Feynman sprinkler

Last updated
Comparison of a regular sprinkler (1) and a reverse sprinkler (2) Feynman sprinkler.svg
Comparison of a regular sprinkler (1) and a reverse sprinkler (2)

A Feynman sprinkler, also referred to as a Feynman inverse sprinkler or reverse sprinkler, is a sprinkler-like device which is submerged in a tank and made to suck in the surrounding fluid. The question of how such a device would turn was the subject of an intense and remarkably long-lived debate. The device generally remains steady with no rotation, though with sufficiently low friction and high rate of inflow, it has been seen to turn weakly in the opposite direction of a conventional sprinkler.

Contents

A regular sprinkler has nozzles arranged at angles on a freely rotating wheel such that when water is pumped out of them, the resulting jets cause the wheel to rotate; a Catherine wheel and the aeolipile ("Hero's engine") work on the same principle. A "reverse" or "inverse" sprinkler would operate by aspirating the surrounding fluid instead. The problem is commonly associated with theoretical physicist Richard Feynman, who mentions it in his bestselling memoirs Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! . The problem did not originate with Feynman, nor did he publish a solution to it.

History

Illustration 153a from Ernst Mach's Mechanik (1883) When the hollow rubber ball is squeezed, air flows in the direction of the short arrows and the wheel turns in the direction of the long arrow. When the rubber ball is released, the direction of the flow of the air is reversed but Mach observed "no distinct rotation" of the device. Reaction wheel.pdf
Illustration 153a from Ernst Mach's Mechanik (1883) When the hollow rubber ball is squeezed, air flows in the direction of the short arrows and the wheel turns in the direction of the long arrow. When the rubber ball is released, the direction of the flow of the air is reversed but Mach observed "no distinct rotation" of the device.

The first documented treatment of the problem is in chapter III, section III, of Ernst Mach's textbook The Science of Mechanics, first published in 1883. [1] There Mach reported that the device showed "no distinct rotation." [2] In the early 1940s (and apparently without awareness of Mach's earlier discussion), the problem began to circulate among members of the physics department at Princeton University, generating a lively debate. Richard Feynman, at the time a young graduate student at Princeton, built a makeshift experiment within the facilities of the university's cyclotron laboratory. The experiment ended with the explosion of the glass carboy that he was using as part of his setup.

In 1966, Feynman turned down an offer from the editor of Physics Teacher to discuss the problem in print and objected to it being called "Feynman's problem," pointing instead to the discussion of it in Mach's textbook. [3] The sprinkler problem attracted a great deal of attention after the incident was mentioned in Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!, a book of autobiographical reminiscences published in 1985. [4] Feynman gave one argument for why the sprinkler should rotate in the forward direction, and another for why it should rotate in reverse; he did not say how or if the sprinkler actually moved. In an article written shortly after Feynman's death in 1988, John Wheeler, who had been his doctoral advisor at Princeton, revealed that the experiment at the cyclotron had shown “a little tremor as the pressure was first applied [...] but as the flow continued there was no reaction.” [5] The sprinkler incident is also discussed in James Gleick's biography of Feynman, Genius, published in 1992 where Gleick claims that a sprinkler will not turn at all if made to suck in fluid. [6]

In 2005, physicist Edward Creutz (who was in charge of the Princeton cyclotron at the time of the incident) revealed in print that he had assisted Feynman in setting up his experiment and that, when pressure was applied to force water out of the carboy through the sprinkler head,

There was a little tremor, as [Feynman] called it, and the sprinkler head rapidly moved back to its original position and stayed there. The water flow continued with the sprinkler stationary. We adjusted the pressure to increase the water flow, about five separate times, and the sprinkler did not move, although water was flowing freely through it in the backwards direction [...] The carboy then exploded, due to the internal pressure. A janitor then appeared and helped me clean up the shattered glass and mop up the water. I don't know what [Feynman] had expected to happen, but my vague thoughts of a time reversal phenomenon were as shattered as the carboy. [7]

The question

In his book, Feynman recites the question: [4]

The problem: You have an S-shaped lawn sprinkler–an S-shaped pipe on a pivot –and the water squirts out at right angles to the axis and makes it spin in a certain direction. Everybody knows which way it goes around; it backs away from the outgoing water. Now the question is this: If you had a lake, or swimming pool–a big supply of water–and you put the sprinkler completely under water, and sucked the water in, instead of squirting it out, which way would it turn? Would it turn the same way as it does when you squirt water out into the air, or would it turn the other way?

