Hajnal line

The line in red is Hajnal's. The dark blue lines show areas of high nuptiality west of the Hajnal line

The Hajnal line is an imaginary line ^{[1] [2] [3] [4]} that is drawn between Saint Petersburg, Russia, and Trieste, Italy.

In 1965, John Hajnal hypothesized that it divides Europe into two areas characterized by different levels of nuptiality. According to Hajnal, to the west of the line, marriage rates and thus fertility were comparatively low, and a significant minority of women married late or remained single; to the east of the line and in the Mediterranean and select pockets of Northwestern Europe, early marriage was the norm and high fertility was countered by high mortality. ^{[5] [6]}

In the 20th century, Hajnal's observations were assumed as valid by a wide variety of sociologists. However, since the early 21st century, his theory has been routinely criticized and rejected by scholars. Hajnal and other researchers did not have access to, or underplayed ^[7] nuptiality research from behind the Iron Curtain which contradict their observations on central and eastern Europeans. ^{[8] [9]} Though some sociologists have called to revise or reject the concept of a "Hajnal line," other scientists continue to cite Hajnal’s research on the influence of western European marriage patterns. ^{[10] [11] [12]}

Although John Hajnal himself was stridently anti-fascist and a survivor of the Jewish holocaust, his theory has been warmly received and heavily promoted by Neo-Nazis, and the alt-right. ^{[13] [14]}

The idea itself has its roots in earlier theories of the racial inferiority of Slavic people. Nazi anthropologist Werner Conze is credited with the earliest development of what would later be called the "Hajnal line". Werner Conze's work directly influenced the decision makers responsible for the Holocaust and the associated mass murder of millions of Slavic civilians in German-occupied territory during World War 2.

Origins

The earliest conception of the theory was created by Werner Conze, a Nazi anthropologist. ^[15] He refined the racist ideas of his mentor, Gunther Ipsen, as well others, who sought to link racial attributes like skin color and ethnicity to marriage patterns. ^[16] His deeply flawed ^[17] analysis of Baltic nuptiality data left an impression on decision makers in the German military, convincing them of the latent racial inferiority and alienness of Slavic people. Since the 1990s, Werner Conze's influence has been linked by German scholars to the mass murder of millions of Slavic civilians during the German occupation of central and eastern European countries. ^{[18] [19] [20] [21]}

Overview

West of this line, the average age of marriage for women was 23 or older, ^[22] men 26, spouses were relatively close in age, ^[23] a substantial number of women married for the first time in their thirties and forties, and 10% to 20% of adults never married. ^{[24] [25] [26]} East of the line, the mean age of both sexes at marriage was earlier, spousal age disparity was greater and marriage more nearly universal. This phenomenon has been described as the 'Western European marriage pattern'. ^[27] Historical demographers have also noted that there are significant variations within the region; to the west of the line, about half of all women aged 15 to 50 years of age were married while the other half were widows or had never married; to the east of the line, about seventy percent of women in that age bracket were married while the other thirty percent were widows or nuns. ^[28] That a number of widows remarried also kept the age of marriage comparatively high; ^[29] if women married for the first time at 21 years of age and twenty percent of all weddings featured a widowed bride and the average age of remarriage was forty years then the average marriage age for women would be 24.8 years: (21 × 0.8) + (40 × 0.2) = 24.8. ^[30] The proportion of marriages that were remarriages (widows and/or widowers marrying again) in the late 1500s was as high as thirty percent; that proportion had fallen to just over eleven percent in the early 1800s. ^[31]

While the average age at first marriage had climbed to 25 for women and 27 for men in England and the Low Countries by the end of the 16th century, ^[32] and the percentage of Englishwomen marrying fell from over 90% to just over 80% through the 17th century and their average age at first marriage rose to 26, ^[33] there was nonetheless great variation within Western Europe; while Lowland Scotland saw patterns similar to England, with women married in the middle twenties after a period of domestic service, the high birth rate of Highland Scotland and the Hebrides imply a lower age of marriage for the bride. ^[34] Similarly, in 1620 the average age of first marriage for Swedish women was roughly 20 years and the proportion of single women was less than 10%, but by the end of the 18th century it had risen to roughly 26 years and continued to climb with the celibacy rate as a result of falling infant mortality rates, declining famines, and other factors. ^[35] Similarly, Ireland's age of marriage in 1830 was 23.8 for women and 27.5 for men where they had once been 21 and 25, respectively, and only about 10% of adults remained unmarried; ^[36] in 1840, they had respectively risen to 24.4 and 27.7; ^{[37] [38]} in the decades after the Great Famine, the age of marriage had risen to 28–29 for women and 33 for men and as much as a third of Irishmen and a fourth of Irishwomen never married due to chronic economic problems that discouraged early marriage. ^[39]

