Encyclopedia of Political Parties – India – Pakistan – Bangladesh – National – Regional – Local. Vol. 23. Moderate phrase in India. New Delhi: Anmol Publications. pp. 29–36. The phase from 1885 to 1905 is known as the period of the Early Nationalists.
  4. Porter, Robin J. (2001). "Imperial India, 1858–1914". Oxford History of the British Empire: The Nineteenth Century. pp. 345, 434.
  5. Burke, S. M.; Al-Din, Salim (1997). The British Raj in India: An Historical Review. USA: Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 325–332. ISBN   978-0195-7773-45. One of the most distinguishing features of the second half of the 19th century was the birth of national awakening in India. It originated from the concepts of nationalism and right of self-determination initiated by the French Revolution, the socio-religious reform movement, the spread of western education and the reaction of Indians to British Raj. The political awareness generated by these trends gave birth to various political associations. This trend culminated in the establishment of the Early Nationalists in 1885, which was the starting point of the organised national movement in India
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sequeira, Dolly Ellen; Raj, S. Irudaya (2009). History & Civics. Morning Star Publishers. pp. 27, 35–41, 45. ISBN   978-8131-7033-11.
  7. Stein, Burton (21 September 2023). A History of India. Vol. I. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. pp. 254–255. ISBN   978-0-19-565446-2. Avoiding confrontations, the early Congress leaders were patient, moderate and conciliatory in their demands
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kundra, D. N. (2012). History & Civics PART II. Goyal Brothers Prakashan. pp. 91, 93, 98–106, 111.
  9. 1 2 Seth, Sanjay (1999). "Rewriting Histories of Nationalism; The politics of "Moderate Nationalism" in India". The American Historical Review. 104 (1): 102, 115. doi:10.2307/2650182. JSTOR   2650182.(subscription required)
  10. 1 2 Ludden, David (2002). India and South Asia: a Short history. pp. 135–197.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Bhattacharya, D. C.; Ghai, K. K. (2009). Indian History. Dayal publishers. pp. 55, 60–61, 88, 92.
  12. James, Lawrence (2000). Raj: The Making and unmaking of British India. Vol. I. St. Martin's Griffin. pp.  323–324. ISBN   0312263821.
  13. Vohra, Ranbir (2001). The Making of India: A Historical Survey . M. E. Sharpe. p.  56. ISBN   9780765607126.
  14. Guha, Ramachandra. India after Gandhi:The History of the World's largest Democracy. pp. 98–99. The achievements by the early Congress leaders urged the development and basic foundation of the extremist leaders.
  15. 1 2 Jim Masselos (1991). Indian Nationalism: An History. Bangalore: Sterling Publishers. pp. 122–123, 125–129, 157–158.
  16. "Lawyers are drawn for the formation of Moderates".
  17. 1 2 3 John F. Riddick (2006). The history of British India: a chronology. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 122 –123 and 55, 136. ISBN   0-313-32280-5.
  18. Islam, Sirajul (2012). "Dufferin, Lord". In Islam, Sirajul; Jamal, Ahmed A. (eds.). Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh (Second ed.). Asiatic Society of Bangladesh.
  19. Robb, Peter (2002). A History of India (1st ed.). Palgrave.
  20. Ashalatha, A.; Koropath, Pradeep; Nambarathil, Saritha (2009). "Chapter 6 – Indian National Movement". Social Science: Standard VIII Part 1 (PDF). Government of Kerala • Department of Education, State Council of Educational Research and Training (SCERT). p. 72. Retrieved 13 October 2011.
  21. 1 2 S. R. Bakshi (1991). Dadabhai Naoroji:The Grand Old Man. Delhi: Anmol Publications. pp. 12, 45. ISBN   81-7041-426-1.
  22. Kesayan, Mukul (29 May 2008). "Story of the Congress – Three pivotal moments that shaped early nationalism in India". Calcutta: The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 19 September 2012.
  23. Buckland, C. E. (1906). Dictionary of Indian Biography. London: Swan Sonnenshein & Co. p. 48.
  24. 1 2 "Past Presidents of Indian National Congress". Indian National Congress. Archived from the original on 15 January 2002.
  25. C. Hayavadana Rao, ed. (1915). The Indian Biographical Dictionary. Pillar & Co. pp. 460–61.
  26. "Presidents of Indian National Congress". 2009. Archived from the original on 26 October 2009. Retrieved 23 April 2014.
  27. "Ananda Charlu the seventh congress president".
  28. "Alfred Webb President – Madras, 1894". Past presidents of Indian National Congress. Indian National Congress.
  29. "As congress president".[ permanent dead link ]
  30. "President of congress". Archived from the original on 28 September 2011. Retrieved 23 April 2014.
  31. "13th President of congress".
  32. "Ananda Mohan Bose". Britannica.com.
  33. "Former Justices". Bombay High Court, Bombay.

Further reading