Garlock Sealing Technologies

Last updated
Garlock Sealing Technologies
Company typeSubsidiary of Enpro
Industry Manufacturing
Founded Palmyra, New York, US (1887)
FounderOlin J. Garlock
Headquarters
Palmyra, New York
,
US
ProductsGasketing, Klozure Dynamic Seals, Hydraulic Components, Expansion Joints, Compression Packing
Website www.garlock.com

Garlock Sealing Technologies is a subsidiary of Enpro Company that produces sealing products. Garlock has a global presence, with 1,887 employees, at 14 facilities, in twelve countries. [1]

Contents

History

In the later nineteenth century, Olin J. Garlock devised a better way to seal piston rods in industrial steam engines. The invention led to the creation of Garlock Sealing Technologies. Founded in 1887, in Palmyra, New York. For a detailed history of Garlock from its founding in 1887 until the takeover by Colt Industries in 1976, see Garlock - The First Eighty-Eight Years 1887-1975, written by Robert M. Waples and son. (Waples was President then Chairman 1955-1960)

Industries

Garlock provides fluid sealing solutions for the following industries: petrochemical, chemical processing, and refining, pulp and paper, power generation, electronics, steel mills, food and pharmaceutical, mining and original equipment manufacturers.

Patented products

Some of Garlock's sealing products include KLOZURE oil seals, bearing isolators and mechanical seals; GYLON gasketing, CEFIL'AIR pneumatic seals and HELICOFLEX metal seals; sheet rubber products, valve and pump packing, hydraulic seals, molded rubber products, expansion joints, butterfly valves, LubriKup oil seals, pump diaphragms and THERMa-PUR high temperature material. Some of these products have US and International patent protection, including Australia. [2]

Partnerships and recent news

Litigation

Gore-Tex

In the 1970s, Garlock infringed W. L. Gore and Associates patents and was sued by Gore in the Federal District Court of Ohio. After a "bitterly contested case" that "involved over two years of discovery, five weeks of trial, the testimony of 35 witnesses (19 live, 16 by deposition), and over 300 exhibits," (quoting the Federal Circuit) the District Court held Gore's patents to be invalid. On appeal, however, the Federal Circuit disagreed in the famous case of Gore v. Garlock, reversing the lower court's decision on the ground, inter alia, that Cropper forfeited any superior claim to the invention by virtue of having concealed the process for making ePTFE from the public, thereby establishing Gore as the legal inventor. [5]

Asbestos

Garlock has been subject to multiple lawsuits regarding asbestos, which were components of earlier products. Now, Garlock produces only asbestos free products. Some of the notable suits include:

References

  1. "Office Locations | Garlock". www.garlock.com. Retrieved 2018-06-26.
  2. "Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC patents in Australia". IP Australia. Retrieved 5 February 2014.
  3. "Bloomberg Politics - Bloomberg". Bloomberg News . Archived from the original on 2012-08-31.
  4. Real Estate Transactions Houston Chronicle
  5. Gore, supra. openjurist.org
  6. "Background Summaries and Attorney Contacts Week of May 29 - 31, 2007" (PDF). State of New York Court of Appeals. Archived from Reynolds v Amchem Products, Inc.%5d NY Court of Appeals the original on 7 March 2008.{{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  7. "Jury Awards Shipyard Worker's Widow $10M". Washington Post . Associated Press. July 27, 2006. Retrieved October 6, 2012.
  8. Virginia Family Recovers $9.25 Million in Mesothelioma Claim - Fayetteville Personal Injury Lawyer [ permanent dead link ]
  9. Fisher, Daniel (10 January 2014). "Judge Slashes Asbestos Liability In Garlock Bankruptcy To $125 Million". Personal Finance. Forbes. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
  10. Daneman, Matthew (22 July 2013). "Garlock Sealing asbestos trial begins today". Democrat and Chronicle. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
  11. Kim, T.K. (26 July 2013). "Federal judge closes portion of Garlock bankruptcy trial". Legal Newsline Legal Journal. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
  12. "ORDER ESTIMATING AGGREGATE LIABILITY" (PDF). UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. 10 January 2014. p. 3. Retrieved 4 February 2014.

See also