Greater Essex Combined County Authority | |
|---|---|
 Area covered by the proposed Greater Essex Combined County Authority | |
| Type | |
| Type | |
| History | |
| Founded | April 2026 (planned) |
| Leadership | |
Mayor | TBD |
| Elections | |
| Directly elected mayor | |
Next election | 2 May 2026 |
The Greater Essex Combined County Authority (GECCA) or simply the Greater Essex Combined Authority (GECA) is a proposed combined county authority for the ceremonial county of Essex, also known as Greater Essex, in the East of England. [a]
Historically, the entire ceremonial county of Essex was administered by Essex County Council in a two-tier system with lower tier district councils. This system continues in most of the county today, but in 1998 the districts of Thurrock and Southend-on-Sea were granted unitary authority status, making them administratively independent from the county council. [1] [2] Essex Police and the Essex County Fire and Rescue Service continued to cover the entire county after 1998. [3] [4] In 2012, the elected county-wide position of Essex Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner was introduced. [b] The three upper-tier authorities of Essex have also continued to work together on different issues since 1998. [2]
Since 1999, the UK Government has devolved powers to local parliaments, assemblies, authorities and mayors in the nations and regions of the UK. [5] [6] In 2009, it introduced combined authorities which can be formed by volunteering groups of local authorities in England, to which the government can devolve powers to. In 2023, the similar combined county authority was also introduced. Both authorities can be led by directly elected mayors, or can be led by a body indirectly appointed by their member authorities. [7]
After the 2014 Scottish independence referendum, the coalition government of David Cameron pledged to devolve powers to city regions in England by negotiating devolution deals with local councils to form combined authorities. [8] [9] In September 2014, Essex County Council leader David Finch called on the government to explore establishing combined authorities for counties like Essex, with the devolution of tax raising powers, funding for social services and other policy areas. [9] In November 2014, Finch and the leaders of the district councils in the county council area co-wrote a letter to the government which asked it to begin negotiations with council leaders across Essex to agree an Essex devolution deal, arguing that devolution would bring economic growth and other benefits to the county. [10]
Negotiations for an Essex devolution deal, or a Greater Essex devolution deal [11] as it also became known, [a] began in December 2014, with Essex County Council, Thurrock Council and Southend-on-Sea Borough Council discussing the formation of a Greater Essex Combined Authority (GECA) with the government. [12] [13] [14] Finch envisioned the combined authority being led by a county governor, who would have a role similar to the elected metro mayors of devolved city regions such as Greater London and Greater Manchester, though he was also willing to accept other arrangements if preferred by the government. [11] [15] All fifteen upper tier and lower tier councils in Essex registered their interest in the Greater Essex Combined Authority, though Colchester Borough Council, Thurrock Council and Southend-on-Sea Borough Council were reluctant to fully commit to the proposal because of financial concerns. [8] [16]
In January 2015, Thurrock Council and Southend-on-Sea Borough Council put forward a proposal of their own to create a South Essex Combined Authority [17] [18] or Essex Thameside Combined Authority, [19] which would run along the northern bank of the River Thames and include Thurrock and Southend and the district councils of Basildon, Rochford and Castle Point in the county council area, which would form a land bridge between the two unitary councils. [8] [16] Thurrock and Southend argued that these southern parts of Essex, which are mainly urban, constituted a distinct economic zone with few links to the mainly rural central and northern parts of the county. [17] [20] Thurrock Council leader John Kent and Southend-on-Sea Borough Council leader Ron Woodley claimed that their proposal was supported by local businesses, [21] while the district councils considered separating from the rest of Essex because of Essex County Council's policy of turning off the majority of street lights at night, which they opposed. [17] Kent and Woodley continued to work with Essex County Council on the Greater Essex proposal despite their public preference for South Essex, as they believed they could negotiate benefits for the south of the county in a Greater Essex devolution deal. [22]
Work on both proposals continued into 2016. In March of that year, Kent and Woodley announced that their councils were withdrawing their support for the Greater Essex Combined Authority, again stating their belief that South Essex was a distinct economic zone from the rest of the county, while also voicing new concerns that the Greater Essex deal would give their areas a lack of autonomy, which they warned would stifle economic growth. The leaders also said they had been unable to secure benefits for the south of Essex in their discussions with the county council. In response, Finch said the county council could explore an Essex devolution deal without Thurrock and Southend. [22]
After the local elections in May 2016, Conservative minority administrations took power in Southend and Thurrock. [23] [24] In Southend, the new Conservative leader John Lamb expressed his support for negotiating a county-wide devolution deal with the government. [25] However, Thurrock Council's new leader Rob Gledhill continued his predecessor's policy of opposing a "pan-Essex" devolution deal, as he believed a South Essex deal could be more beneficial for the region. [26] In June 2016, the fifteen councils leaders of Essex met to vote on a devolution settlement offered by the government, which would include a county-wide mayoral devolution deal for Essex. The deal was narrowly voted down by eight to seven votes, after Gledhill voted against the offer because he believed that this was in the best interests of southern Essex. [26] The Conservative government of David Cameron refused to support a devolution deal which did not include the entire county, and the devolution negotiations were abandoned. [27]
After the collapse of the negotiations, Essex County Council and the southern district councils of Castle Point, Rochford, Basildon and also Brentwood, which was not part of the proposed South Essex Combined Authority, agreed to form the Association of South Essex Local Authorities with Southend and Thurrock. However, the councils agreed not to pursue any devolution deals so they could instead focus on cooperating in the existing framework of local government to encourage economic growth. [27]
{{cite press release}}: CS1 maint: others (link)