Hicky's Bengal Gazette

Hicky's Bengal Gazette
	Front page of Hicky's Bengal Gazette, 10 March 1781, from the University of Heidelberg's archives.
Type	Weekly newspaper
Publisher	James Augustus Hicky
Founded	29 January 1780
Ceased publication	30 March 1782
Headquarters	67 Radha Bazar; Kolkata, India
Country	British India

Last updated August 07, 2024

Hicky's Bengal Gazette or the Original Calcutta General Advertiser was an English-language weekly newspaper published in Kolkata (then Calcutta), the capital of British India. It was the first newspaper printed in Asia, and was published for two years, between 1780 and 1782, before the East India Company seized the newspaper's types and printing press. Founded by James Augustus Hicky, a highly eccentric Irishman who had previously spent two years in jail for debt,^[1] the newspaper was a strong critic of the administration of Governor General Warren Hastings. The newspaper was important for its provocative journalism and its fight for free expression in India.

Newspaper history

Hicky began publication of Hicky's Bengal Gazette on 29 January 1780, having first printed a prospectus announcing that he would begin printing a newspaper. The idea of printing a newspaper in India had been floated twelve years earlier by the Dutch Adventurer William Bolts, but Hicky was the first to execute the concept. Hicky's newspaper was printed once a week on Saturday, and retailed for Rs 1. Its circulation was estimated to be around four hundred copies per week, although possibly more.^[2]

Hicky initially avoided political controversy.^[3] As he observed the effect his paper had, he became more political and his neutral editorial policy shifted to an independent one. His slogan became "Open to all Parties, but influenced by None".^[4] After he learned that competitors with ties to the East India Company were intending to launch a rival newspaper, the India Gazette , he took a strongly anti-Company stance.^[5] Hicky accused an East India Company employee, Simeon Droz, of supporting the India Gazette as punishment for Hicky's refusal to pay a bribe to Droz and Marian Hastings, Warren Hastings' wife.^[6]

In retaliation for Hicky's accusation, Hastings' Supreme Council forbid Hicky from mailing his newspaper through the post office.^[7] On 18 November 1780, the same day that the first India Gazette was published, Hicky modified the name of his newspaper from Hicky's Bengal Gazette; or, Calcutta General Advertiser, to Hicky's Bengal Gazette; or the Original Calcutta General Advertiser to emphasize that his newspaper was founded first.^{[ citation needed ]}

Hicky claimed Hastings' order violated his right to free expression,^[8] and accused Hastings of corruption,^[9] tyranny, and even erectile dysfunction.^[10] Hicky also accused other British leaders in Calcutta of corruption, including the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Judicature at Fort William, Elijah Impey of taking bribes,^[11] and the leader of the Protestant Mission, Johann Zacharias Kiernander of stealing from an orphaned children's fund.^[12] Hicky's editorial independence was short lived as Hastings and Kiernander sued him for libel. After four dramatic trials in June 1781, the Supreme Court found Hicky guilty and sentenced him to jail.^[13]

Hicky continued to print his newspaper from jail, and continued to accuse Hastings and others of corruption.^[14] He was finally suppressed when Hastings instituted fresh lawsuits against him. Hicky's Bengal Gazette ceased publication on 30 March 1782 when its types were seized by an order of the Supreme Court. The next week, its types and printing press were publicly auctioned^[15] and sold to the India Gazette.^{[ citation needed ]}

Editorial policy

Hicky's Bengal Gazette was known for its sarcastic and provocative writing style. Unlike many newspapers of its time, the newspaper discussed taboo topics like female masturbation,^[16] and proto-class consciousness, arguing for the rights of the poor and against taxation without representation. It was strongly anti-war and anti-colonial and routinely ridiculed East India Company leadership for their expansionist and imperialist objectives.^{[ citation needed ]}

Contemporary views

The memoirist William Hickey (who was not related to the paper's founder) describes its establishment shortly after he had succeeded (in his capacity as an attorney-at-law) in having James Hicky released from debtor's jail:

