John Gottman

Last updated
John Gottman
Dr. John Gottman 123.jpg
Born
John Mordecai Gottman

(1942-04-26) April 26, 1942 (age 82)
NationalityAmerican
Education
Known for Cascade Model of Relational Dissolution
Spouse Julie Schwartz Gottman
Children1
Scientific career
Fields Psychology
Institutions University of Washington
Website www.gottman.com

John Mordecai Gottman (born April 26, 1942) is an American psychologist and professor emeritus of psychology at the University of Washington. His research focuses on divorce prediction and marital stability through relationship analyses. Gottman's work has centered on the field of relationship counseling. His focus is on enhanced relationship functioning and mitigation of behaviors detrimental to human relationships. [1] Gottman's work has also contributed to the development of important concepts on social sequence analysis. [ citation needed ]

Contents

In 1996, [2] Gottman co-founded and led The Gottman Institute alongside his wife, psychologist Julie Schwartz Gottman. Together, they are the co-founders of Affective Software Inc, a program seeking to make marriage and relationship counseling procedures more accessible to a broader audience. [3]

In 2007, Gottman was acknowledged as one of the 10 most influential therapists of the past twenty-five years by the Psychotherapy Network. The award was attributed to his contributions to the development of key concepts in social sequence analysis, which are claimed to have enriched the understanding of relationship dynamics and interactions. [4]

Personal life

John Gottman was born on April 26, 1942, in the Dominican Republic to Orthodox Jewish parents. His father was a rabbi in pre-World War II Vienna. Gottman was educated in a Lubavitch Yeshiva Elementary School in Brooklyn. Gottman practices Conservative Judaism, keeps kosher (follows Jewish dietary laws) and observes Shabbat. [5]

In 1987, he married Julie Schwartz, a psychotherapist. His two previous marriages had ended in divorce. [6] He has a daughter named Moriah Gottman. [7] John and Julie Gottman live in Washington state.

Education and work experience

John Gottman received his bachelor's degree in Mathematics-Physics from Fairleigh Dickinson University in 1962. In 1964, he earned his master's in Mathematics-Psychology from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He received a second master's degree in Clinical Psychology-Mathematics in 1967, and a PhD in Clinical Psychology in 1971 from the University of Wisconsin. [8]

At Fairleigh Dickinson University, Gottman worked as an instructor for the mathematics department, a research assistant for the department of physics, and a researcher for the school of engineering. At the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, he worked as a computer programmer and mathematician. He was a program evaluator and research designer for the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. In 1981, Gottman became a professor of psychology at the University of Illinois. Additionally, he was a professor of psychology at the University of Washington for 16 years. Since 2002, Gottman has worked as the emeritus Professor of Psychology for the University of Washington and as the executive director for the Relationship Research Institute in Seattle. [8]

Studies

Predictions of divorce

Gottman developed multiple models, scales, and formulas to predict marital stability and divorce in couples. He has completed seven studies in this field. [9] Some of Gottman's most popular work comes from his research regarding newlywed couples.

This work concludes that there are four negative behaviors that are most likely to lead to and therefore predict divorce. These are: criticism of a partner's personality; contempt, which is usually derived from a position of superiority; defensiveness; and stonewalling, which is displayed through emotional withdrawal from interactions. [10] Typically, defense occurs in response to criticism and stonewalling as a result of feeling overwhelmed by the experience of conflict.

Stable couples handle conflict in positive ways and support each other. [11] In Gottman's book The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work , he addresses some standard tools that these couples implement to stay together, from taking the time to continue building a friendship with their spouse, to honoring and respecting their spouse.

He developed "The Gottman Method Couples Therapy" based on his research findings. The form of therapy aims to increase respect, affection, and closeness; break through and resolve conflict; generate greater understandings; and keep conflict discussions calm. [12] The goal of The Gottman Method is to help couples build happy and stable marriages. Gottman's therapy model focuses more on the process of conflict within the marriage, and less on the content of the conflict.

