Hall v. Decuir

Last updated

Hall v. Decuir
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 17, 1877
Decided January 14, 1878
Full case nameHall v. Decuir
Citations95 U.S. 485 ( more )
Court membership
Chief Justice
Morrison Waite
Associate Justices
Nathan Clifford  · Noah H. Swayne
Samuel F. Miller  · Stephen J. Field
William Strong  · Joseph P. Bradley
Ward Hunt  · John M. Harlan
Case opinions
MajorityWaite, joined by Swayne, Miller, Strong, Bradley, Hunt, Harlan, Field
ConcurrenceClifford
Laws applied
Commerce Clause

Hall v. Decuir, 95 U.S. 485 (1878), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. In Hall, Josephine Decuir, a wealthy woman designated a Creole, sued for racial discrimination she experienced on a steamboat. She was traveling from New Orleans to Pointe Coupee Parish, where she owned a sugar plantation.

Contents

The Supreme Court held that the Louisiana statute authorizing a damages award to Decuir unconstitutionally interfered with interstate commerce. The majority opinion, by Morrison Waite, sought to avoid conflicting state laws with regard to interstate transit. Joseph W. Singer argues that Hall marked the beginning of a phase in Supreme Court jurisprudence that led to Plessy v. Ferguson .

Background

Josephine Decuir née Dubuclet, who was designated a Creole, and her husband Antoine, were members of the Black elite in the antebellum South. [1] [2] The two had married in 1835. [2] Their family were among the wealthiest Black people in the nation. The family lived in Pointe Coupee Parish in south central Louisiana, where they held a vast plantation. Before the American Civil War, the family had owned over 100 slaves. They were accustomed to traveling in first class on the Mississippi River from Hermitage up to Vicksburg or down to New Orleans. [1] [3] Decuir lived in France during the Civil War, and her husband died near its end. [2] Decuir was much less wealthy after the Civil War, selling some of her land. [4] She returned to Pointe Coupee with the intent of settling her husband's estate in 1866. She attempted to visit the ladies' cabin, but was instructed to return to her isolated cabin. According to the captain, Decuir "was in tears and crying" and objected to the treatment, noting that in France she was treated "like a white lady". [5]

In July 1872, she left New Orleans for Point Coupee to consult the lawyers E. K. Washington and Seymour Snaer regarding her husband's estate. Decuir had purchased a first class ticket for $5. When Decuir reached the Governor Allen, she was denied access to a first class cabin—they were "specifically set aside for white persons"—and instead sent to the steerage, or second-class, cabins that were poorly ventilated and also known as the "colored department". [1] [3] [4] [5]

She did not accept the request, and sat in a chair in a recess for the night. [6] [5]

Case

Decuir's lawyers, Washington and Snaer, filed a lawsuit against the steamboat's captain, John C. Benson, shortly after the trip. [6] [5] In Decuir v. Benson she argued her treatment constituted a constitutional violation and "indignity to her personality". Article XIII of the 1868 Constitution of Louisiana specifically prohibited race-based discrimination on transportation. [7] [4] The Eighth District Court of Orleans Parish ruled in her favor, [8] awarding $1,000 in damages. [6] Benson appealed, criticizing the amendment as violating the Commerce Clause in the United States Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment, which guaranteed him a right to liberty and property. [7] The Louisiana Supreme Court, led by John T. Ludeling, affirmed the decision of the lower court, noting that the state's 1869 civil rights act was "enacted solely to protect the newly enfranchised citizens of the United States, within the limits of Louisiana, from prejudice against them." [9] [6] William Gillespie Wyly dissented, considering the law a violation of the Commerce Clause. [8]

John C. Benson died, but Eliza Jane Hall, who was responsible for the execution of his estate, appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). [9] [6] The case was argued on April 17, 1877. [10] SCOTUS decided the case in October and announced it on January 14 the following year. [10] [11]

The SCOTUS reversed the decisions of the lower courts. [6] The decision was unanimous. [10] The majority opinion, by the Chief Justice of the United States, Morrison Waite, sought to avoid conflicting state laws with regard to interstate transit, [12] and held that Louisiana civil rights law unconstitutionally interfered with the federal power over interstate commerce, [13] [14] as the Mississippi was an inter-state waterway [6] and the General Allen, which was federally licensed, occasionally left the state. [7] Indeed, while Decuir was only travelling to Pointe Coupee Parish, the steamship's route went to Vicksburg. [15] SCOTUS concluded that "If the public good requires such legislation, it must come from Congress and not from the States." This ignored the Civil Rights Act of 1875, which guaranteed equal access on transportation. [7] Nathan Clifford wrote a lengthy concurrence to the decision—more than six times as long as Waite's decision—that went into more depth in supporting it. [16]

