Fair Pay Agreements Act 2022

Last updated

Fair Pay Agreements Act 2022
Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg
New Zealand Parliament
  • This bill would provide a framework for collective bargaining for fair pay agreements across entire industries or occupations, rather than just between unions and particular employers. [1]
Royal assent 1 November 2022 [1]
Repealed20 December 2023 [2]
Legislative history
Introduced by Michael Wood [1]
First reading 5 April 2022 [1]
Second reading 18 October 2022 [1]
Third reading 25 October 2022 [1]
Status: Repealed

The Fair Pay Agreements Act 2022, now repealed, was an act of parliament in New Zealand. The act facilitated a framework for collective bargaining for fair pay agreements at an industry-wide level. [1] On 25 October 2023, the Bill passed its third reading in Parliament. While the bill was supported by the Labour, Green and Māori parties, it was opposed by the opposition National and ACT parties, which vowed to repeal it if elected during the 2023 New Zealand general election. [3] [4] On 14 December 2023, the National-led coalition government repealed the Fair Pay Agreements Act as part of its first raft of legislative changes. [5]

Contents

Key provisions

The Fair Pay Agreements Act 2022 outlined the criteria and framework of the fair pay agreements (FPA) process. The Bill protected the right to voluntary membership of unions and employer associations. Employee and employer bargaining parties can only represent members of unions and employer associations respectively. Fair pay agreements and other similar contracts and arrangements cannot confer preference on employers or employees regardless of their membership of unions or employment associations. Parties are also required to act in "good faith" during negotiations. [6]

Preliminary requirements

The Bill outlined the process for initiating bargaining and forming bargaining sides. These parties consisted of the employee and employer bargaining parties. A union wishing to initiate collective bargaining for a proposed FPA must apply to the chief executive for approval. The criteria for approval included at least 1,000 employees or 10% of employees within the coverage of the proposed FPA supporting the application to initiate bargaining for the proposed fair pay agreement. Key conditions for proceeding with an FPA include employees receiving low pay, have little bargaining power in their employment agreement, lack meaningful pay progression, work long and unsocial hours, or perform seasonal or irregular work. [6]

The Bill also outlined the process for seeking approval to initiate the FPA bargaining process, submitting evidence, and the coverage of the proposed FPA based on occupation, industry or type of work. The Bill also outlined the timeframe and process for the chief executive giving approval to initiate FPA bargaining. [6]

The Bill also required the initiating union to inform other unions and employers of approval to initiate bargaining within 15 days after receiving the chief executive's approval. The employer was also required to inform employees and unions about the bargaining process after 15 days of approval being granted to initiate bargaining. The employer was also required to provide employees' contact details to the employee bargaining side. [6]

Employers could also nominate an approved employer association to serve as the employer bargaining party, subject to the approval of the chief executive. Other approved employer bargaining parties included state employers such as the Public Service Commissioner, the Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force, Chief of Parliamentary Counsel, Commissioner of Police, and Te Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand). Other unions could also apply to be an additional employee bargaining party, subject to the chief executive's approval. [6]

FPA bargaining process

The Bill outlined the process for the employee and employer bargaining parties to arrange fair pay agreement meetings, including pay compensation. It also outlined the criteria for employee bargaining parties to access enter workplaces with the exception of dwellinghouses, national security or religious grounds. [6]

It also outlined the bargaining process including the parties providing information to each other, requester or independent reviewer. It also required employee bargaining parties to provide adequate representation to covered members including Māori employees. Similarly, the employer bargaining party was required to provide adequate representation to covered members including Māori employers. The Bill also provided provisions for when bargaining parties ceased to be parties to the FPA process and for changes in coverage, overlap, consolidation, and additions of occupations to the FPA bargaining process. [6]

The Bill also outlined the mandatory content for fair pay agreements including the date on which the agreement came into force and ends, the coverage of the agreement, wage details including wage rates, training and development arrangements, and leave arrangements. The FPA was also required to outline wage details including the minimum base rates and overtime rates. FPA agreements would also cover the topics of the proposed agreement, health and safety requirements, flexible working arrangements, redundancy arrangements, and minimum entitlement provisions. [6]

