Gerald Friedman (economist)

Last updated
Gerald Friedman
Born (1955-07-10) July 10, 1955 (age 68)
Academic career
Institution University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Alma mater Harvard University
Columbia University

Gerald Carl Friedman (born July 10, 1955) [1] is an economics professor at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. [2] He became nationally prominent during the 2016 U.S. presidential election after writing an analysis of Democratic Party candidate Bernie Sanders campaign's policies in which Friedman concluded that these policies would produce significant economic growth in the United States (including 5.3% annual growth in real GDP) if they were enacted. [3] [4] Friedman also received strong backlash for these remarks, from editorial pundits and fellow academics.

Contents

Biography

Gerald Friedman earned his bachelor's degree in economics and history from Columbia University in 1977. Later, he went on to obtain his Ph.D. in economics from Harvard University in 1986, with his dissertation titled, "Politics and Unions: Government, Ideology, and the Labor Movement in the United States and France, 1880-1914." [5]

2016 Election

Report on Sanders's policies

In early February, an article was published on CNN Money that described the Sanders platform as boosting income and jobs. This article was based on the research performed by Gerald Friedman. [6] The article sparked debate among economists and political pundits alike in the aftermath.

Criticism

Friedman received criticism from four former Chairs of the Council of Economic Advisers under both Presidents Clinton and Obama. Their open letter ends with the following quote:

As much as we wish it were so, no credible economic research supports economic impacts of these magnitudes. Making such promises runs against our party’s best traditions of evidence-based policy making and undermines our reputation as the party of responsible arithmetic. These claims undermine the credibility of the progressive economic agenda and make it that much more difficult to challenge the unrealistic claims made by Republican candidates. [7]

According to a report in the Washington Post , the letter from the four former Chairs of The Council of Economic Advisers included an accusation that Professor Friedman was affiliated with the Sanders campaign. [8] [9] [10] [11] Later, Friedman revealed that he was in fact a supporter of Sanders's only opponent in the 2016 Democratic primaries, Hillary Clinton. [12]

In describing Friedman's economic analysis, Paul Krugman, a trade economist and laureate of the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences, has written, "Sorry, but there’s just no way to justify this stuff. For wonks like me, it is, frankly, horrifying." Krugman criticized the GDP growth projection, and claimed that the projection of the US employment-population ratio is unrealistic given population aging. [13]

A critique by Christina Romer and David Romer argued that Friedman's analysis relied on incorrect estimates of the effects on aggregate demand, is in conflict with the plausible size of the US output gap, and that Sanders's policies would have a small, or negative, effect on productivity. [11]

Support

Dean Baker, lead economist from the Center for Economic and Policy Research, agreed that the findings by Gerald Friedman were on the extreme side of possibility, he noted that the four economists from the CEA were blindsided by many economic disasters in the past decades and relied too heavily on their credentials without substantiating why they did not support Gerald Friedman's economic findings on Sanders's policies. [14] In a separate post, Baker criticized Krugman's comment that "every serious progressive policy expert on either health care or financial reform who has weighed in on the primary seems to lean Hillary" and called into question the track-record of the so-called experts, saying, "Given their track record, the public has some cause for skepticism when being told that the experts all line up behind a particular candidate (which happens not to be true)." [15]

James K. Galbraith, an economist from the University of Texas at Austin, wrote a letter that rebutted the critiques of Friedman's analysis. He defended the plausibility of 5.3% GDP growth using the example of the Reagan tax cuts, and defended Friedman's assumptions about the fiscal multiplier. He wrote: "It is not fair or honest to claim that Professor Friedman's methods are extreme. On the contrary, with respect to forecasting method, they are largely mainstream. Nor is it fair or honest to imply that you have given Professor Friedman's paper a rigorous review. You have not." [16]

Books

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Macroeconomics</span> Study of an economy as a whole

Macroeconomics is a branch of economics that deals with the performance, structure, behavior, and decision-making of an economy as a whole—for example, using interest rates, taxes, and government spending to regulate an economy's growth and stability. This includes regional, national, and global economies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recession</span> Business cycle contraction

In economics, a recession is a business cycle contraction that occurs when there is a general decline in economic activity. Recessions generally occur when there is a widespread drop in spending. This may be triggered by various events, such as a financial crisis, an external trade shock, an adverse supply shock, the bursting of an economic bubble, or a large-scale anthropogenic or natural disaster.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reaganomics</span> Economic policies of Ronald Reagan

Reaganomics, or Reaganism, were the neoliberal economic policies promoted by U.S. President Ronald Reagan during the 1980s. These policies are characterized as supply-side economics, trickle-down economics, or "voodoo economics" by opponents, while Reagan and his advocates preferred to call it free-market economics.

