Institute for Free Speech

Last updated
Institute for Free Speech
Formation2005
Founder Bradley A. Smith
Type 501(c)(3) Nonprofit organization
Purpose"To defend the First Amendment right to freedom of speech, press, assembly, and petition." [1] [2] [3]
Location
Region
United States
Website www.ifs.org
Formerly called
Center for Competitive Politics

The Institute for Free Speech (IFS), formerly called the Center for Competitive Politics, is a conservative 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] It has worked to oppose limits on political donations and other campaign regulations. [10] [11] [12] [2] [13] IFS' stated mission is to "promote and defend the First Amendment rights to freely speak, assemble, publish, and petition the government through strategic litigation, communication, activism, training, research, and education." [14]

Contents

History

The Center for Competitive Politics was founded in 2005 by former Federal Election Commission Chairman Bradley A. Smith, a 2000 Clinton appointee who had been selected by congressional Republican leaders. [10] Smith founded the organization with the goal of "challenging the current campaign finance system in both federal court and the court of public opinion." [10]

The organization represented the plaintiffs in SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission , Court of Appeals decision that authorized the creation of Super PACs in 2010. [15]

In 2014, the organization challenged California's requirement that nonprofit groups must turn over their donor lists to the state in order to receive a license to solicit contributions from residents of the state. [16]

In 2014, the organization stated its opposition to a proposed constitutional amendment that would give Congress more power to regulate political spending. [17] It has also opposed proposed Internal Revenue Service guidelines that would redefine tax rules for social welfare organizations that engage in political advocacy as a secondary activity. [18]

In October 2017, the organization changed its name to the Institute for Free Speech, [12] with an emphasis on "protecting First Amendment political speech rights". [19] [2] [3]

Allen Dickerson, legal director of the institute, became a member of the Federal Election Commission in 2020, after being nominated by President Donald Trump and confirmed by a vote of 49 to 47 in the U.S. Senate. [5] [20]

Activities

The Institute for Free Speech represents plaintiffs in free speech cases. [21] [22] [23] It has been particularly active in criticizing campaign finance regulations, taxpayer-financed political campaigns, and restrictions on referendums and ballot initiatives. The organization publishes various studies and reports on campaign finance and political speech matters, and provides pro bono legal counsel to parties in suits challenging the constitutionality of campaign finance statutes. It has also defended the right of independent groups to participate freely in the electoral process. [24] [25]

The organization has a Free Speech Arguments Podcast that reviews oral arguments from First Amendment free political speech cases across the country. [19]

In 2024, the organization released a study of state laws regarding free speech protection against frivolous lawsuits. [19] [26]

In 2024 the Institute for Free Speech sued the FEC over the discrepancy whereby small donors to federal election campaigns utilizing conduits ActBlue or WinRed are automatically made public but same-sized donations directly to the campaign are not. [27] [28] The suit seeks to afford the same level of anonymity to the small-donor conduit contributors. [28] [ independent source needed ]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Campaign finance reform in the United States</span> United States efforts to regulate fundraising for democratic election campaigns

Campaign finance laws in the United States have been a contentious political issue since the early days of the union. The most recent major federal law affecting campaign finance was the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) of 2002, also known as "McCain-Feingold". Key provisions of the law prohibited unregulated contributions to national political parties and limited the use of corporate and union money to fund ads discussing political issues within 60 days of a general election or 30 days of a primary election; However, provisions of BCRA limiting corporate and union expenditures for issue advertising were overturned by the Supreme Court in Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Citizens United (organization)</span> Conservative 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization

Citizens United is a conservative 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization in the United States founded in 1988. In 2010, the organization won a U.S. Supreme Court case known as Citizens United v. FEC, which struck down as unconstitutional a federal law prohibiting corporations and unions from making expenditures in connection with federal elections. The organization's president and chairman is David Bossie.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Election Commission</span> United States independent regulatory agency that regulates federal elections

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is an independent agency of the United States government that enforces U.S. campaign finance laws and oversees U.S. federal elections. Created in 1974 through amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act, the commission describes its duties as "to disclose campaign finance information, to enforce the provisions of the law such as the limits and prohibitions on contributions, and to oversee the public funding of Presidential elections." It is led by six commissioners who are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate.

A 527 organization or 527 group is a type of U.S. tax-exempt organization organized under Section 527 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. A 527 group is created primarily to influence the selection, nomination, election, appointment or defeat of candidates to federal, state or local public office.

