Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance

Last updated

Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance
Convention of 23 November 2007 on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance
Hague Child Support Convention.svg
  Parties
  Signatories that did not ratify
  Party (treaty not entered into force)
Signed23 November 2007
Location The Hague, The Netherlands
Effective1 January 2013
ConditionRatification by 2 states
Signatories18 [1] [2]
Parties25 covering 49 countries
Depositary Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Netherlands)
LanguagesEnglish and French

The Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance, also referred to as the Hague Maintenance Convention or the Hague Child Support Convention is a multilateral treaty governing the enforcement of judicial decisions regarding child support (and other forms of family support) extraterritorially. It is one of a number of conventions in the area of private international law of the Hague Conference on Private International Law in 2007. The convention is open to all states as well as to Regional Economic Integration Organizations as long as they are composed of sovereign states only and have sovereignty in (part of) the content of the convention. The convention entered into force on 1 January 2013 between Norway and Albania, with Bosnia-Herzegovina (2013), Ukraine (2013), the European Union (2014, except with respect to Denmark), Montenegro (2017), United States (2017), Turkey (2017), Kazakhstan (2017), Brazil (2017), Honduras (2017), Belarus (2018), Guyana (2020), Nicaragua (2020), United Kingdom (2021), [lower-alpha 1] Serbia (2021), New Zealand (2021), Ecuador (2022), Botswana (2022), Philippines (2022), Azerbaijan (2023) and Canada (2023 for British Columbia, Manitoba and Ontario) following suit. Because the EU acceptance of the convention applies in 26 EU countries (all except Denmark), the convention applies in 47 countries worldwide.

Contents

Forms of maintenance

Three forms of maintenance form the core of the convention and are defined in article 2:

  1. obligations towards children below the age of 21 (or 18, if a reservation is made)
  2. spousal support in a case linked to child support
  3. spousal support (with limited governmental assistance in obtaining results)

A country can further declare to apply the convention to other forms of family maintenance: "any maintenance obligation arising from a family relationship, parentage, marriage or affinity, including in particular obligations in respect of vulnerable persons". Such a wider scope is only valid between two member states if both have an increase to scope.

Procedure

States Parties are to establish a Central Authority for the convention. The Authority in the country of residence of the requester is the authority through which requests for enforcement of judicial or administrative decisions can be made, while the authority in the country to which the request is lodged should provide further -free- help with the application. As the convention is based on enforcement of judicial decisions, the merit of the decision itself may not be taken into account. The request should include the decision as well as proof that the "respondent had proper notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be heard, or that the respondent had proper notice of the decision and the opportunity to challenge or appeal it on fact and law". The receiving authority is required to actively enforce the decisions by means which are at least as effective as those used when enforcing decisions within that country. They may include withholding of wages or social security payments or garnishments from bank accounts. Also public bodies may request enforcement if they are eligible to receive payments because one of the parties has made a claim to public funds.

States parties

Signature of Bosnia-Herzegovina by Safet Halilovic, Minister of human rights and refugees ChildSupportSig.jpeg
Signature of Bosnia-Herzegovina by Safet Halilović, Minister of human rights and refugees

The convention entered into force on 1 January 2013 following ratification by two states: Albania and Norway. For Bosnia-Herzegovina and Ukraine, the convention entered into force one later in 2013. The European Union became a party in 2014 as a Regional Economic Integration Organization. Because the subject matter of the convention fully falls within EU competency, the EU rather than the individual member states became a party. The convention is applicable to all 27 member states except Denmark and only applies to those territories that form part of the European Union. Also the UK was covered by the European Union territory with regards to this convention until 1 January 2021 (the end of the transition period, when it became a member itself. In December 2015, and July 2016, Montenegro and Turkey respectively acceded to the convention, which entered into force for it on 1 January 2017 and February 2017 respectively, for those parties that have not objected to the accession. The convention entered into force for the US on 1 January 2017 following ratification in September 2016. The United States Senate approved the treaty in 2010, [3] and implementation legislation has been passed on a federal level (Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act, public law 113-183). Ratification could only take place after legislation at state level (UIFSA 2008) had been passed in 54 jurisdictions (the 50 states, DC, Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Guam), [4] which was done in March 2016. [5]

Signatories that did not ratify are Burkina Faso, Georgia and North Macedonia.

