Human Rights Foundation (New Zealand)

Last updated

The Human Rights Foundation of Aotearoa New Zealand is a non-governmental organisation in New Zealand, which seeks "to promote and defend human rights through research based education and advocacy. [1] "

Contents

The Foundation purports to do this by making submissions on bills that might involve human rights issues and investigating New Zealand's compliance with international obligations. The Foundation also takes an interest in human rights issues in the Pacific Islands. [1]

The Foundation was established in December 2001 [1] and was incorporated as a charitable trust on 23 October 2001 under the Charitable Trusts Act 1957. [2]

Organisation

Members of the Foundation can either be ordinary members or Foundation (Life) Members, depending on the membership fee paid. [1]

The Officers of the Human Rights Foundation are its Patron, the Chairperson, the Secretary and the Treasurer, who are all selected by an election. [3] Control of the Foundation resides with a Management Committee, consisting of the Chairperson, the Secretary, the Treasurer and up to eight committee members. [4]

The Human Rights Foundation's current Chairperson is Peter Hosking, who comes from a legal background and has worked in the human rights field. [5] Hosking has been a consultant to the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and to the United Nations Development Programme. [5] He was also formerly the Proceedings Commissioner for the New Zealand Human Rights Commission. [5]

Former Governor-General of New Zealand Dame Silvia Cartwright is the Patron of the Foundation. [1]

Members of the Management Committee include Margaret Bedggood, who was the Chief Commissioner of the Human Rights Commission (New Zealand) from 1989-1994 (during which time the Human Rights Act 1993 was passed) and was on Amnesty International's Executive Committee from 1999-2005, [5] and Tim McBride, who wrote the New Zealand Handbook of Civil Liberties [6] and was a founding member of the Human Rights Foundation. [5]

Purposes and values

The Foundation’s constitution states that it was established for four key purposes.

At the launch of the Human Rights Foundation on 18 December 2001, Dame Silvia Cartwright stated that it was necessary for the human rights infrastructure to have "an active civil society, to ensure grassroots participation, to hold the watchdogs accountable and to contribute a broader understanding of human rights and their implementation". [8] She also spoke of how she had been told that the Foundation would make it a priority to "make practical and theoretical links across human rights issues". [8]

The constitution also sets out the values upon which the Foundation operates, including respect to the Treaty of Waitangi, a concept of rights recognising both individual and group rights and the realisation of individual human potential. [9]

Submissions

The Human Rights Foundation has made a number of submissions on New Zealand bills. Some of their submissions are made in conjunction with other human rights organisations, such as the Equal Justice Project, which is an initiative run by University of Auckland students seeking to provide access to equal justice. [10] The Foundation's submissions have included the Human Rights Amendment Bill, [11] the Crimes of Torture Amendment Bill, [12] the Criminal Procedure (Reform and Modernisation) Bill, [13] the Immigration (Mass Arrivals) Amendment Bill 2012 [14] and recently, the Government Security Bureau (GCSB) and Related Legislation Amendment Bill. [15]

GCSB Bill 2013

In May 2013, the Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill was introduced. [16] The stated purpose of the bill was to amend the Government Communications Security Bureau Act 2003, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1996 and the Intelligence and Security Committee Act 1996, in order to make the statutory framework around the Bureau clearer. [17] The bill amended the objectives, [18] functions, [18] powers [19] and limitations provisions. [19] The amendments gave the GCSB the authority to provide assistance to the New Zealand Defence Force, the New Zealand Police and the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service when carrying out their lawful functions. [18] The amendments also clarified when the GCSB’s powers of interception can be used. Before the amendments, the Act stated that the powers could only be used for the purpose of obtaining foreign intelligence. [19] The bill amended section 13 to say that the powers of interception could also be used for information assurance and cybersecurity. [19] The section stating that GCSB could not conduct foreign intelligence activities against New Zealanders was adjusted so that this only applies to the foreign intelligence function, not the information assurance and cybersecurity functions. [19]

The bill was split into three bills, the Government Communications Security Bureau Amendment Bill, the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Amendment Bill and the Intelligence and Security Committee Amendment Bill. They each had their third readings on the 21 August 2013 [20] and each received Royal Assent on the 26 August 2013. [21] [22] [23]

