Infamia

Last updated

In ancient Rome, infamia (in-, "not", and fama, "reputation") was a loss of legal or social standing. As a technical term in Roman law, infamia was juridical exclusion from certain protections of Roman citizenship, imposed as a legal penalty by a censor or praetor. [1] In more general usage during the Republic and Principate, infamia was damage to the esteem (aestimatio) in which a person was held socially; that is, to one's reputation. A person who suffered infamia was an infamis (plural infames).

Contents

Infamia was a form of censure more disgraceful than ignominia, which in its technical sense resulted from the censors' nota censoria, a figurative branding or marking of a citizen that included removal from the senate or other reduction of status. [2] Ignominia, however, was an impermanent status that could be ameliorated, for instance by paying off a debt. A debtor who could not meet his obligations might eventually suffer infamia, a penalty that legislation passed under Julius Caesar sought to mitigate through payment options. [3]

In addition to bankruptcy, a judgment of flagrant dishonesty over contractual relations and other business dealings could result in infamia. Examples of legal actions for which infamia was a penalty (called actiones famosae or actiones turpes) generally involved a betrayal of trust, at times as expressed by lack of respect for another's property rights. A successful lawsuit claiming theft (furtum) or seizure of movable goods by force (rapina) could result in infamia for the defendant. [4] In 66 BC, a praetorian edict permitted lawsuits against "fraud by means of deception" (dolus) when no other contractual remedy was available. Dolus was so broadly defined that Cicero characterized this kind of lawsuit as a fishing expedition. [5] A contractual obligation of mandatum was based on friendship and could not involve any payment, but a lawsuit could be brought to seek restitution for loss or damage; a depositum was the contractual placing of property in the keeping of someone who was not supposed to use it, and legal action could be undertaken to show that the depositary did not fulfill his obligation or refused to return it. A conviction for either an actio mandati or an actio depositi resulted in infamia primarily for breaking one's word, beyond material or financial loss. [6]

Iniuria (from which English "injury" derives) was a broad category for a wrongful act that could be penalized by infamia, including bodily harm and damage against property or reputation, [7] as well as "affronts to decency" and what would now be called sexual harassment. [8]

Other grounds for infamia included dishonorable discharge from the military, bigamy, and "misbehavior in family life." [9]

Consequences

Infames shared some conditions of status with slaves: they could not provide testimony in a court of law, and they were liable to corporal punishment. [10] They could not bring lawsuits to the court on behalf of themselves or others, and they could not run for public office. [11]

The infames

Infamia was an "inescapable consequence" for certain kinds of employment, including that of undertakers, executioners, [12] prostitutes and pimps, entertainers such as actors and dancers, and gladiators. [13] The collective infamia of stage performers, prostitutes, and gladiators arose from the uses to which they put their bodies: by subjecting themselves to public display, they had surrendered the right of privacy and bodily integrity that defined the citizen. [14] The infamia of entertainers did not exclude them from socializing among the Roman elite, and entertainers who were "stars", both men and women, sometimes became the lovers of such high-profile figures as Mark Antony and the dictator Sulla.

Charioteers may or may not have been infames; two jurists of the later Imperial era argue that athletic competitions were not mere entertainment but "seem useful" as instructive displays of Roman strength and virtus . [15] A passive homosexual who was "outed" might be subject to social infamia in the colloquial sense without being socially ostracized, and if a citizen he might retain his legal standing. [16] [17]

Religious infamy

In late antiquity, when the Roman Empire had come under Christian rule, infamia was used to punish "religious deviants" such as heretics, apostates, and those who declined to give up their own religious practices and convert to Christianity. [18] The modern Roman Catholic Church has the similar concept of infamy.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman censor</span> Roman magistrate and census administrator

The censor was a magistrate in ancient Rome who was responsible for maintaining the census, supervising public morality, and overseeing certain aspects of the government's finances.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in ancient Rome</span>