Legacy

The case was the first the Supreme Court heard on segregation in common carriers after the Civil War ended. [17] Joseph W. Singer argues that Hall marked the beginning of a phase in Supreme Court jurisprudence that led to Plessy v. Ferguson . [18] [19] According to historian Mia Bay, the case "all but endorsed segregation". [20] Jack M. Beermann analyzed the case along with United States v. Cruikshank and noted that the two "signaled the Court's determination to aid in the suppression of the movement for racial justice and reinforce preexisting social and racial hierarchies." [13] According to Charles A. Lofgren, the case "federalized" a decision that the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania had reached in West Chester and Philadelphia Railroad Company v. Miles (1867) and "in a very real sense, constitutionalized it as well". [4]

After World War II, the Supreme Court used the precedent of Hall to declare segregation laws within states unconstitutional as they affected interstate commerce. [10]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana</span> Parish in Louisiana, United States

Pointe Coupee Parish is a parish located in the U.S. state of Louisiana. As of the 2010 census, the population was 22,802; in 2020, its population was 20,758. The parish seat is New Roads.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Roads, Louisiana</span> City in Louisiana, United States

New Roads is a city in and the parish seat of Pointe Coupee Parish, Louisiana, United States. The center of population of Louisiana was located in New Roads in 2000. The population was 4,831 at the 2010 census, down from 4,966 in 2000. The city's ZIP code is 70760. It is part of the Baton Rouge Metropolitan Statistical Area.

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality, a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal". The decision legitimized the many state laws re-establishing racial segregation that had been passed in the American South after the end of the Reconstruction era (1865–1877).

United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that parts of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 were unconstitutional because they exceeded the powers granted to the US Congress under the Commerce Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. Along with United States v. Lopez (1995), it was part of a series of Rehnquist Court cases that limited Congress's powers under the Commerce Clause.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Marshall Harlan</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1877 to 1911

John Marshall Harlan was an American lawyer and politician who served as an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court from 1877 until his death in 1911. He is often called "The Great Dissenter" due to his many dissents in cases that restricted civil liberties, including the Civil Rights Cases, Plessy v. Ferguson, and Giles v. Harris. Many of Harlan's views expressed in his notable dissents would become the official view of the Supreme Court starting from the 1950s Warren Court and onward. His grandson John Marshall Harlan II was also a Supreme Court justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edward Douglass White</span> Chief justice of the United States from 1910 to 1921

Edward Douglass White Jr. was an American politician and jurist from Louisiana. White was a U.S. Supreme Court justice for 27 years, first as an associate justice from 1894 to 1910, then as the ninth chief justice from 1910 until his death in 1921. White is known for formulating the Rule of Reason standard of antitrust law.

Homer Adolph Plessy was an American shoemaker and activist, best known as the plaintiff in the United States Supreme Court decision Plessy v. Ferguson. He staged an act of civil disobedience to challenge one of Louisiana's racial segregation laws and bring a test case to force the U.S. Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of segregation laws. The Court decided against Plessy. The resulting "separate but equal" legal doctrine determined that state-mandated segregation did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution as long as the facilities provided for both black and white people were putatively "equal". The legal precedent set by Plessy v. Ferguson lasted into the mid-20th century, until a series of landmark Supreme Court decisions concerning segregation, beginning with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Supreme Court of the United States</span>

The Supreme Court of the United States is the only court specifically established by the Constitution of the United States, implemented in 1789; under the Judiciary Act of 1789, the Court was to be composed of six members—though the number of justices has been nine for most of its history, this number is set by Congress, not the Constitution. The court convened for the first time on February 2, 1790.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Louisiana Supreme Court</span> Highest court in the U.S. state of Louisiana

The Supreme Court of Louisiana is the highest court and court of last resort in the U.S. state of Louisiana. The modern Supreme Court, composed of seven justices, meets in the French Quarter of New Orleans.

John Howard Ferguson was an American lawyer and judge from Louisiana, most famous as the defendant in the Plessy v. Ferguson case.

The Separate Car Act was a law passed by the Louisiana State Legislature in 1890 which required "equal, but separate" train car accommodations for Blacks and Whites. An unsuccessful challenge to this law culminated in the United States Supreme Court decision of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, which upheld the constitutionality of state laws requiring racial segregation.