The Human Rights Foundation's submission on this bill, made extensive references to the individual's right to privacy. [24] They expressed concern that the monitoring of individuals would also affect the right to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association. [24] These rights are contained in both the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 [25] and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, [26] which New Zealand ratified on 28 December 1978. [27] They argued that the changes to section 14 and the insertion of new sections 15A and 15B mean that New Zealand citizens and permanent residences can be monitored in a wider range of situations. This was previously safeguarded against in the 2003 Act and the Foundation submitted that this deviation was not justified. [28] They also stated their concern that the proposed amendments to the Intelligence and Security Committee Act 1996 [29] would not do enough to counter the concerns about the GCSB's compliance, as raised in a report by Secretary of the Cabinet Rebecca Kitteridge. [30]

Shadow reports

Part of the Human Rights Foundation's activities is producing shadow and alternative reports. These are reports that are presented alongside official reports to United Nations monitoring bodies. On 29 November 2012 the Human Rights Foundation was awarded the New Zealand Law Foundation Shadow Report Award, providing them with a $10,000 grant to assist them with this work. [31] The award was presented by the Law Foundation New Zealand Chair Warwick Deuchrass, who said on behalf of the Law Foundation "we believe shadow reporting is a valuable contributor to the treaty monitoring process". [31] The Human Rights Foundation plans to use the money "to provide more in-depth reports to a wider range of UN organisations", [31] according to Chairperson Peter Hosking.

The Human Rights Foundation's shadow and alternative reports have included the following:

New Zealand's Universal Periodic Review

The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is a process through which the human rights records of United Nations member states are reviewed by the Human Rights Council. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human rights states that the aim of the process is "to improve the human rights situation in all countries and address human rights violations wherever they occur. [36] "

Non-governmental organisations, such as the Human Rights Foundation, may prepare stakeholder reports to be considered alongside the official State report.

New Zealand's First Universal Periodic Review

This was considered on 7 May 2009. [37] The Human Rights Foundation and the Equal Justice Project conducted an analysis of which of the 64 resulting recommendations were and were not accepted by the New Zealand Government. [38]

New Zealand's Second Universal Periodic Review

For the second cycle of New Zealand's Universal Periodic Review, the Human Rights Foundation, in conjunction with Peace Movement Aotearoa, [39] produced a coordination of the reports of non-governmental organisations wanting to contribute. [40] [41]

New Zealand's second UPR was considered on the 27 January 2014 [42] and a final outcome has not currently been released by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.

Information about New Zealand and the UPR process is available here [43]

Refugee issues

Ahmed Zaoui

The Human Rights Foundation supported Ahmed Zaoui, who was granted refugee status in New Zealand by the Refugee Status Appeals Authority (RSAA) but was detained in solitary confinement due to the fact that he was issued with a National Security Risk Certificate. [44]

The Human Rights foundation supported Zaoui by informing the public on the details of his case [45] and by helping to raise financial assistance towards his legal expenses. [44]

Education

The Human Rights Foundation has also compiled a reference text which discusses economical, social and cultural rights in New Zealand. The book, Law into Action: Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in New Zealand, [46] was edited by Kris Gledhill and Margret Bedggood, who is on the Management Committee of the Foundation.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Zealand Security Intelligence Service</span> National intelligence agency of New Zealand

The New Zealand Security Intelligence Service (NZSIS) is New Zealand's primary national intelligence agency. It is responsible for providing information and advising on matters including national security and foreign intelligence. It is headquartered in Wellington and overseen by a Director-General, the Minister of New Zealand Security Intelligence Service, and the parliamentary intelligence and security committee; independent oversight is provided by the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Government Communications Security Bureau</span> New Zealand signals intelligence agency

The Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) is the public-service department of New Zealand charged with promoting New Zealand's national security by collecting and analysing information of an intelligence nature. The GCSB is considered to be New Zealand's most powerful intelligence agency, and has been alleged to have conducted more espionage and data collection than the country's primary intelligence agency, the less funded NZSIS. This has at times proven controversial, although the GCSB does not have the baggage of criticism attached to it for a perceived failure to be effective like the NZSIS does. The GCSB is considered an equivalent of GCHQ in the United Kingdom or the NSA in the United States.

