Family Group Conference

Last updated

A Family Group Conference [1] (FGC), is a mediated formal meeting between family members and other officials such as social workers and police in regards to the care and protection or criminal offending of a child or adolescent. FGCs originated in New Zealand, and were originally used to allow social work practice to work with and not against Māori values and culture. [2] The Children, Young Persons, and Their Families Act 1989 made them a central part of practice and services where serious decisions about children are to be made. [3]

Contents

The Family Group Conference is where the whole whānau (family & extended family members), can help and make decisions about the best way to support the family and take care of their child. [4] It is a formal meeting in which the family, the whānau of the child, and professional practitioners work closely together to make a decision that best meet the needs of the child. The process has four main stages, which includes a meeting where professionals inform the family of the concerns they have, followed by private family time, where the family alone can develop a plan that addresses the concerns that have been raised. [5] The plan is then presented to the professionals who should support it if the concerns have been addressed and it does not put the child at risk. The meetings are facilitated and co-ordinated by people independent of casework decisions in the agency working with the family. [6]

FGCs are used in care and protection cases. They have also been described as the 'lynch-pin' of the New Zealand youth justice system. [7]

Process

Model

A Family Group Conference is a structured decision-making meeting made up of 'family' members. 'Family' is determined broadly, to include the children, parents, extended family, and even significant friends and neighbours to the family who may not actually be blood-related. [8] This group of people are given 'private' time to reach a plan to facilitate the safe care and protection of a child or children in need. The professional is involved in information given at the beginning of the process and in the assessment of the plan, following a decision. All professionals are excluded from the private time, which is attended by family members only. [9] Family Group Conferences are used to make plans for children in a number of different contexts: Child Welfare, Youth Offending, Education Welfare, Domestic Violence, Children as Young Carers, Foster Breakdown, adoption, etc. There would appear to be no particular area of work where this process is unsuitable. Some areas such as Child Protection and Youth Offending have used the process extensively, whilst others such as Education Welfare, adoption and adult services are still at the exploration stage. [10]

Note, that if the child/children are subject to a plan, either child in need (CIN) or child protection (CP), the family plan made at a Family Group Conference would replace the current plan and become the core of the child protection process (this does not end the child protection process). This empowers families to make their own decisions for their children. Statistically families are more likely to stick to a plan made by themselves than a plan that has been made for them. [11]

Principles

The principles that underpin the Family Group Conference process are:

The Children Act 1989 strongly reflects these principles and provides the impetus for using Family Group Conferences in practice. [12]

Key elements

There are five defining features of the Family Group Conference process:

  1. The FGC is the primary decision making forum for the child.
  2. The FGC is made up of as wide a network of family members as possible (including grandparents, siblings, uncles, aunts, parents, child, family friends who may know the child but are not blood relations).
  3. An independent co-ordinator facilitates the involvement of the child, family network and professionals in the Family Group Conference process.
  4. The family should always have private time at the Family Group Conference to produce their plans for the child or young person.
  5. The Family Group Conference plan should be agreed and resourced unless it places the child at risk of significant harm. [13]

Process

There are four stages to a Family Group Conference; each stage of the process has equal importance. No stage should be ignored or treated with less validity than another.

All parties have to agree on the outcome of the conference, and the FGC then makes recommendations to the youth court which the youth court usually accepts and imposes. [14]

Referral

The professional or the child and family can request a conference. When speaking to the family about the process it is important that the principles and elements are conveyed fully.

The referrer is vital to the success of the Family Group Conference process and they must think about their role in the Family Group Conference and be willing to invest positive time and energy into the process.

A referral meeting may be beneficial to clarify:

First contact

A decision will be taken as to how the first contact with the family will take place. When contact is made, the coordinator in consultation with the child and their immediate carer identify the family members who they would wish to attend the meeting. Contact is then made with all the identified members of the conference and a time, date and venue convenient to the family is agreed. The co-ordinator then makes contact with the referrer.

The family at this stage need to understand the:

  • Reasons for the FGC, including who requested it.
  • Importance and value of their involvement and contribution.
  • That the process (within the five defining features) will run in a way that suits them.
  • What the key stages of the FGC will be. [16]

The Conference

Stage one – Information sharing

The coordinator welcomes the family members ensuring that the physical requirements have been dealt with adequately before commencement. The co-ordinator has the right to exclude individuals if absolutely necessary. The grounds for doing so should be explicitly stated (proven likelihood of violence or too drunk to contribute, etc.).

