Economy of the Socialist Republic of Romania

Last updated
Economy of Socialist Republic of Romania
Platforma Petrochimica Borzesti.jpg
Currency Leu (Leu or ROL)
Calendar year
Trade organisations
Comecon, WTO
Statistics
GDP $180 billion
GDP rank40th
External
Main export partners
Flag of the Soviet Union.svg  Soviet Union

All values, unless otherwise stated, are in US dollars.

The economy of the Socialist Republic of Romania was centrally planned, similar to the one of the Soviet Union. Most of the means of production (including all large and medium enterprises) were owned by the state, which established production plans as part of the Five-Year Plans.

Contents

The economy grew between the 1950s and 1970s at one of the fastest rates in the world, changing Romania from a predominantly agricultural country into an industrialized country. Almost 30% of the population moved during this period from rural to urban areas to work in the newly built factories.

During the 1980s, dictator Nicolae Ceaușescu pursued an austerity policy in order to pay foreign debts, leading to a decade-long stagnation and negatively affecting the living standards of the Romanians.

Pre-Socialist Romania

Interwar Romania was one of the least developed countries in Europe, having a per capita income of less than half the one of Czechoslovakia. [1]

Despite having mineral resources and a state interventionist policy, Romania was not able to change the agricultural character of its economy into an industrial one. [1] 80% of its population was employed in labor-intensive agriculture, which made up 64% of Romania's exports, while only 2% of its exports consisted of manufactured goods. [1] Its industrial and economic development, as well as its relationship with the industrialised West was typical of what we call now the periphery countries. [1]

Despite the land reforms, Romania's peasants continued to live at the edge of poverty. Its bourgeoisie used much of the country's economic surplus into non-productive uses, while the country had an oversized and corrupt state apparatus, upon which relied a privileged minority. [2]

Early years

Early post-war development was not slow. The country had been affected by the war and, furthermore, it was burdened by war reparations to the Soviet Union, either directly or through joint Soviet-Romanian companies (SovRoms). Additionally, 1945 and 1946 saw a severe drought which strongly reduced agricultural output. [3]

The lack of organization post-war (much of it due to the political struggle and the agitation among the workers), together with a foreign exchange crisis (which led to shortage of materials and spare parts) meant lower industrial production. [3] An improvement came in late 1947 as the better harvest and a monetary reform helped the economy. [3]

Romanian gross production (1945–1948) [4]
1945194619471948
Natural gas (million cubic ft.)1304133211761260
Coal (thousands of tons)201222682400
Iron ore (thousands of tons)141112121209
Pig iron (thousands of tons)546690191
Steel (thousands of tons)118148183341
Tractors3401000

Nationalization and collectivization

After the Communists were able to liquidate their allies, the reforms were passed at a faster pace. [3] In June 1948, the Great National Assembly passed a nationalization law which resulted in the nationalization of virtually all of Romania's industrial means of production. [3] Together with the nationalization, central planning was introduced, first using one-year-plans (in 1949 and 1950), then using five-year plans (starting in 1951). [3]

In the countryside, all large holdings were nationalized in March 1949, being either converted into state-owned farms or handed over to collective farms. The small farmers were encouraged to join these collective farms, but the brutality with which this program was implemented led to resistance which was, occasionally, even violent. [5] According to a 1961 report given to Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej, around 80,000 peasants were arrested, of which around 30,000 were prosecuted. [5]

However, Romania did not have the material means (such as tractors), nor the skilled people to run large-scale exploitations. The Central Committee admitted the mistakes and retreated temporarily, allowing individual property, with mandatory quotas of the production. The pressure from these quotas, combined to the attractiveness of industrial jobs in the cities led to a decline of agriculture's share of the labor force from 74.1% in 1950 to 69.5% in 1955. [5] It was only in 1958 that a new campaign begun: the number of households engaged in private agriculture went down from 88.5% in 1955 to around 7% in 1962, when the socialization of agriculture was considered complete. [6]