PartyEntry into ForceSpousal
Support
Support to adult
children until
other recognized support
Flag of Albania.svg  Albania 1 January 2013Yes check.svg21 (25, high school or university students)
Flag of Azerbaijan.svg  Azerbaijan 27 November 202418
Flag of Belarus.svg  Belarus 1 June 2018Red x.svg18
Flag of Botswana.svg  Botswana 16 November 2023
Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina.svg  Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 February 2013Red x.svg21
Flag of Brazil.svg  Brazil 1 November 2017Yes check.svgcollateral or direct kinship, or affinity, including vulnerable persons
Flag of Cape Verde.svg  Cabo Verde 12 January 2025Red x.svg
Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg  Canada (British Columbia, Ontario and Manitoba)1 February 2024Yes check.svg21vulnerable adult children; Entry into force for British Columbia: 1 March 2024
Flag of Ecuador.svg  Ecuador 2 July 2022
Flag of Europe.svg  European Union [lower-alpha 1] 1 August 2014Yes check.svg21
Flag of Guyana.svg  Guyana 7 March 2020
Flag of Honduras.svg  Honduras 19 October 2018Red x.svg
Flag of Kazakhstan.svg  Kazakhstan 14 June 2019Red x.svg
Flag of Kyrgyzstan (2023).svg  Kyrgyzstan 1 November 2024Red x.svg
Flag of Montenegro.svg  Montenegro 1 January 2017Red x.svgRed x.svg (reserves the right to limit to children under 18)
Flag of New Zealand.svg  New Zealand 1 November 2021Yes check.svg
Flag of Nicaragua.svg  Nicaragua 18 April 2020Red x.svg
Flag of Norway.svg  Norway 1 January 2013Yes check.svg21 (25 may be recognized)
Flag of Serbia.svg  Serbia 1 February 2021Children receiving regular education until the age of 26 as well as adult children incapable for work and lacking the funding to support themselves
Flag of Turkey.svg  Turkey 1 February 2017Yes check.svg21 (25 if education continues)mentally and physically disabled children (irrespective of age); and parents in need of care
Flag of Ukraine.svg  Ukraine 1 November 2013Red x.svg18 (23, students)incapacitated adults (from adult children, parents, siblings)
children raised by grand parents
Flag of the United Kingdom.svg  United Kingdom [lower-alpha 2] [lower-alpha 1] 1 January 2021Yes check.svg
Flag of the United States.svg  United States 1 January 2017Red x.svg

The convention does not apply between the United States and Kazakhstan, the United States and Guyana, and between the United States and Botswana, following the objection of the US to the accession those countries, as those countries did not provide information about their child support legislation and procedures in their country. [7] [8]

Relationship to other Conventions

The convention revises two Hague Conventions as well a United Nations convention relating to family support. When the convention is in force on the territories of members which are also parties to one of those conventions, the 2007 convention is applicable.

YearTitleStates covered
by 2007 convention
States not covered
by 2007 convention
1973Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions Relating to Maintenance Obligations213
1958Hague Convention concerning the recognition and enforcement of decisions relating to maintenance obligations towards children164
1956 United Nations Convention on the Recovery Abroad of Maintenance 3529

Protocol

Hague Maintenance Protocol
Protocol on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations
HagueMaintenanceProtocol.svg
  Parties
  Signatory that did not ratify
  Party (treaty not entered into force)
Signed23 November 2007
Location The Hague, The Netherlands
Effective1 August 2013
ConditionRatification by 2 states
Signatories8
Parties7, covering 31 countries
Flag of Brazil.svg  Brazil
Flag of Ecuador.svg  Ecuador
Flag of Europe.svg  European Union
(all 27 Member States, except Denmark)
Flag of Kazakhstan.svg  Kazakhstan
Flag of Serbia.svg  Serbia
Flag of Ukraine.svg  Ukraine
DepositaryGovernment of the Netherlands
LanguagesEnglish and French