Effects

The Western European pattern of late and non-universal marriage restricted fertility massively, especially when it was coupled with very low levels of childbirth out of wedlock. Birth control took place by delaying marriage more than suppressing fertility within it. A woman's life-phase from menarche (generally reached on average at 14 years, at about 12 years for elite women) ^{[40] [41]} to the birth of her first child was unusually long, averaging ten years. ^{[42] [43]}

Economy

Class differences played a great role in when a couple could marry; the wealthier that a couple was, the likelier that they were to marry earlier. Noblewomen and gentlewomen married early, but they were a small minority; ^[44] a thousand marriage certificates issued by the Diocese of Canterbury between 1619 and 1660 show that only one bride was aged thirteen years, four were fifteen, twelve were sixteen, seventeen were seventeen, and the other 966 of the brides were aged nineteen years or older when they married for the first time. The church stipulated that both the bride and groom must be at least 21 years of age to marry without the consent of their families; the most common ages of marriage were 22 for women, 24 for men; the median ages were 22.8 for women and 25.5 for men; the average ages were 24 years for women and nearly 28 years for men. The youngest brides were nobility and gentry. ^[45]

The moderate rates of fertility, mortality, and marriage within the region were tied to the economy; when times were better, more people could afford to marry early and thus have more children and conversely more people delayed marriages (or remained unmarried) and bore fewer children when times were bad. This contrasts with societies outside of this region, where early marriage for both sexes was virtually universal and high fertility was counteracted by high mortality; ^[46] in the 15th century, a Tuscan woman 21 years of age would be seen as past marriageable age, the deadline for which was 19 years, and easily 97 percent of Florentine women were married by the age of 25 years while 21 years was the typical age of an English bride. ^[47]

Significance

The region's late marriage pattern has received considerable scholarly attention in part because it appears to be unique; it has not been found in any other part of the world prior to the 20th century. However, similar marriage patterns, with a high degree of female agency (as measured by the so-called 'female-friendliness index') have been documented in Mongolia, Japan, and parts of Southeast Asia. ^[48] The origins of the late marriage system are a matter of conjecture prior to the 16th century when the demographic evidence from family reconstitution studies makes the prevalence of the pattern clear; while evidence is scant, most English couples seemed to marry for the first time in their early twenties before the Black Death and afterward, when economic conditions were better, often married in their late teens. ^[49] Many historians have wondered whether this unique conjugal regime might explain, in part, why capitalism first took root in Northwestern Europe, contributing to the region's relatively low mortality rates, hastening the fragmentation of the peasantry and the precocious formation of a mobile class of landless wage-earners. Others have highlighted the significance of the late marriage pattern for gender relations, for the relative strength of women's position within marriage, the "conjugal" dowry system of Northwestern Europe in which the dowry merged with the husband's wealth and would thus grow or shrink depending on circumstances (perhaps an incentive for many women to work), ^[50] the centrality of widows in village land inheritance, and the vitality of women's community networks. ^[46]