Industrialization

The formaldehyde production facility at the chemical plant of Victoria, Brasov. The chemical industry was one of the focuses in the government's industrialization plans 1964 Combinatul chimic din orasul Victoria. Instalatia de formaldehida.JPG
The formaldehyde production facility at the chemical plant of Victoria, Brașov. The chemical industry was one of the focuses in the government's industrialization plans

A large investment plan was started: between 1950 and 1953, the ratio of investment to national income grew from 19% to 34%. [3] It focused on industrialization, which received 48% of the investment funds, as well as construction. [3] Most of the investment was in electrification, metallurgy, machine building and chemical industries. [3] However, few investments were made in the countryside (less than 10%). [3]

In 1953, the pace of industrialization was slowed, more resources being redirected to consumption and housing. Retail sales were increased and steps were made to end rationing in order to gain the favors of the working class. [7] The second five-year plan (1956–1960) was supposed to accelerate the pace of industrialization again, but, in the context of the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, the Romanian Communist Party cautiously reduced the investment to half of the original amount and, instead, increased the workers' wages by 15%. [7] After the leadership was sure that they had the control in the country, the government resumed its policy of industrialization, growing investment by 10.92% in 1958 and 16.23% in 1959. [7]

Over this period, industrialization proceeded at a faster rate than any other Eastern European country. [8] The labor force increased from 12% to 19.2% between 1950 and 1965 and, according to official figures, its industrial production increased by 649%. [8] While the real figures are expected to have been lower, most sources agree that there was a massive growth. [8]

The industrialization had an important social impact. The cities grew as new jobs were created in factories, but the inhabitants of these urban areas suffered overcrowding and lack of services, as not enough funds were allocated to building housing. [9] The high level investment in industry meant that, although consumption increased in absolute terms, it was the lowest among the Eastern Bloc countries. [9]

Drive towards national autonomy

Following the consolidation of power of Nikita Khrushchev in 1957, he began to press for economic coordination and reforms in the Eastern Bloc. [6] The Romanian leadership under Gheorghiu-Dej disagreed with this course and preferred to continue the Stalinist-style investments in industry rather than the moderate approach to industrialization supported by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. [6]

Romania was able to have a relatively independent economic policy thanks to the context, which included the death of Stalin, Romania success in keeping stability internally and its role in restoring order in Hungary after the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, as well as the Sino-Soviet split. [10]

Romania's foreign trade
Year [11] Soviet UnionWestern countries
ImportsExportsImportsExports
195857.7%50.2%21.5%24.9%
196437.7%39.8%39.8%32.8%

The Soviet Union showed dissatisfaction with Romania's investment in heavy industry; symbolically it did not provide any assistance in the building of the massive Galați steel works. [11] The Romanian Communist Party used this resistance in its propaganda to rally popular support, by portraying development as a national goal. [11]

Since Romania could no longer rely on the Soviet economic assistance, the government began establishing trade relations with the capitalist West. [11] The result was that the proportion of trade with the Soviet Union decreased, while trade with Western countries grew. [11] By 1965, the West may have accounted as much as half of Romania's imports of equipment and machinery. [11]

Ceaușescu transition

1980s austerity

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 Crowther, p.55
  2. Crowther, p.149
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Crowther, p.56
  4. Wolff, Robert Lee (1967). The Balkans in our Time. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 347.
  5. 1 2 3 Crowther, p.57
  6. 1 2 3 Crowther, p.59
  7. 1 2 3 Crowther, p.58
  8. 1 2 3 Crowther, p.63
  9. 1 2 Crowther, p.64
  10. Crowther, p.60
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Crowther, p.61

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Import substitution industrialization</span> Trade and economic policy

Import substitution industrialization (ISI) is a trade and economic policy that advocates replacing foreign imports with domestic production. It is based on the premise that a country should attempt to reduce its foreign dependency through the local production of industrialized products. The term primarily refers to 20th-century development economics policies, but it has been advocated since the 18th century by economists such as Friedrich List and Alexander Hamilton.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Five-year plans of the Soviet Union</span> Series of nation-wide centralized economic plans in the Soviet Union