Once people are ready it is then time to:

  • introduce individual group members, coordinator and professionals.
  • Clarify the process.
  • Discuss the ground rules, i.e. confidentiality, respect for self and others' views, etc.
  • Reinforce that this is the family's meeting and that the process is flexible so that it suits the family.

Having welcomed the family and made the introductions it is important to share information next. This is done by:

  • The professional – information is shared in a clear, jargon-free manner. All relevant information must be provided to the family, without this they cannot make an informed decision. The professional will need to voice his or her:
    • Concerns.
    • Family strengths.
    • What the family needs to think about.
    • Resources available to the family.
    • What cannot be agreed (e.g., a child cannot live with someone who may place them at risk). [17]

Stage Two – Private family time

At this stage, the co-ordinator and the professionals withdraw leaving the family to discuss and plan in private. There are three basic tasks, which the family need to complete:

  • To agree a plan that meets the needs of the child or /young person.
  • To agree a contingency plan.
  • To agree how to monitor and review the plan.

The co-ordinator should be available during this time if the family need any clarification or additional information.

The family should be aware that:

  • They have as long as they need.
  • They can come out at any time.
  • Food and drink can be provided by the coordinator.
  • Once they agree, a plan the coordinator can help them write it out. [18]

Stage Three – Agreeing and recording the family decision

This final stage is vitally important both to the family and to the agency. It defines the outcome of the Family Group Conference for the child. The co-ordinator invites the family to relay their plan helping to clarify and understand each point. She or he will then:

  • Write each point on a flip chart in front of the family using their own terminology, language and phrases.
  • Check that all members agree to the plan or that there is a majority consensus.
  • Identify parts of the plan that will need agency agreement and resources.
  • Establish who will monitor the plan to make sure it is working.
  • Record the plans for review, and the contingency plan.
  • Having completed this task the co-ordinator will then invite the professional to comment on the plan and if it is acceptable to the agency.

NB: The Family Group Conference model, as developed in the United Kingdom, states that the family's plan should be agreed providing it does not place a child at risk of significant harm. [19]

Monitoring and review

The model states that responsibility for monitoring the plan lies with the family group, the referrer will continue to work with the family and will monitor the family plan also but the lead must remain with the family. This is important because in order for the family to feel a sense of ownership they must also feel that they have some responsibility. There will, of course, be professional monitoring and in the instance where there is child protection proceedings this monitoring will be done at the monthly core group meetings. The level of this monitoring will depend upon the nature of the original referral. [20] There will be differences between the level of monitoring in a child protection case and in a request for family support services. Making decisions about this will be part of casework planning and supervision.

Within the Family Group Conference there is an automatic review procedure usually within a three-month period. It should be possible for all those involved (family members and professionals) to call a review if the plan is not working, requires updating, or if anyone has new concerns to highlight. This should be made clear at the outset. [21]

Note, that whilst during monthly core group meetings, the professionals will go through the family plan discussing what is going well and what they may be struggling with, Professionals cannot amend or ask the family to amend the family plan outside of the Family Group Conference arena. This is for two reasons, firstly not all members of the family will be present at a core group meeting, and secondly there can not be any professionals in the room with you when you are making your amendments as this may influence your decision making. If you (the family) or the professionals feel that changes are needed then the Family Group Conference coordinator will need to be contacted so that he/she can arrange a review. [22]

Family Group Conferences worldwide

FGCs are used in many countries. [23] In the United States, they are known as Family Guided Decision Making. In the Netherlands and Flanders, they are known as Eigen Kracht Conferentieoks (Own Power Conferences).

Ireland introduced the process into legislation in 2000 under the Children's and Families Act. Every HSE now provides this service. Northern Ireland also has a country wide service although it is not legislated for it is required under government department guidelines.

The 1989 Children Act (England & Wales) like the New Zealand Children, Young Persons and their Families Act 1989 has some similar principles which underpin and inform the development of how Social Workers interact and work with children and families. The UK programme like its counterpart, has focused on these principles:

The Act sought to minimise, where possible, the use of legal proceedings in family life and attempt to, "strike a balance between the rights of children to express their views on decisions made about their lives, the rights of parents to exercise their responsibilities towards the child and the duty of the state to intervene where the child's welfare requires it", The Children Act 1989(2).