John Gottman conducted a study based on oral interviews with 95 newlywed couples. His predictions are based on perceived marital bonds. Couples were asked about their relationship, mutual history, and philosophy toward marriage. The interview measured the couple's perceptions of shared history and marriage by focusing on the positive or negative qualities of the relationship expressed in the telling of the story. To measure each spouse's perception of the marriage and each other, the interviewer listened to the couple's negative or positive experiences. Rather than scoring the content of their answers, interviewers used the Oral History Interview coding system, developed by Buehlman and Gottman in 1996, to measure spouses' perceptions about the marriage and each other. Therefore, the couples' perception was used to predict whether they would gain marital stability or end up divorced. The more positive their perceptions and attitudes were about their marriage and each other, the more stable the marriage. [13]

Gottman's models partly rely on Paul Ekman's method of analyzing human emotion and microexpressions. Ekman's research was primarily based on observing the micro-expressions to determine whether somebody was lying or telling the truth. [14]

The original study was published by Gottman and Kim Therese Buehlman in 1992, in which they interviewed couples with children. A posteriori modeling yielded a discriminant function that could discern those who had divorced with 94% accuracy. [15] Since Gottman believed that early married life is a period of adjustment, and perceptions are being formed, he sought to predict marital stability and divorce through couples' perceptions during the first year of marriage. [16]

In 1998, Gottman developed a model to predict which newlywed couples would remain married and which would divorce four to six years later. The model fits the data with 90% accuracy. Another model from Gottman can determine with 81% accuracy which marriages survived after seven to nine years. [17]

Gottman's follow-up study with newlywed couples, published in 2000, used the Oral History Interview to predict marital stability and divorce. Gottman's model fit with 87.4% accuracy for classifying couples who divorce (or not) within the couples' first five years of marriage. He used couples' perceptions about their marriages and each other to model marital stability or divorce. [16]

In a 2002 paper, Gottman and Robert W. Levenson perform a regression analysis of a two-factor model where skin conductance levels and oral history narratives encodings are the only two statistically significant variables. Facial expressions using Ekman's encoding scheme were not statistically significant. [18]

Gottman developed what he named "The Four Horsemen": 1. Criticism, 2. Defensiveness, 3. Contempt, and 4. Stonewalling, as ineffective communication styles that contribute to marital dissolution. Gottman claims that one of the highest predictors of divorce was the presence of contempt, which he defined as one spouse viewing themselves as better than the other spouse.

Independent studies testing Gottman marriage courses

Building Strong Families Program

BSF 15-Month Impact Report BSF Impacts.jpg
BSF 15-Month Impact Report

Independent research on the impact of Gottman's marriage strengthening programs for the general public has further questioned Gottman couple education programs.

The largest independent evaluation of a marriage education curriculum developed by Gottman was conducted by Mathematica Policy Research [19] at nine sites in five states. The study was titled, "Loving Couples, Loving Children," [20] and was a federally funded, multi-year Building Strong Families Program study contracted by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. The study group included low-income, unwed couples.

An impact report released by the Office of Planning Research and Evaluation [21] showed that the intervention had no positive impact and, in one case, "had negative effects on couples' relationships." [22]

Supporting Healthy Marriage Project

An ongoing study by Manpower Development Research Corporation (MDRC), [23] known as the Supporting Healthy Marriage Project (SHM), is evaluating Gottman's "Loving Couples, Loving Children" program among low-income, married couples. The multi-year, random assignment study is funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. In an early impact study on the effectiveness of "skills-based relationship education programs designed to help low-income married couples strengthen their relationships and, in turn, to support more stable and more nurturing home environments and more positive outcomes for parents and their children," MDRC reported [24] "Overall, the program has shown some small positive effects, without clear indications (yet no clear negative proof) for improving the odds to stay together after 12 months."

The program is still ongoing.

Matthews, Wickrama and Conger

A study published by Matthews, Wickrama and Conger, based on couples' perceptions, was done in 1996. The study showed that spousal hostility and net of warmth predicted, with 80% accuracy, which couples would divorce or not divorce within a year. [25]

Relations and effects

In multiple analyses, Gottman has shown a plethora of relations and effects in marriage and divorce, some in peer-reviewed publications, while many others appear in Gottman's own books. Among those are:

Cascade Model of Relational Dissolution

Gottman's Cascade Model of Relational Dissolution [33] states that there are four major emotional reactions that are destructive and thus are the four predictors to a divorce: criticism, defensiveness, stonewalling, and contempt. Gottman calls these four predictors of divorce the “four horsemen” of marriage because they herald trouble for a marriage. The Gottman institute also provides ways to avoid using these harmful communication styles. They are a part of the Cascade Model of Relational Dissolution because they build upon each other. One behavior leads to the next, resulting in more hostility and less communication in a relationship, ultimately, leading to emotional separation and dissolution of the marriage. [34] Gottman also addresses the differences between volatile and hostile couples. Volatile couples tend to split their time between arguments and passion/love. Hostile couples engage in more arguments than passion/love. When couples use the communication styles described in Gottman's Four Horsemen frequently, they are slipping into a hostile communication pattern. [35] In a study done applying Gottman's Four Horsemen, researchers found that couples who had hostile relationship patterns had the poorest relationship quality. [36]