Freeborn women in ancient Rome were citizens (cives), but could not vote or hold political office. Because of their limited public role, women are named less frequently than men by Roman historians. But while Roman women held no direct political power, those from wealthy or powerful families could and did exert influence through private negotiations. Exceptional women who left an undeniable mark on history include Lucretia and Claudia Quinta, whose stories took on mythic significance; fierce Republican-era women such as Cornelia, mother of the Gracchi, and Fulvia, who commanded an army and issued coins bearing her image; women of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, most prominently Livia and Agrippina the Younger, who contributed to the formation of Imperial mores; and the empress Helena, a driving force in promoting Christianity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Augury</span> Roman religious practice

Augury was a Greco-Roman religion practice of observing the behavior of birds, to receive omens. When the individual, known as the augur, read these signs, it was referred to as "taking the auspices". "Auspices" means "looking at birds". Auspex, another word for augur, can be translated to "one who looks at birds". Depending upon the birds, the auspices from the gods could be favorable or unfavorable. Sometimes politically motivated augurs would fabricate unfavorable auspices in order to delay certain state functions, such as elections. Pliny the Elder attributes the invention of auspicy to Tiresias the seer of Thebes

<i>Mos maiorum</i> Customs and traditions of ancient Rome

The mos maiorum is the unwritten code from which the ancient Romans derived their social norms. It is the core concept of Roman traditionalism, distinguished from but in dynamic complement to written law. The mos maiorum was collectively the time-honoured principles, behavioural models, and social practices that affected private, political, and military life in ancient Rome.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gladiatrix</span> Female gladiator

The gladiatrix is the female equivalent of the gladiator of ancient Rome. Like their male counterparts, gladiatrices fought each other, or wild animals, to entertain audiences at various games and festivals. Very little is known about them. They seem to have used much the same equipment as male gladiators, but were heavily outnumbered by them, and were almost certainly considered an exotic rarity by their audiences. They seem to have been introduced during the very Late Republic and early Roman empire, and were officially banned as unseemly from 200 AD onwards. Their existence is known only through a few accounts written by members of Rome's elite, and a very small number of inscriptions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Infamy</span>

Infamy, in common usage, is the notoriety gained from a negative incident or reputation. The word stems from the Latin infamia, antonym of fama.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marriage in ancient Rome</span> Social institution in the classical Roman civilization

Marriage in ancient Rome was a fundamental institution of society and was used by Romans primarily as a tool for interfamilial alliances. Roman marriage was a monogamous institution: Roman citizens could have only one spouse at a time but were allowed to divorce and remarry. This form of monogamy in Greco-Roman civilization may have arisen from the relative egalitarianism of democratic and republican city-states. Early Christianity embraced this ideal of monogamous marriage, and perpetuated it as an essential element in many later Western cultures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homosexuality in ancient Rome</span> Sexuality in ancient Rome

Homosexuality in ancient Rome often differs markedly from the contemporary West. Latin lacks words that would precisely translate "homosexual" and "heterosexual". The primary dichotomy of ancient Roman sexuality was active / dominant / masculine and passive / submissive / feminine. Roman society was patriarchal, and the freeborn male citizen possessed political liberty (libertas) and the right to rule both himself and his household (familia). "Virtue" (virtus) was seen as an active quality through which a man (vir) defined himself. The conquest mentality and "cult of virility" shaped same-sex relations. Roman men were free to enjoy sex with other males without a perceived loss of masculinity or social status, as long as they took the dominant or penetrative role. Acceptable male partners were slaves and former slaves, prostitutes, and entertainers, whose lifestyle placed them in the nebulous social realm of infamia, excluded from the normal protections accorded to a citizen even if they were technically free. Freeborn male minors were off limits at certain periods in Rome, though professional prostitutes and entertainers might remain sexually available well into adulthood.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Slavery in ancient Rome</span> Treatment of people as property in ancient Rome and its empire

Slavery in ancient Rome played an important role in society and the economy. Unskilled or low-skill slaves labored in the fields, mines, and mills with few opportunities for advancement and little chance of freedom. Skilled and educated slaves—including artisans, chefs, domestic staff and personal attendants, entertainers, business managers, accountants and bankers, educators at all levels, secretaries and librarians, civil servants, and physicians—occupied a more privileged tier of servitude and could hope to obtain freedom through one of several well-defined paths with protections under the law. The possibility of manumission and subsequent citizenship was a distinguishing feature of Rome's system of slavery, resulting in a significant and influential number of freedpersons in Roman society.