New Zealand's intelligence agencies and units have existed, with some interruption, since World War II. At present, New Zealand's intelligence community has approximately 550 employees, and has a combined budget of around NZ$145 million.

The National Assessments Bureau (NAB), previously known as the External Assessments Bureau (EAB), is a New Zealand intelligence analysis agency within the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC). The NAB along with the Government Communications Security Bureau and the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service is one of the three core members of New Zealand's intelligence community. It provides assessments to the Prime Minister, other Ministers, senior officials and New Zealand's diplomatic missions abroad, on events and developments that bear on New Zealand's interests, especially in regard to matters of national security.

Nauru is a small island country in the South Pacific. With a population of 13,649 it is the world's least populous independent republic. Nauru's government operates under its constitution, part two of which contains 'protection of fundamental rights and freedoms.' The Human Rights Council (UNHRC) carried out Nauru's Universal Periodic Review (UPR) in January 2011. The review was generally favourable with only a few areas of concern.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Terrorism Suppression Act 2002</span> Act of the Parliament of New Zealand

The Terrorism Suppression Act 2002 is New Zealand counter-terrorism legislation passed under the Clark-led Labour government. Enacted following the September 11 attacks in the United States, the Act was designed to better address contemporary terrorism issues, both domestically and abroad. Until May 2019, the Act had not been formally used in a prosecution; however there were several failed attempts by the Crown to do so. Many individuals and organisations have however been designated as "Terrorist entities" under the Act's provisions, in line with UN Security Council designations. The Act was amended in 2007. In May 2019, a charge of engaging in a terrorist act was laid against Brenton Tarrant, the perpetrator of the Christchurch mosque attacks, under section 6A of the Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in New Zealand</span>

Human rights in New Zealand are addressed in the various documents which make up the constitution of the country. Specifically, the two main laws which protect human rights are the New Zealand Human Rights Act 1993 and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. In addition, New Zealand has also ratified numerous international United Nations treaties. The 2009 Human Rights Report by the United States Department of State noted that the government generally respected the rights of individuals, but voiced concerns regarding the social status of the indigenous population.

Tonga is a constitutional monarchy with a population of approximately 130,000. Politics and the economy are dominated by the king, the nobility, and a few prominent commoners. Economic, social and cultural rights are generally well respected. There are, however, a number of issues concerning protection of civil and political rights, particularly freedom of expression, and rights to political participation. Violence against women is a serious issue.

The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) is a state monitoring mechanism of the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC). It was established by General Assembly resolution 60/251 in 2006 to periodically review the protection and promotion of human rights in each of the 193 United Nations (UN) Member States. New Zealand has been reviewed twice via the UPR in 2009 and 2014.

New Zealand is committed to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and has ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, both of which contain a right to privacy. Privacy law in New Zealand is dealt with by statute and the common law. The Privacy Act 2020 addresses the collection, storage and handling of information. A general right to privacy has otherwise been created in the tort of privacy. Such a right was recognised in Hosking v Runting [2003] 3 NZLR 385, a case that dealt with publication of private facts. In the subsequent case C v Holland [2012] NZHC 2155 the Court recognised a right to privacy in the sense of seclusion or a right to be free from unwanted intrusion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Waihopai Station</span> Secure communications facility in New Zealand

The Waihopai Station is a secure communication facility, located near Blenheim, run by New Zealand's Government Communications Security Bureau. The station started operating in 1989, and collects data that is then shared with New Zealand's allies. In 2021, it was announced that the parts of the station would be deconstructed and removed from the site. Several protests and disputes surrounding its use and the wider implications of the information gathered has gained the facility some local and international notoriety.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Government Communications Security Bureau Act 2003</span> Act of Parliament in New Zealand

The Government Communications Security Bureau Act 2003 is a repealed New Zealand Act of Parliament. It formalised the role of the Government Communications Security Bureau, which had previously existed in various states of secrecy since 1977, as the national authority for signals intelligence and information systems security, and put it on a similar legislative footing to the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mass surveillance in the United Kingdom</span>

The use of electronic surveillance by the United Kingdom grew from the development of signal intelligence and pioneering code breaking during World War II. In the post-war period, the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) was formed and participated in programmes such as the Five Eyes collaboration of English-speaking nations. This focused on intercepting electronic communications, with substantial increases in surveillance capabilities over time. A series of media reports in 2013 revealed bulk collection and surveillance capabilities, including collection and sharing collaborations between GCHQ and the United States' National Security Agency. These were commonly described by the media and civil liberties groups as mass surveillance. Similar capabilities exist in other countries, including western European countries.