Common Cause is a watchdog group based in Washington, D.C., with chapters in 35 states. It was founded in 1970 by John W. Gardner, a Republican, who was the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare in the administration of President Lyndon Johnson as well as chair of the National Urban Coalition, an advocacy group for minorities and the working poor in urban areas. In its early days, Common Cause focused its efforts on ending the Vietnam War and lowering the voting age from 21 to 18.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Campaign finance in the United States</span> Contributions to American election campaign funds

The financing of electoral campaigns in the United States happens at the federal, state, and local levels by contributions from individuals, corporations, political action committees, and sometimes the government. Campaign spending has risen steadily at least since 1990. For example, a candidate who won an election to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1990 spent on average $407,600, while the winner in 2022 spent on average $2.79 million; in the Senate, average spending for winning candidates went from $3.87 million to $26.53 million.

ActBlue is an American Democratic Party political action committee (PAC) and fundraising platform founded in 2004. ActBlue is a major part of the Democratic Party's fundraising infrastructure. It is focused on mobilizing small-dollar donors and, as of June 2024, had raised $13.7 billion for Democratic candidates and causes since it was established. ActBlue is organized as a PAC, but it serves as a conduit for processing individual contributions made through the platform. Under federal law, these contributions are made by individuals and are not considered PAC donations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bradley Smith (law professor)</span> American political scientist

Bradley Alan Smith is the Josiah H. Blackmore II/Shirley M. Nault Professor at Capital University Law School in Columbus, Ohio. He previously served as commissioner, vice chairman, and chairman of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) between 2000 and 2005. He has held prior visiting appointments at Princeton University and West Virginia University. He is best known for his writing and activities on campaign finance regulation.

Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 U.S. 449 (2007), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that issue ads may not be banned from the months preceding a primary or general election.

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The court held 5–4 that the freedom of speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political campaigns by corporations including for-profits, nonprofit organizations, labor unions, and other kinds of associations.

Independent expenditure-only political action committees, better known as super PACs, are a type of political action committee (PAC) in the United States. Unlike traditional PACs, super PACs are legally allowed to fundraise unlimited amounts of money from individuals or organisations for the purpose of campaign advertising; however, they are not permitted to either coordinate with or contribute directly to candidate campaigns or political parties. Super PACs are subject to the same organizational, reporting, and public disclosure requirements of traditional PACs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colbert Super PAC</span> American satirical political action committee

Americans for a Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow was a United States political action committee (PAC) established by Stephen Colbert, who portrayed a character of the same name who was a mock-conservative political pundit on Comedy Central's satirical television series The Colbert Report. As a super PAC the organization could raise unlimited sums of money from corporations, unions and other groups, as well as wealthy individuals. Speaking in character, Colbert said the money would be raised not only for political ads, but also "normal administrative expenses, including but not limited to, luxury hotel stays, private jet travel, and PAC mementos from Saks Fifth Avenue and Neiman Marcus."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dark money</span> Undisclosed American political contributions

In politics, particularly the politics of the United States, dark money refers to spending to influence elections, public policy, and political discourse, where the source of the money is not disclosed to the public.

McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, 572 U.S. 185 (2014), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on campaign finance. The decision held that Section 441 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, which imposed a limit on contributions an individual can make over a two-year period to all national party and federal candidate committees, is unconstitutional.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Derek Cressman</span> American politician

Derek Cressman is a California-based political reform advocate, author and former California Secretary of State candidate. His political ideals focus on removing big money from politics, improving campaign finance transparency and modernizing the California voter registration system. He began his work on these issues in 1995 as the Democracy Program Director for U.S. PIRG and worked in many positions, including Vice President for States, at Common Cause from 2006 to 2013.

<i>FEC v. National Conservative PAC</i> 1985 United States Supreme Court case

FEC v. National Conservative PAC, 470 U.S. 480 (1985), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States striking down expenditure prohibitions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA), which regulates the fundraising and spending in political campaigns. The FECA is the primary law that places regulations on campaign financing by limiting the amount that may be contributed. The Act established that no independent political action committee may contribute more than $1,000 to any given presidential candidate in support of a campaign.

FEC v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life was a lawsuit filed by the US Federal Election Commission.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">For the People Act</span> Election reform and anti-corruption bill in the 117th Congress

The Freedom to Vote Act, introduced as H.R. 1, is a bill in the United States Congress intended to expand voting rights, change campaign finance laws to reduce the influence of money in politics, ban partisan gerrymandering, and create new ethics rules for federal officeholders.

The Sixteen Thirty Fund is a hub of undisclosed political spending on the American Left. The group serves as a fiscal sponsor for other organizations, incubating and financing various progressive projects. According to The New York Times, "The Sixteen Thirty is part of a broader network of progressive nonprofits that donors use to fill specific spaces on the political chessboard." The Sixteen Thirty Fund is administered by Arabella Advisors, a for-profit consulting firm.

Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for Senate, 596 U.S. 289 (2022), was a case related to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court of the United States struck down section 304 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, which limited the amount of money that candidates could be paid on personal loans to their campaign.

