Fleischner's theorem

Last updated
A 2-vertex-connected graph, its square, and a Hamiltonian cycle in the square Fleischner's theorem.svg
A 2-vertex-connected graph, its square, and a Hamiltonian cycle in the square

In graph theory, a branch of mathematics, Fleischner's theorem gives a sufficient condition for a graph to contain a Hamiltonian cycle. It states that, if is a 2-vertex-connected graph, then the square of is Hamiltonian. It is named after Herbert Fleischner, who published its proof in 1974.

Contents

Definitions and statement

An undirected graph is Hamiltonian if it contains a cycle that touches each of its vertices exactly once. It is 2-vertex-connected if it does not have an articulation vertex, a vertex whose deletion would leave the remaining graph disconnected. Not every 2-vertex-connected graph is Hamiltonian; counterexamples include the Petersen graph and the complete bipartite graph .

The square of is a graph that has the same vertex set as , and in which two vertices are adjacent if and only if they have distance at most two in . Fleischner's theorem states that the square of a finite 2-vertex-connected graph with at least three vertices must always be Hamiltonian. Equivalently, the vertices of every 2-vertex-connected graph may be arranged into a cyclic order such that adjacent vertices in this order are at distance at most two from each other in .

Extensions

In Fleischner's theorem, it is possible to constrain the Hamiltonian cycle in so that for given vertices and of it includes two edges of incident with and one edge of incident with . Moreover, if and are adjacent in , then these are three different edges of . [1]

In addition to having a Hamiltonian cycle, the square of a 2-vertex-connected graph must also be Hamiltonian connected (meaning that it has a Hamiltonian path starting and ending at any two designated vertices) and 1-Hamiltonian (meaning that if any vertex is deleted, the remaining graph still has a Hamiltonian cycle). [2] It must also be vertex pancyclic, meaning that for every vertex and every integer with , there exists a cycle of length containing . [3]

If a graph is not 2-vertex-connected, then its square may or may not have a Hamiltonian cycle, and determining whether it does have one is NP-complete. [4]

An infinite graph cannot have a Hamiltonian cycle, because every cycle is finite, but Carsten Thomassen proved that if is an infinite locally finite 2-vertex-connected graph with a single end then necessarily has a doubly infinite Hamiltonian path. [5] More generally, if is locally finite, 2-vertex-connected, and has any number of ends, then has a Hamiltonian circle. In a compact topological space formed by viewing the graph as a simplicial complex and adding an extra point at infinity to each of its ends, a Hamiltonian circle is defined to be a subspace that is homeomorphic to a Euclidean circle and covers every vertex. [6]

Algorithms

The Hamiltonian cycle in the square of an -vertex 2-connected graph can be found in linear time, [7] improving over the first algorithmic solution by Lau [8] of running time . Fleischner's theorem can be used to provide a 2-approximation to the bottleneck traveling salesman problem in metric spaces. [9]

History

A proof of Fleischner's theorem was announced by Herbert Fleischner in 1971 and published by him in 1974, solving a 1966 conjecture of Crispin Nash-Williams also made independently by L. W. Beineke and Michael D. Plummer. [10] In his review of Fleischner's paper, Nash-Williams wrote that it had solved "a well known problem which has for several years defeated the ingenuity of other graph-theorists". [11]

Fleischner's original proof was complicated. Václav Chvátal, in the work in which he invented graph toughness, observed that the square of a -vertex-connected graph is necessarily -tough; he conjectured that 2-tough graphs are Hamiltonian, from which another proof of Fleischner's theorem would have followed. [12] Counterexamples to this conjecture were later discovered, [13] but the possibility that a finite bound on toughness might imply Hamiltonicity remains an important open problem in graph theory. A simpler proof both of Fleischner's theorem, and of its extensions by Chartrand et al. (1974), was given by Říha (1991), [14] and another simplified proof of the theorem was given by Georgakopoulos (2009a). [15]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kuratowski's theorem</span> On forbidden subgraphs in planar graphs

In graph theory, Kuratowski's theorem is a mathematical forbidden graph characterization of planar graphs, named after Kazimierz Kuratowski. It states that a finite graph is planar if and only if it does not contain a subgraph that is a subdivision of or of .