<i>Keys v. Carolina Coach Co.</i> Landmark 1955 US civil rights case

Sarah Keys v. Carolina Coach Company, 64 MCC 769 (1955) is a landmark civil rights case in the United States in which the Interstate Commerce Commission, in response to a bus segregation complaint filed in 1953 by a Women's Army Corps (WAC) private named Sarah Louise Keys, broke with its historic adherence to the Plessy v. Ferguson separate but equal doctrine and interpreted the non-discrimination language of the Interstate Commerce Act as banning the segregation of black passengers in buses traveling across state lines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Melville Fuller</span> Chief justice of the United States from 1888 to 1910

Melville Weston Fuller was an American politician, attorney, and jurist who served as the eighth chief justice of the United States from 1888 until his death in 1910. Staunch conservatism marked his tenure on the Supreme Court, exhibited by his tendency to support unfettered free enterprise and to oppose broad federal power. He wrote major opinions on the federal income tax, the Commerce Clause, and citizenship law, and he took part in important decisions about racial segregation and the liberty of contract. Those rulings often faced criticism in the decades during and after Fuller's tenure, and many were later overruled or abrogated. The legal academy has generally viewed Fuller negatively, although a revisionist minority has taken a more favorable view of his jurisprudence.

Catherine D. Kimball, known as Kitty Kimball, is the retired Chief Justice of the Louisiana Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Waite Court</span> Period of the US Supreme Court from 1874 to 1888

The Waite Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1874 to 1888, when Morrison Waite served as the seventh Chief Justice of the United States. Waite succeeded Salmon P. Chase as Chief Justice after the latter's death. Waite served as Chief Justice until his death, at which point Melville Fuller was nominated and confirmed as Waite's successor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fuller Court</span> Period of the US Supreme Court from 1888 to 1910

The Fuller Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1888 to 1910, when Melville Fuller served as the eighth Chief Justice of the United States. Fuller succeeded Morrison R. Waite as Chief Justice after the latter's death, and Fuller served as Chief Justice until his death, at which point Associate Justice Edward Douglass White was nominated and confirmed as Fuller's replacement.

Transport and bus boycotts in the United States were protests against the racial segregation of transport services before the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which outlawed such forms of discrimination.

Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railway Co. v. Mississippi, 133 U.S. 587 (1890), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a Mississippi law that required railroads to racially segregate their passengers. The Court in Hall v. Decuir (1878) had struck down a similar Louisiana law on the grounds that it unreasonably interfered with Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce. A railroad challenged the Mississippi law on the same ground, arguing that it violated the Dormant Commerce Clause by burdening interstate commerce. The Supreme Court, dividing 7 to 2, disagreed. Writing for the majority, Justice David Josiah Brewer distinguished Hall on the basis that Mississippi's law, unlike Louisiana's, applied solely to intrastate commerce. Justices John Marshall Harlan and Joseph P. Bradley dissented. According to Harlan, the Mississippi law subjected all trains, including those involved in interstate commerce, to the segregation requirement. Finding no differences between the case and Hall, he voted to strike down the law.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Bay 2021, p. 41.
  2. 1 2 3 Scott 2020, p. 543.
  3. 1 2 Harris 2005, p. 873.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Lofgren 1987, p. 128.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Scott 2020, pp. 543–544.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Bay 2021, p. 42.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Harris 2005, p. 874.
  8. 1 2 Scott 2020, pp. 543–546.
  9. 1 2 Lofgren 1987, pp. 128–129.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Cottrol, Robert J. (2009). "Hall v. Decuir". In Hall, Kermit L.; Ely, James W. (eds.). The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acref/9780195379396.001.0001. ISBN   978-0-19-537939-6.
  11. ↑ Beermann 2020, p. 954.
  12. ↑ Gordon, David (1986). "Hall v. Decuir 95 U.S. 485 (1877)". Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. Retrieved May 1, 2021.
  13. 1 2 Beermann 2020, p. 953.
  14. ↑ Welke, Barbara Young (August 13, 2001). Recasting American Liberty: Gender, Race, Law, and the Railroad Revolution, 1865–1920. Cambridge University Press. p.  338. ISBN   978-0-521-64966-7.
  15. ↑ Lofgren 1987, p. 130.
  16. ↑ Lofgren 1987, p. 131.
  17. ↑ Welke 1995, p. 298.
  18. ↑ Singer, Joseph William (1996). "No Right to Exclude: Public Accommodations and Private Property". Northwestern University Law Review . 90 (4): 1396 – via HeinOnline.
  19. ↑ Palmore, Joseph R. (November 1997). "The Not-So-Strange Career of Interstate Jim Crow: Race, Transportation, and the Dormant Commerce Clause, 1878–1946". Virginia Law Review . 83 (8): 1774. doi:10.2307/1073658. JSTOR   1073658.
  20. ↑ Bay 2021, p. 43.

Bibliography

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.