Criticism

The first indication of the cascade model is criticism. Criticism is an attack on a person's character or personality. This can also be defined as ad hominem. [37] One way to differentiate between a criticism and a complaint is in the way the statement begins. Relationships that tend to stay together begin conversations like these in what Gottman describes as a soft startup, or a tactful, respectful way of speaking, rather than in a harsh startup, which typically incorporates broad absolute statements such as “you always…” or “you never…” [38] Another way to differentiate between a criticism and a complaint is what the target of the statement is. If the statement is targeting the person, it is a criticism. If the statement is targeting an action of the other person, it is a complaint. Couples whose relationship tends to be more negative engage in criticism of one another more frequently. Frequent critiques and attacks relating to this tier can lead to other behaviors that are set out in the cascade model. To avoid the use of criticism, Gottman claims it is best to use “I” statements instead of “you” statements. The following is an example of a criticism versus a complaint:

Complaint - “Earlier I asked if you could do the dishes, and you haven’t yet. Would you be willing to do them still? It would help me out a lot.” Criticism - “You still haven’t done the dishes. I asked you to, and you obviously didn’t care enough to do them. You are so lazy.”

Defensiveness: Defensiveness, the second tier of the cascade model is a response to pathological criticism. A partner in this phase will attempt to make excuses or even shift blame from themselves to their partner. This can occur when one partner is stressed out and perceives a question or statement as an attack. This can either be a question that does not have a favorable response or criticism or complaint. This phase of the cascade model can also cause their partner to feel that they are not taking their concerns seriously or that they are avoiding responsibility. [38] This is characterized by a deflection of criticism and an avoidance of responsibility. Counter attacks and criticism of one's partner are characteristic of defensiveness. Gottman claims that to avoid defensiveness, it's helpful to take responsibility for your actions or inactions. It's also helpful to acknowledge and accept your partner's perspective. Although you may see the situation differently, you should acknowledge that your partner has their own perspective. [38] The following is an example of a scenario with a defensive response or a non-defensive response:

Complaint - “Earlier I asked if you could do the dishes, and you haven’t yet. Would you be willing to do them still? It would help me out a lot.”

Defensive response - “You know that I don’t have time today. I’m way too busy with work. If you have time to ask me, then you have time to do them yourself.”

Non-defensive response - “I’m sorry. I completely forgot. I’ve been really busy with work. I should have let you know that I might be getting to them later. I’ll do them right after I send this email.”

Contempt: The third tier of the cascade model is contempt which is derived from a mentality of superiority. Pathological criticism of one another and responding to this criticism with defensive behaviors can lead to contempt. Contempt results from a lack of respect or acknowledgement. Contempt may include sarcasm, cynicism, name calling, eye rolling, mockery, or hostile humor. A general indignation and lack of respect characterizes interaction in this phase of the cascade. Gottman claims that to avoid contempt, partners should build a culture of appreciation. [38] The following is an example of a contempt response:

Non-defensive response - “I’m sorry. I completely forgot. I’ve been really busy with work. I should have let you know that I might be getting to them later. I’ll do them right after I send this email.” Contempt - “You’re kidding. ‘I’ve been really busy with work’. I could do your job in my sleep. You can’t possibly be that busy. You’re just a glorified secretary.”

Stonewalling: Stonewalling is the final tier of the cascade model and is a response to the first three tiers. It is characterized by the building up of mental and physical barriers to avoid interaction with one's partner. An attempt to appear busy or other means of purposely avoiding contact are employed and very little communication takes place. Communication that does take place is not meaningful and can often be destructive. This often occurs when an individual feels overwhelmed, and it is strongly related to the experience of emotional flooding. [39] The following is an example of how to healthily avoid stonewalling: [38]

Alternative response - “I’m trying to listen, but I’m extremely overwhelmed. I want to be able to have this conversation with you, because I know it’s important. Can you give me a little while to process everything? We can come back to it after I have time to process.”

