Institutional logic

Last updated

Institutional logic is a core concept in sociological theory and organizational studies, with growing interest in marketing theory. [1] It focuses on how broader belief systems shape the cognition and behavior of actors. [2]

Contents

Friedland and Alford (1991) wrote: "Institutions are supraorganizational patterns of human activity by which individuals and organizations produce and reproduce their material subsistence and organize time and space. They are also symbolic systems, ways of ordering reality, and thereby rendering experience of time and space meaningful". [3] Friedland and Alford (1991, p. 248) elaborated: "Each of the most important orders of contemporary Western societies has a central logic – a set of material practices and symbolic constructions – which constitute its organising principles and which is available to organizations and individuals to elaborate." Thornton and Ocasio (1999: 804) define institutional logics as "the socially constructed, historical patterns of material practices, assumptions, values, beliefs, and rules by which individuals produce and reproduce their material subsistence, organize time and space, and provide meaning to their social reality". [4]

Overview

Focusing on macro-societal phenomena, Friedland and Alford (1991: 232) identified several key Institutions: the Capitalist market, bureaucratic state, democracy, nuclear family, and Christianity that are each guided by a distinct institutional logic. Thornton (2004) revised Friedland and Alford's (1991) inter-institutional scheme to six institutional orders, i.e., the market, the corporation, the professions, the state, the family, and religions. More recently, Thornton, Ocasio and Lounsbury (2012), in more fully fleshing out the institutional logic perspective, added community as another key institutional order. This revision to a theoretically abstract and analytically distinct set of ideal types makes it useful for studying multiple logics in conflict and consensus, the hybridization of logics, and institutions in other parts of society and the world. While building on Friedland and Alford's scheme, the revision addresses the confusion created by conflating institutional sectors with ideology (democracy) and means of organization (bureaucracy), variables that can be characteristic several different institutional sectors. The institutional logic of Christianity leaves out other religions in the US and other religions that are dominant in other parts of the world. [5] Thornton and Ocasio (2008) discuss the importance of not confusing the ideal types of the inter-institutional system with a description of the empirical observations in a study—that is to use the ideal types as meta theory and method of analysis.

New institutionalism

While the concept of institutional logics has emerged from the new institutional theory, also called "neo-institutional theory", it expands its theoretical scope by not only explaining homogeneity but also heterogeneity in organizational and individual behavior. [6]

Organizational theorists operating within the new institutionalism (see also institutional theory) have begun to develop the institutional logics concept by empirically testing it. One variant emphasizes how logics can focus the attention of key decision-makers on a particular set of issues and solutions (Ocasio, 1997), leading to logic-consistent decisions (Thornton, 2002). A fair amount of research on logics has focused on the importance of dominant logics and shifts from one logic to another (e.g., Lounsbury, 2002; Thornton, 2002; Suddaby & Greenwood, 2005). Haveman and Rao (1997) showed how the rise of Progressive thought enabled a shift in savings and loan organizational forms in the U.S. in the early 20th century. Scott et al. (2000) detailed how logic shifts in healthcare led to the valorization of different actors, behaviors and governance structures. Thornton and Ocasio (1999) analyzed how a change from professional to market logics in U.S. higher education publishing led to corollary changes in how executive succession was carried out.

While much earlier work focused on ambiguity as a result of multiple and conflicting institutional logics, at the levels of analysis of society and individual roles, [7] Friedland and Alford (1991:248-255) discussed in theory multiple and competing logics at the macro level of analysis. Recent empirical research, inspired by the work of Bourdieu, is developing a more pluralistic approach by focusing on multiple competing logics and contestation of meaning. [8] By focusing on how some fields are composed of multiple logics, and thus, multiple forms of institutionally-based rationality, institutional analysts can provide new insight into practice variation and the dynamics of practice. [9] Multiple logics can create diversity in practice by enabling variety in cognitive orientation and contestation over which practices are appropriate. As a result, such multiplicity can create enormous ambiguity, leading to logic blending, the creation of new logics, and the continued emergence of new practice variants. Thornton, Jones, and Kury (2005) showed how competing logics may never resolve but share the market space as in the case of architectural services.

