Employment and Social Insurance Act

Last updated

Employment and Social Insurance Act
Parliament-Ottawa.jpg
Parliament of Canada
Enacted by Parliament of Canada
Assented to1935

The Employment and Social Insurance Act (French : Loi sur le placement et les assurances sociales) was a statute enacted by the Parliament of Canada in 1935 during the final months of the government of R.B. Bennett. The Act was intended to introduce a nationwide employment insurance scheme, and also to convince voters that Bennett was willing to intervene aggressively in the economy, as President Roosevelt had done in the United States with the New Deal. The Act was a key component of the program of interventionist laws known as "Bennett's New Deal."

Contents

In 1936, the Act was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Canada, as unemployment insurance was found to fall under one of the heads of power assigned by Canada's constitution to the provinces. [1] The ruling of the Supreme Court was upheld by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in 1937. [2] The Employment and Social Insurance Act therefore failed to achieve its policy goal, as Canada was left for a time without unemployment insurance.

Background

In 1919 the Royal Commission on Industrial Relations, sometimes called the Mathers Commission, recommended a national program of unemployment insurance. [3]

In 1930, the Conservative government was elected due to a promise of federal action against unemployment. Initially, the federal government pursued the traditional model of providing temporary and emergency funding to municipalities in support of their relief aid. Over time a new policy was developed in an effort to combat public unemployment that would be administered by the federal government and provided nationally. [4]

Introduction of the Employment and Social Insurance Act

R. B. Bennett's government passed the Employment and Social Insurance Act in 1935, to establish a national unemployment scheme. The national unemployment scheme was modeled on the British approach at the time, which included flat-rate financial benefits for the unemployed based on worker, employer, and state contributions. [5] The Act was part of eight interventionist laws, which were collectively characterized as "Bennett's New Deal"—a Canadian version of Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal. [6] The "Bennett New Deal" included the Weekly Rest in Industrial Undertakings Act, the Limitations of Hours of Work Act, the Minimum Wages Act, the National Products Marketing Act, the Employment and Social Insurance Act, the Farmers Creditor's Arrangement Act, the Dominion Trade and Industry Commission Act and section 498A of the Criminal Code. This was the Canadian parliament's attempt to deal with the economic hardships of the Great Depression. [7]

The legislation on Unemployment Insurance was struck down in 1936 by a 4 to 2 decision of the Supreme Court, a decision that was upheld in 1937 by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. The Supreme Court split 3–3 on the case involving three other pieces of legislation, collectively referred to as the "Labour Conventions Case". These were the Weekly Rest in Industrial Undertakings Act, the Minimum Wages Act, and the Limitations of Hours of Work Act. That split decision would have left those acts in force, but the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council also struck down those laws. The Natural Products Marketing Act was declared ultra vires by the unanimous judgment of both the Supreme Court and the Privy Council. The other three acts were maintained, namely the Farmers Creditor's Arrangement Act, the Dominion Trade and Industry Commission Act and section 498A of the Criminal Code.

The matter that brought this to a head was the unsuccessful attempt by the Bennett government to invoke international treaties to legitimize certain laws that would bring Canada into compliance with Part XIII of the Treaty of Versailles, dealing with labour. In 1919 Canada had, for the first time, been a signatory to an international treaty. The Limitation of Hours of Work Act had been the subject of a legal reference in 1925, and at that time the Supreme Court had held that the Dominion had no legislative power to deal with the matter, and the only thing that could be done by Ottawa was to bring the Convention to the attention of the provinces and leave any further action to them.

Matter of Reference to the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) and Decisions by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC)

On November 5, 1935, the Governor General in Council made a matter of reference regarding the constitutionality of the several Acts, two of which dated from 1934, and the cases were then brought to the SCC. The SCC rendered its judgements on June 17, 1936 invalidating three of those Acts and maintaining the others, as described previously. The judgements were then sent to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in the UK, which was then the highest court to settle legal issues of Canada. The JCPC decisions that struck down the Employment and Social Insurance Act as well as the 3 acts concerned by 'Labour Conventions Case' were met with discontent in the English Canadian centralist circles and led to their demanding appeals to London be abolished.