Solution

The behavior of the reverse sprinkler is qualitatively quite distinct from that of the ordinary sprinkler, and one does not behave like the other "played backwards". Most of the published theoretical treatments of this problem have concluded that the ideal reverse sprinkler will not experience any torque in its steady state. It may be understood in terms of conservation of angular momentum: in its steady state, the amount of angular momentum carried by the incoming fluid is constant, which implies that there is no torque on the sprinkler itself.

Alternatively, in terms of forces on an individual sprinkler nozzle, consider Mach's illustration. There:

The two forces are equal and opposite, so sucking in the fluid causes no net force on the sprinkler nozzle. This is similar to the pop pop boat when it sucks in water—the inflowing water transfers its momentum to the boat, so sucking in water causes no net force on the boat. [8] [9]

Many experiments, going back to Mach, find no rotation of the reverse sprinkler. In setups with sufficiently low friction and high rate of inflow, the reverse sprinkler has been seen to turn weakly in the opposite sense to the conventional sprinkler, even in its steady state. [10] [11] Such behavior could be explained by the diffusion of momentum in a non-ideal (i.e., viscous) flow. [9] However, careful observation of experimental setups shows that this turning is associated with the formation of a vortex inside the body of the sprinkler. [12] An analysis of the actual distribution of forces and pressure in a non-ideal reverse sprinkler provides the theoretical basis to explain this:

Differences in the regions over which internal and external forces act constitute a force-couple with different moment arms consistent with reverse rotation... the resulting flow-field asymmetry developed downstream from the sprinkler-arm bends supports the role of vortices in reverse sprinkler rotation by suggesting a mechanism for generating vortices in a consistent direction. [13]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fluid dynamics</span> Aspects of fluid mechanics involving flow

In physics, physical chemistry and engineering, fluid dynamics is a subdiscipline of fluid mechanics that describes the flow of fluids – liquids and gases. It has several subdisciplines, including aerodynamics and hydrodynamics. Fluid dynamics has a wide range of applications, including calculating forces and moments on aircraft, determining the mass flow rate of petroleum through pipelines, predicting weather patterns, understanding nebulae in interstellar space and modelling fission weapon detonation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lift (force)</span> Force perpendicular to flow of surrounding fluid

When a fluid flows around an object, the fluid exerts a force on the object. Lift is the component of this force that is perpendicular to the oncoming flow direction. It contrasts with the drag force, which is the component of the force parallel to the flow direction. Lift conventionally acts in an upward direction in order to counter the force of gravity, but it is defined to act perpendicular to the flow and therefore can act in any direction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Feynman</span> American theoretical physicist (1918–1988)

Richard Phillips Feynman was an American theoretical physicist. He is best known for his work in the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics, the theory of quantum electrodynamics, the physics of the superfluidity of supercooled liquid helium, and in particle physics, for which he proposed the parton model. For his contributions to the development of quantum electrodynamics, Feynman received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1965 jointly with Julian Schwinger and Shin'ichirō Tomonaga.

Newton's laws of motion are three physical laws that describe the relationship between the motion of an object and the forces acting on it. These laws, which provide the basis for Newtonian mechanics, can be paraphrased as follows:

  1. A body remains at rest, or in motion at a constant speed in a straight line, except insofar as it is acted upon by a force.
  2. At any instant of time, the net force on a body is equal to the rate at which the body's momentum is changing with time.
  3. If two bodies exert forces on each other, these forces have the same magnitude but opposite directions.
<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bernoulli's principle</span> Principle relating to fluid dynamics

Bernoulli's principle is a key concept in fluid dynamics that relates pressure, density, speed and height. Bernoulli's principle states that an increase in the speed of a parcel of fluid occurs simultaneously with a decrease in either the pressure or the height above a datum. The principle is named after the Swiss mathematician and physicist Daniel Bernoulli, who published it in his book Hydrodynamica in 1738. Although Bernoulli deduced that pressure decreases when the flow speed increases, it was Leonhard Euler in 1752 who derived Bernoulli's equation in its usual form.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vortex</span> Fluid flow revolving around an axis of rotation

In fluid dynamics, a vortex is a region in a fluid in which the flow revolves around an axis line, which may be straight or curved. Vortices form in stirred fluids, and may be observed in smoke rings, whirlpools in the wake of a boat, and the winds surrounding a tropical cyclone, tornado or dust devil.