Recent research has also documented the co-existence or potential conflict of multiple logics within particular organizations. Zilber (2002), for example, described the organizational consequences of a shift from one logic to another within an Israeli rape crisis center, in which new organization members reshaped the center and its practices to reflect a new dominant logic that they have carried into the organization. [10] Tilcsik (2010) documented a logic shift in a post-Communist government agency, describing a conflict between the agency's old guard (carriers of the logic of Communist state bureaucracies) and its new guard (carriers of a market logic). This study shows that, paradoxically, an intra-organizational group's efforts to resist a particular logic might in fact open the organization's door to carriers of that very logic. [11] Almandoz (2012) examined the embeddedness of new local banks' founding teams in a community logic or a financial logic, linking institutional logics to new banking venture's establishment and entrepreneurial success. [12] As these studies demonstrate, the institutional logics perspective offers valuable insights into important intra-organizational processes affecting organizational practices, change, and success. These studies represent an effort to understand institutional complexity due to conflicting or inconsistent logics within particular organizations, a situation that might results from the entry of new organization members or the layering (or "sedimentation") of new organizational imprints upon old ones over time. [13]

Institutional theory in marketing

This growing area of research highlights the way that market structures, processes and consumer behaviors can be shaped by different institutional logics. [14] For example, different rhetorical strategies grounded in particular institutional logics might be used in order to better persuade potential consumers. [15]

Much like the growing use of institutional theory in marketing, we also find more use of institutional logics in marketing. For example, Eritmur and Coskuner-Balli examined the conflicting institutional logics of the yoga market, highlighting the coexistence of the fitness, commercial, spiritual, and medical logic. [16] Thompson-Whiteside and Turnbull employ the institutional logics framing to evaluate continued gender stereotypes in advertising. [17]

Much like in management, this research has gone beyond showing the existence of a particular institutional logic into situations of so-called institutional complexity where there are multiple coexisting and often conflicting institutional logics present in a given domain (See Greenwood et al. 2011). [18] For example, social entrepreneurs must combine elements of business and social purpose. [19] Dolbec and coauthors also consider how ongoing institutional complexity may foster market evolution. [20] Work in this last line of argument is where the interest in institutional logics intersects with research in market shaping and market system dynamics.

More recent research has examined how firms and consumers might navigate conflicting institutional logics. For example, a study of Italian ketogenic dieters found they undertook "emotion work" to navigate the institutional complexity in this area, given that the ketogenic diet conflicted with the traditional Italian diet. [21] Similarly, market intermediaries may use particular rhetorical strategies to navigate multiple institutional logics, as seen in the case of agencies seeking to recruit women to donate their eggs for donor-assisted IVF. [22] Firms, similarly, must also navigate situations of institutional complexity in markets, as seen in the varying emphasis on fitness, spirituality and commercial logics by different schools and entrepreneurs in the yoga industry. [23]

Historicizing institutional logics

Recent work in institutional theory has attempted to bring historiography into an understanding of institutions. In particular, scholars have drawn onto the Annales School in history. Concepts such as mentalities, critical events, and time horizon have been mapped out and explained in institutional terms, to be mobilized in future research. [24] [25] Such theoretical framework complements existing apparatus in institutional theory, in the sense that it helps understand historical and temporal dynamics in institutional theory.

See also

Related Research Articles

Strategy is a general plan to achieve one or more long-term or overall goals under conditions of uncertainty. In the sense of the "art of the general", which included several subsets of skills including military tactics, siegecraft, logistics etc., the term came into use in the 6th century C.E. in Eastern Roman terminology, and was translated into Western vernacular languages only in the 18th century. From then until the 20th century, the word "strategy" came to denote "a comprehensive way to try to pursue political ends, including the threat or actual use of force, in a dialectic of wills" in a military conflict, in which both adversaries interact.

New institutionalism is an approach to the study of institutions that focuses on the constraining and enabling effects of formal and informal rules on the behavior of individuals and groups. New institutionalism traditionally encompasses three major strands: sociological institutionalism, rational choice institutionalism, and historical institutionalism. New institutionalism originated in work by sociologist John Meyer published in 1977.

Organization studies is the academic field interested in a collective activity, and how it relates to organization, organizing, and management. It is "the examination of how individuals construct organizational structures, processes, and practices and how these, in turn, shape social relations and create institutions that ultimately influence people".

A consulting firm or simply consultancy is a professional service firm that provides expertise and specialised labour for a fee, through the use of consultants. Consulting firms may have one employee or thousands; they may consult in a broad range of domains, for example, management, engineering, and so on.

In sociology and organizational studies, institutional theory is a theory on the deeper and more resilient aspects of social structure. It considers the processes by which structures, including schemes, rules, norms, and routines, become established as authoritative guidelines for social behavior. Different components of institutional theory explain how these elements are created, diffused, adopted, and adapted over space and time; and how they fall into decline and disuse.