Which law is applicable on maintenance obligations is not governed by the conventions but by a protocol concluded on the same day. In 2010, it was ratified by the European Union, which declared it had competence over all matters concerning the protocol with regards to all its member states except for Denmark and the United Kingdom. It applied the Protocol since 2011 provisionally, also between its member states within the Maintenance regulation. Serbia has ratified the Protocol on 10 April 2013, leading to entry into force of the convention on 1 August 2013. Afterwards Kazakhstan (2016), Brazil (2017), Ecuador (2022) and Ukraine (2022) became parties. Albania, Georgia and North Macedonia have signed the convention, but did not ratify it.

Applicable law

The applicable law that is determined by the convention is not restricted to the laws of the parties to the convention: it is therefore possible that a law of a non-state party is chosen. As a general rule, the law of the habitual residence of the creditor (the person obtaining maintenance) habitual residence applies. In cases of parents towards their children, children towards their parents, and persons regarding young persons (under 21, and if there is no spousal relationship) the following 3 laws are considered in a so-called cascade:

  1. Law of the debtor (general rule under the convention), but if that leads to no maintenance
  2. Law of the forum, and if that leads to no maintenance:
  3. Law of the common nationality

If the court seized is the debtor's habitual residence, the first two applicable laws are reversed leading to the following cascade:

  1. Law of the forum (the law of the debtor's habitual residence), but if that leads to no maintenance
  2. Law of the creditor (general rule under the convention), and if that leads to no maintenance:
  3. Law of the common nationality

In the cases of (former) spouses, either party may object to the use of the law of the creditor's habitual residence, instead using the law which as a closer connection with the marriage if "the law of another State, in particular the State of their last common habitual residence, has a closer connection with the marriage". In cases where both parties share a nationality and the law of that nationality as well as the law of the debtor's habitual residence would not lead to maintenance, a debtor may also contest to use of the law of the creditor's habitual residence, provided it is not a case relating to child support. In cases not concerning child support (for children below 18) or vulnerable adults, both parties may choose the law governing the maintenance, choosing from:

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 The convention applied to the UK as part of the European Union until Brexit on 1 February 2020, and until 1 January 2021, the European Union membership still encompassed the United Kingdom for this convention. The accession of the UK as a party in its own right, deposited on 2 January 2019, was first suspended and finally retracted on 30 January. The UK ratified the convention on 28 September 2020 with entry into force on 1 January 2021 [6]
  2. Including Gibraltar

Related Research Articles

The European Convention on Nationality was signed in Strasbourg on 6 November 1997. It is a comprehensive convention of the Council of Europe dealing with the law of nationality. The convention is open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and the non-member States which have participated in its elaboration and for accession by other non-member States. The Convention came into force on 1 March 2000 after ratification by 3 countries. As of 2021, the convention has been signed by 29 countries and ratified by 21 of those countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hague Conference on Private International Law</span> International organization

The Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) is an intergovernmental organisation in the area of private international law, that administers several international conventions, protocols and soft law instruments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction</span> 1980 multilateral treaty

The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction or Hague Abduction Convention is a multilateral treaty that provides an expeditious method to return a child who was wrongfully taken by a parent from one country to another country. In order for the Convention to apply, both countries must be Contracting States; i.e. both must have adopted the Convention.

In modern society, the role of marriage and its termination through divorce have become political issues. As people live increasingly mobile lives, the conflict of laws and its choice of law rules are highly relevant to determine:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brussels Regime</span> Rules regulating jurisdiction of courts

The Brussels Regime is a set of rules regulating which courts have jurisdiction in legal disputes of a civil or commercial nature between individuals resident in different member states of the European Union (EU) and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA). It has detailed rules assigning jurisdiction for the dispute to be heard and governs the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.