The challenge for Social Services was how to achieve a safe balance of partnership and parental responsibility whilst protecting the child from possible or further risk. Services were developed to support the child within the home environment, Family Support Workers, HomeStart, Family Centres, etc. In most cases the family are neither consulted or had requested these services with the result that there is little change in the family circumstances and in some instances a greater dependency is created. [25]

Family Group Conference was debated in the early 1990s as an alternative and progressive way to work with families. The successful outcomes in other countries demonstrated that this radical approach had potential. Initially eight local authorities and voluntary groups piloted the scheme with Hampshire, Essex and Wiltshire taking the lead. Careful study of the model was made and then adapted to fit with the culture and legislation. [26]

In 2007, Germany has introduced Family Group Conferences for juveniles in Elmshorn, Schleswig-Holstein, called Gemeinschaftskonferenzen (GMK). These GMKs are organised by the Verein für Jugendhilfe Pinneberg e.V., and the Crime Prevention Council of Elmshorn. The conferences are being evaluated by Prof. Otmar Hagemann from the University of Applied Sciences, Kiel. [27] [28]

Related Research Articles

Best interests or best interests of the child is a child rights principle, which derives from Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which says that "in all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration". Assessing the best interests of a child means to evaluate and balance "all the elements necessary to make a decision in a specific situation for a specific individual child or group of children".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Friends General Conference</span> Association of Quakers

Friends General Conference (FGC) is an association of Quakers in the United States and Canada made up of 16 yearly meetings and 12 autonomous monthly meetings. "Monthly meetings" are what Quakers call congregations; "yearly meetings" are organizations of monthly meetings within a geographic region. FGC was founded in 1900.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foster care</span> System of non-parental temporary child-care

Foster care is a system in which a minor has been placed into a ward, group home, or private home of a state-certified caregiver, referred to as a "foster parent", or with a family member approved by the state. The placement of a "foster child" is normally arranged through the government or a social service agency. The institution, group home, or foster parent is compensated for expenses unless with a family member.

Children's rights or the rights of children are a subset of human rights with particular attention to the rights of special protection and care afforded to minors. The 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) defines a child as "any human being below the age of eighteen years, unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier." Children's rights includes their right to association with both parents, human identity as well as the basic needs for physical protection, food, universal state-paid education, health care, and criminal laws appropriate for the age and development of the child, equal protection of the child's civil rights, and freedom from discrimination on the basis of the child's race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, religion, disability, color, ethnicity, or other characteristics.

International adoption is a type of adoption in which an individual or couple residing in one country becomes the legal and permanent parent(s) of a child who is a national of another country. In general, prospective adoptive parents must meet the legal adoption requirements of their country of residence and those of the country whose nationality the child holds.

The United States Children's Bureau is a federal agency organized under the United States Department of Health and Human Services' Administration for Children and Families. Today, the bureau's operations involve improving child abuse prevention, foster care, and adoption. Historically, its work was much broader, as shown by the 1912 act which created and funded it:

The said bureau shall investigate and report to [the Department of Commerce and Labor] upon all matters pertaining to the welfare of children and child life among all classes of our people, and shall especially investigate the questions of infant mortality, the birth-rate, orphanage, juvenile courts, desertion, dangerous occupations, accidents and diseases of children, employment, legislation affecting children in the several states and territories.

Foster children in Canada are known as permanent wards. A ward is someone, in this case a child, placed under protection of a legal guardian and are the legal responsibility of the government. Census data from 2011 counted children in foster care for the first time, counting 47,885 children in care. The majority of foster children – 29,590, or about 62% – were aged 14 and under. The wards remain under the care of the government until they "age out of care." This age is different depending on the province.

In the United States, adoption is the process of creating a legal parent–child relationship between a child and a parent who was not automatically recognized as the child's parent at birth.

Child protective services (CPS) is the name of an agency in many states of the United States responsible for providing child protection, which includes responding to reports of child abuse or neglect. Some states use other names, often attempting to reflect more family-centered practices, such as department of children and family services (DCFS). CPS is also sometimes known by the name of department of social services, though these terms more often have a broader meaning.