Masstige is a marketing term meaning downward brand extension. The word is a portmanteau of the words mass and prestige and has been described as "prestige for the masses". Ajay Kumar, Justin Paul and Anandakuttan Unnithan defined masstige marketing as "A marketing strategy which envisages to make brands prestigious while retaining its affordability for the mass consumers, by grounding in product and promotion strategies, and keeping prices relatively high". Michael Silverstein and Neil Fiske introduced the term 'Masstige', Justin Paul developed the concept, introduced a scale to measure it and popularised it in his articles in 2015, 2018 and 2019.

Historical institutionalism (HI) is a new institutionalist social science approach that emphasizes how timing, sequences and path dependence affect institutions, and shape social, political, economic behavior and change. Unlike functionalist theories and some rational choice approaches, historical institutionalism tends to emphasize that many outcomes are possible, small events and flukes can have large consequences, actions are hard to reverse once they take place, and that outcomes may be inefficient. A critical juncture may set in motion events that are hard to reverse, because of issues related to path dependency. Historical institutionalists tend to focus on history to understand why specific events happen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Richard Scott</span> American sociologist

William Richard Scott is an American sociologist, and Emeritus Professor at Stanford University, specialised in institutional theory and organisation science. He is known for his research on the relation between organizations and their institutional environments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Management cybernetics</span> Application of cybernetics to management and organizations

Management cybernetics is concerned with the application of cybernetics to management and organizations. "Management cybernetics" was first introduced by Stafford Beer in the late 1950s and introduces the various mechanisms of self-regulation applied by and to organizational settings, as seen through a cybernetics perspective. Beer developed the theory through a combination of practical applications and a series of influential books. The practical applications involved steel production, publishing and operations research in a large variety of different industries. Some consider that the full flowering of management cybernetics is represented in Beer's books. However, learning continues.

Michael Lounsbury is an American organizational theorist, Associate Dean of Research, Thornton A. Graham Chair and Professor of strategic management, organizations and sociology at the University of Alberta, and expert in innovation and institutions.

In statistics, qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) is a data analysis based on set theory to examine the relationship of conditions to outcome. QCA describes the relationship in terms of necessary conditions and sufficient conditions. The technique was originally developed by Charles Ragin in 1987 to study data sets that are too small for linear regression analysis but large for cross-case analysis.

Liberal institutionalism is a theory of international relations that holds that international cooperation between states is feasible and sustainable, and that such cooperation can reduce conflict and competition. Neoliberalism is a revised version of liberalism. Alongside neorealism, liberal institutionalism is one of the two most influential contemporary approaches to international relations.

Rational choice institutionalism (RCI) is a theoretical approach to the study of institutions arguing that actors use institutions to maximize their utility, and that institutions affect rational individual behavior. Rational choice institutionalism arose initially from the study of congressional behaviour in the U.S. in the late 1970s. Influential early RCI scholarship was done by political economists at California Institute of Technology, University of Rochester, and Washington University. It employs analytical tools borrowed from neo-classical economics to explain how institutions are created, the behaviour of political actors within it, and the outcome of strategic interaction.

Sociological institutionalism is a form of new institutionalism that concerns "the way in which institutions create meaning for individuals." Its explanations are constructivist in nature. According to Ronald L. Jepperson and John W. Meyer, Sociological institutionalism

treats the “actorhood” of modern individuals and organizations as itself constructed out of cultural materials – and treats contemporary institutional systems as working principally by creating and legitimating agentic actors with appropriate perspectives, motives, and agendas. The scholars who have developed this perspective have been less inclined to emphasize actors’ use of institutions and more inclined to envision institutional forces as producing and using actors. By focusing on the evolving construction and reconstruction of the actors of modern society, institutionalists can better explain the dramatic social changes of the contemporary period – why these changes cut across social contexts and functional settings, and why they often become worldwide in character.

The term ‘hybrid institution’ is not yet well-established or clearly defined in academic literature. German and Keller possibly introduced the term in 2009, describing it as "an institutional arrangement governing the interdependencies among discrete property holders and regimes". Abbot and Faude have suggested more recently that most areas in world politics today are governed "neither by individual institutions nor by regime complexes composed of formal interstate institutions. Rather, they are governed by “hybrid institutional complexes” comprising heterogeneous interstate, infra-state, public–private and private transnational institutions, formal and informal." Whether they are anything more than euphemisms for public-private partnerships, which are nothing new, is yet to be firmly established.

