Freedom of information in the United States

Last updated

Freedom of information in the United States relates to the public's ability to access government records, meetings, and other information. In the United States, freedom of information legislation exists at all levels of government: federal level, state level, and local level.

Contents

Federal level

Since the founding of the United States, the public's right to know the affairs of their government has been foundational democracy. James Madison wrote during the United States Constitutional Convention, "The right of freely examining public characters and measures and free communication, is the only effective guardian of every other right." [1] [2]

Several federal laws have strengthened the public's ability to access public records.

Federal legislation

The most important was the Freedom of Information Act, signed into law on July 4, 1966, by President Lyndon Johnson.

Proposed legislation

Miscellaneous Authoritative Federal Sources

U.S. Attorney General Memoranda

History

The Holder Memo is part of series of policy memos on how federal agencies should apply FOIA exemptions. Beginning in 1977 with Attorney General Griffin Bell, and continued by Attorney General William French Smith in 1981 and Attorney General Janet Reno in 1993, U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced how the executive branch should approach FOIA, its application, and DOJ's defense of agency's actions. In other words, DOJ's position on when they would defend in a FOIA suit has seesawed for about the last three decades.

Reno Memo

The Reno Memo [6] established a "presumption" in favor of disclosure by providing that "it shall be the policy of the Department of Justice to defend the assertion of a FOIA exemption only in those cases where the agency reasonably foresees that disclosure would be harmful to an interest protected by that exemption". It encouraged all government agencies to review FOIA requests in a manner most favorable to openness and to release information, even though it might fall within one of the nine exemption categories, if no "foreseeable harm" would result from the disclosure. The goal was to achieve the "maximum responsible disclosure".

Ashcroft Memo

On October 12, 2001, Attorney General John Ashcroft issued a policy memorandum on FOIA to all federal executive agencies. The AG declared the Department of Justice (DOJ) would defend agencies' decisions to withhold documents from a FOIA requester under one of the statute's exemptions "unless they lack a sound legal basis or present an unwarranted risk of adverse impact on the ability of other agencies to protect other important records".

The Ashcroft Memorandum reversed the Reno standard. Agencies were told that in making discretionary FOIA decisions they should carefully consider the fundamental values behind the exemptions—national security, privacy, government's interests, etc.—and to lean in their favor whenever possible. The Ashcroft Memo [7] with its "sound legal basis" standard encouraged (or at least seemed to support) greater use of FOIA exemptions by federal agency personnel.

AG Holder Memo

The Ashcroft Memo was rescinded by Attorney General Eric Holder on March 14, 2009. The AG Holder Memo [8] appears to have reinstated the Reno Memo standard and extends the policy. The policy of the executive branch is to be open, responsive, transparent, and accountable. The current memo encourages the maximum disclosure possible in discretionary exemptions and to, whenever possible, reasonably segregate exempt information and release the rest.

State legislation

All fifty U.S. states and the District of Columbia also have freedom of information laws that govern the public's access to government records at state and local levels. [9] These laws go by many different names including Sunshine Laws, Public Records Laws, Open Records Laws, etc. Additionally, Open Meeting Laws govern the public's access to meetings of public officials or appointed boards. [10]

All Freedom of Information style laws supports the ideal that in a democracy, people have the right to know the business of their government. However, the laws vary in scope and strength among jurisdictions. [1] For example, Florida's Sunshine Law creates both a statutory and constitutional right to access whereas many states only provide the statutory right. [2] Additionally, while a state may have strong legislation the state's compliance with its own laws may negatively impact the public's ability to access records. [11]