"At the time I first saw Hicky he had been about seven years in India. During his confinement he met with a treatise upon printing, from which he collected sufficient information to commence [as a] printer, there never having been a press in Calcutta ... it occurred to Hicky that great benefit might arise from setting on foot a public newspaper, nothing of that kind ever having appeared. Upon his types &c., therefore reaching him, he issued proposals for printing a weekly paper, which, meeting with extraordinary encouragement, he speedily issued his first work. As a novelty every person read it, and was delighted. Possessing a fund of low wit, his paper abounded with proof of that talent. He had also a happy knack at applying appropriate nicknames and relating satirical anecdotes".^[17]

Hicky benefited little from the paper, as William Hickey further tells us that he allowed it "to become the channel of personal invective, and the most scurrilous abuse of individuals of all ranks, high and low, rich and poor, many were attacked in the most wanton and cruel manner ... His utter ruin was the consequence".^[18]

Legacy

Hicky's Bengal Gazette was the first printed newspaper to be published in Asia.^[19] The newspaper became famous not only among the British soldiers posted in India at that time^[20] but also inspired Indians to write newspapers of their own.^{[ citation needed ]}

Surviving collections

Six archives are known to have collections (all incomplete) of Hicky's Bengal Gazette:

University of Melbourne
University of Heidelberg. From George Livius. Available for free online.
National Library of India
High Court of Calcutta (only an extraordinary issue dated 25 June 1781).
British Library. Two collections. One ^{[ permanent dead link ]} originally from the British Museum, from George Livius. The other ^{[ permanent dead link ]}, less complete collection, is originally from a private auction^[21] and from the India Office Library.
University of California, Berkeley's Bancroft Library. Collected by H. Morse Stephens sometime before 1907.^[22] This collection was likely once owned by Paul Ferris, one of Hicky's assistants.