Maria Goranova is professor of management at the University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. She conducts research on shareholder empowerment and activism, corporate governance, and corporate strategy. She serves as editor of Corporate Governance: An International Review, and on the editorial board of Journal of Management, and is a member of the Academy of Management, International Association for Business and Society, and Strategic Management Society. Her research has been published in a number of leading journals including Strategic Management Journal, Journal of Management Studies, Organization Science, Journal of Management, Academy of Management Perspectives, Journal of Business Research, and Academy of Management Proceedings. She is also recipient of Distinguished Paper and Best Reviewer Awards from the Academy of Management.

Patricia H. Thornton is an American organizational theorist, and Grand Challenge Initiative Professor of Sociology and Entrepreneurship at Texas A&M University as well as Adjunct Associate Professor of Business Administration at the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University. She is known for her work on "the sociology of entrepreneurship" and "the Institutional Logics Perspective."

Rational choice is a prominent framework in international relations scholarship. Rational choice is not a substantive theory of international politics, but rather a methodological approach that focuses on certain types of social explanation for phenomena. In that sense, it is similar to constructivism, and differs from liberalism and realism, which are substantive theories of world politics. Rationalist analyses have been used to substantiate realist theories, as well as liberal theories of international relations.

Necessary Condition Analysis (NCA) is a research approach and tool employed to discern "necessary conditions" within datasets. These indispensable conditions stand as pivotal determinants of particular outcomes, wherein the absence of such conditions ensures the absence of the intended result. Illustratively, the admission of a student into a Ph.D. program necessitates an adequate GMAT score; the progression of AIDS mandates the presence of HIV; and the realization of organizational change will not occur without the commitment of management. Singular in nature, these conditions possess the potential to function as bottlenecks for the desired outcome. Their absence unequivocally guarantees the failure of the intended objective, a deficiency that cannot be offset by the influence of other contributing factors. It is noteworthy, however, that the mere presence of the necessary condition does not ensure the assured attainment of success. In such instances, the condition demonstrates its necessity but lacks sufficiency. To obviate the risk of failure, the simultaneous satisfaction of each distinct necessary condition is imperative. NCA serves as a systematic mechanism, furnishing the rationale and methodological apparatus requisite for the identification and assessment of necessary conditions within extant or novel datasets. It is a powerful method for investigating causal relationships and determining the minimum requirements that must be present for an outcome to be achieved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Syagnik Banerjee</span>

Syagnik “Sy” Banerjee is an American scholar, author, and professor affiliated with the University of Michigan-Flint. He is known for publishing literature on the subjects of digital marketing, data sciences, and public policy in publications such as the Journal of Business Research, the Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, and the Harvard Business Review. His works have been cited more than 800 times in academic journals. He is also known for co-authoring the book M-Powering Marketing in a Mobile World.