The five-year plans for the development of the national economy of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) consisted of a series of nationwide centralized economic plans in the Soviet Union, beginning in the late 1920s. The Soviet state planning committee Gosplan developed these plans based on the theory of the productive forces that formed part of the ideology of the Communist Party for development of the Soviet economy. Fulfilling the current plan became the watchword of Soviet bureaucracy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Socialist Republic of Romania</span> 1947–1989 republic in Southeastern Europe

The Socialist Republic of Romania was a Marxist–Leninist one-party socialist state that existed officially in Romania from 1947 to 1989. From 1947 to 1965, the state was known as the Romanian People's Republic. The country was an Eastern Bloc state and a member of the Warsaw Pact with a dominant role for the Romanian Communist Party enshrined in its constitutions. Geographically, RSR was bordered by the Black Sea to the east, the Soviet Union to the north and east, Hungary and Yugoslavia to the west, and Bulgaria to the south.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej</span> General Secretary of the Romanian Communist Party (1901–1965)

Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej was a Romanian communist politician and electrician. He was the first Communist leader of Romania from 1947 to 1965, serving as first secretary of the Romanian Communist Party from 1944 to 1954 and from 1955 to 1965, and as the first Communist Prime Minister of Romania from 1952 to 1955.

In the mid-1980s, Communist Czechoslovakia was prosperous by the standards of the Eastern Bloc, and did well in comparison to many richer western countries. Consumption of some goods like meat, eggs and bread products was even higher than the average countries in Western Europe, and the population enjoyed high macroeconomic stability and low social friction. Inhabitants of Czechoslovakia enjoyed a standard of living generally higher than that found in most other East European countries. Heavily dependent on foreign trade, the country nevertheless had one of the Eastern Bloc's smallest international debts to non-socialist countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of East Germany</span>

East Germany had a command economy, similar to the economic system in the Soviet Union and other Comecon member states — in contrast to the market economies or mixed economies or other capitalist states. The state established production targets, set prices, and also allocated resources, codifying these decisions in comprehensive plans. The means of production were almost entirely state-owned. The GDR had an above-average standard of living compared to other Eastern Bloc countries or the Soviet Union, and enjoyed favorable duty and tariff terms with the West German market; in 1989, it was estimated that 50 to 60% of its trade was with Western countries. However by the mid-1980s its economy had reached a state of stagnation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Era of Stagnation</span> 1964–1985 period of the Soviet Union

The "Era of Stagnation" is a term coined by Mikhail Gorbachev in order to describe the negative way in which he viewed the economic, political, and social policies of the Soviet Union that began during the rule of Leonid Brezhnev (1964–1982) and continued under Yuri Andropov (1982–1984) and Konstantin Chernenko (1984–1985). It is sometimes called the "Brezhnevian Stagnation" in English.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Romanian Communist Party</span> 1921–1989 political party in Romania, ruling from 1953 to 1989

The Romanian Communist Party was a communist party in Romania. The successor to the pro-Bolshevik wing of the Socialist Party of Romania, it gave an ideological endorsement to a communist revolution that would replace the social system of the Kingdom of Romania. After being outlawed in 1924, the PCR remained a minor and illegal grouping for much of the interwar period and submitted to direct Comintern control. During the 1920s and the 1930s, most of its activists were imprisoned or took refuge in the Soviet Union, which led to the creation of competing factions that sometimes came into open conflict. That did not prevent the party from participating in the political life of the country through various front organizations, most notably the Peasant Workers' Bloc. During the mid-1930s, due to the purges against the Iron Guard, the party was on the road to achieving power, but the dictatorship of king Carol II crushed this. In 1934–1936, PCR reformed itself in the mainland of Romania properly, with foreign observers predicting a possible communist takeover in Romania. The party emerged as a powerful actor on the Romanian political scene in August 1944, when it became involved in the royal coup that toppled the pro-Nazi government of Ion Antonescu. With support from Soviet occupational forces, the PCR pressured King Michael I into abdicating, and it established the Romanian People's Republic in December 1947.

