Film Classification Act, 2005

Last updated

The Film Classification Act, 2005 is a statute which governs motion picture and computer game ratings in the province of Ontario, Canada. The law also provides the legal basis for the activities of the Ontario Film Review Board. Prior to this, film censorship and classification in Ontario was mandated first by the Theatres and Cinematographs Act, 1911 then the Theatres Act, 1953.

Contents

History

Theatres and Cinematographs Act, 1911

Originally, motion pictures were reviewed and censored under the Theatres and Cinematographs Act which was passed on 24 March 1911 and established the Board of Censors, the first film review board in Ontario. The law was originally scheduled to be in force on 1 June that year, but was postponed until at least 20 June because of an illness of Arthur Matheson who as Ontario's treasurer was responsible for appointing the new board. [1] This led to the creation of the Ontario Board of Censors of Moving Pictures which began operations on 27 June 1911. [2] Each film shown in the province was required to be reviewed and approved by the Board which would then apply a "stamp" which would be displayed on theatre screens prior to the start of the film. [3] Films which did not include the Board's stamp could be confiscated by authorities under the new law, which conversely prevented law enforcement officials from stopping the presentation of stamped films because of the film's content (section 6). Enforcement of the stamping provisions began after 1 December 1911, following the Board's initial task of reviewing 4000 extant films. [4]

Section 10 of the original 1911 act prohibited children less than 15 years from attending a commercial film unless accompanied by an adult. This led to an unintended consequence where young girls would approach adult strangers to escort them to movies. There were recommendations that this provision be revoked or changed, especially since the film censorship regime would be deemed sufficient to protect children from inappropriate film content. [5] In 1914, the provincial government introduced amendments to restrict eligible escorts to parents or legal guardians. Theatre operators were held responsible for ensuring that children were not being escorted by strangers. [6]

After its first year, some film exhibitors would flout the law by removing certificate stamp images from films inspected by the Board of Censors then splicing these certificates to films which were not approved for Ontario audiences. [7]

Theatres Act, 1953

In 1953, the province replaced the Theatres and Cinematographs Act with a new law, the Theatres Act. [8]

Significant amendments to the act and its regulations were made on various occasions. Videotape and 8 mm film classification was introduced in 1975, following concerns that pornographic presentations were being distributed in such formats beyond the purview of the Board of Censors. [9] [10]

In 1981, the Adult Accompaniment rating was introduced which allowed films to be classified so that children under 14 were restricted unless escorted by an adult. The classification was developed to open films of social significance to younger audiences which might otherwise have been restricted. In developing the new classification, provincial officials noted that the film One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest was restricted to adults only, although the film was based on a book that was studied by many high school students. [11]

The provincial government introduced Bill 82 to change the Theatres Act in May 1984. The bill passed that December and took effect February 1985. These changes renamed the Board of Censors to the Ontario Censor Board the Ontario Film Review Board. [8] [12]

Rating categories were restructured again in 2001, with the introduction of the 18A rating which when applied to a film prohibits persons under 18 from attending unless accompanied by an adult. The Adult Accompaniment rating was renamed 14A but its effect was otherwise unchanged. [13]

On 30 April 2004, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice found certain sections of the Theatres Act to violate the freedom of expression provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the case of R. v. Glad Day Bookshops Inc. . [14] The Ontario government modified the regulation under the Theatres Act was modified on 5 July 2004 to restrict the grounds on which a motion picture can be banned from Ontario, namely to pornographic films which involve violence, degradation or minors. [15]

Film Classification Act, 2005

The Legislative Assembly of Ontario introduced Bill 158, the Film Classification Act, for first reading on 9 December 2004. Minister of Consumer and Business Services Jim Watson introduced the legislation as a means of updating the film classification system while curtailing the censorship powers of the Ontario Film Review Board. The bill's second reading began on 15 February 2005 and was carried on 6 April. After review by the province's Standing Committee on Justice Policy, Bill 158 received its third reading on 19 May then was carried on division on 30 May with Royal Assent proclaimed on 13 June. [16] The statute took legal effect on 31 August 2005. [16] [17]

The Film Classification Act, 2005 ended the provincial power to ban films, although film censorship powers would be retained for some cases of pornographic films. [18] For video games, the Act also gave the province power to enforce the ratings system of the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB), prohibiting the sale or exhibition of "Mature" and "Adults Only"-rated games to those under the age of 17 and 18 respectively. [19] The OFRB had previously attempted to enforce such restrictions by classifying specific games as films, notwithstanding their rating. [20]

The act itself specifies the general provincial powers of entertainment classification including the appeals process, licensing of distributors and exhibitors, powers of inspection and investigation and transition from the previous Theatres Act. Details of rating categories, licensing, and exemptions from classification are specified in the associated Ontario Regulation 452/05 which took effect at the same time as the act.