References

  1. ↑ Lounsbury, Michael; Steele, Christopher W.J.; Wang, Milo Shaoqing; Toubiana, Madeline (2021). "New Directions in the Study of Institutional Logics: From Tools to Phenomena". Annual Review of Sociology. 47 (1): 261–280. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-111734 . ISSN   0360-0572. S2CID   236571196.
  2. ↑ Friedland & Alford, 1991; Lounsbury, 2007; Thornton, 2004
  3. ↑ Friedland, Roger, and Robert R. Alford. 1991. Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions. Pp. 232-266 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 243.
  4. ↑ Thornton, Patricia, H. and William Ocasio (2008). "Institutional Logics," in Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Kerstin Sahlin and Roy Suddaby (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, CA: Sage.
  5. ↑ Gümüsay, Ali A. (2020-05-01). "The Potential for Plurality and Prevalence of the Religious Institutional Logic". Business & Society. 59 (5): 855–880. doi:10.1177/0007650317745634. ISSN   0007-6503. S2CID   148920667.
  6. ↑ Thornton, Patricia H.; Ocasio, William (2008), "Institutional Logics", The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, London: SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 99–128, doi:10.4135/9781849200387.n4, ISBN   978-1-4129-3123-6 , retrieved 2021-03-30
  7. ↑ (Boltanski and Thevenot ([1986] 1991)
  8. ↑ (Lounsbury, 2007; Marquis & Lounsbury, 2007; Schneiberg, 2007)
  9. ↑ (see Lounsbury, 2001; Lounsbury & Crumley, 2007)
  10. ↑ Zilber, T. B. (2002). "Institutionalization as an Interplay between Actions, Meanings, and Actors: The Case of a Rape Crisis Center in Israel." Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 234-254.
  11. ↑ Tilcsik, A. (2010). "From ritual to reality: Demography, ideology, and decoupling in a post-communist government agency." Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1474-1498. Abstract
  12. ↑ Almandoz, J. (2012). "Arriving at the Starting Line: The Impact of Community and Financial Logics on New Banking Ventures." Academy of Management Journal.
  13. ↑ Marquis, Christopher; Tilcsik, András (2013-06-01). "Imprinting: Toward a Multilevel Theory". Academy of Management Annals. 7 (1): 195–245. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.728.6149 . doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.766076. hdl:1813/36441. ISSN   1941-6520.
  14. ↑ Ben Slimane, Karim; Chaney, Damien; Humphreys, Ashlee; Leca, Bernard (2019-12-01). "Bringing institutional theory to marketing: Taking stock and future research directions". Journal of Business Research. 105: 389–394. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.042. ISSN   0148-2963. S2CID   199282779.
  15. ↑ Hartman, Anna E.; Coslor, Erica (2019-12-01). "Earning while giving: Rhetorical strategies for navigating multiple institutional logics in reproductive commodification". Journal of Business Research. 105: 405–419. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.010. hdl: 11343/223022 . ISSN   0148-2963. S2CID   197826643.
  16. ↑ Ertimur, Burçak; Coskuner-Balli, Gokcen (March 2015). "Navigating the Institutional Logics of Markets: Implications for Strategic Brand Management". Journal of Marketing. 79 (2): 40–61. doi:10.1509/jm.13.0218. ISSN   0022-2429. S2CID   167667318.
  17. ↑ Thompson-Whiteside, Helen; Turnbull, Sarah (2021-01-02). "#Metoovertising: the institutional work of creative women who are looking to change the rules of the advertising game". Journal of Marketing Management. 37 (1–2): 117–143. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2020.1869060. ISSN   0267-257X. S2CID   232210800.
  18. ↑ Greenwood, Royston; Raynard, Mia; Kodeih, Farah; Micelotta, Evelyn R.; Lounsbury, Michael (June 2011). "Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses". Academy of Management Annals. 5 (1): 317–371. doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.590299. ISSN   1941-6520.
  19. ↑ Cherrier, Helene; Goswami, Paromita; Ray, Subhasis (2018-05-01). "Social entrepreneurship: Creating value in the context of institutional complexity". Journal of Business Research. 86: 245–258. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.056. ISSN   0148-2963.
  20. ↑ Dolbec, Pierre-Yann; Arsel, Zeynep; Aboelenien, Aya (November 2022). "A Practice Perspective on Market Evolution: How Craft and Commercial Coffee Firms Expand Practices and Develop Markets". Journal of Marketing. 86 (6): 50–69. doi: 10.1177/00222429221093624 . ISSN   0022-2429. S2CID   247824961.
  21. ↑ Corciolani, Matteo (2023-03-01). "Navigating institutional complexity through emotion work: The case of Italian consumers adapting to a ketogenic diet". Journal of Business Research. 158: 113657. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113657 . ISSN   0148-2963. S2CID   255882783.
  22. ↑ Hartman, Anna E.; Coslor, Erica (2019-12-01). "Earning while giving: Rhetorical strategies for navigating multiple institutional logics in reproductive commodification". Journal of Business Research. 105: 405–419. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.010. hdl: 11343/223022 . ISSN   0148-2963. S2CID   197826643.
  23. ↑ Ertimur, Burçak; Coskuner-Balli, Gokcen (March 2015). "Navigating the Institutional Logics of Markets: Implications for Strategic Brand Management". Journal of Marketing. 79 (2): 40–61. doi:10.1509/jm.13.0218. ISSN   0022-2429. S2CID   167667318.
  24. ↑ Clemente, Marco; Durand, Rodolphe; Roulet, Thomas (2017-01-01). "The Recursive Nature of Institutional Change: An Annales School Perspective". Journal of Management Inquiry. 26 (1): 17–31. doi:10.1177/1056492616656408. ISSN   1056-4926. S2CID   147794834.
  25. ↑ Wang, Milo Shaoqing; Steele, Christopher W. J.; Greenwood, Royston (2019-04-01). "Mentalités and Events: Historicizing Institutional Logics" (PDF). Academy of Management Review. 44 (2): 473–476. doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0370. hdl: 20.500.11820/3e7dd8ed-d418-4f71-9dcb-39c152f3cb68 . ISSN   0363-7425. S2CID   169663703.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.