In Roman law, ius singulare was a special law that applied to a certain class of persons, such as soldiers or minors, or to an individual, in contrast to ius commune civium Romanorum, the law in common to all Roman citizens. In effect, ius singulare was "a technique for incorporating new rules without having to change the old ones."

The Lex Scantinia is a poorly documented Roman law that penalized a sex crime (stuprum) against a freeborn male minor. The law may also have been used to prosecute adult male citizens who willingly took a passive role in having sex with other men. It was thus aimed at protecting the citizen's body from sexual abuse (stuprum), but did not prohibit homosexual behavior as such, as long as the passive partner was not a citizen in good standing. The primary use of the Lex Scantinia seems to have been harassing political opponents whose lifestyles opened them to criticism as passive homosexuals or pederasts in the Hellenistic manner.

Leges Clodiae were a series of laws (plebiscites) passed by the Plebeian Council of the Roman Republic under the tribune Publius Clodius Pulcher in 58 BC. Clodius was a member of the patrician family ("gens") Claudius; the alternative spelling of his name is sometimes regarded as a political gesture. With the support of Julius Caesar, who held his first consulship in 59 BC, Clodius had himself adopted into a plebeian family in order to qualify for the office of tribune of the plebs, which was not open to patricians. Clodius was famously a bitter opponent of Cicero.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prostitution in ancient Rome</span> Aspect of ancient Roman society

Prostitution in ancient Rome was legal and licensed. Men of any social status were free to engage prostitutes of either sex without incurring moral disapproval, as long as they demonstrated self-control and moderation in the frequency and enjoyment of sex. Brothels were part of the culture of ancient Rome, as popular places of entertainment for Roman men.

Res extra commercium is a doctrine originating in Roman law, holding that certain things may not be the object of private rights, and are therefore insusceptible to being traded. The doctrine encompasses entities such as humans, public areas, organs, citizenship, and prostitution, and is an exception to the general principle of freedom of contract.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glossary of ancient Roman religion</span>

The vocabulary of ancient Roman religion was highly specialized. Its study affords important information about the religion, traditions and beliefs of the ancient Romans. This legacy is conspicuous in European cultural history in its influence on later juridical and religious vocabulary in Europe, particularly of the Christian Church. This glossary provides explanations of concepts as they were expressed in Latin pertaining to religious practices and beliefs, with links to articles on major topics such as priesthoods, forms of divination, and rituals.

Furtum was a delict of Roman law comparable to the modern offence of theft despite being a civil and not criminal wrong. In the classical law and later, it denoted the contrectatio ("handling") of most types of property with a particular sort of intention – fraud and in the later law, a view to gain. It is unclear whether a view to gain was always required or added later, and, if the latter, when. This meant that the owner did not consent, although Justinian broadened this in at least one case. The law of furtum protected a variety of property interests, but not land, things without an owner, or types of state or religious things. An owner could commit theft by taking his things back in certain circumstances, as could a borrower or similar user through misuse.

In Roman law, contracts could be divided between those in re, those that were consensual, and those that were innominate contracts in Roman law. Although Gaius only identifies a single type of contract in re, it is commonly thought that there were four types of these, as Justinian identifies: mutuum, commodatum, depositum (deposit) and pignus (pledge).