YYYY-MM-DD	British Library	University of Heidelberg	National Library of India	University of Melbourne	High Court of Calcutta	University of California, Berkeley	Notes
Prospectus	No	No	No	Yes	No	No	Likely printed in the week or month before the first issue
1780-01-29	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes	The first issue
1780-02-05	No	No	No	No	No	Yes
1780-02-12	No	No	No	No	No	Yes
1780-02-19	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-02-26	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-03-04	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-03-11	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-03-18	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-03-25	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-04-01	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1780-04-08	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-04-15	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-04-22	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-04-29	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-05-06	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1780-05-13	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-05-20	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	No
1780-05-27	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-06-03	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-06-10	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-06-17	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-06-24	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-07-01	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-07-08	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-07-15	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-07-22	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-07-29	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-08-05	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-08-12	Partial	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	BL is missing pages 2&3
1780-08-19	Yes	No	Partial	Yes	No	Yes	NLI is missing part of page 1&2
1780-08-26	Yes	No	Yes	Partial	No	Yes	Melbourne is missing page 1&2
1780-09-02	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-09-09	Yes	No	Partial	No	No	Yes
1780-09-16	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-09-23	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-09-30	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-10-07	Yes	No	No	No	No	Yes
1780-10-14	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-10-21	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-10-28	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-11-04	Yes	No	Partial	No	No	Yes	NLI is missing part of pages 3&4
1780-11-11	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-11-18	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-11-25	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-12-02	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1780-12-09	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1780-12-16	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1780-12-23	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1780-12-30	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1781-01-06	No	No	No	No	No	No	Existence Imputed
1781-01-13	No	No	No	Yes	No	Yes
1781-01-20	No	No	No	Yes	No	No
1781-01-27	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-02-03	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1781-02-10	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-02-17	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-02-24	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-03-03	Yes	No	No	Yes	No	Yes
1781-03-10	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-03-17	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-03-24	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-03-31	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-04-07	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-04-14	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	British Museum edition of the BL missing sections on pages 1&2
1781-04-21	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-04-28	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-04-28 Extraordinary	Yes	No	No	No	No	Yes
1781-05-05	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes
1781-05-12	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-05-19	Yes	Yes	Partial	Yes	No	Yes	NLI is missing part of pages 1&2
1781-05-26	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-06-02	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-06-09	Partial	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	BL missing pages 1&2
1781-06-16	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-06-23	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1781-06-25 Extraordinary	Yes	No	No	No	Yes	No
1781-06-30	Partial	Partial	Partial	Partial	No	Partial	All collections are missing sections on pages 3& 4
1781-07-07	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-07-07 Supplement	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Supplement is between pages 3&4
1781-07-14	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
1781-07-21	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-07-23 Extraordinary	Yes	No	No	No	No	Yes
1781-07-28	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	Mislabeled as 30 July
1781-08-04	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-08-06 Extraordinary	Yes	Yes	Partial	No	No	Yes
1781-08-11	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-08-18	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-08-25	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-09-01	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-09-08	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-09-15	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes
1781-09-15 Supplement	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	Yes	Supplement is between pages 3&4
1781-09-22	Yes	Yes	Partial	Yes	No	Yes
1781-09-29	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-10-06	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-10-13	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-10-20	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-10-27	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-11-03	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-11-10	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-11-17	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-11-24	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-11-26 Extraordinary	Yes	No	No	No	No	No
1781-12-01	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-12-08	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	British Museum edition of the BL missing section on page 3
1781-12-15	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes
1781-12-22	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1781-12-29	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes
1782-01-05	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	Partial	Berkeley is missing pages 3&4
1782-01-12	Yes	No	No	No	No	No
1782-01-19	Yes	No	No	No	No	No
1782-01-26	Yes	No	No	No	No	No
1782-02-02	Yes	No	No	Yes	No	No
1782-02-09	Yes	No	No	No	No	No
1782-02-16	Yes	No	No	No	No	No
1782-02-23	Yes	No	No	No	No	No
1782-03-02	Yes	No	No	No	No	No
1782-03-09	Yes	No	No	No	No	No
1782-03-16	Yes	No	No	No	No	No
1782-03-23	Yes	No	No	No	No	No
1782-03-30	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	The last issue
Total Issues (excluding prospectus, partial issues, supplements, and extraordinaries)	95	37	88	51	0	96
Total Issues (including prospectus, partial issues, supplements, and extraordinaries)	104	40	97	55	1	103

Gallery

Images of Hicky's Bengal Gazette

The first page of the first issue of Hicky's Bengal Gazette in a bound volume at the University of California, Berkeley's Bancroft Library
The second page of the first issue of Hicky's Bengal Gazette
The third page of the first issue of Hicky's Bengal Gazette
The fourth page of the first issue of Hicky's Bengal Gazette

Related Research Articles

Warren Hastings was a British colonial administrator, who served as the first Governor of the Presidency of Fort William (Bengal), the head of the Supreme Council of Bengal, and so the first Governor-General of Bengal in 1772–1785. He and Robert Clive are credited with laying the foundation of the British Empire in India. He was an energetic organizer and reformer. In 1779–1784 he led forces of the East India Company against a coalition of native states and the French. In the end, the well-organized British side held its own, while France lost influence in India. In 1787, he was accused of corruption and impeached, but he was eventually acquitted in 1795 after a long trial. He was made a Privy Councillor in 1814.

Lieutenant-General Sir Eyre Coote, KB was an Anglo-Irish military officer and politician who sat in the House of Commons from 1768 to 1780. He is best known for his many years of service with the British Army in India. His victory at the Battle of Wandiwash is considered a decisive turning point in the struggle for control in India between Britain and France. He was known by his sepoy troops as Coote Bahadur.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Shore, 1st Baron Teignmouth</span> Governor-General of India

John Shore, 1st Baron Teignmouth, 1st Baronet was a British official of the East India Company who served as Governor-General of Bengal from 1793 to 1798. In 1798 he was created Baron Teignmouth in the Peerage of Ireland. Shore was the first president of the British and Foreign Bible Society. A close friend of the orientalist Sir William Jones (1746–1794), Shore edited a memoir of Jones's life in 1804, containing many of Jones's letters.