The Bill also outlined the FPA finalisation process including the Employment Relations Authority's (ERA) compliance assessment, the ratification process, the chief executive's verification process and checks for overlap between different fair pay agreements, and the chief executive's notice to bring the proposed FPA into force. [6]

The Bill also discussed the variation, renewal, and replacement process for fair pay agreements. It also outlined the process for enforcement and penalties for non-compliance with the FPA process, with ERA being given jurisdiction over these matters. The Bill also outlined the mediation process including the role of mediation services, bargaining support services and ERA. It also empowered Labour Inspectors to determine coverage of fair pay agreements. [6]

History

Working Group

In June 2018, the Sixth Labour Government established a Fair Pay Agreements Working Group to advise on the design of a sector-level bargaining system. The Working Group was chaired by former Prime Minister Rt Hon Jim Bolger. [7] The Government sought to address the rising disparity between wage increases and labour productivity and combat a "race to the bottom" situation in certain sectors where businesses competed for contracts by reducing wages or employment conditions. In addition, union membership had dropped from 70% in 1992 to less than 20% by 2022. The Government proposed addressing these issues by establishing a Fair Pay Agreement (FPA) system to facilitate collective bargaining between employers and unions to reach agreed minimum standards for pay and working conditions, provide support for bargaining parties in negotiating the FPA process, and ensure compliance. [7]

The Working Group released its report to the Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety Iain Lees-Galloway on December 2018. This report discussed the issues facing the development of fair pay agreement system in New Zealand and gave advice on the legal and enforcement mechanisms. [8]

Consultation

In October 2019, the Government released a discussion paper seeking feedback on a range of options for the design of the FPA system. This consultation closed in late November 2019. [7] This discussion paper proposed a four-stage Fair Pay Agreements process where unions with the consent of their workers initiated the FPA process and decided which work they wanted to be covered. Second, the discussion paper defined the key bargaining parties (unions and employers' representatives), the scope of the agremeents and exemptions. Third, the paper proposed that the parties would receive support in the form of training, a government-provided bargaining support person and outlined the process for communications between unions and workers, and external mediation by the Employment Relations Authority (ERA). Fourth, the paper outlined the verification process for an FPA agreement including vetting by ERA, and ratification by employees, employers, and enactment and enforcement by the ERA and Labour Inspectorate. [9]

In May 2021, the Government released the design of the Fair Pay Agreements system, which was informed by input from the Fair Pay Agreements Working Group and public consultation. In addition, the New Zealand Council of Trade Unions and BusinessNZ contributed to the development of the FPA model. [7]

Introduction and first reading

The Fair Pay Agreements Bill was introduced to Parliament on 29 March 2022. [7] The Bill passed its first reading on 5 April 2022 by a margin of 77 to 43. While the Labour , Green parties and Te Pati Māori supported the Bill, it was opposed by the opposition National and ACT parties. The bill's sponsor Labour MP Michael Wood (the-then Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety) argued that a fair pay agreements system would protect the rights and economic security of workers, and provided a framework for sector-wide collective bargaining between employers and unions. Similar sentiments were echoed by fellow Labour MPs Stuart Nash, Meka Whaitiri, Marja Lubeck, Angela Roberts, Camilla Belich, Ibrahim Omer and Green MP Jan Logie, who argued that the FPA system did not target "good" employers, would protect workers' rights, ensure fairness in the workplace, address cost of living pressures. [10]

National MPs Paul Goldsmith, Scott Simpson, David Bennett, and Todd McClay and ACT MP Chris Baillie argued that the FPA system would favour unions at the expense of employers and employees, impede entrepreneurialism, and impose red tape on businesses, and harm the economy. Goldsmith claimed that trade unions were increasingly irrelevant in New Zealand and that the bill amounted to "compulsory unionisation" by stealth. Baillie also claimed that the fair pay agreements system was unnecessary since employees' pay and conditions had improved substantially following the introduction of the employment contracts agreement system in 1991. McClay claimed that the FPA system would hurt the New Zealand and impede recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic. [10]