<i>Contubernium</i> Quasi-marital relationship involving slaves

In ancient Rome, contubernium was a quasi-marital relationship between two slaves or between a slave (servus) and a free citizen who was usually a former slave or the child of a former slave. A slave involved in such a relationship was called contubernalis, the basic and general meaning of which was "companion".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Concubinatus</span> Quasi-marital relationship involving Roman citizens

Concubinatus was a monogamous union, intended to be of some duration but not necessarily permanent, that was socially and to some extent legally recognized as an alternative to marriage in the Roman Empire. Concubinage became a legal concern in response to Augustan moral legislation that criminalized adultery and imposed penalties on some consensual sexual behaviors outside marriage.

In Roman law, obligatio ex delicto is an obligation created as a result of a delict. While "delict" itself was never defined by Roman jurisprudents, delicts were generally composed of injurious or otherwise illicit actions, ranging from those covered by criminal law today such as theft (furtum) and robbery (rapina) to those usually settled in civil disputes in modern times such as defamation, a form of iniuria. Obligationes ex delicto therefore can be characterized as a form of private punishment, but also as a form of loss compensation.

References

  1. ↑ McGinn, Thomas A. J. (1998). Prostitution, Sexuality and the Law in Ancient Rome. Oxford University Press. p. 65ff.
  2. ↑ Adolf Berger, s.v. ignominia and nota censoria, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law (American Philological Society, 1953, 1991), pp. 491, 598.
  3. ↑ M. W. Frederiksen, "Caesar, Cicero and the Problem of Debt," Journal of Roman Studies 56:1/2 (1966), pp. 134–135.
  4. ↑ Berger, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, s.v. furtum, p. 480; rapina, p. 667; vi bona rapta, p. 763.
  5. ↑ Literally, "a dragnet of any and all malicious intent" (everriculum malitiarum omnium): Berger, s.v. dolus, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, p. 343, citing Cicero, De natura deorum 3.30.74.
  6. ↑ Berger, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, s.v. mandatum, p. 574; depositum, p. 432.
  7. ↑ Berger, s.v. iniuria, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, p. 502.
  8. ↑ Nephele Papakonstantinou and Anne Stevens, "Raptus and Roman Law," Clio 52 (2020), p. 24.
  9. ↑ Berger, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, s.v. infamia, p. 500.
  10. ↑ Edwards, Catharine (1997). Unspeakable Professions Public Performance and Prostitution in Ancient Rome. Princeton University Press. p. 73. ISBN   9780691011783.
  11. ↑ Berger, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law, s.v. infamia, p. 500.
  12. ↑ Bond, Sarah (2017). Trade and Taboo. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.3998/mpub.9934045. ISBN   978-0-472-00361-7.
  13. ↑ Edwards, Catharine (1997). Unspeakable Professions Public Performance and Prostitution in Ancient Rome. Princeton University Press. p. 67. ISBN   9780691011783.
  14. ↑ Edwards, "Unspeakable Professions," pp. 66–67.
  15. ↑ Bell, Sinclair W., "Roman Chariot-Racing: Charioteers, Factions, Spectators", in P. Christesen and D. Kyle (Editors), Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Sport and Spectacle in Greek and Roman Antiquity, January 2014, pp. 492–504, citing Ulpian, Digest, 3. 2. 4, doi : 10.1002/9781118609965.ch33
  16. ↑ Richlin, Amy (1993). "Not before Homosexuality: The Materiality of the cinaedus and the Roman Law against Love between Men". Journal of the History of Sexuality. Vol. 3, no. 4. pp. 550–551, 555ff.
  17. ↑ Edwards, Catharine (1997). Unspeakable Professions Public Performance and Prostitution in Ancient Rome. Princeton University Press. p. 68. ISBN   9780691011783.
  18. ↑ Sarah Bond, "Altering Infamy: Status, Violence, and Civic Exclusion in Late Antiquity," Classical Antiquity 33:1 (2014), pp. 1-30


LEX

This article about Roman law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Gender symbols (4 colors).svg

This sexuality-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.