Nathaniel Brassey Halhed was an English Orientalist and philologist.

The First Anglo-Maratha War (1775–1782) was the first of three Anglo-Maratha Wars fought between the British East India Company and Maratha Confederacy in India. The war began with the Treaty of Surat and ended with the Treaty of Salbai. The war, fought in between Surat and Poona, saw British defeat and restoration of positions of both the parties before the war. Warren Hastings, the first Governor-General of Bengal decided not to attack Pune directly.

James Hickey may refer to:

Hindi media refers to media in Hindi language and its dialects, across the Hindi belt in India, and elsewhere with the Hindi-speaking Indian diaspora.

James Atkinson was a surgeon, artist and Persian scholar — "a Renaissance man among Anglo-Indians".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Long (priest)</span>

James Long (1814–1887) was an Anglo-Irish priest of the Anglican Church. A humanist, educator, evangelist, translator, essayist, philanthropist and a missionary to India, he resided in the city of Calcutta, India, from 1840 to 1872 as a member of the Church Missionary Society, leading the mission at Thakurpukur.

In British India, the Vernacular Press Act (1878) was enacted to curtail the freedom of the Indian press and prevent the expression of criticism toward British policies—notably, the opposition that had grown with the outset of the Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878–80). The government adopted the Vernacular Press Act 1878 to regulate the indigenous press in order to manage strong public opinion and seditious writing producing unhappiness among the people of native region with the government. The Act was proposed by Lytton, then Viceroy of India, and was unanimously passed by the Viceroy's Council on 14 March 1878. The act excluded English-language publications as it was meant to control seditious writing in 'publications in Oriental languages' everywhere in the country, except for the South. Thus the British totally discriminated against the Indian Press.

In the last quarter of the 18th century, Calcutta grew into the first major centre of commercial and government printing. For the first time in the context of South Asia it becomes possible to talk of a nascent book trade which was full-fledged and included the operations of printers, binders, subscription publishing and libraries.

James Augustus Hicky was an Irishman who launched the first printed newspaper in India, Hicky's Bengal Gazette.

The Madras Courier was an Indian English language newspaper that ran between 1785 and 1821. It was the first newspaper to be published in Madras, Madras Presidency, British India. It was the leading newspaper of its time and was the officially recognized newspaper for printing government notifications.

John Hyde was a Puisne Judge on the Supreme Court of Judicature at Fort William in Bengal from 1774 to his death. He is the primary author of Hyde's Notebooks, a series of 74 notebooks that are a trove of information for the first years of the Supreme Court of Judicature at Fort William, the highest court in Bengal from 1774 to 1862. The originals of these are kept at the Victoria Memorial in Kolkata. Partial microfilms are held at the National Library of India, Kolkata. The digitized microfilm is available online. The originals, which vary slightly from the microfilm, were digitized in 2015 but are not yet released.

The Supreme Council of Bengal, also known as Council of Four, was the highest level of executive government in British India from 1774 to 1833: the period in which the East India Company, a private company, exercised political control of British colonies in India. It was formally subordinate to both the East India Company's Court of Directors and to the British Crown.

John Zachariah Kiernander, also known as Johann Zacharias Kiernander, was a Swedish Lutheran missionary in British India who enjoyed

The Calcutta Chronicle and General Advertiser was a weekly English-language newspaper published in Kolkata, the capital of British India. It was one of the earliest newspapers in colonial India and was published for four years until it stopped its publication under pressure from the East India Company. Two Englishmen, Daniel Stuart and Joseph Cooper, founded the newspaper and also set up the Chronicle Printing Press. A large portion of the newspaper was dedicated to advertisements, and therefore was also called the 'General Advertiser'.

The India Gazette; or, Calcutta Public Advertiser was an English language weekly newspaper published in Calcutta, then capital of British India. It was the second newspaper printed in India.

Andrew Otis is an American writer and journalist. Otis is considered an expert on journalism and the early print history of Bengal.