Select committee stage

The Fair Pay Agreements Bill was referred to the Education and Workforce Committee on 5 April 2022. The Committee also considered parliamentary paper G.46C alongside the Bill at the request of the Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety. This paper proposed a "backstop policy" for a situation where no party was willing to represent the non-initiating bargaining side. In that situation, the Employment Relations Authority would be allowed to set the terms of the FPA. G.46c also proposed making the default bargaining party role voluntary rather than mandatory. [11]

The Fair Pay Agreements Bill also received 1,796 written submissions and 120 oral submission by 19 May 2022. On 5 October 2022, the Education and Workforce Committee released its report, recommending that the Bill proceed to further readings with some amendments. During the select committee stage, the ACT party reiterated its opposition to the Bill, stating that it violated freedom of association by allowing unions to represent workers even when the worker did not wish that to happen. Similarly, the National Party claimed the Bill allowed the Government to impose mandatory union deals on workplaces and vowed to repeal it if elected into government at the 2023 New Zealand general election. [11]

Second reading

On 18 October 2022, Parliament voted by a margin of 77 to 43 votes to accept the Education and Workforce Committee's recommendations to progress the Fair Pay Agreements Bill. The Bill also passed its second reading by a margin of 77 to 43 votes. While Labour, the Greens, Te Pati Māori and independent candidate Gaurav Sharma voted to progress the legislation, National and ACT affirmed their opposition to the Fair Pay Agrements Bill. [12]

Third reading

On 25 October 2022, the Fair Pay Agreements Bill passed its third reading by a margin of 76 to 43 votes. While Labour, Green parties and Te Pati Māori supported the Bill, it was opposed by National and ACT. Labour and Green MPs hailed the Bill's passage as a victory for workers' rights while National and ACT MPs criticised the legislation as a threat to voluntary unionisation and market flexibility. National vowed to repeal the legislation if it formed the next government following the 2023 election. [13] [3] [4] The Bill received royal assent on 1 November 2022. [1]

While the Bill came into effect in December 2022, no fair pay agreements had been reached by the time of its repeal in December 2023. Businesses opposed the legislation on the grounds that it impose extra conditions including increased costs. [5]

Repeal

Following the 2023 New Zealand general election, the incoming National-led coalition government reaffirmed its commitment to repealing the Fair Pay Agreements Act before Christmas 2023 as part of National's coalition agreements with the allied ACT and New Zealand First parties. [5] The Government's repeal plans drew opposition from several unions including Stand Up, the New Zealand Nurses Organisation, Post Primary Teachers' Association, Unite Union, and First Union New Zealand, who claimed it would disadvantage workers and drive down wages and working conditions. On 11 December 2023, about 150 protesters picketed the electorate offices of ACT party leader David Seymour and deputy leader Brooke Van Velden. They were joined by several opposition MPs including Labour's workplace relations spokesperson Camila Belich, fellow Labour MP Phil Twyford, Greens co-leader Marama Davidson and Ricardo Menéndez March. [14] By contrast, Retail NZ chief executive Carolyn Young welcomed the repeal of Fair Pay Agreements, claiming they were inflexible and complicated employment laws. [15]

On 14 December, the Government's Fair Pay Agreements Act Repeal Act 2023 passed its third reading under urgency. While the repeal bill was supported by National, ACT and NZ First, it was opposed by Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori. The Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety Van Velden welcomed the repeal of the FPA Act, stating that "fair pay agreements were never about fairness, they forced a minority of union worker's views on all affected workers and businesses and this government opposes the views that were put forward by the previous government and that law." [5] The Fair Pay Agreements Repeal Act received royal assent on 19 December and came into force on 20 December. [7] Consequently, New Zealand reverted to the previous workplace framework where collective bargaining was limited to unions and particular employers. [2]

Related Research Articles

Labour laws, labour code or employment laws are those that mediate the relationship between workers, employing entities, trade unions, and the government. Collective labour law relates to the tripartite relationship between employee, employer, and union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Labor Relations Act of 1935</span> 1935 U.S. federal labor law regulating the rights of workers and unions