Flooding

Emotional flooding occurs when a person feels inundated with sudden negative emotions and behaviors (often the first three predictors in this model,) and it leads them to promptly end or avoid further interaction with their partner. This experience can diminish their ability to communicate effectively, and it may compel them to stonewall or exhibit other avoidant behaviors. [40] Although flooding is not one of the main four indicators of divorce, Gottman indicated that it was an important factor in this model. His research also noted that there are gender differences related to flooding; specifically that it is a more common experience for men. [41] It has also been linked to an increase chance of intimate partner violence, possibly due to the decreased capacity for appropriate cognitive functioning and the inability to cope with conflict that is indicative of flooding. [42]

The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work

In The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work , his most popular book, Gottman discusses behaviors that he observed in marriages that are successful and those that are detrimental to marriage, based on research conducted at his "Love Lab" in Seattle, Washington. He outlines seven principles that will reinforce the positive aspects of a relationship and help marriages endure during the rough moments. [43] These principles include, enhancing your love map (a term Gottman uses to describe the center of a person's brain where they store relevant information about their partner), nurturing your fondness and admiration, turning towards each other rather than away, letting your partner influence you, solving solvable problems, overcoming gridlock, and creating a shared meaning.

Practical solutions

The following is a partial list of methods and practices developed by Gottman and his wife for marriage and child-rearing:

Therapist education

The Gottman Institute certifies new therapists regularly. Three levels of professional training are generally delivered through intensive two-day seminars or through at-home or online study to train therapists in Gottman Method Couples Therapy: [44]

In Gottman's book, The Marriage Clinic: A Scientifically-Based Marital Therapy, he states that therapy should emphasize "conflict regulation, not resolution." [45]

Pre-birth workshop

Bringing Baby Home is a two-day seminar to help prepare would-be parents to a new baby, using 18 exercises and other tricks.

In a peer-reviewed paper, Gottman shows that for a randomly controlled, unblinded experiment, couples attending the workshop were better off later, as follows: Without the workshop, 70% of couples had lower marital satisfaction relative to before birth (a common finding); 58% of mothers had some symptoms of depression after giving birth. For mothers who participated in the workshop, only 22% had depressive symptoms. [46]

Self-help books

Gottman has authored or co-authored 60 works. They cover research-backed advice for improving marriages, raising emotionally intelligent children, and on having children without damaging the relationship. [47]

In Gottman's work, Raising an Emotionally Intelligent Child, he lists the five steps to emotion coaching. Emotion coaching is designed to "support the development of empathetic responses and thought constructions promoting better self-management and regulation." [48] The five steps Gottman lists in his book are:

  1. Be aware of your child's emotions.
  2. Recognize the emotion as an opportunity for connection and teaching.
  3. Listening empathetically and validating your child's emotions.
  4. Help your child label their emotions.
  5. Set limits while problem solving. [48]

His most famous self-help book, The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work: A Practical Guide from the Country's Foremost Relationship Expert, is widely regarded as both powerful and practical. [49] [50]

The Gottman Method of Relationship Therapy

The Gottman Method is a therapy approach which focuses on supporting and strengthening couples by utilizing Gottman's research and his theory which is referred to as The Sound Relationship House. This theory consists of nine components.

  1. Building love maps - This refers to enhancing how well one knows their partner. Gottman developed an app especially designed to target the further developing love maps named Gottman's Card Decks. The app centers around asking questions in different relational areas such as emotional intimacy, romance, friendship, hobbies, and personality aspects of each partner. It is free to download and is often advertised on The Gottman Institute social media platforms. The questions are created in order to encourage couples to think deeply about what they already know about one another and spaces in which they can improve and continue learning new details about them or changes as they occur. The goal in mind when developing love maps is to strengthen bonds and increase fondness and admiration in the relationship. [51]
  2. Nurturing fondness and admiration in the relationship.
  3. Turning towards each other - This involves being aware of a partner's needs and responding to their bids for connection.
  4. Creating a positive perspective - This is when the couple looks for the best in each other rather than rushing to criticism.
  5. Managing conflict - Managing conflict is when you take into consideration your partner's feelings and emotions. Another aspect of conflict management is continual dialogue to ensure resolution. When feeling heated during arguments, it is important to self-soothe by doing something to get your mind off the issue at hand. [52]
  6. Making life dreams come true - It is important to be with someone who is trying to inspire you to reach your goals.
  7. Creating shared meaning - This is when couples start to have rituals, traditions, and symbols that you share together.
  8. Weight-bearing wall - Cultivating trust in the relationship.
  9. Weight-bearing wall - Cultivating commitment in the relationship. [53]

Therapists can receive certification in Gottman Method Couples Therapy. [54]