An economist is a professional and practitioner in the social science discipline of economics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protectionism</span> Economic policy of restraining trade between states through government regulations

Protectionism, sometimes referred to as trade protectionism, is the economic policy of restricting imports from other countries through methods such as tariffs on imported goods, import quotas, and a variety of other government regulations. Proponents argue that protectionist policies shield the producers, businesses, and workers of the import-competing sector in the country from foreign competitors. Opponents argue that protectionist policies reduce trade and adversely affect consumers in general as well as the producers and workers in export sectors, both in the country implementing protectionist policies and in the countries protected against.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supply-side economics</span> Macroeconomic theory

Supply-side economics is a macroeconomic theory that postulates economic growth can be most effectively fostered by lowering taxes, decreasing regulation, and allowing free trade. According to supply-side economics, consumers will benefit from greater supplies of goods and services at lower prices, and employment will increase. Supply-side fiscal policies are designed to increase aggregate supply, as opposed to aggregate demand, thereby expanding output and employment while lowering prices. Such policies are of several general varieties:

  1. Investments in human capital, such as education, healthcare, and encouraging the transfer of technologies and business processes, to improve productivity. Encouraging globalized free trade via containerization is a major recent example.
  2. Tax reduction, to provide incentives to work, invest and take risks. Lowering income tax rates and eliminating or lowering tariffs are examples of such policies.
  3. Investments in new capital equipment and research and development (R&D), to further improve productivity. Allowing businesses to depreciate capital equipment more rapidly gives them an immediate financial incentive to invest in such equipment.
  4. Reduction in government regulations, to encourage business formation and expansion.
<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Krugman</span> American economist (born 1953)

Paul Robin Krugman is an American economist who is the Distinguished Professor of Economics at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York and a columnist for The New York Times. In 2008, Krugman was the winner of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his contributions to New Trade Theory and New Economic Geography. The Prize Committee cited Krugman's work explaining the patterns of international trade and the geographic distribution of economic activity, by examining the effects of economies of scale and of consumer preferences for diverse goods and services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greg Mankiw</span> American economist

Nicholas Gregory Mankiw is an American macroeconomist who is currently the Robert M. Beren Professor of Economics at Harvard University. Mankiw is best known in academia for his work on New Keynesian economics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Bureau of Economic Research</span> American private nonprofit research organization

The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) is an American private nonprofit research organization "committed to undertaking and disseminating unbiased economic research among public policymakers, business professionals, and the academic community". The NBER is known for providing start and end dates for recessions in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daron Acemoglu</span> Turkish-American economist

Kamer Daron Acemoğlu is a Turkish-born American economist who has taught at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) since 1993. He is currently the Elizabeth and James Killian Professor of Economics at MIT. He was named Institute Professor in 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen Moore (writer)</span> American writer and economic commentator

Stephen Moore is an American conservative writer and television commentator on economic issues. He co-founded and served as president of the Club for Growth from 1999 to 2004. Moore is a former member of the Wall Street Journal editorial board. He worked at The Heritage Foundation from 1983 to 1987 and again since 2014. Moore advised Herman Cain's 2012 presidential campaign and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heather Boushey</span> American economist (born 1970)

Heather Marie Boushey is an American economist. Boushey currently serves as a member of President Joe Biden's Council of Economic Advisers. She also serves as the Chief Economist for the Invest in America Cabinet at the White House. She previously was the president and CEO of the Washington Center for Equitable Growth. She has also worked as an economist at the Center for American Progress and the United States Congress Joint Economic Committee.

Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium modeling is a macroeconomic method which is often employed by monetary and fiscal authorities for policy analysis, explaining historical time-series data, as well as future forecasting purposes. DSGE econometric modelling applies general equilibrium theory and microeconomic principles in a tractable manner to postulate economic phenomena, such as economic growth and business cycles, as well as policy effects and market shocks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tomas J. Philipson</span> Swedish-American economist

Tomas J. Philipson is a Swedish-born American economist who served as the Acting Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers in the Trump administration. He departed from the position and the Council at the end of June, 2020, to return to the University of Chicago. He holds the Daniel Levin Chair in Public Policy at the University of Chicago, with posts in the Harris School of Public Policy Studies, Department of Economics, and the Law School. He was a Director of the Becker Friedman Institute at the university.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christina Romer</span> Economist

Christina Duckworth Romer is the Class of 1957 Garff B. Wilson Professor of Economics at the University of California, Berkeley and a former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers in the Obama administration. She resigned from her role on the Council of Economic Advisers on September 3, 2010.

David Hibbard Romer is an American economist, the Herman Royer Professor of Political Economy at the University of California, Berkeley, and the author of a standard textbook in graduate macroeconomics as well as many influential economic papers, particularly in the area of New Keynesian economics. He is also the husband and close collaborator of Council of Economic Advisers former Chairwoman Christina Romer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Depression of 1920–1921</span> Sharp deflationary recession

The Depression of 1920–1921 was a sharp deflationary recession in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries, beginning 14 months after the end of World War I. It lasted from January 1920 to July 1921. The extent of the deflation was not only large, but large relative to the accompanying decline in real product.