Freedom of the press in British India or freedom of the press in pre-independence India refers to the censorship on print media during the period of British rule by the British Crown on the Indian subcontinent from 1858 to 1947. The British Indian press was legally protected by the set of laws such as Vernacular Press Act, Censorship of Press Act, 1799, Metcalfe Act and Indian Press Act, 1910, while the media outlets were regulated by the Licensing Regulations, 1823, Licensing Act, 1857 and Registration Act, 1867. The British administrators in the India subcontinent brought a set of rules and regulations into effect designed to prevent circulating claimed inaccurate, media bias and disinformation across the subcontinent.

References

↑ Otis 2018 , pp. 9, 16, 19
↑ Otis 2018 , p. 290
↑ Otis 2018 , p. 68
↑ Otis 2018 , p. 76
↑ Otis 2018 , pp. 103, 108
↑ Otis 2018 , pp. 98, 100
↑ Otis 2018 , pp. 101–102
↑ Otis 2018 , pp. 104–105
↑ Otis 2018 , p. 108
↑ Otis 2018 , p. 147
↑ Otis 2018 , pp. 110–111
↑ Otis 2018 , pp. 132–133
↑ Otis 2018 , pp. 147, 160, 190
↑ Otis 2018 , pp. 190–192
↑ Otis 2018 , pp. 201–202
↑ Otis 2018 , p. 72
↑ The Memoirs of William Hickey Vol.II (1775-1782), London: Hurst & Blackett, 1918, p. 175.
↑ Hickey, Memoirs, Vol. II, p. 176.
↑ Otis 2018 , p. 26
↑ Otis 2018 , p. 27
↑ Bloomsbury Book Auctions, 25 March 1985. Sale No. 32, 27 February 1985. Lot 67. Hicky's Gazette of 11 March 1780 was purchased by the India Office Library for £200.
↑ Sanial, S. C. (July 1907). "The History of Journalism in India". Calcutta Review. 249: 362.

Bibliography

Otis, Andrew (2018). Hicky's Bengal Gazette: The Untold Story of India's First Newspaper. Westland Books. ISBN 978-93-86850-91-1.

External links

Hicky's Bengal Gazette – University of Heidelberg (free online)
Hicky's Bengal Gazette – University of Melbourne
Hicky's Bengal Gazette – British Library (Digital copy held by Adam Matthew Digital)
Hicky's Bengal Gazette – National Library of India

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[1] Otis 2018 , pp. 9, 16, 19

[2] Otis 2018 , p. 290

[3] Otis 2018 , p. 68

[4] Otis 2018 , p. 76

[5] Otis 2018 , pp. 103, 108

[6] Otis 2018 , pp. 98, 100

[7] Otis 2018 , pp. 101–102

[8] Otis 2018 , pp. 104–105

[9] Otis 2018 , p. 108

[10] Otis 2018 , p. 147

[11] Otis 2018 , pp. 110–111

[12] Otis 2018 , pp. 132–133

[13] Otis 2018 , pp. 147, 160, 190

[14] Otis 2018 , pp. 190–192

[15] Otis 2018 , pp. 201–202

[16] Otis 2018 , p. 72

[17] The Memoirs of William Hickey Vol.II (1775-1782), London: Hurst & Blackett, 1918, p. 175.

[18] Hickey, Memoirs, Vol. II, p. 176.

[19] Otis 2018 , p. 26

[20] Otis 2018 , p. 27

[21] Bloomsbury Book Auctions, 25 March 1985. Sale No. 32, 27 February 1985. Lot 67. Hicky's Gazette of 11 March 1780 was purchased by the India Office Library for £200.

[22] Sanial, S. C. (July 1907). "The History of Journalism in India". Calcutta Review. 249: 362.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

Front page of Hicky's Bengal Gazette, 10 March 1781, from the University of Heidelberg's archives.
Type	Weekly newspaper
Publisher	James Augustus Hicky
Founded	29 January 1780
Ceased publication	30 March 1782
Headquarters	67 Radha Bazar Kolkata, India
Country	British India