Local government bodies in New Zealand have responsibilities under the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA) to perform a wide range of functions, and provide a wide range of services to the communities they represent. There is not an explicit focus on human rights in New Zealand local government, or any direct reference to human rights under the LGA. Local bodies in New Zealand are required to act in a way that is consistent with the rights guaranteed under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZBORA). Internationally there is growing consideration of how local government does and could promote and protect fundamental rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minister for National Security and Intelligence (New Zealand)</span> New Zealand minister of the Crown

The Minister for National Security and Intelligence is a minister in the New Zealand Government who is responsible for leading and setting the policies and legislative framework of New Zealand's national security system. The current minister is Christopher Luxon, who is also the current Prime Minister of New Zealand, as by convention, the National Security and Intelligence portfolio is always held by the Prime Minister.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015</span> Act of the Parliament of Australia

The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015(Cth) is an Act of the Parliament of Australia that amends the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 (original Act) and the Telecommunications Act 1997 to introduce a statutory obligation for Australian telecommunication service providers (TSPs) to retain, for a period of two years, particular types of telecommunications data (metadata) and introduces certain reforms to the regimes applying to the access of stored communications and telecommunications data under the original Act.

Forced marriage is the marriage of one person to another person without the consent of one or both of the parties. It is to be distinguished from an arranged marriage, where the parties do not select their partners but there is free choice to accept or decline the marriage. Forced marriage is widely recognised as a human rights abuse, with some commentators considering it a form of slavery.

Marital rape generally refers to non-consensual sexual intercourse between married spouses. In Singapore, there used to be a partial immunity for marital rape first introduced during British colonial rule because it was deemed not a criminal offence except when the wife is below 13 years of age or when any of the specific circumstances provided under section 375(4) of the Singapore Penal Code are satisfied. Since 1 January 2020, the law was repealed and its immunity lifted under the Criminal Law Reform Act 2019, criminalising marital rape.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Russia Sanctions Act 2022</span> Act of Parliament in New Zealand