Awards and honors

Gottman has been the recipient of four National Institute of Mental Health Research Scientist Awards: the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy Distinguished Research Scientist Award, the American Family Therapy Academy [55] Award for Most Distinguished Contributor to Family Systems Research, the American Psychological Association Division of Family Psychology, Presidential Citation for Outstanding Lifetime Research Contribution and the National Council of Family Relations, [56] 1994 Burgess Award for Outstanding Career in Theory and Research. [57] In addition, Gottman takes a spot in the Psychotherapy Networker's Top 10 Most Influential Therapists of the past quarter-century. [8]

In 2021, Gottman received an honorary Doctor of Science degree from the University of Wisconsin–Madison. [58]

Works

Gottman has published over 190 papers, and is the author or co-author of 40 books, notably: [57]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Romance (love)</span> Type of love that focuses on feelings

Romance or romantic love is a feeling of love for, or a strong attraction towards another person, and the courtship behaviors undertaken by an individual to express those overall feelings and resultant emotions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Breakup</span> Termination of an intimate relationship

A relationship breakup, breakup, or break-up is the ending of a relationship. The act is commonly termed "dumping [someone]" in slang when it is initiated by one partner. The term is less likely to be applied to a married couple, where a breakup is typically called a separation or divorce. When a couple engaged to be married breaks up, it is typically called a "broken engagement". People commonly think of breakups in a romantic aspect, however, there are also non-romantic and platonic breakups, and this type of relationship dissolution is usually caused by failure to maintain a friendship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microexpression</span> Innate result of voluntary, involuntary, and conflicting emotional responses

A microexpression is a facial expression that only lasts for a short moment. It is the innate result of a voluntary and an involuntary emotional response occurring simultaneously and conflicting with one another, and occurs when the amygdala responds appropriately to the stimuli that the individual experiences and the individual wishes to conceal this specific emotion. This results in the individual very briefly displaying their true emotions followed by a false emotional reaction.

Assertiveness is the quality of being self-assured and confident without being aggressive to defend a right point of view or a relevant statement. In the field of psychology and psychotherapy, it is a skill that can be learned and a mode of communication. Dorland's Medical Dictionary defines assertiveness as:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Contempt</span> Disgust and anger towards something or someone

In colloquial usage, contempt usually refers to either the act of despising, or having a general lack of respect for something. This set of emotions generally produces maladaptive behaviour. Other authors define contempt as a negative emotion rather than the constellation of mentality and feelings that produce an attitude. Paul Ekman categorises contempt as the seventh basic emotion, along with anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness and surprise. Robert C. Solomon places contempt on the same emotional continuum as resentment and anger, and he argues that the differences between the three are that resentment is anger directed towards a higher-status individual; anger is directed towards an equal-status individual; and contempt is anger directed towards a lower-status individual.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intimate relationship</span> Physical or emotional intimacy

An intimate relationship is an interpersonal relationship that involves emotional or physical closeness between people and may include sexual intimacy and feelings of romance or love. Intimate relationships are interdependent, and the members of the relationship mutually influence each other. The quality and nature of the relationship depends on the interactions between individuals, and is derived from the unique context and history that builds between people over time. Social and legal institutions such as marriage acknowledge and uphold intimate relationships between people. However, intimate relationships are not necessarily monogamous or sexual, and there is wide social and cultural variability in the norms and practices of intimacy between people.

Couples therapy attempts to improve romantic relationships and resolve interpersonal conflicts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Active listening</span> Technique of both listening to what is said and replying with an accurate summary

Active listening is the practice of preparing to listen, observing what verbal and non-verbal messages are being sent, and then providing appropriate feedback for the sake of showing attentiveness to the message being presented.

Diana Adile Kirschner is an American psychologist and author. Early in her career she was involved in the field of integrative psychotherapy, a movement that seeks to find the best practices from among the major schools of therapy. Kirschner's work involved integrating individual therapy, couples therapy, and family therapy into an approach called Comprehensive Family Therapy. The book she coauthored, Comprehensive Family Therapy, was nominated by the American Psychological Association as one of the 100 most important books on family psychology.

Meta-emotion is "an organized and structured set of emotions and cognitions about the emotions, both one's own emotions and the emotions of others". This broad definition of meta-emotion sparked psychologists' interest in the topic, particularly regarding parental meta-emotion philosophy.

Emotionally focused therapy and emotion-focused therapy (EFT) are related humanistic approaches to psychotherapy that aim to resolve emotional and relationship issues with individuals, couples, and families. These therapies combine experiential therapy techniques, including person-centered and Gestalt therapies, with systemic therapy and attachment theory. The central premise is that emotions influence cognition, motivate behavior, and are strongly linked to needs. The goals of treatment include transforming maladaptive behaviors, such as emotional avoidance, and developing awareness, acceptance, expression, and regulation of emotion and understanding of relationships. EFT is usually a short-term treatment.