In theoretical physics, particularly in discussions of gravitation theories, Mach's principle is the name given by Albert Einstein to an imprecise hypothesis often credited to the physicist and philosopher Ernst Mach. The hypothesis attempted to explain how rotating objects, such as gyroscopes and spinning celestial bodies, maintain a frame of reference.

Compressible flow is the branch of fluid mechanics that deals with flows having significant changes in fluid density. While all flows are compressible, flows are usually treated as being incompressible when the Mach number is smaller than 0.3. The study of compressible flow is relevant to high-speed aircraft, jet engines, rocket motors, high-speed entry into a planetary atmosphere, gas pipelines, commercial applications such as abrasive blasting, and many other fields.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trouton–Noble experiment</span> 1901–1903 physics experiment

The Trouton–Noble experiment was an attempt to detect motion of the Earth through the luminiferous aether, and was conducted in 1901–1903 by Frederick Thomas Trouton and H. R. Noble. It was based on a suggestion by George FitzGerald that a charged parallel-plate capacitor moving through the aether should orient itself perpendicular to the motion. Like the earlier Michelson–Morley experiment, Trouton and Noble obtained a null result: no motion relative to the aether could be detected. This null result was reproduced, with increasing sensitivity, by Rudolf Tomaschek, Chase and Hayden in 1994. Such experimental results are now seen, consistent with special relativity, to reflect the validity of the principle of relativity and the absence of any absolute rest frame. The experiment is a test of special relativity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brownian ratchet</span> Perpetual motion device

In the philosophy of thermal and statistical physics, the Brownian ratchet or Feynman–Smoluchowski ratchet is an apparent perpetual motion machine of the second kind, first analysed in 1912 as a thought experiment by Polish physicist Marian Smoluchowski. It was popularised by American Nobel laureate physicist Richard Feynman in a physics lecture at the California Institute of Technology on May 11, 1962, during his Messenger Lectures series The Character of Physical Law in Cornell University in 1964 and in his text The Feynman Lectures on Physics as an illustration of the laws of thermodynamics. The simple machine, consisting of a tiny paddle wheel and a ratchet, appears to be an example of a Maxwell's demon, able to extract mechanical work from random fluctuations (heat) in a system at thermal equilibrium, in violation of the second law of thermodynamics. Detailed analysis by Feynman and others showed why it cannot actually do this.

Terrell rotation or the Terrell effect is the visual distortion that a passing object would appear to undergo, according to the special theory of relativity, if it were travelling at a significant fraction of the speed of light. This behaviour was described independently by both Roger Penrose and James Edward Terrell. Penrose's article was submitted 29 July 1958 and published in January 1959. Terrell's article was submitted 22 June 1959 and published 15 November 1959. The general phenomenon was noted already in 1924 by Austrian physicist Anton Lampa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bell's spaceship paradox</span> Thought experiment in special relativity

Bell's spaceship paradox is a thought experiment in special relativity. It was first described by E. Dewan and M. Beran in 1959 but became more widely known after John Stewart Bell elaborated the idea further in 1976. A delicate thread hangs between two spaceships initially at rest in the inertial frame S. They start accelerating in the same direction simultaneously and equally, as measured in S, thus having the same velocity at all times as viewed from S. Therefore, they are all subject to the same Lorentz contraction, so the entire assembly seems to be equally contracted in the S frame with respect to the length at the start. At first sight, it might appear that the thread will not break during acceleration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wolfgang Rindler</span> Austrian physicist

Wolfgang Rindler was an Austrian physicist working in the field of general relativity where he is known for introducing the term "event horizon", Rindler coordinates, and for the use of spinors in general relativity. An honorary member of the Austrian Academy of Sciences and foreign member of the Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, he was also a prolific textbook author.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pop pop boat</span> Simple toy working on a water jet principle

A pop-pop boat is a toy with a simple steam engine without moving parts, typically powered by a candle or vegetable oil burner. The name comes from the noise made by some versions of the boats.

The Hoyle–Narlikar theory of gravity is a Machian and conformal theory of gravity proposed by Fred Hoyle and Jayant Narlikar that originally fits into the quasi steady state model of the universe.

