Design for Hector 26 April 1858 | |
Class overview | |
---|---|
Name | Hector class |
Builders | Rijkswerf (Amsterdam) |
Operators | Royal Netherlands Navy |
Succeeded by | Haarlemmermeer class |
Completed | 2 |
Scrapped | 2 |
General characteristics | |
Type | Gunvessel |
Tonnage | 230 [1] |
Displacement | 383 tons [2] |
Length | 34.60 m (113 ft 6 in) [2] |
Beam | 7.40 m (24 ft 3 in) [2] |
Draught | 3.20 m (10 ft 6 in) [2] |
Installed power |
|
Complement |
|
The Hector class was a class of 2 gunvessels of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The class proved a failure.
In 1855 the Dutch navy designed the sail-only Pro Patria class gunboats, in Dutch: 'Verdedigingsvaartuigen'. The class was 20 m (66 ft) long, had a draught of less than 2 m (6 ft 7 in), two masts and mounted four 30-pounder cannon and a mortar. At least 13 of these gunboats were built. For river and coastal defense these would have to be supplemented with steam gunvessels, in Dutch: stoomflottille vaartuigen. Meanwhile, a lot schooners, schoonerbrigs and small paddle steamers in the Dutch East Indies were expected to become unfit in a few years.
When the United Kingdom sent some gunvessels to China, the Dutch got an idea to solve the high demand for steam gunvessels. A high pressure steam engine took less space than a low pressure one. Using a high-pressure steam engine would allow construction of a small screw gunvessel. For service in the Indies the ships would have to be loaded with many supplies, and have a deep draught. For service in home waters they would not have to be loaded so heavily, and would therefore have a shallower draught required for coastal and river defense. The ships would furthermore have to mount a heavy battery, and have to be good sailers. By October 1857 the plans were in progress. [3]
A design drawing of the Hector class dated October 1857 called for a vessel of three masts, 30 m (98 ft) long, and with a draft of 2.4 m (7 ft 10 in) in home service and 3.2 m (10 ft) in the Indies. The armament would consist of four 36-pounders or four 30-pounders long No 4. This drawing is titled 'Verdedigingsvaartuig met Stoomvermogen' and was (is) stored together with the drawings of the Pro Patria class. This design or a slightly different one of these dimension was approved on 27 February 1858.
Shortly after the approval of 27 February 1858 the navy decided to lengthen the ship by resolution of 26 April 1858. In the new drawings the Hector got the title 'Stoom-flottille vaartuig'.
An essential feature of the Hector design was the use of high-pressure steam engines. These took much less space than low-pressure engines. The designers therefore thought it feasible to build ships with the same battery as the Vesuvius-class sloops, but with less draught, and much smaller. The objective was a vessel armed like the Vesuvius, but costing far less. [4] The design proved a failure even before the first of the Hector class was commissioned. In East Asia the English gun vessels with high pressure were in continuous repair, and so the Dutch did not send the Hector class to the East Indies. [4]
In 1861 the armament of the Hector and Vulkaan was given as 8 guns. [5] In view of the statement that the class was to carry the same battery as the Vesuvius class, this could have been four medium 30-pdr SBML and four 12-pdr SBML. In 1869 the armament was given as only 4 long 30-pounders. [6]
The Hector and Vulkaan drew a lot of criticism in the 1862 investigation of the navy by the Dutch house of representatives. Captain-lieutenant J. Andrea called the Hector and Vulkaan: 'failed, even though they might be put to some use.' K.L. Turk, chief engineer of naval construction, said: 'Only the Hector and Vulkaan are less suitable, because too many demands had been made.' Captain-lieutenant J.A.H. Schreuder said: 'the flotilla vessels are failures for their purpose, and of no use. They have too much rigging, are too tight, and draw too much water for coastal defense'. Captain-lieutenant R.L. de Haes considered the small vessels that had been built recently to be 'a failed experiment'. [7]
After the Hector class the Dutch navy hastily returned to using low-pressure steam engines in ships meant for the East Indies. The Haarlemmermeer class that followed would prove that the high pressure engine was not the only flaw in the Hector design.