See also

• Demographic transition

References

1. Population Studies, Issues 39-34. Strasbourg: The Council of Europe. 1976. "Hajnal (1965) outlined two marriage patterns that historically prevailed in Europe, geographically delineated by an imaginary line connecting Saint Petersburg and Trieste (referred to also as Hajnal's line)."
2. Lieberman, Julia (2010). Sephardi Family Life in the Early Modern Diaspora. Brandeis University Press. ISBN   978-1584659433. "John Hajnal published the revolutionary essay “European Marriage Patterns in Perspective,” which divided Europe along an imaginary line known as the “Hajnal line,” one that separated Eastern and Western Europe"
3. Bradatan, Cristina; Anderson (2012). "Guest Editor Comments". Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 43 (3). JSTOR   41604520. "although (for brevity) he calls it “European,” he defines it as being applicable only to the Northwestern Europe, west of an imaginary line connecting “Leningrad” (Saint Petersburg) to Trieste"
4. Piazzo, Pier Paolo (2017). "Mikolaj Szołtysek: Rethinking East Central Europe: Family Systems and Co-Residence in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth". "The existence of an imaginary line which ran down from St Petersburg to Trieste and neatly separated western and eastern European marriage and family patterns has been one of the basic tenets of historical demography and family history for half a century."
5. Hajnal, John (1965). "European marriage pattern in historical perspective". In Glass, D.V.; Eversley, D.E.C. (eds.). Population in History . London: Arnold.
6. Kertzer, David I.; Barbagli, Marzio (2001). The history of the European family . New Haven: Yale University Press. p. xiv.
7. Szołtysek 2012 "This tendency to underplay variations in family living arrangements in the European East was criticized even among Western scholars. As early as in 1990s, D. Kertzer argued that “eastern Europe, like western Europe, displayed a diversity of household systems in preindustrial times” which were linked to “regional differences in political economic arrangements and ecological conditions.”153"
8. Szołtysek, Mikołaj (2012). "Spatial construction of European family and household systems: a promising path or a blind alley? An Eastern European perspective". Continuity and Change. 27 (1): 11–52. doi:10.1017/S0268416012000057. ISSN   0268-4160. "This essay represents an attempt at a re-examination of the Western scientific evidence for the existence of the divergent ‘Eastern European family pattern’. This evidence is challenged by almost entirely unknown contributions of Eastern European scholars, revealing the stark incompatibility of the two discourses."
9. Angeli, Aurora (2019). "Book Review: Rethinking East-central Europe: Family Systems and Coresidence in the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth". Genus. 75. doi: 10.1186/s41118-018-0048-4 .
10. Piazzo 2017. sfn error: no target: CITEREFPiazzo_2017 (help)
11. Dennison, Tracy; Ogilvie, Sheilagh (2014). "Does the European Marriage Pattern Explain Economic Growth?". Cambridge University Press. 74 (3): 651–693. doi:10.1017/S0022050714000564. S2CID   8112005.
12. Henrich, Joseph (2020). The WEIRDest People in the World. Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.
13. Ferenc, Glatz (1983). East European Quarterly, Volume 17. Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado. pp. 31–40.
14. Hermansson, Patrik; Lawrence, David; Mulhall, Joe (2020). The International Alt-Right: Fascism for the 21st Century?. Taylor & Francis. ISBN   978-0429627095.
15. Melegh, Attila (2017). European Regions and Boundaries: A Conceptual History. Oxford: Berghahn Books. p. 310. ISBN   978-1785335853. "He was also creating the pathways toward the so-called Hajnal line, at least in the Baltic region. Conze was a follower and promoter of the “Ostforschung” in Nazi Germany, publishing his related thesis in 1940."
16. Fertig, Georg. "The Hajnal thesis before Hajnal: The pre-history of the European Marriage Pattern" (PDF). Universität Münster.
17. Szołtysek, Mikolaj; Goldstein, Barbara Zuber (2016). "Historical Family Systems and the Great European Divide: The Invention of the Slavic East". Demogràfia English Edition. 52 (5).
18. Dunkhase, Jan Eike (2010). Werner Conze: A German Historian in the 20th Century. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. ISBN   9783525370124.
19. "Historiker im Nationalsozialismus Geschichtswissenschaft und der "Volkstumskampf im Osten"". Hamburger Institut für Sozialforschung.
20. Haar, Ingo (2002). Historiker Im Nationalsozialismus: Deutsche Geschichtswissenschaft Und Der Volkstumskampf Im Osten (Kritische Studien zur Geschichtswissenschaft). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. ISBN   352535942X.