An unaccompanied minor is a child without the presence of a legal guardian.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Safeguarding</span> Measures to protect the health, well-being and human rights of individuals

Safeguarding is a term used in the United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia to denote measures to protect the health, well-being and human rights of individuals, which allow people—especially children, young people and vulnerable adults—to live free from abuse, harm and neglect.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oranga Tamariki Act 1989</span> Act of Parliament in New Zealand

The Oranga Tamariki Act 1989 or Children's and Young People's Well-being Act 1989 is an Act of the New Zealand Parliament that was passed in 1989. The Act's main purpose is to "promote the well-being of children, young persons, and their families and family groups." In June 2017, the New Zealand Parliament passed amendment legislation renaming the bill the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989.

The Child Welfare League of America (CWLA) is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization that coordinates efforts for child welfare in the United States, and provides direct support to agencies that serve children and families. The organization's vision is "that every child will grow up in a safe, loving, and stable family," and its primary objective is to "Make Children a National Priority". The CWLA is run by professionals in the children's services field. As a national organization it lobbies for both child protection, and delivery of services to children. It is the oldest child welfare organization in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hague Adoption Convention</span> International convention

The Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption is an international convention dealing with international adoption, child laundering, and child trafficking in an effort to protect those involved from the corruption, abuses, and exploitation which sometimes accompanies international adoption. The convention has been considered crucial because it provides a formal international and intergovernmental recognition of intercountry adoption to ensure that adoptions under the convention will generally be recognized and given effect in other party countries.

Joint Council on International Children's Services, founded in 1976, was a nonprofit child advocacy organization based in Alexandria, Virginia. The organization "work[ed] to end the suffering of children who live every day without the protection and love of a strong permanent and safe family. Our 142 Partners in 52 countries do the same."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foster care in the United States</span> System of non-parental care in America

Foster care is the term used for a system in which a minor who has been made a ward or a non-minor, typically aged 18-21, who volunteers for placement, is placed in a relative placement, a non-related extended family (NREFM) placement, a community family home, an institution, a group home (residential child care community, residential treatment center, etc. Relative, NREFM, and community caregivers certified by the state are typically referred to as "foster parents," "kin caregivers," "resource parents," or other local terms. The placement of the child is usually arranged through state or county social services. The institution, group home, or caregiver is reimbursed for the expenses related to caring for the child. The state via the family court and child protection agency stand in loco parentis to the minor, making all legal decisions, while the caregiver is responsible for the day-to-day care of the minor. Even while their child is in Care, typically birth parents retain Education and Medical rights and the right to contact with their child unless parental rights are terminated by the Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adoption in the Philippines</span>

Adoption in the Philippines is a process of granting social, emotional and legal family and kinship membership to an individual from the Philippines, usually a child. It involves a transfer of parental rights and obligations and provides family membership. The Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) defines adoption as a "socio-legal process of giving a permanent family to a child whose parents have voluntarily or involuntarily given up their parental rights."

The youth justice system in New Zealand consists of organisations and processes that deal with offending by children aged 10–13 years and young people aged 14–16 years. These differ from general criminal processes, and are governed by different principles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015</span> Act of the Parliament of India

Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 has been passed by Parliament of India amidst intense controversy, debate, and protest on many of its provisions by Child Rights fraternity. It replaced the Indian juvenile delinquency law, Juvenile Justice Act, 2000, and allows for juveniles in conflict with Law in the age group of 16–18, involved in Heinous Offences, to be tried as adults. The Act also sought to create a universally accessible adoption law for India, overtaking the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (1956) and the Guardians and Wards Act (1890), though not replacing them. The Act came into force from 15 January 2016.

Transnational child protection refers to the protection of children from violence, exploitation, abuse and neglect in an international setting. When a non-national child comes into contact with public authorities and service providers, a series of checks, assessments and immediate measures sets in to identify the child and to assess her or his situation. Article 19 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child provides for the protection of children in and out of the home, including in their country of origin, residence or a third country. Article 2 of the Convention provides for the right to non-discrimination, meaning children have the right to protection regardless of the national origin or status of the child or his or her parents or legal guardians.