Name | Laid down | Launched | Commissioned | Fate | Built by |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hector | 1 May 1858 [6] | 22 June 1859 [8] | 16 April 1860 [9] | Rijkswerf Amsterdam | |
Vulkaan | 1 May 1858 [6] | 20 May 1859 [10] | 1 May 1865 [11] | Sold 3 January 1912 [12] | Rijkswerf Amsterdam |
The Heiligerlee-class monitors were a group of five ironclad monitors built for the Royal Netherlands Navy in the late 1860s.
HNLMS Heiligerlee, formerly known as Panter, was a Heiligerlee-class monitor built in England for the Royal Netherlands Navy in the 1860s. Among the new ships built for the Dutch navy Heiligerlee was the first true monitor: a ship with shallow draught, only a few (heavy) guns and decent armor. These characteristics made her very suitable to operate way inland in the Dutch delta.
The Djambi class was a class of steam corvettes of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The class comprised Djambi, Zoutman, Willem, Leeuwarden, Metalen Kruis and Curaçao. Later two ships of a supposedly 'slightly revised' type were built, the Zilveren Kruis-class corvettes.
The Watergeus class was a class of screw sloop-of-war of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The class comprised the 'Watergeus' and the Marnix. A third ship that had been planned was cancelled.
The Zilveren Kruis class was a class of two steam-powered corvettes of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The class comprised Zilveren Kruis and Van Galen.
The Groningen class was a class of steam corvettes of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The class comprised Groningen, Citadel van Antwerpen and Vice-Admiraal Koopman
The Evertsen class was a class of steam frigates of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The class comprised Evertsen and Zeeland
The Vesuvius class was a class of steam screw sloops of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The class comprised Vesuvius, Cornelis Dirks, Reinier Claessen, Het Loo, Reteh and Prinses Maria.
The Samarang class was a class of steam screw gunvessels of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The class originally comprised Samarang, Batavia and Makassar, but was later extended.
The Pontianak class was a class of steam screw gunvessels of the Royal Netherlands Navy.
The Riouw class was a class of four steam screw gunvessels of the Royal Netherlands Navy. They were the first composite built ships of the Dutch navy.
The Ever class was a class of 14 flat-iron gunboats of the Royal Netherlands Navy.
The Haarlemmermeer class was a class of nine gunvessels of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The class was a failure because of its extreme susceptibility to dry rot.
The Soestdijk class was a class of 8 gunvessels of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The class was built to the same design as the preceding Haarlemmermeer class, but proved far more durable.
The Bali class was a ship class of sloops of the Royal Netherlands Navy and Japanese Navy. The class comprised Bali, Kanrin Maru, Soembing and Chōyō Maru
The Ardjoeno class was a ship class of paddle-steamers of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The class comprised Ardjoeno, Gedeh (1850), Amsterdam and Gedeh (1874).
The RML 16 cm No. 3, or Getrokken kanon van 16 cm No. 3 was a rifled muzzle loading gun. It was a Dutch attempt to cheaply provide rifled ordnance to its navy.
The RML 16 cm No. 1, or Getrokken kanon van 16 cm No. 1 was a rifled muzzle loading gun. It was the first Dutch rifled gun which had been designed as such.
Hercules was a Dutch steam paddle tugboat. She was also the first vessel to effectively use a compound steam engine. In about 1890, a discussion about the invention of the compound steam engine made that Fijenoord brought up the blueprints of Hercules. These proved that Gerhard Moritz Roentgen had invented the compound steam engine.
The Bromo class were a class of large paddle-steamers (sloops) of the Royal Netherlands Navy in the Dutch East Indies. The class comprised Bromo (1874) and Merapi (1874).