The National Labor Relations Act of 1935, also known as the Wagner Act, is a foundational statute of United States labor law that guarantees the right of private sector employees to organize into trade unions, engage in collective bargaining, and take collective action such as strikes. Central to the act was a ban on company unions. The act was written by Senator Robert F. Wagner, passed by the 74th United States Congress, and signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

Collective bargaining is a process of negotiation between employers and a group of employees aimed at agreements to regulate working salaries, working conditions, benefits, and other aspects of workers' compensation and rights for workers. The interests of the employees are commonly presented by representatives of a trade union to which the employees belong. A collective agreement reached by these negotiations functions as a labour contract between an employer and one or more unions, and typically establishes terms regarding wage scales, working hours, training, health and safety, overtime, grievance mechanisms, and rights to participate in workplace or company affairs. Such agreements can also include 'productivity bargaining' in which workers agree to changes to working practices in return for higher pay or greater job security.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom labour law</span> Rights of workers, unions, and duties of employers in the UK

United Kingdom labour law regulates the relations between workers, employers and trade unions. People at work in the UK have a minimum set of employment rights, from Acts of Parliament, Regulations, common law and equity. This includes the right to a minimum wage of £10.42 for over-23-year-olds from April 2023 under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The Working Time Regulations 1998 give the right to 28 days paid holidays, breaks from work, and attempt to limit long working hours. The Employment Rights Act 1996 gives the right to leave for child care, and the right to request flexible working patterns. The Pensions Act 2008 gives the right to be automatically enrolled in a basic occupational pension, whose funds must be protected according to the Pensions Act 1995. Workers must be able to vote for trustees of their occupational pensions under the Pensions Act 2004. In some enterprises, such as universities or NHS foundation trusts, staff can vote for the directors of the organisation. In enterprises with over 50 staff, workers must be negotiated with, with a view to agreement on any contract or workplace organisation changes, major economic developments or difficulties. The UK Corporate Governance Code recommends worker involvement in voting for a listed company's board of directors but does not yet follow international standards in protecting the right to vote in law. Collective bargaining, between democratically organised trade unions and the enterprise's management, has been seen as a "single channel" for individual workers to counteract the employer's abuse of power when it dismisses staff or fix the terms of work. Collective agreements are ultimately backed up by a trade union's right to strike: a fundamental requirement of democratic society in international law. Under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 strike action is protected when it is "in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute".

A union security agreement is a contractual agreement, usually part of a union collective bargaining agreement, in which an employer and a trade or labor union agree on the extent to which the union may compel employees to join the union, and/or whether the employer will collect dues, fees, and assessments on behalf of the union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australian labour law</span> Rights and duties of workers, unions and employers in Australia

Australian labour law sets the rights of working people, the role of trade unions, and democracy at work, and the duties of employers, across the Commonwealth and in states. Under the Fair Work Act 2009, the Fair Work Commission creates a national minimum wage and oversees National Employment Standards for fair hours, holidays, parental leave and job security. The FWC also creates modern awards that apply to most sectors of work, numbering 150 in 2024, with minimum pay scales, and better rights for overtime, holidays, paid leave, and superannuation for a pension in retirement. Beyond this floor of rights, trade unions and employers often create enterprise bargaining agreements for better wages and conditions in their workplaces. In 2024, collective agreements covered 15% of employees, while 22% of employees were classified as "casual", meaning that they lose many protections other workers have. Australia's laws on the right to take collective action are among the most restrictive in the developed world, and Australia does not have a general law protecting workers' rights to vote and elect worker directors on corporation boards as do most other wealthy OECD countries.

Enterprise bargaining is an Australian term for a form of collective bargaining, in which wages and working conditions are negotiated at the level of the individual organisations, as distinct from sectoral collective bargaining across whole industries. Once established, they are legally binding on employers and employees that are covered by the Enterprise bargaining agreement. An Enterprise Agreement (EA) consists of a collective industrial agreement between either an employer and a trade union acting on behalf of employees or an employer and employees acting for themselves.