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hamiltonian path</span> Path in a graph that visits each vertex exactly once

In the mathematical field of graph theory, a Hamiltonian path is a path in an undirected or directed graph that visits each vertex exactly once. A Hamiltonian cycle is a cycle that visits each vertex exactly once. A Hamiltonian path that starts and ends at adjacent vertices can be completed by adding one more edge to form a Hamiltonian cycle, and removing any edge from a Hamiltonian cycle produces a Hamiltonian path. The computational problems of determining whether such paths and cycles exist in graphs are NP-complete.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eulerian path</span> Trail in a graph that visits each edge once

In graph theory, an Eulerian trail is a trail in a finite graph that visits every edge exactly once. Similarly, an Eulerian circuit or Eulerian cycle is an Eulerian trail that starts and ends on the same vertex. They were first discussed by Leonhard Euler while solving the famous Seven Bridges of Königsberg problem in 1736. The problem can be stated mathematically like this:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outerplanar graph</span> Non-crossing graph with vertices on outer face

In graph theory, an outerplanar graph is a graph that has a planar drawing for which all vertices belong to the outer face of the drawing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Perfect graph</span> Graph with tight clique-coloring relation

In graph theory, a perfect graph is a graph in which the chromatic number equals the size of the maximum clique, both in the graph itself and in every induced subgraph. In all graphs, the chromatic number is greater than or equal to the size of the maximum clique, but they can be far apart. A graph is perfect when these numbers are equal, and remain equal after the deletion of arbitrary subsets of vertices.

In the mathematical discipline of graph theory, the line graph of an undirected graph G is another graph L(G) that represents the adjacencies between edges of G. L(G) is constructed in the following way: for each edge in G, make a vertex in L(G); for every two edges in G that have a vertex in common, make an edge between their corresponding vertices in L(G).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kneser graph</span> Graph whose vertices correspond to combinations of a set of n elements

In graph theory, the Kneser graphK(n, k) (alternatively KGn,k) is the graph whose vertices correspond to the k-element subsets of a set of n elements, and where two vertices are adjacent if and only if the two corresponding sets are disjoint. Kneser graphs are named after Martin Kneser, who first investigated them in 1956.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ore's theorem</span>

Ore's theorem is a result in graph theory proved in 1960 by Norwegian mathematician Øystein Ore. It gives a sufficient condition for a graph to be Hamiltonian, essentially stating that a graph with sufficiently many edges must contain a Hamilton cycle. Specifically, the theorem considers the sum of the degrees of pairs of non-adjacent vertices: if every such pair has a sum that at least equals the total number of vertices in the graph, then the graph is Hamiltonian.

In the mathematical field of graph theory, a quartic graph is a graph where all vertices have degree 4. In other words, a quartic graph is a 4-regular graph.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Graph toughness</span>

In graph theory, toughness is a measure of the connectivity of a graph. A graph G is said to be t-tough for a given real number t if, for every integer k > 1, G cannot be split into k different connected components by the removal of fewer than tk vertices. For instance, a graph is 1-tough if the number of components formed by removing a set of vertices is always at most as large as the number of removed vertices. The toughness of a graph is the maximum t for which it is t-tough; this is a finite number for all finite graphs except the complete graphs, which by convention have infinite toughness.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Handshaking lemma</span> Every graph has evenly many odd vertices

In graph theory, a branch of mathematics, the handshaking lemma is the statement that, in every finite undirected graph, the number of vertices that touch an odd number of edges is even. For example, if there is a party of people who shake hands, the number of people who shake an odd number of other people's hands is even. The handshaking lemma is a consequence of the degree sum formula, also sometimes called the handshaking lemma, according to which the sum of the degrees equals twice the number of edges in the graph. Both results were proven by Leonhard Euler (1736) in his famous paper on the Seven Bridges of Königsberg that began the study of graph theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Václav Chvátal</span> Czech-Canadian mathematician

Václav (Vašek) Chvátal is a Professor Emeritus in the Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering at Concordia University in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and a visiting professor at Charles University in Prague. He has published extensively on topics in graph theory, combinatorics, and combinatorial optimization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hypohamiltonian graph</span> Type of graph in graph theory