Đổi Mới is the name given to the economic reforms initiated in Vietnam in 1986 with the goal of creating a "socialist-oriented market economy". The term đổi mới itself is a general term with wide use in the Vietnamese language meaning "innovate" or "renovate". However, the Đổi Mới Policy refers specifically to these reforms that sought to transition Vietnam from a command economy to a socialist-oriented market economy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First five-year plan</span> Economic policy of the Soviet Union from 1928 to 1932

The first five-year plan of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) was a list of economic goals, implemented by Communist Party General Secretary Joseph Stalin, based on his policy of socialism in one country. Leon Trotsky had delivered a joint report to the April Plenum of the Central Committee in 1926 which proposed a program for national industrialisation and the replacement of annual plans with five-year plans. His proposals were rejected by the Central Committee majority which was controlled by the troika and derided by Stalin at the time. Stalin's version of the five-year plan was implemented in 1928 and took effect until 1932.

The economic history of China describes the changes and developments in China's economy from the founding of the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1949 to the present day. The speed of China's transformation in this period from one of the poorest countries to one of the world's largest economies is unmatched in history.

The Five-Year Plans of Vietnam are a series of economic development initiatives. The Vietnamese economy is shaped primarily by the Vietnamese Communist Party through the plenary sessions of the Central Committee and national congresses. The party plays a leading role in establishing the foundations and principles of communism, mapping strategies for economic development, setting growth targets, and launching reforms.

On the eve of the 1921 revolution, Mongolia had an underdeveloped, stagnant economy based on nomadic animal husbandry. Farming and industry were almost nonexistent; transportation and communications were primitive; banking, services, and trade were almost exclusively in the hands of Chinese or other foreigners. Most of the people were illiterate nomadic herders, and a large part of the male labour force lived in the monasteries, contributing little to the economy. Property in the form of livestock was owned primarily by aristocrats and monasteries; ownership of the remaining sectors of the economy was dominated by Chinese or other foreigners. Mongolia's new rulers thus were faced with a daunting task in building a modern, socialist economy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Industrialization in the Soviet Union</span>

Industrialization in the Soviet Union was a process of accelerated building-up of the industrial potential of the Soviet Union to reduce the economy's lag behind the developed capitalist states, which was carried out from May 1929 to June 1941.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mexican miracle</span>

The Mexican miracle is a term used to refer to the country's inward-looking development strategy that produced sustained economic growth. It is considered to be a golden age in Mexico's economy in which the Mexican economy grew 6.8% each year. It was a stabilizing economic plan which caused an average growth of 6.8% and industrial production to increase by 8% with inflation staying at only 2.5%. Beginning roughly in the 1940s, the Mexican government would begin to roll out the economic plan that they would call "the Mexican miracle," which would spark an economic boom beginning in 1954 spanning some 15 years and would last until 1970. In Mexico, the Spanish economic term used is "Desarrollo estabilizador" or "Stabilizing Development."

The Tenth Five-Year Plan, or the 10th Five-Year Plan of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), was a set of goals designed to strengthen the country's economy between 1976 and 1980. The plan was presented by the Chairman of the Council of Ministers Alexei Kosygin at the 25th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU). Officially the plan was normally referred to as "The Plan of Quality and Efficiency".

The Galați steel works, formally Liberty Galați, is a steel mill in Galați, Romania, the country's largest.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alexandru Bârlădeanu</span>

Alexandru Bârlădeanu was a Romanian Marxian economist and statesman who was prominent during the communist regime until being sidelined in 1968. In his later years, following the collapse of the regime, he served as Senate President.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Economic Policy</span> 1921–28 Soviet economic policy theorized by Lenin

The New Economic Policy (NEP) was an economic policy of the Soviet Union proposed by Vladimir Lenin in 1921 as a temporary expedient. Lenin characterized the NEP in 1922 as an economic system that would include "a free market and capitalism, both subject to state control", while socialized state enterprises would operate on "a profit basis".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economy of the Soviet Union</span>

The economy of the Soviet Union was based on state ownership of the means of production, collective farming, and industrial manufacturing. An administrative-command system managed a distinctive form of central planning. The Soviet economy was characterized by state control of investment, prices, a dependence on natural resources, lack of consumer goods, little foreign trade, public ownership of industrial assets, macroeconomic stability, low unemployment and high job security.

References