<i>The Feynman Lectures on Physics</i> Textbook by Richard Feynman

The Feynman Lectures on Physics is a physics textbook based on a great number of lectures by Richard Feynman, a Nobel laureate who has sometimes been called "The Great Explainer". The lectures were presented before undergraduate students at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), during 1961–1964. The book's co-authors are Feynman, Robert B. Leighton, and Matthew Sands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tests of relativistic energy and momentum</span>

Tests of relativistic energy and momentum are aimed at measuring the relativistic expressions for energy, momentum, and mass. According to special relativity, the properties of particles moving approximately at the speed of light significantly deviate from the predictions of Newtonian mechanics. For instance, the speed of light cannot be reached by massive particles.

The index of physics articles is split into multiple pages due to its size.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bouncing ball</span> Physics of bouncing balls

The physics of a bouncing ball concerns the physical behaviour of bouncing balls, particularly its motion before, during, and after impact against the surface of another body. Several aspects of a bouncing ball's behaviour serve as an introduction to mechanics in high school or undergraduate level physics courses. However, the exact modelling of the behaviour is complex and of interest in sports engineering.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Malkus waterwheel</span> Mechanical model that exhibits chaotic dynamics

The Malkus waterwheel, also referred to as the Lorenz waterwheel or chaotic waterwheel, is a mechanical model that exhibits chaotic dynamics. Its motion is governed by the Lorenz equations. While classical waterwheels rotate in one direction at a constant speed, the Malkus waterwheel exhibits chaotic motion where its rotation will speed up, slow down, stop, change directions, and oscillate back and forth between combinations of such behaviours in an unpredictable manner.

References

  1. ↑ Mach, Ernst (1883). Die Mechanik in Ihrer Entwicklung Historisch-Kritisch Dargerstellt (in German). Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus. Available in English as The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of its Development (3rd ed.). Chicago: Open Court. 1919. pp.  299–301.
  2. ↑ Mach, Ernst (1919). The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of its Development. Translated by McCormack, Thomas J. (3rd ed.). Chicago: Open Court. pp.  301.
  3. ↑ Feynman, Richard P. (April 5, 2005). Ferynman, Michelle (ed.). Perfectly Reasonable Deviations from the Beaten Track: The Letters of Richard P. Feynman. New York: Basic Books. pp. 209–211. ISBN   0-465-02371-1.
  4. 1 2 Feynman, Richard P. (1985). Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!. New York: W. W. Norton. pp. 63–65.
  5. ↑ Wheeler, John Archibald (1989). "The young Feynman". Physics Today . 42 (2): 24–28. Bibcode:1989PhT....42b..24W. doi:10.1063/1.881189.
  6. ↑ Gleick, James (1992). Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman. New York: Pantheon. pp. 106–108. ISBN   978-0-679-74704-8.
  7. ↑ Creutz, Edward C. (2005). "Feynman's reverse sprinkler". American Journal of Physics . 73 (3): 198–199. Bibcode:2005AmJPh..73..198C. doi:10.1119/1.1842733.
  8. ↑ Jenkins, Alejandro (May 3, 2004). "An elementary treatment of the reverse sprinkler". American Journal of Physics . 72 (10): 1276–1282. arXiv: physics/0312087 . Bibcode:2004AmJPh..72.1276J. doi:10.1119/1.1761063. S2CID   119430653.
  9. 1 2 Jenkins, Alejandro (2011). "Sprinkler head revisited: momentum, forces, and flows in Machian propulsion". European Journal of Physics . 32 (5): 1213–1226. arXiv: 0908.3190 . Bibcode:2011EJPh...32.1213J. doi:10.1088/0143-0807/32/5/009. S2CID   118379711.
  10. ↑ Wang, Kaizhe; Sprinkle, Brennan; Zuo, Mingxuan; Ristroph, Leif (26 January 2024). "Centrifugal Flows Drive Reverse Rotation of Feynman's Sprinkler". Physical Review Letters. 132 (4): 044003. Bibcode:2024PhRvL.132d4003W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.044003 . Retrieved 1 February 2024.
  11. ↑ "How Does a "Reverse Sprinkler" Work? Researchers Solve Decades-Old Physics Puzzle". NYU. Retrieved 1 February 2024.
  12. ↑ Rueckner, Wolfgang (2015). "The puzzle of the steady-state rotation of a reverse sprinkler" (PDF). American Journal of Physics . 83 (4): 296–304. Bibcode:2015AmJPh..83..296R. doi:10.1119/1.4901816. S2CID   32075644.
  13. ↑ Beals, Joseph (2017). "New angles on the reverse sprinkler: Reconciling theory and experiment". American Journal of Physics . 85 (3): 166–172. Bibcode:2017AmJPh..85..166B. doi:10.1119/1.4973374.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.