In macroeconomics, particularly in the history of economic thought, the Treasury view is the assertion that fiscal policy has no effect on the total amount of economic activity and unemployment, even during times of economic recession. This view was most famously advanced in the 1930s by the staff of the British Chancellor of the Exchequer. The position can be characterized as:

Any increase in government spending necessarily crowds out an equal amount of private spending or investment, and thus has no net impact on economic activity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of macroeconomic thought</span>

Macroeconomic theory has its origins in the study of business cycles and monetary theory. In general, early theorists believed monetary factors could not affect real factors such as real output. John Maynard Keynes attacked some of these "classical" theories and produced a general theory that described the whole economy in terms of aggregates rather than individual, microeconomic parts. Attempting to explain unemployment and recessions, he noticed the tendency for people and businesses to hoard cash and avoid investment during a recession. He argued that this invalidated the assumptions of classical economists who thought that markets always clear, leaving no surplus of goods and no willing labor left idle.

Market monetarism is a school of macroeconomic thought that advocates that central banks target the level of nominal income instead of inflation, unemployment, or other measures of economic activity, including in times of shocks such as the bursting of the real estate bubble in 2006, and in the financial crisis that followed. In contrast to traditional monetarists, market monetarists do not believe monetary aggregates or commodity prices such as gold are the optimal guide to intervention. Market monetarists also reject the New Keynesian focus on interest rates as the primary instrument of monetary policy. Market monetarists prefer a nominal income target due to their twin beliefs that rational expectations are crucial to policy, and that markets react instantly to changes in their expectations about future policy, without the "long and variable lags" postulated by Milton Friedman.

References

  1. "Friedman, Gerald, 1955-". LC Name Authority File. Library of Congress . Retrieved 24 April 2020.
  2. "Gerald Friedman". U. Mass. Amherst: Department of Economics, Faculty.
  3. Friedman, Gerald (January 28, 2016). "What would Sanders do? Estimating the economic impact of Sanders programs" (PDF). Dollarsandsense.org.
  4. Matthews, Chris (18 February 2016). "Meet the Man Who Says Bernie Sanders Can Deliver 5.3% Economic Growth". Fortune . Retrieved 9 June 2016.
  5. Friedman, Gerald (June 9, 1985). Politics and unions: government, ideology and the labor movement in the United States and France, 1880-1914. OCLC   18276810 via Open WorldCat.
  6. Luhby, Tami (February 8, 2016). "Under Sanders, income and jobs would soar, economist says". CNN Money . Retrieved 2019-04-20.
  7. Krueger, Alan; Goolsbee, Austan; Romer, Christina; Tyson, Laura D’Andrea (February 17, 2016). "An Open Letter from Past CEA Chairs to Senator Sanders and Professor Gerald Friedman" . Retrieved 2019-05-08.
  8. Tankersley, Jim (February 18, 2016). "Top Democratic economists just launched a brutal attack on Bernie Sanders". Washington Post (blog).
  9. Johnson, Dave (February 23, 2016). "The Sanders "Economic Plan" Controversy: Economist Gerald Friedman did an analysis of Senator Bernie Sanders's plan suggesting it would produce significant growth in the economy – and then a group of left-leaning economists flipped out". Moyers & Company.
  10. Drum, Kevin (February 26, 2016). "Gerald Friedman's Analysis of the Sanders Spending Plan Just Took a Hit Below the Waterline". Mother Jones .
  11. 1 2 Romer, Christina D.; Romer, David H. (February 25, 2016). "Senator Sanders's Proposed Policies and Economic Growth" (PDF). Retrieved 2019-05-08.
  12. Tankersley, Jim (February 18, 2016). "The economist who vouched for Bernie Sanders' big liberal plans is voting for Hillary Clinton". Washington Post.
  13. Krugman, Paul (February 19, 2016). "Varieties of Voodoo". New York Times. Retrieved 2019-04-20.
  14. Baker, Dean (February 19, 2016). "The Four Economists' Big Letter". The Huffington Post . Retrieved 2016-10-10.
  15. Baker, Dean (January 31, 2016). "Paul Krugman, Bernie Sanders, and the Experts". Center for Economic and Policy Research . Retrieved 2016-10-10.
  16. Galbraith, James K. (February 18, 2016). "Response to 'An Open Letter from Past CEA Chairs to Senator Sanders and Professor Gerald Friedman'" (PDF). Dollarsandsense.org. Retrieved 2019-05-08.
  17. Friedman, Gerald (June 9, 1998). State-making and labor movements: France and the United States, 1876-1914. Cornell University Press. OCLC   39756672 via Open WorldCat.