In conflict of laws, habitual residence is the standard used to determine the law which should be applied to determine a given legal dispute or entitlement. It can be contrasted with the law on domicile, traditionally used in common law jurisdictions to do the same thing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hague Trust Convention</span> 1985 treaty on international trust law

The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Trusts and on their Recognition, or Hague Trust Convention is a multilateral treaty developed by the Hague Conference on Private International Law on the Law Applicable to Trusts. It concluded on 1 July 1985, entered into force 1 January 1992, and is as of September 2017 ratified by 14 countries. The Convention uses a harmonised definition of a trust, which is the subject of the convention, and sets conflict rules for resolving problems in the choice of the applicable law. The key provisions of the Convention are:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations 1980</span> Choice of law in contract disputes

The Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations 1980, or the "Rome Convention", is a measure in private international law or conflict of laws which creates a common choice of law system in contracts within the European Union. The convention determines which law should be used, but does not harmonise the substance. It was signed in Rome, Italy on 19 June 1980 and entered into force in 1991.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hague Convention on Parental Responsibility and Protection of Children</span>

The Hague Convention on parental responsibility and protection of children, or Hague Convention 1996, officially Convention of 19 October 1996 on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children or Hague Convention 1996 is a convention of the Hague Conference on Private International Law. It covers civil measures of protection concerning children, ranging from orders concerning parental responsibility and contact to public measures of protection or care, and from matters of representation to the protection of children's property. It is therefore much broader in scope than two earlier conventions of the HCCH on the subject.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness</span> 1961 United Nations multilateral treaty

The Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness is a 1961 United Nations multilateral treaty whereby sovereign states agree to reduce the incidence of statelessness. The Convention was originally intended as a Protocol to the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, while the 1954 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons was adopted to cover stateless persons who are not refugees and therefore not within the scope of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International child abduction in Japan</span>

International child abduction in Japan refers to the illegal international abduction or removal of children from their country of habitual residence by an acquaintance or family member to Japan or their retention in Japan in contravention to the law of another country. Most cases involve a Japanese parent taking their children to Japan in defiance of visitation or joint custody orders issued by Western courts. The issue is a growing problem as the number of international marriages increases. Parental abduction often has a particularly devastating effect on parents who may never see their children again.

International matrimonial law is an area of private international law. The area specifically deals with relations between spouses and former spouses on issues of marriage, divorce and child custody. In the last 50 years, the States Members of the Hague Conference on Private International Law have attempted to harmonize domestic matrimonial laws and judicial rulings across international borders in these areas.

The term international child abduction is generally synonymous with international parental kidnapping,child snatching, and child stealing.

The Convention of 1961 Concerning the Powers of Authorities and the Law Applicable in Respect of the Protection of Infants, French: Convention du 5 octobre 1961 concernant la compétence des autorités et la loi applicable en matière de protection des mineurs, or Hague Protection of Minors Convention is a multilateral convention of the Hague Conference on Private International Law. The 1961 Convention emphasized the concept of the "interests of the child" as a basis for authorities of the child's nationality to overrule the authorities of the child's habitual residence. It built upon prior efforts to create successful multilateral treaties and brought an innovation in terminology by creating a compromise between advocates of "nationality" as the determining factor for jurisdiction and advocates for the modern fact-centric model of "habitual residence." The convention also included expanded language to encompass both judicial and administrative authorities in response to the Boll case. Of particularly special note, the drafters of the 1961 Convention expressly considered a provision addressing the removal of a child from their habitual residence with an intent to evade rightful jurisdiction—primarily for child custody reasons. This first attempt to codify international child abduction failed due to an inability to agree on a definition or manner of describing the phenomenon, with a number of countries that adhered to the principle of nationality regulating personal child and family law unable to classify their nationals removing children from foreign countries to their home state as illegal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brussels II</span>