References

  1. ↑ "Your Rights | The Institute for Free Speech defends your First Amendment right to freedom of speech, press, assembly, and petition". Institute for Free Speech. Retrieved 6 April 2024.
  2. 1 2 3 "Institute for Free Speech". DeSmog . Retrieved 6 April 2024.
  3. 1 2 "Institute for Free Speech". Charity Navigator . Retrieved 6 April 2024.
  4. ↑ Sanders, Katie. "Is IRS Obama's Watergate?". Politifact . Retrieved 2024-04-06. the conservative-leaning Center for Competitive Politics
  5. 1 2 Ackley, Kate (26 June 2020). "FEC set to lose its quorum again". Roll Call . Retrieved 6 April 2024. the conservative Institute for Free Speech
  6. ↑ Lonas, Lexi (20 October 2023). "'No credibility': Critics cry foul as colleges press for free speech amid Israel-Hamas conflict". The Hill . Retrieved 6 April 2024. the conservative-leaning Institute for Free Speech
  7. ↑ Williams, Joseph P. (12 Feb 2018). "The Right's First Amendment Push". U.S. News & World Report . Retrieved 6 April 2024. the Institute for Free Speech, a right-leaning public policy center
  8. ↑ Miller, Steve (12 December 2023). "How Tax-Exempt Nonprofits Skirt U.S. Law to Turn Out the Democrat Base in Elections | RealClearInvestigations". www.realclearinvestigations.com. Retrieved 6 April 2024. the conservative Institute for Free Speech
  9. ↑ "David Keating, leader for the right on campaign finance laws - The Fulcrum". thefulcrum.us. 20 Sep 2020. Retrieved 6 April 2024. one of the foremost conservative forces in the money-in-politics debate
  10. 1 2 3 Cummings, Jeanne (2008-08-12). "Conservatives plot on campaign finance". Politico . Retrieved 11 August 2014.
  11. ↑ Beckel, Michael (2016-01-20). "What Is "'Dark Money' and Is It Bad?". Center for Public Integrity . Retrieved 2024-04-06– via NBC News.
  12. 1 2 Leathle, Emma (November 1, 2017). "Congress Holds Hearings On Online Political Ads". HuffPost . Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  13. ↑ Ackley, Kate (2022-09-21). "Senators to seek action on Democratic political disclosure bill". Roll Call . Retrieved 2024-04-07.
  14. ↑ "About the Institute for Free Speech". Institute for Free Speech. 23 October 2007. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
  15. ↑ "The Court Case That Led to the Creation of Super PACs". About.com . Archived from the original on 2014-08-19. Retrieved 2014-08-18.
  16. ↑ "Give Us Your Donors, or Else". The Wall Street Journal . 2014-07-22. Retrieved 11 August 2014.
  17. ↑ Newlin Carney, Eliza (2014-07-02). "Hobby Lobby Ruling Fuels Amendment Push". Roll Call . Retrieved 11 August 2014.
  18. ↑ Hicks, Josh (2014-06-18). "IRS to propose specific limits on nonprofits' political activities". Washington Post. Retrieved 11 August 2014.
  19. 1 2 3 "Welcome to The Institute for Free Speech | Your Rights: The Institute for Free Speech is here to defend your First Amendment rights". Institute for Free Speech. Retrieved 6 April 2024.
  20. ↑ Lee, Michelle Ye Hee (December 9, 2020). "Senate confirms three FEC commissioners, restoring full slate for the first time since 2017". The Washington Post .
  21. ↑ Pazniokas, Mark (September 13, 2023). "Court explores whether CT's campaign law violates free speech". The Connecticut Mirror . Retrieved 8 April 2024.
  22. ↑ "Alexander et al v. Sutton et al". pacermonitor.com. PacerMonitor, LLC. Retrieved 8 April 2024.
  23. ↑ "Belin v. Nelson". pacermonitor.com. PacerMonitor, LLC. Retrieved 8 April 2024.
  24. ↑ Mahony, Edmund (20 May 2024). "CT Supreme Court rules that state ban on some political ads infringes on political free speech". Hartford Courant. Retrieved 24 May 2024.
  25. ↑ Mays, Jeffery C. (23 April 2019). "Gays? Palestinians? Speaking Your Mind Can Spell Trouble on the City Council". The New York Times. Retrieved 24 May 2024.
  26. ↑ Collins, Ronald K.L. (January 10, 2024). "Robert Post: 'There is growing pessimism about the future of free speech in the United States' — First Amendment News 407 | Institute for Free Speech report on frivolous lawsuits". FIRE Newsdesk. Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression . Retrieved 8 April 2024.
  27. ↑ Lee, Michelle Ye Hee (September 10, 2019). "Trump's critics are targeting his donors, sparking fears of a backlash against disclosure". Washtington Post. Retrieved January 28, 2024.
  28. 1 2 "Small-Dollar Donors Sue FEC over Disclosure Requirements" (Press release). Institute for Free Speech. July 11, 2024. Retrieved January 20, 2024.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.