The Russia Sanctions Act 2022 is an Act of Parliament passed by the New Zealand Parliament that establishes the framework for autonomous sanctions against Russia in response to its 2022 invasion of Ukraine. This legislation would allow sanctions to be placed on those responsible for or associated with the Russian invasion of Ukraine including people, services, companies and assets. The Sanctions Act also allows for sanctions to be imposed on other states complicit with Russian aggression including Belarus. On 9 March 2022, the Russian Sanctions Act passed with unanimous support from all parties represented in Parliament.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Human Rights Foundation "About the Foundation" (Retrieved 5 May 2014)
  2. ↑ "Charitable Trusts Act 1957 No 18 (as at 12 November 2018), Public Act – New Zealand Legislation". www.legislation.govt.nz. Retrieved 6 June 2019.
  3. ↑ "Charities Services | Home". register.charities.govt.nz. Retrieved 26 January 2021.
  4. ↑ Human Rights Foundation Constitution, section 8
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Human Rights Foundation "Staff and Management Committee" (Retrieved 5 May 2014)
  6. ↑ Tim McBride New Zealand Handbook of Civil Liberties (Price Milburn, Auckland, 1973)
  7. ↑ Human Rights Foundation Constitution, section 2
  8. 1 2 Dame Silvia Cartwright, Former Governor-General of New Zealand "Launch of the Human Rights Foundation" (18 December 2001)
  9. ↑ Human Rights Foundation Constitution, section 4
  10. ↑ The Equal Justice Project "About" (Retrieved 5 May 2014)
  11. ↑ Human Rights Foundation "Submission to the Justice and Electoral Committee on the Human Rights Amendment Bill 2013"
  12. ↑ Human Rights Foundation "Submission to the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee on the Crimes of Torture Amendment Bill 2006"
  13. ↑ Human Rights Foundation "Submission to the Law and Order Select Committee on the Criminal Procedure (Reform and Modernisation) Bill 2011"
  14. ↑ Human Rights Foundation "Submission to the Transport and Industrial Relations Select Committee on the Immigration Amendment Bill 2012"
  15. ↑ Human Rights Foundation "Submission to Intelligence and Security Committee on the Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill 2013"
  16. ↑ New Zealand Parliament "Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill" (Retrieved 5 May 2014)
  17. ↑ Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill (109-1), Explanatory note, at 1
  18. 1 2 3 Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill (109-1), Explanatory note, at 3
  19. 1 2 3 4 5 Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill (109-1), Explanatory note, at 4
  20. ↑ (21 August 2013) 692 NZPD 12689
  21. ↑ "Government Communications Security Bureau Amendment Act 2013 No 57, Public Act – New Zealand Legislation". www.legislation.govt.nz. Retrieved 6 June 2019.
  22. ↑ "Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Amendment Act 2013 No 58 (as at 28 September 2017), Public Act – New Zealand Legislation". www.legislation.govt.nz. Retrieved 6 June 2019.
  23. ↑ "Intelligence and Security Committee Amendment Act 2013 No 59, Public Act – New Zealand Legislation". www.legislation.govt.nz. Retrieved 6 June 2019.
  24. 1 2 Human Rights Foundation "Submission to Intelligence and Security Committee on the Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill 2013" at p.2
  25. ↑ New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, ss 14, 16 and 17
  26. ↑ International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 999 UNTS 171 (opened for signature 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976), arts 17, 19, 21 and 22
  27. ↑ Ministry of Justice "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights" Archived 13 May 2016 at the Wayback Machine (Retrieved 5 May 2014)
  28. ↑ Human Rights Foundation "Submission to Intelligence and Security Committee on the Government Communications Security Bureau and Related Legislation Amendment Bill 2013" at p.9
  29. ↑ "Intelligence and Security Committee Act 1996 No 46 (as at 28 September 2017), Public Act Contents – New Zealand Legislation". www.legislation.govt.nz. Retrieved 6 June 2019.
  30. ↑ Rebecca Kitteridge Review of Compliance at the Government Communications Security Bureau (March 2013)
  31. 1 2 3 The Law Foundation New Zealand "Inaugural Human Rights Award Announced" (press release, 4 December 2012)
  32. ↑ Human Rights Foundation Shadow report to the 15th, 16th, and 17th consolidated report of the New Zealand Government under the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination being considered by the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (June 2007)
  33. ↑ Human Rights Foundation Alternative report on the 5th periodic report of the New Zealand Government under the International Convention Against Torture being considered by the United Nations Committee Against Torture (April 2009)
  34. ↑ Human Rights Foundation Alternative report on the 5th periodic report of the New Zealand Government under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights being considered by the United Nations Human Rights Committee (March 2010)
  35. ↑ Human Rights Foundation Shadow report to the 18th, 19th and 20th consolidated report of the New Zealand Government under the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination being considered by the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (January 2013)
  36. ↑ Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights "Universal Periodic Review" (Retrieved 5 May 2014)
  37. ↑ Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights "UPR - New Zealand" (Retrieved 5 May 2014)
  38. ↑ Human Rights Foundation and Equal Justice Project "Universal Periodic Review Progress Chart" (Retrieved 6 May 2014)
  39. ↑ Peace Movement Aotearoa (Retrieved 6 May 2014)
  40. ↑ Human Rights Foundation "The HRF and the UPR" (Retrieved 6 May 2014)
  41. ↑ Human Rights Foundation Universal Periodic Review of New Zealand, 18th session of the Working Group on the UPR, January/February 2014, Joint Stakeholders Report Coordinated by the Human Rights Foundation of Aotearoa New Zealand"
  42. ↑ Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights "UPR 2nd Cycle - New Zealand" Archived 2014-04-30 at the Wayback Machine
  43. ↑ "Universal Periodic Review of the New Zealand government's human rights record". www.nzupr.org. Retrieved 26 January 2021.
  44. 1 2 Human Rights Foundation "Current Projects" (Retrieved on 7 May 2014)
  45. ↑ Zaoui v Attorney General (No 2) [2006] 1 NZLR 289
  46. ↑ Margaret Bedggod and Kris Gledhill (eds) Law into Action: Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in New Zealand (Thomson Reuters, Wellington, 2011)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.