1936 "New Deal" Decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

ActSupreme Court of Canada CaseJudicial Committee of the Privy Council CaseFinal disposal
Section 498A of the Criminal Code Reference re legislation jurisdiction of Parliament of Canada to enact Section 498A of the Criminal Code (1936) S.C.R. 363 (June 17, 1936) Attorney General of British Columbia v Attorney General of Canada and others (1937) UKPC 8 (28 January 1937) Valid legislation
Dominion Trade and Industry Commission Act Reference re legislative jurisdiction of Parliament of Canada to enact the Dominion Trade and Industry Commission Act, 1935 (1936) S.C.R. 379 (June 17, 1936) Attorney General of Ontario v Attorney General of Canada and others (1937) UKPC 11 (28 January 1937) Valid legislation
Farmers’ Creditors Arrangement Act Reference re legislative jurisdiction of Parliament of Canada to enact the Farmers' Creditors Arrangement Act, 1934, as amended by the Farmers' Creditors Arrangement Act Amendment Act, 1935 (1936) S.C.R. 384 (June 17, 1936) Attorney General of British Columbia v Attorney General of Canada and others (1937) UKPC 10 (28 January 1937) Valid legislation
Natural Products Marketing Act Reference re legislative jurisdiction of Parliament of Canada to enact the Natural Products Marketing Act, 1934, and The Natural Products Marketing Act Amendment Act, 1935 (1936) S.C.R. 398 (June 17, 1936) Attorney General of British Columbia v Attorney General of Canada and others (1937) UKPC 9 (28 January 1937) Invalid
Weekly Rest In Industrial Undertakings Act, Minimum Wages Act, Limitation of Hours of Work Act Reference re legislative jurisdiction of Parliament of Canada to enact the Minimum Wages Act (1935, c. 44) (1936) S.C.R. 461 (June 17, 1936) Attorney General of Canada v Attorney General of Ontario and others (1937) UKPC 6 (28 January 1937) Invalid
Employment and Social Insurance Act Reference re legislative jurisdiction of Parliament of Canada to enact the Employment and Social Insurance Act (1935, c. 48) (1936) S.C.R. 427 (June 17, 1936) Attorney General of Canada v Attorney General of Ontario and others (1937) UKPC 7 (28 January 1937) Invalid

Aftermath

In the general election of 1935, the Conservatives lost votes to two new parties, the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation and the Social Credit Party, and were replaced in government by the Liberals led by Mackenzie King, whose proportion of the vote held constant from the last election.

The first compulsory national unemployment insurance program was instituted in August 1940 under the King government after a constitutional amendment was agreed to by all of the Canadian provinces, to concede to the federal government legislative power over unemployment insurance. New Brunswick, Alberta and Quebec had held out against the federal government's desire to amend the constitution but ultimately acceded to its request, Alberta being the last to do so. The British North America Act s. 91 was amended by adding in a heading designated Number 2A simply in the words "Unemployment Insurance". [8]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial Committee of the Privy Council</span> Judicial body in the United Kingdom

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) is the highest court of appeal for the Crown Dependencies, the British Overseas Territories, some Commonwealth countries and a few institutions in the United Kingdom. Established on 14 August 1833 to hear appeals formerly heard by the King-in-Council, the Privy Council formerly acted as the court of last resort for the entire British Empire, other than for the United Kingdom itself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">R. B. Bennett</span> Prime Minister of Canada from 1930 to 1935

Richard Bedford Bennett, 1st Viscount Bennett was a Canadian lawyer, businessman, philanthropist, and politician who served as the 11th prime minister of Canada from 1930 to 1935.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social Security Act</span> 1935 U.S. law creating the Social Security program and unemployment insurance

The Social Security Act of 1935 is a law enacted by the 74th United States Congress and signed into law by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 14, 1935. The law created the Social Security program as well as insurance against unemployment. The law was part of Roosevelt's New Deal domestic program.

Canadian federalism involves the current nature and historical development of the federal system in Canada.

Pith and substance is a legal doctrine in Canadian constitutional interpretation used to determine under which head of power a given piece of legislation falls. The doctrine is primarily used when a law is challenged on the basis that one level of government has encroached upon the exclusive jurisdiction of another level of government.

In many Commonwealth jurisdictions, the phrase "peace, order, and good government" (POGG) is an expression used in law to express the legitimate objects of legislative powers conferred by statute. The phrase appears in many Imperial Acts of Parliament and Letters Patent, most notably the constitutions of Barbados, Canada, Australia and formerly New Zealand and South Africa.

In Canadian law, a reference question or reference case is a submission by the federal or a provincial government to the courts asking for an advisory opinion on a major legal issue. Typically the question concerns the constitutionality of legislation.

The judiciary of Australia comprises judges who sit in federal courts and courts of the States and Territories of Australia. The High Court of Australia sits at the apex of the Australian court hierarchy as the ultimate court of appeal on matters of both federal and State law.

<i>Russell v The Queen</i> 1882 Canadian constitutional law case

Russell v The Queen is a Canadian constitutional law decision dealing with the power of the federal Parliament. The case was decided in 1882 by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, at that time the highest court in the British Empire, including Canada. The Judicial Committee held that the Canada Temperance Act was valid federal legislation under the peace, order and good government power, set out in section 91 of the Constitution Act, 1867. The case expanded upon the jurisprudence that was previously discussed in Citizen's Insurance Co. v. Parsons.

<i>Citizens Insurance Co of Canada v Parsons</i> Canadian constitutional law case – 1881

Citizens Insurance Co of Canada v Parsons is a major Canadian constitutional case decided by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, at that time the highest court of appeal for the British Empire. The case decided a significant issue of the division of powers between the federal Parliament and the provincial legislatures. The approach taken to provincial power, as advocated by Premier Oliver Mowat of Ontario, began to set the constitutional framework for broad provincial powers and a reduction in the centralist vision of Confederation espoused by Prime Minister John A. Macdonald.

<i>Board of Commerce case</i>

Re Board of Commerce Act 1919 and the Combines and Fair Prices Act 1919, commonly known as the Board of Commerce case, is a Canadian constitutional decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in which the "emergency doctrine" under the federal power of peace, order and good government was first created.