Stonewalling is a refusal to communicate or cooperate. Such behaviour occurs in situations such as marriage counselling, diplomatic negotiations, politics and legal cases. Body language may indicate and reinforce this by avoiding contact and engagement with the other party. People use deflection in a conversation in order to render a conversation pointless and insignificant. Tactics in stonewalling include giving sparse, vague responses; refusing to answer questions; and responding to questions with additional questions. Stonewalling can be used as a stalling tactic rather than an avoidance tactic.

In interpersonal communication, an I-message or I-statement is an assertion about the feelings, beliefs, values, etc. of the person speaking, generally expressed as a sentence beginning with the word I, and is contrasted with a "you-message" or "you-statement", which often begins with the word you and focuses on the person spoken to. Thomas Gordon coined the term "I message" in the 1960s while doing play therapy with children. He added the concept to his book for parents, P.E.T.: Parent Effectiveness Training (1970). Not every message that begins with the word I is an I-message; some are statements about the speaker's perceptions, observations, assumptions, or criticisms.

Behavioral marital therapy, sometimes called behavioral couples therapy, has its origins in behaviorism and is a form of behavior therapy. The theory is rooted in social learning theory and behavior analysis. As a model, it is constantly being revised as new research presents.

Family therapy is a branch of psychotherapy focused on families and couples in intimate relationships to nurture change and development. It tends to view change in terms of the systems of interaction between family members.

Marriage and health are closely related. Married people experience lower morbidity and mortality across such diverse health threats as cancer, heart attacks, and surgery. There are gender differences in these effects which may be partially due to men's and women's relative status. Most research on marriage and health has focused on heterosexual couples, and more work is needed to clarify the health effects on same-sex marriage. Simply being married, as well as the quality of one's marriage, has been linked to diverse measures of health. Research has examined the social-cognitive, emotional, behavioral and biological processes involved in these links.

The Vulnerability-Stress-Adaptation (VSA) Model is a framework in relationship science for conceptualizing the dynamic processes of marriage, created by Benjamin Karney and Thomas Bradbury. The VSA Model emphasizes the consideration of multiple dimensions of functioning, including couple members' enduring vulnerabilities, experiences of stressful events, and adaptive processes, to account for variations in marital quality and stability over time. The VSA model was a departure from past research considering any one of these themes separately as a contributor to marital outcomes, and integrated these separate factors into a single, cohesive framework in order to best explain how and why marriages change over time. In adherence with the VSA model, in order to achieve a complete understanding of marital phenomenon, research must consider all dimensions of marital functioning, including enduring vulnerabilities, stress, and adaptive processes simultaneously.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Julie Schwartz Gottman</span> American psychologist (born 1951)

Julie Schwartz Gottman is an American clinical psychologist, researcher, speaker and author. Together with her husband and collaborator, John Gottman, she is the co-founder of The Gottman Institute – an organization dedicated to strengthening relationships through research-based products and programs. She is the co-creator of the Sound Relationship House Theory, Gottman Method Couples Therapy, and The Art and Science of Love weekend workshop for couples, among other programs.

The Cascade Model of Relational Dissolution is a relational communications theory that proposes four critically negative behaviors that lead to the breakdown of marital and romantic relationships. The model is the work of psychological researcher John Gottman, a professor at the University of Washington and founder of The Gottman Institute, and his research partner, Robert W. Levenson. This theory focuses on the negative influence of verbal and nonverbal communication habits on marriages and other relationships. Gottman's model uses a metaphor that compares the four negative communication styles that lead to a relationship's breakdown to the biblical Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, wherein each behavior, or horseman, compounds the problems of the previous one, leading to total breakdown of communication.

<i>The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work</i> 1999 book by John Gottman

The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work is a 1999 book by John Gottman, which details seven principles for couples to improve their marriage and the "Four Horseman" to watch out for, that usually herald the end of a marriage. The book was based on Gottman's research in his Family Research Lab, known as the "Love Lab", where he observed more than 650 couples over 14 years.