A modern award is a ruling in Australian labour law of the national Fair Work Commission or by a state industrial relations commission which grants all wage earners in one industry or occupation the same minimum pay rates and conditions of employment such as leave entitlements, overtime and shift work, as well as other workplace-related conditions. The national awards, with the National Employment Standards, provide a minimum safety net of terms and conditions of employment for all national system employees. The pay rates are often called award wages or award rates. Awards in Australia are part of the system of compulsory arbitration in industrial relations.

<i>Canada Labour Code</i> Canadian employment legislation

The Canada Labour Code is an Act of the Parliament of Canada to consolidate certain statutes respecting labour. The objective of the Code is to facilitate production by controlling strikes & lockouts, occupational safety and health, and some employment standards.

An Australian workplace agreement (AWA) was a type of formalised individual agreement negotiated between an employer and employee in Australia that existed from 1996 to 2009. Employers could offer a "take it or leave it" AWA as a condition of employment. They were registered by the Employment Advocate and did not require a dispute resolution procedure. These agreements operated only at the federal level. AWAs were individual written agreements concerning terms and conditions of employment between an employer and employee in Australia, under the Workplace Relations Act 1996. An AWA could override employment conditions in state or territory laws except those relating to occupational health and safety, workers' compensation, or training arrangements. An AWA was required to meet only the most minimal Australian Fair Pay and Conditions Standard. Agreements were not required to include effective dispute resolution procedures, and could not include prohibited content. Agreements were for a maximum of five years; approved, promoted and registered by the Workplace Authority; operated to the exclusion of any award; and prohibited industrial action regarding details in the agreement for the life of the agreement. The introduction of AWAs was a very controversial industrial relations issue in Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WorkChoices</span> Australian industrial relations law

WorkChoices was the name given to changes made to the federal industrial relations laws in Australia by the Howard government in 2005, being amendments to the Workplace Relations Act 1996 by the Workplace Relations Amendment Act 2005, sometimes referred to as the Workplace Relations Amendment Act 2005, that came into effect on 27 March 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 is a UK Act of Parliament which regulates United Kingdom labour law. The act applies in full in England and Wales and in Scotland, and partially in Northern Ireland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Labor relations</span> Study of work and workers

Labor relations or labor studies is a field of study that can have different meanings depending on the context in which it is used. In an international context, it is a subfield of labor history that studies the human relations with regard to work in its broadest sense and how this connects to questions of social inequality. It explicitly encompasses unregulated, historical, and non-Western forms of labor. Here, labor relations define "for or with whom one works and under what rules. These rules determine the type of work, type and amount of remuneration, working hours, degrees of physical and psychological strain, as well as the degree of freedom and autonomy associated with the work." More specifically in a North American and strictly modern context, labor relations is the study and practice of managing unionized employment situations. In academia, labor relations is frequently a sub-area within industrial relations, though scholars from many disciplines including economics, sociology, history, law, and political science also study labor unions and labor movements. In practice, labor relations is frequently a subarea within human resource management. Courses in labor relations typically cover labor history, labor law, union organizing, bargaining, contract administration, and important contemporary topics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Employment Relations Act 2000</span> Statute of the Parliament of New Zealand

The New Zealand Employment Relations Act 2000 is a statute of the Parliament of New Zealand. It was substantially amended by the Employment Relations Amendment Act 2001 and by the ERAA 2004.

A collective agreement, collective labour agreement (CLA) or collective bargaining agreement (CBA) is a written contract negotiated through collective bargaining for employees by one or more trade unions with the management of a company that regulates the terms and conditions of employees at work. This includes regulating the wages, benefits, and duties of the employees and the duties and responsibilities of the employer or employers and often includes rules for a dispute resolution process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904</span> Act of the Parliament of Australia, no longer in force, registered as C1904A00013

The Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 (Cth) was an Act of the Parliament of Australia, which established the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration, besides other things, and sought to introduce the rule of law in industrial relations in Australia. The Act received royal assent on 15 December 1904.

