Academic career and teaching
Dore began teaching as a Lecturer at the University of Zambia in 1976. In 1979,he joined Southern Illinois University School of Law and later moved to St. Louis University School of Law,where he founded the Center for International and Comparative Law and served as its co-director of for a decade. [4] [5] [6] Over his 35-year teaching career,he specialized in jurisprudence,international law,legal anthropology,and constitutional law. [1]
Dore also lectured in Africa,Latin America,Europe and the Middle East. He served as a visiting professor for fifteen years in France at institutions including Paris Dauphine University,Toulouse Capitole University,University of Orléans,and the Marie and Louis Pasteur University (formerly known as the University of Franche-Comté). [1] [2] [7] His teaching abroad led to several publications in French academic journals and books. [2] In recogniction of these contributions,he received an honorary doctorate from the University of Orléans,France. [8]
Research and scholarship
At St. Louis University School of Law,Dore established a partnership with the University of Warsaw,resulting in the creation of the St. Louis-Warsaw Transatlantic Law Journal,where he served as the Editor-in-Chief for five years. [1] [2] [9] His research interests include international law,international arbitration,legal philosophy,political theory,ethics,and western philosophy. [10] [3]
Dore’s work has been reviewed in academic journals. His analysis of UNCITRAL's Model Law [11] was praised for bridging theory and practice, [12] though some reviewers suggested broader comparisons. [13] [14] His book on Namibia's mandate system [15] was noted for its critique of South Africa's apartheid policies and enforcement failures. [16] [17] [18] His work on international law and superpowers [19] was recognized for its anthropological framing of interbloc reciprocity. [20]
Over the past two decades,Dore’s scholarship has examined the intersection of law with other disciplines,including philosophy,political theory,anthropology,linguistics,and sociology. His work explores foundational questions about legal epistemology,normativity,and justice through a multidisciplinary lens. The following are summaries of three major publications:
The Epistemological Foundations of Law (2007)
Dore's 2007 book The Epistemological Foundations of Law investigates the philosophical foundations of law beginning with Socrates' assertion that law constitutes a truth claim. It explores whether eternal truths about law exist and whether they are knowable. Key questions include the nature of law,the role of reason in legal inquiry,the relationship between law and morality,and the basis of legal obligation. [21]
This book traces these themes across eight historical and philosophical periods:
- Pre-philosophical era (Greek poets and playwrights such as homer,Hesiod,and Sophocles) [22]
- Presocratic period (625-470 BCE) [23]
- Postsocratic period [24]
- Roman period [25]
- Medieval and Christian period [26]
- Enlightenment [27]
- Modern period [28]
- Postmodern period [29]
Each chapter critically examines the evolution of legal thought within these contexts. The book may be used as a standalone treatise or as a pedagogical resource,as it is accompanied by a teacher's manual.
Homo Juridicus:Culture as a Normative Order (2016)
In this work,Dore examines the normative structures underlying social and cultural formations. Dore deconstructs the concept of normativity and analyzes its expression through anthropology,sociology,psychology,linguistics,and philosophy. [30] The book considers how legal and non-legal norms contribute to social order,challenging conventional assumptions about the role of law in cultural systems. [31] This book is also intended for either independent study or instructional use,as it is accompanied by a teacher’s manual.
A Materialist Theory of Justice:A Methodological,Philosophical and Moral Justification (2025)
In this book,Dore presents a theory of justice grounded in three forms of justification:methodological,philosophical,and moral. [32] The methodological framework draws on Karl Marx’s materialist epistemology,emphasizing empirical reliability. The philosophical component engages with classical and modern traditions,while the moral justification introduces principles aimed at promoting human flourishing through individual and governmental action. [33]
The theory contrasts with proceduralist models such as that of John Rawls,which prioritize fairness of process over substantive outcomes. [34] Dore proposes a “thick,”outcome-oriented theory of justice that shifts focus from procedural means to ethical ends. [35]
The book advances the “inseparability thesis,”which posits that individuals are socially embedded and that justice must account for structural conditions of equality. [36] It integrates elements from Aristotelian essentialism,Hegelian phenomenalism,and critical theory,drawing on thinkers including Hobbes,Aquinas,Kant,Dewey,Mead,Habermas,Foucault,Lyotard,Honneth,Sandel,Walzer,Nussbaum,Keynes,Sen,and Marx. [37]
Using this methodological framework,the book offers anthropological and philosophical critiques of Western liberal political and economic systems,with particular attention to the United States. It argues that these systems perpetuate structural inequalities through mechanisms of domination and exploitation. [38]
Dore is currently writing a prequel to this book titled Mind vs Matter:Metaphysics,Ideology and The Ethics of Ontological Closure. [1] The companion volume will deepen the epistemological and ethical foundations presented in A Materialist Theory of Justice by examining the conditions in which matter becomes intelligible to the mind,without resorting to metaphysical guarantees or non-falsifiable methodologies. It will discuss early Greek atomist philosophy,quantum field theory,and a critique of Aristotelian metaphysics to explain how dissent,empirical truth,and alternative modes of inquiry may be suppressed or foreclosed by ontological closure. This volume is intended to be historical,methodological and ethical. It will deal with inquiries such as what epistemic openness may be required to resist systems that tend to totalize reality,as well as what sort of materialist ethics may emerge from such resistance. [1]