Film Content Information Act, 2020

Related Research Articles

A motion picture content rating system classifies films based on their suitability for audiences due to their treatment of issues such as sex, violence, or substance abuse; their use of profanity; or other matters typically deemed unsuitable for children or adolescents. Most countries have some form of rating system that issues determinations variously known as certifications, classifications, certificates, or ratings. Age recommendations, of either an advisory or restrictive capacity, are often applied in lieu of censorship; in some jurisdictions movie theaters may have a legal obligation to enforce restrictive ratings.

This article chronicles the history of British film certificates.

The National Legion of Decency, also known as the Catholic Legion of Decency, was a Catholic group founded in 1934 by Archbishop of Cincinnati, John T. McNicholas, as an organization dedicated to identifying objectionable content in motion pictures on behalf of Catholic audiences. Members were asked to pledge to patronize only those motion pictures which did not "offend decency and Christian morality". The concept soon gained support from other churches.

The Ontario Film Review Board is an inactive agency of the government of the Canadian province of Ontario that was formerly responsible for that province's motion picture rating system. Until 2015, the board reported to the Minister of Consumer Services but as of 1 October 2015, the board was overseen by the Ontario Film Authority. The board's activities were based on the Film Classification Act, 2005.

The Maritime Film Classification Board is a government organization responsible for reviewing films and granting film ratings in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Irish Film Classification Office</span> Irish censorship and classification within Ireland

The Irish Film Classification Office (IFCO) is the organisation responsible for films, television programmes, and some video game classification and censorship within Ireland. Where restrictions are placed by the IFCO, they are legally binding.

Censorship in Singapore mainly targets political, racial, religious issues and homosexual content as defined by out-of-bounds markers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Jolliffe (censor)</span> New Zealand public servant

William Jolliffe was New Zealand's first Chief Censor of Films.

In Canada, appeals by the judiciary to community standards and the public interest are the ultimate determinants of which forms of expression may legally be published, broadcast, or otherwise publicly disseminated. Other public organisations with the authority to censor include some tribunals and courts under provincial human rights laws, and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, along with self-policing associations of private corporations such as the Canadian Association of Broadcasters and the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Film censorship</span> Films that are banned in a particular country

Film censorship is carried out by various countries to differing degrees, sometimes as a result of powerful or relentless lobbying by organizations or individuals. Films that are banned in a particular country change over time.

<i>Syndromes and a Century</i> 2006 Thai film

Syndromes and a Century is a 2006 Thai drama film written and directed by Apichatpong Weerasethakul. The film was among the works commissioned for Peter Sellars' New Crowned Hope festival in Vienna to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the birth of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. It premiered on August 30, 2006 at the 63rd Venice Film Festival.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Kong motion picture rating system</span>

The Hong Kong motion picture rating system is a legal system of movie screening and rating. An official government agency issues ratings for any movie that will be shown in Hong Kong cinemas.

The Manitoba Film Classification Board (MFCB) was a provincial government organization responsible for rating films and video games rented, sold, or shown in the province of Manitoba. In mid 2018, the Board was dissolved, with its duties being outsourced to British Columbia for film classifications, and transferred to the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) for video games.

Motion picture ratings in Canada are mostly a provincial responsibility, and each province has its own legislation regarding exhibition and admission. For home video purposes, a single Canadian Home Video Rating System rating consisting of an average of the participating provincial ratings is displayed on retail packages, although various provinces may have rules on display and sale, especially for the R and A categories.