In the mathematical field of graph theory, a graph G is said to be hypohamiltonian if G itself does not have a Hamiltonian cycle but every graph formed by removing a single vertex from G is Hamiltonian.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Halin graph</span> Mathematical tree with cycle through leaves

In graph theory, a Halin graph is a type of planar graph, constructed by connecting the leaves of a tree into a cycle. The tree must have at least four vertices, none of which has exactly two neighbors; it should be drawn in the plane so none of its edges cross, and the cycle connects the leaves in their clockwise ordering in this embedding. Thus, the cycle forms the outer face of the Halin graph, with the tree inside it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grinberg's theorem</span> On Hamiltonian cycles in planar graphs

In graph theory, Grinberg's theorem is a necessary condition for a planar graph to contain a Hamiltonian cycle, based on the lengths of its face cycles. If a graph does not meet this condition, it is not Hamiltonian. The result has been widely used to prove that certain planar graphs constructed to have additional properties are not Hamiltonian; for instance it can prove non-Hamiltonicity of some counterexamples to Tait's conjecture that cubic polyhedral graphs are Hamiltonian.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hamiltonian decomposition</span>

In graph theory, a branch of mathematics, a Hamiltonian decomposition of a given graph is a partition of the edges of the graph into Hamiltonian cycles. Hamiltonian decompositions have been studied both for undirected graphs and for directed graphs. In the undirected case a Hamiltonian decomposition can also be described as a 2-factorization of the graph such that each factor is connected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Herschel graph</span> Bipartite non-Hamiltonian polyhedral graph

In graph theory, a branch of mathematics, the Herschel graph is a bipartite undirected graph with 11 vertices and 18 edges. It is a polyhedral graph, and is the smallest polyhedral graph that does not have a Hamiltonian cycle, a cycle passing through all its vertices. It is named after British astronomer Alexander Stewart Herschel, because of Herschel's studies of Hamiltonian cycles in polyhedral graphs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pancyclic graph</span>

In the mathematical study of graph theory, a pancyclic graph is a directed graph or undirected graph that contains cycles of all possible lengths from three up to the number of vertices in the graph. Pancyclic graphs are a generalization of Hamiltonian graphs, graphs which have a cycle of the maximum possible length.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gallai–Hasse–Roy–Vitaver theorem</span> Duality of graph colorings and orientations

In graph theory, the Gallai–Hasse–Roy–Vitaver theorem is a form of duality between the colorings of the vertices of a given undirected graph and the orientations of its edges. It states that the minimum number of colors needed to properly color any graph equals one plus the length of a longest path in an orientation of chosen to minimize this path's length. The orientations for which the longest path has minimum length always include at least one acyclic orientation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Graph power</span> Graph operation: linking all pairs of nodes of distance ≤ k

In graph theory, a branch of mathematics, the kth powerGk of an undirected graph G is another graph that has the same set of vertices, but in which two vertices are adjacent when their distance in G is at most k. Powers of graphs are referred to using terminology similar to that of exponentiation of numbers: G2 is called the square of G, G3 is called the cube of G, etc.

References

Notes

  1. Fleischner (1976); Müttel & Rautenbach (2012).
  2. Chartrand et al. (1974); Chartrand, Lesniak & Zhang (2010)
  3. Hobbs (1976), answering a conjecture of Bondy (1971).
  4. Underground (1978); Bondy (1995).
  5. Thomassen (1978).
  6. Georgakopoulos (2009b); Diestel (2012).
  7. Alstrup et al. (2018)
  8. Lau (1980); Parker & Rardin (1984).
  9. Parker & Rardin (1984); Hochbaum & Shmoys (1986).
  10. Fleischner (1974). For the earlier conjectures see Fleischner and Chartrand, Lesniak & Zhang (2010).
  11. MR 0332573.
  12. Chvátal (1973); Bondy (1995).
  13. Bauer, Broersma & Veldman (2000).
  14. Bondy (1995); Chartrand, Lesniak & Zhang (2010).
  15. Chartrand, Lesniak & Zhang (2010); Diestel (2012).

Primary sources

Secondary sources