Freedom of Information laws by state

StateFreedom of Information LawCode Section [12] First EnactedWho May Request Records [12]
AlabamaAlabama Public Records LawAl. Code §§ 36-12-40; 36-12-411923 [13] Any citizen
AlaskaAlaska Public Records ActA.S. §§ 40.25.110 to 40.25.125; 40.25.1511900 [14] Any person
ArizonaArizona Public Records LawA.R.S. §§ 39–121.01 to 39–121.031901 [15] Any person
ArkansasArkansas Freedom of Information ActArk. Code Ann. §§ 25-19-101 to 25-19-1111967 [16] Citizens of the state/commonwealth
California California Public Records Act Gov’t Code §§ 6250 to 6276.481968 [17] Any person
Colorado Colorado Open Records Act C.R.S. §§ 24-72-200.1 to 24-72-205.51969 [18] Any person
ConnecticutConnecticut Freedom of Information ActConnecticut General Statutes Chapter 14 §§ 1–200 to 1-2421975 [19] Any person
DelawareDelaware Freedom of Information ActTit. 29, §§ 10001 to 10007; 101121977 [20] Citizens of the state/commonwealth
FloridaFlorida Sunshine LawFla. Stat. §§ 119.01 to 119.191967 [21] Any person
GeorgiaGeorgia Open Records ActO.C.G.A. §§ 50-18-70 to 50-18-1031959 [22] Citizens of the state/commonwealth
HawaiiUniform Information Practices Act (Modified)Haw. Rev. Stat. §§ 92F-1 to 92F-431975 [23] Any person
IdahoIdaho Public Records ActIdaho Code §§ 74–101 to 74-1261990 [24] Any person
Illinois Illinois Freedom of Information Act ILCS 5 §§ 140/1 to 140/11.61984 [25] Any person
IndianaAccess to Public Records ActIN Code §§ 5-14-3-1 to 5-14-3-101983 [26] Any person
IowaIowa Open Records LawIowa Code §§ 22.1 to 22.161967 [27] Any person
KansasKansas Open Records ActKSA §§ 45–215 to 45-5241984 [28] Any person
KentuckyKentucky Open Records ActKentucky Revised Statute Chapter §§ 61.870 to 61.8841976 [29] From Kentucky: "an individual residing in Kentucky, a domestic business with a location in Kentucky (or an out-of-state business registered with the Secretary of State), a person who works in Kentucky, a person or business that owns real property within Kentucky, a person or business authorized to act on behalf of a Kentucky resident, or a news-gathering organization"; inmates have some restrictions; non-Kentucky people may request records, but their requests can be denied
LouisianaLouisiana Public Records LawLa.R.S. §§ 44:31 to 44:411940 [30] Any person 18 or older
MaineMaine Freedom of Access ActTit. 1, §§ 400 to 4341959 [31] Any person
MarylandMaryland Public Information ActGen. Provis. §§ 4–101 to 4-6011970 [32] Any person
Massachusetts Massachusetts Public Records Law Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 66, §§ 1 to 211897 [33] Any person
MichiganMichigan Freedom of Information ActMich. Comp. Laws Ann. §§ 15.231 to 15.2461977 [34] Any person
MinnesotaMinnesota Data Practices ActMinn. Statutes §§ 13.01 to 13.99 Ch. 13 Appendix1974 [35] Any person
MississippiMississippi Public Records ActMiss. Code Ann. §§ 25-61-1 to 25-61-191983 [36] Any person
Missouri Missouri Public Records Act Mo. Code §§ 109.180; 610.010 to 610.2251961 [37] Citizens of the state/commonwealth
MontanaMontana Public Records ActMontana Code §§ 2-6-101 to 2-6-10201895 [38] Any person
NebraskaNebraska Public Records LawNebraska Statutes §§ 84–712 to 84-712.091866 [39] Any person
NevadaNevada Open Records ActN.R.S. §§ 239.010-239.3401911 [40] Any person
New HampshireRight to Know LawR.S.A. Ch. 91-A:1 to 91-A:101967 [41] Any citizen
New Jersey New Jersey Open Public Records Act N.J.S.A. §§ 47:1A-1 to 47:1A-132002 [42] Citizens of the state/commonwealth
New MexicoInspection of Public Records ActNMSA §§ 14-2-1 to 14-2-121993 [43] Any person
New YorkNew York Freedom of Information LawPub. Off. §§ 84 to 901974 [44] Any person
North CarolinaNorth Carolina Public Records LawNCGS Chapter 132–1 to 132-111995 [45] Any person
North DakotaOpen Records StatuteNDCC §§ 44-04-18 to 44-04-321957 [46] Any person
OhioOhio Open Records LawOhio Rev. Code §§ 149.43 to 149.45; 2743.751963 [47] Any person
OklahomaOklahoma Open Records ActTitle 51 Oklahoma Statutes §§ 24A.1 to 24A.321999 [48] Any person
OregonOregon Public Records LawO.R.S. §§ 192.311 to 192.5131973 [49] Any person
PennsylvaniaRight-to-Know Law65 Pennsylvania Statute §§ 67.101 to 67.13101957 [50] Any legal resident of the United States
Rhode IslandRhode Island Access to Public Records ActP.L. §§ 38-2-1 to 38-2-161979 [51] Any person
South CarolinaSouth Carolina Freedom of Information ActS.C. Code Ann. §§ 30-4-10 to 30-4-1651974 [52] Any person
South DakotaSouth Dakota Sunshine LawSDCL Chapter 1-27-1 to 1-27-482009 [53] Any person
Tennessee Tennessee Open Records Act Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 10-7-503 to 10-7-5081957 [54] Citizens of the state/commonwealth
Texas Texas Public Information Act Gov't §§ 552.001 to 552.3761973 [55] Any person
UtahGovernment Records Access and Management ActUtah Code Title 63G-2-101 to 63G-2-8041991 [56] Any person
VermontVermont Open Records LawVermont Statute Tit. 1, §§ 315 to 3201976 [57] Any person
VirginiaVirginia Freedom of Information ActCode of Virginia §§ 2.2-3700 to 2.2-37151968 [58] Citizens of the state/commonwealth
Washington Washington Public Records Act RCW §§ 42.56.001 to 42.56.9041972 [59] Any person
West VirginiaWest Virginia Freedom of Information ActW.Va. Code §§ 29B-1-1 to 29B-1-71977 [60] Any person
WisconsinWisconsin Open Records LawWisconsin Statute §§ 19.21 to 19.391981 [61] Any person
WyomingWyoming Sunshine LawWyo. Stat. §§ 16-4-201 to 16-4-2051983 [62] Any person
District of ColumbiaFreedom of Information Act [63] DC Official Code §§ 2–531 to 2-5401974 [64] Any person