21. Heim, Susanne; Blunden, A.G.; Götz, Aly (2002). Architects of Annihilation: Auschwitz and the Logic of Destruction. Princeton University Press. ISBN   0691089388.
22. Levine, David (1977). Family Formation in an Age of Nascent Capitalism. Academic Press. p. 152. ISBN   978-0-12-445050-9.
23. Laslett, Peter (1965). The World We Have Lost. New York, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. p. 82.
24. Hajnal, John (1965). "European marriage pattern in historical perspective". In Glass, D. V.; Eversley, D.E.C. (eds.). Population in History . London: Arnold. pp.  101–143.
25. Coontz, Stephanie (2005). Marriage, a History: From Obedience to Intimacy, or How Love Conquered Marriage. New York, New York: Viking Press, Penguin Group. pp.  125–129. ISBN   978-0-670-03407-9.
26. De Moor, Tine; van Zanden, Jan Luiten (2010). "Girl power: the European marriage pattern and labour markets in the North Sea region in the late medieval and early modern period". The Economic History Review . 63 (1): 1–33 [p. 17]. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.2009.00483.x.
27. Lutz, Wolfgang; Scherbov, Sergei; Volkov, Andrei (1994). Demographic trends and patterns in the Soviet Union before 1991. London: Routledge. p. 55. ISBN   113485319X. "It is called the Western European marriage pattern (Hajnal, 1965)."
28. Kertzer 2001; 224–225
29. Bryson, Bill (2011). At Home: A Short History of Private Life. Anchor Press. p. 337. ISBN   978-0-552-77735-3.
30. Hajnal, 1965. pp. 108–109
31. Wrigley, E.A.; Schofield, R.S. (1981). The population history of England, 1541–1871: a reconstruction. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press. pp. 258–259. ISBN   978-0-674-69007-3.
32. De Moor, 2009; 17
33. Cressy, David (1997). Birth, Marriage, and Death : Ritual, Religion, and the Life-Cycle in Tudor and Stuart England. Oxford University Press. p.  285. ISBN   978-0-19-820168-7.
34. Lawrence, A. (2008). "Women in the British Isles in the sixteenth century". In Tittler, R.; Jones, N. (eds.). A Companion to Tudor Britain . Oxford: Blackwell John Wiley & Sons. p.  384. ISBN   978-1-4051-3740-9.
35. Palm, Lennart; Schott, Raphaëlle (2001). "Le changement caché du système démographique suédois à "l'Époque de la Grandeur"". Annales de Démographie Historique. 2 (102): 141–172. doi:10.3917/adh.102.0141.
36. Lee, Joseph J. (2008). The Modernization of Irish Society, 1848–1918. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan. p. 3. ISBN   978-0-7171-6031-0.
37. Mokyr, Joel (2013). Why Ireland Starved: A Quantitative and Analytical History of the Irish Economy, 1800–1850. Routledge Press. p. 72. ISBN   978-0-415-60764-3.
38. O'Neill, Kevin (2003). Family and Farm in Pre-Famine Ireland: The Parish of Killashandra. University of Wisconsin Press. p.  180. ISBN   978-0-299-09840-7.
39. Nolan, Janet (1989). Ourselves Alone: Women's Emigration from Ireland, 1885–1920. University Press of Kentucky. pp.  74–75. ISBN   978-0-8131-1684-6.
40. "Menarche". Mum.org.
41. Hajnal, John (1965). "European marriage pattern in historical perspective". In Glass, D.V.; Eversley, D.E.C. (eds.). Population in History . London: Arnold. p.  123.
42. Seccombe, Wally (1992). A Millennium of Family Change, Feudalism to Capitalism in Northwestern Europe . Verso. pp.  184–186. ISBN   9780860913320.
43. Amundsen, Darrel; Dreis, Carol Jean (1973). "The Age of Menarche in Medieval Europe". Human Biology . 45 (3): 363–369. JSTOR   41459883. PMID   4584336.
44. Coontz, Stephanie. 2005. pp. 125–129.
45. Laslett, Peter. 1965. p. 82
46. Kertzer, David I and Marzio Barbagli. 2001. p. xxii
47. De Moor, Tine and Jan Luiten van Zanden. 2009. pp. 17–18
48. Diebolt, Claude; Rijpma, Auke; Carmichael, Sarah; Dilli, Selin; Störmer, Charlotte (31 January 2019). Cliometrics of the Family. Springer. p. 158. ISBN   978-3-319-99480-2.
49. Hanawalt, Barbara A. (1986). The Ties That Bound: Peasant Families in Medieval England. Oxford University Press. pp.  95–100. ISBN   978-0-19-503649-7.
50. De Moor, Tine and Jan Luiten van Zanden. 2009. p 8-12

Further reading

• Coale, Ansley J; Watkins, Susan Cotts (1986). The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN   978-0691101767.
• Levine, David (1977). Family Formation in an Age of Nascent Capitalism. New York: Academic Press. ISBN   978-0124450509.
• Seccombe, Wally (1992). A Millennium of Family Change, Feudalism to Capitalism in Northwestern Europe. London; New York: Verso. ISBN   978-0860913320.
• Therborn, Göran (2004). Between Sex and Power, Family in the World, 1900–2000 . Routledge Press. pp.  144–145. ISBN   978-0415300780.
• Hartman, Mary S (2004). The Household and the Making of History, A Subversive View of the Western Past. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0521536691.