References

  1. ↑ "Family Group Conference – Beac". barentscooperation.org. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  2. ↑ The Family Group Conference 14-Year Journey: Celebrating the Successes, Learning the Lessons, Embracing the Challenges Archived 11 January 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ↑ "Family Group Conference – Beac". barentscooperation.org. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  4. ↑ "The Family Group Conference (or FGC)". Child Youth & Family New Zealand. Retrieved 20 July 2014.
  5. ↑ "Social services and your family – Family Lives". familylives.org.uk. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  6. ↑ Read "Violence in Families: Assessing Prevention and Treatment Programs" at NAP.edu.
  7. ↑ Youth Justice Process in New Zealand – Family Group Conferencing – Youth Court – New Zealand Archived 30 April 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  8. ↑ "Family Group Conference". Windwood Family Services. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  9. ↑ "Child Protection Conferences". proceduresonline.com. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  10. ↑ "Mapping of online articles on Covid-19 and Gender". UNESCO. 11 May 2020. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  11. ↑ "Child in Need Plans and Reviews". proceduresonline.com. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  12. ↑ "Family Group Conference". wirralchildcare.proceduresonline.com. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  13. ↑ Frost, Nick; Abram, Fiona; Burgess, Hannah (11 December 2012). "Family group conferences: context, process and ways forward". Child & Family Social Work. 19 (4): 480–490. doi:10.1111/cfs.12047. ISSN   1356-7500.
  14. ↑ "Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development | Child Development". courses.lumenlearning.com. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  15. ↑ "Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development | Child Development". courses.lumenlearning.com. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  16. ↑ "Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development | Child Development". courses.lumenlearning.com. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  17. ↑ Reinhard, Susan C.; Given, Barbara; Petlick, Nirvana Huhtala; Bemis, Ann (2008), Hughes, Ronda G. (ed.), "Supporting Family Caregivers in Providing Care", Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses, Advances in Patient Safety, Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), PMID   21328765 , retrieved 11 January 2021
  18. ↑ Reinhard, Susan C.; Given, Barbara; Petlick, Nirvana Huhtala; Bemis, Ann (2008), Hughes, Ronda G. (ed.), "Supporting Family Caregivers in Providing Care", Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses, Advances in Patient Safety, Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), PMID   21328765 , retrieved 11 January 2021
  19. ↑ Reinhard, Susan C.; Given, Barbara; Petlick, Nirvana Huhtala; Bemis, Ann (2008), Hughes, Ronda G. (ed.), "Supporting Family Caregivers in Providing Care", Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses, Advances in Patient Safety, Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), PMID   21328765 , retrieved 11 January 2021
  20. ↑ Treatment, Center for Substance Abuse (2006). Chapter 7. Clinical Issues, Challenges, and Strategies in Intensive Outpatient Treatment. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US).
  21. ↑ "Implications for Policy and Practice – Child Welfare Information Gateway". childwelfare.gov. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  22. ↑ "Good Practice in Core Groups". nottinghamshirescb.proceduresonline.com. Retrieved 11 January 2021.
  23. ↑ Presentation for WWW survey with Gale Burford
  24. ↑ O'Halloran, Kerry, ed. (2009), "The Adoption Process in Ireland", The Politics of Adoption: International Perspectives on Law, Policy & Practice, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 211–248, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9152-0_8, ISBN   978-1-4020-9152-0 , retrieved 11 January 2021
  25. ↑ O'Halloran, Kerry, ed. (2009), "The Adoption Process in Ireland", The Politics of Adoption: International Perspectives on Law, Policy & Practice, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 211–248, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9152-0_8, ISBN   978-1-4020-9152-0 , retrieved 11 January 2021
  26. ↑ O'Halloran, Kerry, ed. (2009), "The Adoption Process in Ireland", The Politics of Adoption: International Perspectives on Law, Policy & Practice, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 211–248, doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9152-0_8, ISBN   978-1-4020-9152-0 , retrieved 11 January 2021
  27. ↑ Zehr, H. (2010) Fairsöhnt: Restaurative Gerechtigkeit – wie Opfer und Täter heil werden können. Schwarzenfeld: Neufeld Verlag.
  28. ↑ Hagemann, O.; Schäfer, P. & Schmidt, S. (2009) Victimology, Victim Assistance and Criminal Justice Perspectives shared by international Experts at the Inter-University Centre of Dubrovnik. Mönchengladbach: Fachhochschule Niederrhein Verlag.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.