<i>Toronto Electric Commissioners v Snider</i>

Toronto Electric Commissioners v Snider is a Canadian constitutional decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council where the Council struck down the federal Industrial Disputes Investigation Act, precursor to the Canada Labour Code. The Court identified matters in relation to labour to be within the exclusive competence of the province in the property and civil rights power under section 92(13) of the Constitution Act, 1867. This decision is considered one of the high-water marks of the council's interpretation of the Constitution in favour of the provinces.

The New York State Department of Labor is the department of the New York state government that enforces labor law and administers unemployment benefits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian labour law</span> Laws regulating labour in India

Indian labour law refers to law regulating labour in India. Traditionally, the Indian government at the federal and state levels has sought to ensure a high degree of protection for workers, but in practice, this differs due to the form of government and because labour is a subject in the concurrent list of the Indian Constitution. The Minimum Wages Act 1948 requires companies to pay the minimum wage set by the government alongside limiting working weeks to 40 hours. Overtime is strongly discouraged with the premium on overtime being 100% of the total wage. The Payment of Wages Act 1936 mandates the payment of wages on time on the last working day of every month via bank transfer or postal service. The Factories Act 1948 and the Shops and Establishment Act 1960 mandate 15 working days of fully paid vacation leave and 7 casual leaves each year to each employee, with an additional 7 fully paid sick days. The Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017 gives female employees of every company the right to take 6 months' worth of fully paid maternity leave. It also provides for 6 weeks worth of paid leaves in case of miscarriage or medical termination of pregnancy. The Employees' Provident Fund Organisation and the Employees' State Insurance, governed by statutory acts provide workers with necessary social security for retirement benefits and medical and unemployment benefits respectively. Workers entitled to be covered under the Employees' State Insurance are also entitled to 90 days worth of paid medical leaves. A contract of employment can always provide for more rights than the statutory minimum set rights. The Indian parliament passed four labour codes in the 2019 and 2020 sessions. These four codes will consolidate 44 existing labour laws. They are: The Industrial Relations Code 2020, The Code on Social Security 2020, The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 and The Code on Wages 2019. Despite having one of the longest working hours, India has one of the lowest workforce productivity levels in the world.

<i>British Coal Corp v R</i> Case of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

British Coal Corp v R is a decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in which the authority of the Canadian Parliament to prohibit appeals to the JCPC in criminal cases was upheld.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Section 91 of the Constitution Act, 1867</span> Provision of the Constitution of Canada

Section 91 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is a provision in the Constitution of Canada that sets out the legislative powers of the federal Parliament. The federal powers in section 91 are balanced by the list of provincial legislative powers set out in section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867. The dynamic tension between these two sets of legislative authority is generally known as the "division of powers". The interplay between the two lists of powers have been the source of much constitutional litigation since the Confederation of Canada in 1867.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development</span> Wisconsin State Department charged with building and strengthening Wisconsins workforce.

The Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development (DWD) is an agency of the Wisconsin state government responsible for providing services to Wisconsin workers, employers, and job-seekers to meet Wisconsin's workforce needs. To effect its mission, the Department administers unemployment benefits and workers' compensation programs for the state of Wisconsin; ensures compliance with state laws on wages and discrimination; provides job resources, training, and employment assistance for job-seekers; and engages with employers to help them find and maintain adequate staffing for their businesses.

<i>Labour Conventions Reference</i>

Canada (AG) v Ontario (AG)[1937] UKPC 6, [1937] A.C. 326, also known as the Labour Conventions Reference, is a landmark decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council concerning the distinct nature of federal and provincial jurisdiction in Canadian federalism.

The Natural Products Marketing Act was passed by the government of R. B. Bennett in 1934. It was the subject of an appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which delivered its judgment on 28 January 1937, along with the repudiations of three labour statutes and the Employment and Social Insurance Act, all passed by Bennett.

Disallowance and reservation are historical constitutional powers in Canada that act as a mechanism to delay or overrule legislation passed by Parliament or a provincial legislature. In contemporary Canadian history, disallowance is an authority granted to the governor general in council to invalidate an act passed by a provincial legislature. Reservation is an authority granted to the lieutenant governor to withhold royal assent from a bill which has been passed by a provincial legislature; the bill is then "reserved" for consideration by the federal cabinet.

References

  1. Jugements de la Cour suprême du Canada, June 17, 1936, p. 427
  2. Supreme Court, January 28, 1937
  3. "Employment insurance". The Canadian Encyclopedia . Retrieved August 25, 2019.
  4. Mapleleafweb: Archived 2012-02-21 at the Wayback Machine Employment Insurance in Canada. History, Structure and Issues
  5. Stanford University: Risk-sharing and the decentralization of social insurance. Federalism and decentralized Governance workshop
  6. Quebec History, Marianopolis College: R. B. Bennett’s New Deal, 1935
  7. McCord Museum: Sean Mills, 1919-1945: Depression and war
  8. CA, 1867: Constitution Act, 1867, 30 & 31 Victoria, c. 3. Consolidated with amendments