References

  1. The Gottman Institute. Online Abstracts of Published Research Articles. Accessed online 14 October 2008.
  2. John Gottman. John Gottman, Ph.D., Licensed Clinical Psychologist Archived 2009-02-26 at the Wayback Machine . Accessed online 14 October 2008.
  3. "Affective Software, Inc". affectivesoftware.com. Retrieved 2021-07-07.
  4. "The Top 10: The Most Influential Therapists of the Past Quarter-Century". Psychotherapy Networker. 2007. Archived from the original on 2011-02-05. Retrieved 2012-07-10.
  5. Weinstein, Natalie (30 May 1997), "Do you want to raise a mensch? Psychology researcher tells how", The Jewish Bulletin of Northern California
  6. "Gottman Rite Held". Wisconsin State Journal. No. p.2, section 5. 14 February 1971.
  7. Gottman, John M. (1999). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Harmony; 1st edition. pp. Dedication page. ISBN   978-0609805794.
  8. 1 2 3 "John & Julie Gottman - About". The Gottman Institute. Retrieved 2020-11-04.
  9. "How Dr. Gottman Can Predict Divorce (with 94% Accuracy)". The Gottman Relationship Institute. 23 August 2017.
  10. Mann, Jeff (2015-09-10). "Scientists say this facial expression can kill a relationship". Brain Fodder. Retrieved 2021-07-01.
  11. "Research FAQs". The Gottman Relationship Institute. Retrieved 21 March 2012.
  12. "What is Gottman Method Couples Therapy?". The Gottman Research Institute. Retrieved 21 March 2012.
  13. Buehlman, K.T., Gottman, John (1996). The Oral History Coding System.(In J. Gottman (Ed.), What predicts divorce? The measures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. "Microexpressions: A Universal Language You Wear on Your Face". Orlando Science Center. 2020-04-29. Retrieved 2021-07-01.
  15. Buehlman, K. T.; Gottman, John; Katz, L. F. (1992). "How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an oral history interview". Journal of Family Psychology. 5 (3–4): 295–318. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.295.
  16. 1 2 Carrere, S.; Buehlman, K. T.; Gottman, J. M.; Coan, J. A.; Ruckstuhl, L. (2000). "Predicting marital stability and divorce in newlywed couples". Journal of Family Psychology. 14 (1): 42–58. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.514.2214 . doi:10.1037/0893-3200.14.1.42. PMID   10740681.
  17. Gottman, John (2003). The Mathematics of Marriage. MIT Press. ISBN   978-0-262-07226-7. Archived from the original on 2009-02-27. Retrieved 2008-10-14.
  18. Gottman, JM; Levenson, RW (2002). "A two-factor model for predicting when a couple will divorce: exploratory analyses using 14-year longitudinal data". Fam Process. 41 (1): 83–96. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.40102000083.x. PMID   11924092.
  19. "Family Support Policy Research". Mathematica.
  20. "Resources for Couples | The Gottman Institute".
  21. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.
  22. Building Strong Families Program Impact Report, Mathematica Policy Research, May 2010.
  23. "MDRC". MDRC.
  24. Knox, Virginia, et al. "Early Impacts from the Supporting Healthy Marriage Evaluation," MDRC, New York, NY, March 2012.
  25. Matthews, Lisa S.; K. A. S. Wickrama; Rand D. Conger (August 1996). "Predicting Marital Instability from Spouse and Observer Reports of Marital Interaction". Journal of Marriage and Family. 58 (3): 641–655. doi:10.2307/353725. JSTOR   353725.
  26. The Marriage Clinic, John Gottman, 1994
  27. 1 2 The Science of Trust, John Gottman, 2011
  28. L’Abate, Luciano (October 2012). "Review of 'The Science of Trust: Emotional Attunement for Couples,' by John M. Gottman". The American Journal of Family Therapy. 40 (5): 459–460. doi:10.1080/01926187.2011.637485. S2CID   144022258.
  29. "The Anger Iceberg". The Gottman Institute. 2016-11-08. Retrieved 2021-07-01.
  30. Busby, Dean M.; Holman, Thomas B. (December 2009). "Perceived Match or Mismatch on the Gottman Conflict Styles: Associations with Relationship Outcome Variables". Family Process. 48 (4): 531–545. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01300.x. PMID   19930437.
  31. The Marriage Clinic, John Gottman, 1994
  32. Tapia-Villanueva, Luis; Molina, María Elisa; Aspillaga, Carolina; Cruzat, Claudia; Pereira, Ximena; Poulsen, Gianella; Sotomayor, Patricia; Armijo, Iván (December 2014). "Factors Preventing Gridlock in Chilean Couples' Relationships Based on the Discourse of Couples Therapists and Highly Adjusted Couples". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy. 35 (4): 462–478. doi:10.1002/anzf.1076.
