This article needs additional citations for verification .(May 2007) |
An Interactive Electronic Technical Manual (IETM) is a platform to consume and sometimes manage technical documentation. IETMs compress volumes of text into just CD-ROMs or online pages which may include sound and video, and allow readers to locate needed information far more rapidly than in paper manuals. IETMs came into widespread use in the 1990s as huge technical documentation projects for the aircraft and defense industries.
In the United States, in the late 1970s, the US Military began to look at other ways to produce technical manuals. With the introduction of computer technology it was theorized that moving technical manuals to an electronic format would obtain a cost savings, allow better integration with other logistics systems and improve usability of the technical material.
Research was performed in the 1970s and 1980s by all branches of the US military to obtain information on what the goals should be for the electronic technical manuals. Early research was conducted at the Army Communicative Technology Office at Ft. Eustis, the Air Force Human Resources Laboratory (now called Armstrong Laboratory) at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, and the David Taylor Research Center (now called Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division) in Bethesda, Maryland. [1] Programs developed by the Navy, Navy Technical Information Presentation System (NTIPS) and the Air Force, Computer-based Maintenance Aid System (CMAS), were used along with user surveys, technological analysis and design studies to come up with the basic concepts for IETMs. Based on field tests with technicians maintaining military equipment, the tests found that performance was greatly improved and dramatic improvement occurred for inexperienced technicians. One questionnaire found that 90% of the technicians preferred electronic manuals and found them easier to use. [1] [2]
Other examples of the improvements from IETMs included:
Because of the positive results, the Department of Defense identified the need for standardization of the IETM development. In 1987 a joint military and commercial group was formed consisting of the Office of the Secretary of Defense Computer-assisted Acquisition and Logistics Support (OSD CALS) and Aerospace Industries Association (AIA). This group developed concepts for IETM authoring, IETM presentation and data interchange which were used as the basis for standard development. In 1989 the US Navy, Air Force and Army formed an ad-hoc group to determine the best way to create standards for IETMS. Input from the use of NTIPS and CMAS, later renamed Integrated Maintenance Information System(IMIS), were used along with input from the CALS Industry Steering Group (ISG) Paperless Technical Manual Committee, the Navy A-12 Program, The Air Force ATF Program, and the Army PMDE Program's IETM Style Guide as a starting point for a working group for IETM standards. The group came out with the first formally issued set of standards in 1992. [2] By 1994, Senior R&D Engineer Michael Weldon, working on behalf of LORAL Corporation, developed a demonstration White Paper IETM describing the use of an IETM utilizing an eyeglass Monitor interfaced with a portable belt mounted CD Player for hands free use by technicians in the field, i.e. as when working on a tower 60 feet AGL.
The Tri-Service group came up with three standards:
The Tri-Service Group also came up with a roadmap that went through to 1997 for revision of the standards and the creation of documentation explaining the standards. [2]
A synonymous term for IETM is Interactive Electronic Technical Manual (IETP) and whilst some would say one is a single manual and the other a suite of publications, in reality this is not true. The difference in definition is more of geography or route into electronic documentation. With the standard being first defined in the USA as IETM, understandably the Americas mostly use that term. It is also widespread in Asia and particularly India. However, those nations that come more from an S1000D background tend to use IETP - so this is largely Europe, and emerging nations new to electronic publications. [3]
The ETM classes defined by the Tri-Service IETM Working Group are as follows. Note, Class 0 is included for completeness to define a full spectrum; and Class 5 is intentionally left open ended to include future innovations not yet available.
To be called an IETM, the ETM must have extensive provision for the authoring activity to include authored interactive features into the IETM (e.g., prompts, dialogs for obtaining data from a user, alternative branches which the user must choose). There are two classes of IETMs: Class 4 which fully conforms to the IETM Specifications and includes a DBMS-managed formal database for the IETM Revisable Source Data; and Class 3 which does not fully conform to Class 4 (especially in the use of a revisable database for the source data) but has many of the features of a Class 4 IETM. To the end user, Class 3 and Class 4 IETMs may appear to be the functional equivalent; however, the source data management system used to prepare them will be substantially different. Class 5 is a functional super-set of Class 4 with additional features, but which still conforms to the Class 4 IETM Specifications. Class 1 and 2 are for ETMs which do not have authored-in interaction contained in the information itself. Class 2 ETMs is reserved for automated document viewing systems which employs a viewer which gives the reader some interactive features, but which operate on a document file whose only authored-in interactive information is hypertext references to another spot in the document. Class 1 applies to conventional printed document page images, whereas Class 2 eliminates the pagination restrictions and scrolls through the document without page breaks. Whilst some would like to invent new 'classes' of IETM for marketing purposes, these are the levels defined by CALS and encompass all types of IETM.
Due to the imprecise nature of the generic descriptions used in the class and level description of IETMs, IETMs are now defined using a Functionality Matrix. IETMs can have many different features and the Functionality Matrix is used as a checklist of which features are required for a particular IETM. This checklist more precisely defines what functionality an IETM has, and allows clearer communication between an IETM developer and the IETM customer. Classes and levels of IETMS are no longer regarded as acceptable descriptors of IETMs.
The IETM functionality matrix was first developed by the US Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) Product Support Committee. It is used in most US military technical data specifications as well as S1000D, the international IETM standard.
Outline of IETM
| LEVEL -1 | Normally scanned document | Normal PDF file |
| LEVEL -2 | Basic | PDF file with indexing, internal links between pages |
| LEVEL -3 | Intermediate | HTML/XML based Software |
| LEVEL -4 | Advanced | HTML/XML based software with advanced navigation features |
Indian Defense wants all the equipment to be delivered along with IETMs since 2014. Based on the complexity, Level 3 or Level 4 is asked in the RFQ document. Since 2018, mostly Level 4 is asked to deliver.
IETMs are available in 2 standards