High Court of the Marshall Islands

Last updated
High Court of the Marshall Islands
High Court of the Marshall Islands Seal.gif
Seal of the court
Jurisdiction Marshall Islands
Composition methodRecommendation of Judicial Service Commission, Appointment by Cabinet, and Approval of Nitijela
Authorised by Constitution of the Marshall Islands
Appeals to Supreme Court of the Marshall Islands
Judge term lengthCitizens During Good Behavior Up to Age 72; Noncitizens During Good Behavior for Term of 1 Year or More
Number of positions1 Chief Justice and Optional (Currently 2) Associate Justices
Website http://rmicourts.org/
Chief Justice
CurrentlyCarl Ingram
Since2013
Lead position ends2023

The High Court is the second highest court of law in the Marshall Islands judiciary. The court is established by Article VI, section 3 of the republic's constitution. [1] It has appellate jurisdiction over cases originating in the lower courts as well as original jurisdiction over certain classes of cases, including some criminal and civil matters, wills, and divorces. [2] The court consists of a Chief Justice and an optional number of Associate Justices. [3] The current Chief Justice, Carl Ingram, a U.S. citizen who originally came to the Marshall Islands with the Peace Corps in 1979, was first appointed as an associate justice of the High Court in March 2003, then as chief justice in October 2003 and for a second 10-year term as chief justice effective October 2013. [4] [ needs update ]

Chief Justices

NameTook officeLeft officeNotes
John Lanham October 1981March 1985 [5] [6]
Nelson Doi March 1985April 1986 [5]
Adhikarana D. Tennekone April 19861989 [7] [8]
Philip T. Bird 19891991 [9]
Neil Rutledge June 19921993-? [5]
Witten Philippo ?-19941995-?acting [10]
Daniel Cadra April 1996June 1999 [11]
Charles Henry 20012002 [12]
Carl Ingram October 2003Incumbent [11]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Pakistan</span> Highest authority court of Pakistan

The Supreme Court of Pakistan is the apex court in the judicial hierarchy of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Puisne judge and puisne justice are terms for an ordinary judge or a judge of lesser rank of a particular court. The term comes from a combination of the two French words, puis and (born) which have been combined as French: puisné or puîné; meaning "junior".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the Philippines</span> Highest court in the Philippines

The Supreme Court (Filipino: Kataas-taasang Hukuman; colloquially referred to as the Korte Suprema, is the highest court in the Philippines. The Supreme Court was established by the Second Philippine Commission on June 11, 1901 through the enactment of its Act No. 136, an Act which abolished the Real Audiencia de Manila, the predecessor of the Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial system of Singapore</span> National court system

Under the Constitution of Singapore, the judicial system of Singapore is divided into the Supreme Court which comprises the Court of Appeal and the High Court, and the subordinate courts, namely the State Courts and Family Justice Courts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Singapore</span> National supreme court

The Supreme Court of Singapore is a set of courts in Singapore, comprising the Court of Appeal and the High Court. It hears both civil and criminal matters. The Court of Appeal hears both civil and criminal appeals from the High Court. The Court of Appeal may also decide a point of law reserved for its decision by the High Court, as well as any point of law of public interest arising in the course of an appeal from a court subordinate to the High Court, which has been reserved by the High Court for decision of the Court of Appeal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial review in the United States</span> Power of courts to review laws

In the United States, judicial review is the legal power of a court to determine if a statute, treaty, or administrative regulation contradicts or violates the provisions of existing law, a State Constitution, or ultimately the United States Constitution. While the U.S. Constitution does not explicitly define the power of judicial review, the authority for judicial review in the United States has been inferred from the structure, provisions, and history of the Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Pakistan</span> National judicial system

The judiciary of Pakistan is the national system of courts that maintains the law and order in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Pakistan uses a common law system, which was introduced during the colonial era, influenced by local medieval judicial systems based on religious and cultural practices. The Constitution of Pakistan lays down the fundamentals and working of the Pakistani judiciary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Spain</span> Highest court in Spain

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the Kingdom of Spain. The court has original jurisdiction over cases against high-ranking officials of the Kingdom and over cases regarding the legalization of political parties. It also has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all cases. The Court has the power of judicial review, except for the judicial revision on constitutional matters, reserved to the Constitutional Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of India</span> National court system

The judiciary of India is the system of courts that interpret and apply the law in the Republic of India. The Constitution of India provides concept for a single and unified judiciary in India. India uses a mixed legal system based majorly on the common law system with civil laws applicable in certain territories in combination with certain religion specific personal laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial officers of the Republic of Singapore</span>

The judicial officers of the Republic of Singapore work in the Supreme Court and the State Courts to hear and determine disputes between litigants in civil cases and, in criminal matters, to determine the liability of accused persons and their sentences if they are convicted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Court of Malaysia</span> Highest court of appeals in Malaysia

The Federal Court of Malaysia is the highest court and the final appellate court in Malaysia. It is housed in the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya. The court was established during Malaya's independence in 1957 and received its current name in 1994.