See also

Individuals

U.S.

Related Research Articles

The Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), is a United States federal law which governs the behavior of federal advisory committees. In particular, it has special emphasis on open meetings, chartering, public involvement, and reporting. The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) oversees the process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Government in the Sunshine Act</span> Federal transparency law in the US

The Government in the Sunshine Act is a U.S. law passed in 1976 that affects the operations of the federal government, Congress, federal commissions, and other legally constituted federal bodies. It is one of a number of Freedom of Information Acts, intended to create greater transparency in government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freedom of Information Act (United States)</span> 1967 US statute regarding access to information held by the US government

The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, is the United States federal freedom of information law that requires the full or partial disclosure of previously unreleased or uncirculated information and documents controlled by the U.S. government, state, or other public authority upon request. The act defines agency records subject to disclosure, outlines mandatory disclosure procedures, and includes nine exemptions that define categories of information not subject to disclosure. The act was intended to make U.S. government agencies' functions more transparent so that the American public could more easily identify problems in government functioning and put pressure on Congress, agency officials, and the president to address them. The FOIA has been changed repeatedly by both the legislative and executive branches.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2004 California Proposition 59</span> Amendment of the Constitution of California

Proposition 59 was an amendment of the Constitution of California that introduced freedom of information or "sunshine" provisions. It was proposed by the California Legislature and overwhelmingly approved by the voters in an initiative held as part of the November 2004 elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Security Archive</span> Open government advocacy and investigative journalism nonprofit at George Washington University

The National Security Archive is a 501(c)(3) non-governmental, non-profit research and archival institution located on the campus of the George Washington University in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1985 to check rising government secrecy. The National Security Archive is an investigative journalism center, open government advocate, international affairs research institute, and the largest repository of declassified U.S. documents outside the federal government. The National Security Archive has spurred the declassification of more than 15 million pages of government documents by being the leading non-profit user of the U.S. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), filing a total of more than 70,000 FOIA and declassification requests in its over 35+ years of history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Freedom of Information Act 2000</span> Act of Parliament in the United Kingdom

The Freedom of Information Act 2000 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that creates a public "right of access" to information held by public authorities. It is the implementation of freedom of information legislation in the United Kingdom on a national level. Its application is limited in Scotland to UK Government offices located in Scotland. The Act implements a manifesto commitment of the Labour Party in the 1997 general election, developed by David Clark as a 1997 White Paper. The final version of the Act was criticised by freedom of information campaigners as a diluted form of what had been proposed in the White Paper. The full provisions of the act came into force on 1 January 2005.

Public records are documents or pieces of information that are not considered confidential and generally pertain to the conduct of government.

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press(RCFP) is a nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C., that provides pro bono legal services and resources to and on behalf of journalists. The organization pursues litigation, offers direct representation, submits amicus curiae briefs, and provides other legal assistance on matters involving the First Amendment, press freedom, freedom of information, and court access issues.

The Automated Targeting System or ATS is a United States Department of Homeland Security computerized system that, for every person who crosses U.S. borders, scrutinizes a large volume of data related to that person, and then automatically assigns a rating for which the expectation is that it helps gauge whether this person may be placed within a risk group of terrorists or other criminals. Similarly ATS analyzes data related to container cargo.

Massachusetts Public Records Law is a law in Massachusetts detailing what kinds of documents are actually public records. It is a state law that is similar to the federal Freedom of Information Act, which was signed into law by Lyndon B. Johnson in 1966. According to the Boston Globe newspaper in 2016, "Massachusetts is currently the one state in the country where the Legislature, judiciary, and governor’s office all claim to be completely exempt from the [public records] law." Many voters would welcome more government transparency. For example, in 2020, a "ballot question in 16 house districts found overwhelming support for increasing transparency." Interest groups focusing on the issue include Act on Mass and the New England First Amendment Coalition.