Brussels II Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, which came into force on 1 March 2001, sets out a system for the allocation of jurisdiction and the reciprocal enforcement of judgments between European Union Member States and was modelled on the 1968 Brussels Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters. It was intended to regulate domains that were excluded from the Brussels Convention and Brussels I. The Brussels II Regulation deals with conflict of law issues in family law between member states; in particular those related to divorce and child custody. The Regulation seeks to facilitate free movement of divorce and related judgments between Member States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hague Divorce Convention</span> 1970 multilateral treaty

The Hague Divorce Convention, officially Convention on the Recognition of Divorces and Legal Separations is a convention concluded by the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH). It regulates the recognition of divorces and legal separations provided they have been performed according to the correct legal process in the state where the divorce was obtained. Not all divorces need to be recognized under the convention. Only those divorces obtained in a state where ;

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maintenance regulation</span> Regulation of EU, determining which court has jurisdiction in the event of a conflict

The Maintenance Regulation (EC) No 4/2009, formally the Council Regulation (EC) on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations, is a European Union Regulation on conflict of law issues regarding maintenance obligations. The regulation governs which courts have jurisdiction and which law it should apply. It further governs the recognition and enforcement of decisions. The regulation amends the Brussels Regulation, which covers jurisdiction in legal disputes of a civil or commercial nature between individuals more broadly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hague Choice of Court Convention</span>

The Hague choice of court convention, formally the Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements, is an international treaty concluded within the Hague Conference on Private International Law. It was concluded in 2005, and entered into force on 1 October 2015. The European Union, Denmark, Mexico, Singapore, Ukraine and the United Kingdom are parties to the convention. Albania, China, Israel, North Macedonia and the United States signed the convention, but did not ratify.

Surrogacy is legal in New Zealand if it is performed altruistically, where the surrogate donates her services selflessly, without any compensation beyond the coverage of expenses. Commercial surrogacy, where the surrogate is paid in addition to the coverage of expenses, is not legal. There is a lack of specific legislation and regulations dealing with surrogacy, though the recent increase in surrogacy cases has led to a number of amendments. New Zealand is party to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, and ratified it in April 1993. The primary principle of this convention is that the best interests of the child are paramount, which must then encompass all surrogacy agreements and regulations. The lack of clear surrogacy legislation in New Zealand has led to many couples engaging in reproductive tourism in order to ensure the surrogacy is successful. This has the potential to significantly impact the human rights of all of the parties involved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hague Judgments Convention</span> International treaty

The Hague Judgments Convention, formally the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters is an international treaty concluded within the Hague Conference on Private International Law. It was concluded in 2019, and entered into force on 1 September 2023 for the European Union and Ukraine. The convention governs the recognition of judgements in civil and commercial matters.

References

  1. "38: Convention of 23 November 2007 on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance". HCCH. 15 June 2011. Retrieved 7 July 2011.
  2. "Bosnië-Herzegovina ondertekent Haags Verdrag Levensonderhoud-inning" (in Dutch). Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Netherlands). 6 July 2011. Retrieved 7 July 2011.
  3. "Treaties, 110th Congress (2007 - 2008), 110-21". THOMAS (library of Congress). Archived from the original on 14 December 2012. Retrieved 21 June 2013.
  4. "H.R.1896 - International Child Support Recovery Improvement Act of 2013". THOMAS (Library of Congress. 19 June 2013. Retrieved 23 June 2013.
  5. "UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT 2008 AMENDMENTS NOW ENACTED NATIONWIDE". Uniform Law Commission. Retrieved 25 March 2016.
  6. "DECLARATION/RESERVATION/NOTIFICATION". Hague Conference on Private International Law . 1 April 2019. Retrieved 2 April 2019.
  7. "U.S. Objection to Accession of Kazakhstan to Hague Convention". www.acf.hhs.gov. Retrieved 28 February 2023.
  8. "U.S. Objection to Accession of Guyana to Hague Convention". www.acf.hhs.gov. Retrieved 28 February 2023.