The Government of Guam (GovGuam) is a presidential representative democratic system, whereby the president is the head of state and the governor is head of government, and of a multi-party system. Guam is an organized, unincorporated territory of the United States with policy relations between Guam and the US under the jurisdiction of the Office of Insular Affairs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of New York</span> Judicial branch of the New York state government

The Judiciary of New York is the judicial branch of the Government of New York, comprising all the courts of the State of New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial independence in Singapore</span> Judicial independence in the nation

Judicial independence is protected by Singapore's Constitution, statutes such as the State Courts Act and Supreme Court of Judicature Act, and the common law. Independence of the judiciary is the principle that the judiciary should be separated from legislative and executive power, and shielded from inappropriate pressure from these branches of government, and from private or partisan interests. It is crucial as it serves as a foundation for the rule of law and democracy.

Law in the Republic of Vanuatu consists of a mixed system combining the legacy of English common law, French civil law and indigenous customary law. The Parliament of Vanuatu is the primary law-making body today, but pre-independence French and British statutes, English common law principles and indigenous custom all enjoy constitutional and judicial recognition to some extent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Mauritius</span> The Mauritius Supreme Court formed 1850

The Supreme Court of Mauritius is the highest court of Mauritius and the final court of appeal in the Mauritian judicial system. It was established in its current form in 1850, replacing the Cour d'Appel established in 1808 during the French administration and has a permanent seat in Port Louis. There is a right of appeal from the Supreme Court of Mauritius directly to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) is the court of final appeal for Mauritius.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Solomon Islands</span> Branch of the Government of Solomon Islands

The judiciary of Solomon Islands is a branch of the Government of Solomon Islands that interprets and applies the laws of Solomon Islands, to ensure equal justice under law, and to provide a mechanism for dispute resolution. The legal system is derived from chapter VII, part II of the Constitution, adopted when the country became independent from the United Kingdom in 1978. The Constitution provided for the creation of a High Court, with original jurisdiction in civil and criminal cases, and a Court of Appeal. It also provided for the possibility of "subordinate courts", with no further specification (art.84).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Sierra Leone</span>

The Judiciary of Sierra Leone is the branch of the Government of the Republic of Sierra Leone which interprets and applies the laws of Sierra Leone to ensure impartial justice under law and to provide a mechanism for dispute resolution. The independence of the judiciary is guaranteed by the constitution.

The Supreme Court is the highest court of law in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. It has final authority of all cases brought before it. It consists of a Chief Justice and two associate justices.

References

  1. "Constitution of the Republic of the Marshall Islands (Art. VI, sec. 3)" (PDF). Embassy of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-11-22. Retrieved 2016-07-08.
  2. Margolick, David (April 3, 1992). "At the Bar; The Marshall Islands Has Blue Lagoons, Pacific Breezes and an Opening on a Court". The New York Times .
  3. "The RMI Judiciary". RMI Judiciary. Archived from the original on 13 June 2016. Retrieved 6 July 2016.
  4. "Senior Judges and Staff". RMI Judiciary. Archived from the original on 2016-06-02. Retrieved 2016-07-08.
  5. 1 2 3 Marshall Islands Supreme Court (July 1982). "Marshall Islands Law Reports". Supreme Court, Republic of the Marshall Islands.
  6. "A look back at the 1950s". The Marshall Islands Journal. 11 February 2022.
  7. Report to the United Nations on the Administration of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, transmitted by the United States of America (Report). United States Department of State. 1985.
  8. Van Dyke, Jon M. (2009). "The Pacific Judicial Conference: Strengthening the Independent Judiciary and the Rule of Law in the Pacific" (PDF). Western Legal History. 22 (1 & 2). Pasadena, CA: Ninth Judicial Circuit Historical Society: 154. ISSN   0896-2189.
  9. "Chinese Embassy opens". The Marshall Islands Journal. 3 March 2016.
  10. "Judge Philippo" (PDF). Republic of the Marshall Islands Law Reports: Opinions and Selected Orders July 1993 Through July 2004. 2. December 4, 2004.
  11. 1 2 "Senior Judges and Staff". Republic of the Marshall Islands Judiciary.
  12. "Suspended Marshall Islands chief justice in court on Monday". RNZ . 25 April 2003.