<i>Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Department of Justice</i>

EPIC v. Department of Justice is a 2014 case in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia between the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) where EPIC seeks court action to enforce their Freedom of Information Act request for documents that the Department of Justice has withheld pertaining to George W. Bush's authorization of NSA warrantless surveillance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California Public Records Act</span> Freedom-of-information law in California, US

The California Public Records Act was a law passed by the California State Legislature and signed by governor Ronald Reagan in 1968 requiring inspection or disclosure of governmental records to the public upon request, unless exempted by law.

United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989), was a case before the United States Supreme Court.

FOIA Exemption 3 Statutes are statutes found to qualify under Exemption 3 of the U.S. Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.§ 552(b)(3). Under its terms, as amended in 1976 and 2009, a statute qualifies as an "Exemption 3 statute" only if it "(i) requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue; or (ii) establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld." Additionally, any statute enacted after October 29, 2009, acting to exclude information release must contain a specific citation to subsection (b)(3) of the FOIA statute.

The open government laws in Florida are focused on three areas:

Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc., 562 U.S. 397 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case on aspects of corporate personhood. It held that the exemption from Freedom of Information Act disclosure requirements for law enforcement records which "could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy" does not protect information related to corporate privacy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">FOIA Oversight and Implementation Act of 2014</span>

The FOIA Oversight and Implementation Act of 2014 is a bill that would amend the Freedom of Information Act in order to make it easier and faster to request and receive information. The bill would require the Office of Management and Budget to create a single FOIA website for people to use to make FOIA requests and check on the status of their request. The bill would also create a Chief FOIA Officers Council charged with reviewing compliance and recommending improvements. This bill would also require the federal agency to release the information it disclosed to the person who requested it publicly afterwards.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Illinois Freedom of Information Act</span> Public records law in Illinois

The Illinois Freedom of Information Act, 5 ILCS 140/1 et seq., is an Illinois statute that grants to all persons the right to copy and inspect public records in the state. The law applies to executive and legislative bodies of state government, units of local government, and other entities defined as "public bodies". All records related to governmental business are presumed to be open for inspection by the public, except for information specifically exempted from disclosure by law. The statute is modeled after the federal Freedom of Information Act and serves a similar purpose as freedom of information legislation in the other U.S. states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Illinois Public Access Counselor</span> Bureau under Illinois Attorney General

The Illinois Public Access Counselor (PAC) is an attorney in the office of the Illinois Attorney General who is responsible for enforcing the state's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Open Meetings Act (OMA). The PAC is the head of the Public Access Bureau, a group of more than one dozen attorneys who process complaints against public bodies and provide education to the public on Illinois' transparency laws.

<i>City of Champaign v. Madigan</i> Illinois court case concerning freedom of information

City of Champaign v. Madigan, 2013 IL App (4th) 120662, 992 N.E.2d 629 (2013), is a case decided by the Illinois Appellate Court in 2013 concerning the state's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The court ruled that messages sent and received by elected officials during a city council meeting are subject to public disclosure, even when those communications are stored on personal electronic devices. The case addressed a public records request from a reporter for The News-Gazette in Champaign, Illinois, who observed Champaign city council members and the mayor using their personal electronic devices to send messages, outside the public's view, during a city council meeting.