South African labour law regulates the relationship between employers, employees and trade unions in the Republic of South Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fair Work Act 2009</span> Australian industrial relations law

The Fair Work Act 2009(Cth) is an Act of the Parliament of Australia, passed by the Rudd government to reform the industrial relations system of Australia. It replaced the Howard government's WorkChoices legislation, it established Fair Work Australia, later renamed the Fair Work Commission.

The Workplace Democracy Act is a proposed US labor law, that has been sponsored by Bernie Sanders and re-introduced from 1992 to 2018. Among its different forms, it would have removed obstacles to employers making collective agreements, established an impartial National Public Employment Relations Commission to support fair collective bargaining, required that pensions plans are jointly managed by employee and employer representatives, changed the definition of an "employee" to ensure every person who works for other people has labor rights, and repeal all "right to work" laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">E tū</span> New Zealand trade union

E tū is a New Zealand trade union created in October 2015 through the merger of the Service & Food Workers Union, the Flight Attendants and Related Services Union, and the Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing Union at a time when many unions in the country had been amalgamating and developing new strategies in the face of declining membership and challenging relations in a changing labour market. Affiliated with the New Zealand Labour Party and other union groups in the country and overseas, E tū advocates within the relevant legislation for fair pay agreements, better conditions, and health and safety for workers in a range of industries. Members of E tū were involved in a long process that resulted in a review of the Equal Pay Act 1972 that led to the establishment of processes for establishing pay equity. The passing of the Fair Pay Agreements Bill (2022) enabled the union to achieve significant success for cleaners and security guards in New Zealand. As of 31 March 2021, E tū Incorporated had 48,624 members.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "Fair Pay Agreements Bill". New Zealand Parliament. Archived from the original on 26 December 2023. Retrieved 26 December 2023.
  2. 1 2 "The repeal of Fair Pay Agreements legislation". Employment New Zealand. New Zealand Government. 20 December 2023. Archived from the original on 20 December 2023. Retrieved 26 December 2023.
  3. 1 2 Neilson, Michael (26 October 2022). "Fair Pay Agreements to become law after heated, marathon debate". Newstalk ZB . Archived from the original on 26 October 2022. Retrieved 27 January 2024.
  4. 1 2 "Fair Pay Agreements Bill passes third reading in Parliament". 1 News . TVNZ. 26 October 2022. Archived from the original on 26 October 2022. Retrieved 27 January 2024.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "Parliament repeals Fair Pay Agreements". Radio New Zealand . 14 December 2023. Archived from the original on 14 December 2023. Retrieved 27 January 2024.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 "Fair Pay Agreements Bill". Government Bill of 25 November 2022. New Zealand Parliament. Creative Commons by small.svg  This article incorporates text available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Fair Pay Agreements legislation". Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. 20 December 2023. Archived from the original on 17 January 2024. Retrieved 26 January 2024.
  8. Bolger, Jim. "Fair Pay Agreement Working Group Report". Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment . Retrieved 26 January 2024.
  9. "The proposed Fair Pay Agreement system". Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. March 2022. Retrieved 26 January 2024.
  10. 1 2 "Fair Pay Agreements Bill — First Reading". New Zealand Parliament. 5 April 2022. Archived from the original on 20 January 2023. Retrieved 26 January 2024.
  11. 1 2 "Final Report of the Education and Workforce Committee". New Zealand Parliament. 5 October 2022. Archived from the original on 27 January 2024. Retrieved 27 January 2024.
  12. "Fair Pay Agreements Bill — Second Reading". New Zealand Parliament. 18 October 2022. Archived from the original on 27 January 2024. Retrieved 27 January 2024.
  13. "Fair Pay Agreements Bill — Third Reading". New Zealand Parliament. 26 October 2022. Archived from the original on 16 January 2024. Retrieved 27 January 2024.
  14. Stanford, Emma (11 December 2023). "Protesters wanting to keep Fair Pay Agreements target ACT leader's office". Radio New Zealand . Archived from the original on 11 December 2023. Retrieved 27 January 2023.
  15. "Retailers welcome demise of 'unnecessary' Fair Pay Agreements legislation". Radio New Zealand . 12 December 2023. Archived from the original on 14 December 2023. Retrieved 27 January 2023.