Censorship in New Zealand has been present since around 1850 and is currently managed by the Classification Office under the Films, Videos, and Publications Classification Act 1993.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Board of Film Classification</span> British film classification organisation

The British Board of Film Classification is a non-governmental organisation founded by the British film industry in 1912 and responsible for the national classification and censorship of films exhibited at cinemas and video works released on physical media within the United Kingdom. It has a statutory requirement to classify all video works released on VHS, DVD, Blu-ray, and, to a lesser extent, some video games under the Video Recordings Act 1984. The BBFC was also the designated regulator for the UK age-verification scheme which was abandoned before being implemented.

The Australian Classification Board is an Australian government statutory body responsible for the classification and censorship of films, video games and publications for exhibition, sale or hire in Australia. The ACB was established in 1970 and was once part of the Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC), which was dissolved in 2006. The Department of Communications and the Arts provided administrative support to the ACB from 2006 until 2020, when it was merged into the 'mega department' of the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications. Decisions made by the ACB may be reviewed by the Australian Classification Review Board. The ACB now operates under the Commonwealth Classification Act 1995. The ACB is made up of a director, a deputy director, and three other board members, appointed by the government for three- or four-year terms, and temporary board members. The ACB is located in Sydney, New South Wales.

Media regulation in the Republic of Singapore is carried out by the Info-communications Media Development Authority (IMDA) and effected by various laws.

Censorship in the Philippines refers to the control of certain information in the Philippines.

References

  1. ↑ "Moving Picture Law Effective June 20 / Delay in Appointment of Board of Censors Results in Postponement". The Globe . 30 May 1911. p. 8.
  2. ↑ "Moving Picture Censors Appointed / No suggestive, immoral or obscene films will be passed". The Globe . 28 June 1911. p. 9.
  3. ↑ "The Censors for the moving picture films". Toronto Star . 28 June 1911. p. 9.
  4. ↑ "Films must have the official stamp". Toronto Star . 23 November 1911. p. 19.
  5. ↑ "Girls ask strangers to take them to shows / Removal of Rule Forbidding Unaccompanied Children to Attend Picture Shows Is Urged". Toronto Star . 16 December 1911. p. 21.
  6. ↑ "To exclude youngsters from the movie shows". The Globe . 13 April 1914. p. 9.
  7. ↑ "Says showmen use uncensored films". The Globe . 5 November 1912. p. 9.
  8. 1 2 Robertson, Clive (2006). Policy Matters: Administrations of Art and Culture. YYZ Books. pp. 45–47. ISBN   978-0-920397-36-7 . Retrieved 2 November 2009.
  9. ↑ Webster, Norman (29 April 1975). "Hairy stuff gets through loophole". The Globe and Mail . p. 7.
  10. ↑ Coleman, Thomas (4 July 1975). "Toronto is sex products testing place for 'who's who of smut', Drea asserts". The Globe and Mail . pp. 1–2.
  11. ↑ "Teens may see adult movies". Toronto Star . 5 March 1980. p. A11.
  12. ↑ Annual Report - Film Review Board. Ontario Film Review Board. 1988–1989. p. 15.
  13. ↑ "Ontario adopts new movie classifications". CTV News. 16 January 2001. Retrieved 7 November 2009.[ dead link ]
  14. ↑ "R. v. Glad Day Bookshops Inc., 2004 CanLII 16104 (ON S.C.) - Docket 02-SC-000024". Ontario Superior Court of Justice. 30 April 2004. Retrieved 31 October 2009.
  15. ↑ "Regulatory Changes to the Theatres Act Now in Effect". Ministry of Consumer and Business Services (Ontario). 5 July 2004. Retrieved 31 October 2009.
  16. 1 2 "Bill 158, Film Classification Act, 2005". Legislative Assembly of Ontario . Retrieved 2 November 2009.
  17. ↑ "Film Classification Act, 2005 in effect on August 31, 2005". Ontario Film Review Board. Archived from the original on 15 September 2009. Retrieved 31 October 2009.
  18. ↑ "Ontario ends banning of films". CBC News. 31 May 2005. Retrieved 2 November 2009.
  19. ↑ "Manitoba moves to rate violent video games". CBC News. Archived from the original on March 25, 2014. Retrieved March 19, 2014.
  20. ↑ "Ontario slaps 'R' rating on video game". CBC News. March 5, 2004. Archived from the original on March 24, 2014. Retrieved March 18, 2014.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.