References

  1. 1 2 Stewart, Daxton R. "Chip" (2010-07-08). "Let the Sunshine In, or Else: An Examination of the "Teeth" of State and Federal Open Meetings and Open Records Laws". Communication Law and Policy. 15 (3): 265–310. doi:10.1080/10811680.2010.489858. ISSN   1081-1680. S2CID   144106823.
  2. 1 2 Edwards, K. (2003). "Freedom of information laws". Encyclopedia of International Media and Communications: 53–67. doi:10.1016/B0-12-387670-2/00100-X. ISBN   9780123876706 – via Elsevier Science & Technology.
  3. ↑ Gold, Hadas (26 February 2014). "House unanimously passes FOIA bill". Politico (blog). Retrieved 19 April 2015.
  4. ↑ "FOIA". Act No. H.R. 1211 of 25 February 2014 . Retrieved 19 April 2015.
  5. ↑ "Freedom of Information Act". whitehouse.gov . 21 January 2009 – via National Archives.
  6. ↑ "FOIA Update: Attorney General Reno's FOIA Memorandum". 13 August 2014.
  7. ↑ "New Attorney General FOIA Memorandum Issued".
  8. ↑ http://www.usdoj.gov/ag/foia-memo-march2009.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  9. ↑ "State Public Record Laws". FOIAdvocates.
  10. ↑ Kaye, Janet (2008-06-05), "Open Meetings Law", in Donsbach, Wolfgang (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. wbieco010, doi:10.1002/9781405186407.wbieco010, ISBN   978-1-4051-8640-7 , retrieved 2023-03-16
  11. ↑ "States Failing FOI Responsiveness – National Freedom of Information Coalition". 2007. Retrieved 2023-03-17.
  12. 1 2 National survey of state laws. Richard A. Leiter, Wendy Leiter (9th ed.). Getzville, NY: William S. Hein & Co., Inc. 2022. pp. 807–816. ISBN   978-0-8377-4269-4. OCLC   1343162981.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  13. ↑ "Open Government Guide Alabama - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  14. ↑ "Open Government Guide Alaska - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  15. ↑ "Open Government Guide Arizona - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  16. ↑ "Open Government Guide Arkansas - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  17. ↑ "California Public Records Act FAQs". post.ca.gov. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  18. ↑ "Open Government Guide Colorado - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  19. ↑ "Open Government Guide Connecticut - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  20. ↑ "Open Government Guide Delaware - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  21. ↑ Kalil, Earl L. (1975). "Florida Sunshine Law". Florida Bar Journal. 49 (2): 72–116 – via HeinOnline.
  22. ↑ "Open Government Guide Georgia - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  23. ↑ "Open Government Guide Hawaii - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  24. ↑ Younger, Cally (2015). "In Year 25 Idaho's Public Records Law Gets a Checkup by Idaho's Public Records Ombudsman". Advocate (Idaho State Bar). 58 (2): 32–34 – via HeinOnline.
  25. ↑ "Open Government Guide Illinois - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  26. ↑ Office of the Public Access Counselor (2022). "Handbook on Indiana's Public Access Laws" (PDF). Access to Public Records Act. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
  27. ↑ "Open Government Guide Iowa - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  28. ↑ "Open Government Guide Kansas - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  29. ↑ "Open Government Guide Kentucky - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  30. ↑ "Open Government Guide Louisiana - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
  31. ↑ "Open Government Guide Maine - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  32. ↑ "In new report, Maryland open-records officials urge greater transparency". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved 2023-03-07.
  33. ↑ "Open Government Guide Massachusetts - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  34. ↑ "Open Government Guide Michigan - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  35. ↑ "Open Government Guide Minnesota - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  36. ↑ "Open Government Guide Mississippi - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  37. ↑ "Missouri". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  38. ↑ "Open Government Guide Montana - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  39. ↑ "Outline of Nebraska Public Records Statutes". Attorney General Mike Hilgers. 2023. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  40. ↑ "Open Government Guide Nevada - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  41. ↑ "Open Government Guide New Hampshire - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  42. ↑ "Open Government Guide New Jersey - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  43. ↑ "Open Government Guide New Mexico - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  44. ↑ "Open Government Guide New York - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  45. ↑ "Open Government Guide North Carolina - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  46. ↑ The State and Local Division, Office of Attorney General (2022). "Open Records Manual" (PDF). North Dakota Office of Attorney General. Retrieved March 9, 2023.
  47. ↑ "Open Government Guide Ohio - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  48. ↑ "Open Government Guide Oklahoma - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  49. ↑ "Oregon". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  50. ↑ Pileggi, Dominic (2007). "Pennsylvania's Right-to-Know Law" (PDF). The Office of Open Records. Retrieved March 9, 2023.
  51. ↑ "Open Government Guide Rhode Island - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  52. ↑ "Open Government Guide South Carolina - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  53. ↑ "Open Government Guide South Dakota - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  54. ↑ "Open Government Guide Tennessee - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-09.
  55. ↑ "Open Government Guide Texas - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  56. ↑ "Open Government Guide Utah - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  57. ↑ "Vermont State Archives & Records Administration". Vermont Secretary of State. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  58. ↑ "Open Government Guide Virginia - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  59. ↑ "Open Government Guide Washington - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  60. ↑ McGraw, Jr., Darrell V. (2011). "The West Virginia Freedom of Information Act" (PDF). Retrieved March 9, 2023.
  61. ↑ "Open Government Guide Wisconsin - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-06.
  62. ↑ "Open Government Guide Wyoming - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-09.
  63. ↑ Office of Open Government. "Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)". Open DC. Retrieved March 3, 2023.
  64. ↑ "Open Government Guide District of Columbia - Reporters Committee". The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. Retrieved 2023-03-05.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.