  33. Handbook of interpersonal communication. Knapp, Mark L., Daly, John A. (John Augustine), 1952- (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. 2002. ISBN   978-0761921608. OCLC   49942207.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  34. Fowler, Craig; Dillow, Megan R. (2 February 2011). "Attachment Dimensions and the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse". Communication Research Reports. 28 (1): 16–26. doi:10.1080/08824096.2010.518910. S2CID   143729646.
  35. Gottman, John (1994). "What makes marriage work?". Psychology Today. 27 (2): 38–43.
  36. Holman, Thomas B.; Jarvis, Mark O. (June 2003). "Hostile, volatile, avoiding, and validating couple‐conflict types: An investigation of Gottman's couple‐conflict types". Personal Relationships. 10 (2): 267–282. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00049. ISSN   1350-4126.
  37. "Definition of AD HOMINEM". www.merriam-webster.com. 2023-11-25. Retrieved 2023-12-18.
  38. 1 2 3 4 5 "The Four Horsemen: Criticism, Contempt, Defensiveness, & Stonewalling". The Gottman Institute. 2013-04-24. Retrieved 2021-07-01.
  39. Malik, Jill; Heyman, Richard E.; Slep, Amy M. Smith (Mar 2020). "Emotional Flooding in Response to Negative Affect in Couple Conflicts: Individual Differences and Correlates". Journal of Family Psychology. 34 (2): 145–154. doi:10.1037/fam0000584. PMC   7007326 . PMID   31393141.
  40. Kashian, Nicole (2019-11-24). "The Influence of Channel, Flooding, and Repair on Effective Couple Conflict Communication". International Journal of Communication. 13: 20.
  41. Gottman, John M. (1993). "A theory of marital dissolution and stability". Journal of Family Psychology. 7 (1): 57–75. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.7.1.57.
  42. O'Leary, K. Daniel; Slep, Amy M. Smith; O'Leary, Susan G. (November 2007). "Multivariate models of men's and women's partner aggression". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 75 (5): 752–764. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.5.752. PMID   17907857.
  43. Gottman, John; Silver, Nan (1999). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Three Rivers Press. ISBN   978-0609805794.
  44. "Research-based couples therapy training for individuals and groups," The Gottman Relationship Institute website, retrieved November 26, 2012. "Mental Health Professional Workshops in the Gottman Method Couples Therapy". Archived from the original on 2012-11-23. Retrieved 2012-11-26.
  45. Leggett, Debra G. (October 2009). "Book Review: John M. Gottman The Marriage Clinic (1999). Julie Schwartz Gottman The Marriage Clinic Casebook New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2004. 456 pp., 237 pp. (casebook). $49, $32 (casebook)". The Family Journal. 17 (4): 384–385. doi:10.1177/1066480709347354. S2CID   144452776.
  46. Shapiro, Alyson F.; Gottman, John M. (January 2005). "Effects on Marriage of a Psycho-Communicative-Educational Intervention With Couples Undergoing the Transition to Parenthood, Evaluation at 1-Year Post Intervention". Journal of Family Communication. 5 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0501_1. S2CID   55596629.
  47. "John M. Gottman". www.goodreads.com. Retrieved 2020-08-22.
  48. 1 2 Gus, Licette; Rose, Janet; Gilbert, Louise (March 2015). "Emotion Coaching: A universal strategy for supporting and promoting sustainable emotional and behavioural well-being". Educational and Child Psychology. 32 (1): 31–41. doi:10.53841/bpsecp.2015.32.1.31. S2CID   56159472.
  49. "Independents/Chain Bestseller List". archive.nytimes.com. Retrieved 2021-03-09.
  50. Van Zutphen, Neal (31 December 2016). "Book Review: The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work". Journal of Financial Therapy. 7 (2). doi: 10.4148/1944-9771.1141 .
  51. "Gottman Card Decks App - Couples".
  52. Phillips, Eleanor; Cheston, Ric (1979). "Conflict Resolution: What Works?". California Management Review. 21 (4): 76–83. doi:10.2307/41164837. JSTOR   41164837. S2CID   154480110. ProQuest   206299549.
  53. "What is The Sound Relationship House?". The Gottman Institute. 2020-11-30. Retrieved 2021-07-02.
  54. "The Gottman Method - About". The Gottman Institute. Retrieved 2020-11-04.
  55. American Family Therapy Academy website
  56. "Home | National Council on Family Relations". www.ncfr.org.
  57. 1 2 "About John Gottman" Archived 2010-01-27 at the Wayback Machine on the Gottman Institute website
  58. "Ella, Nosbusch, Grant to receive honorary degrees from UW–Madison". news.wisc.edu. Retrieved 2022-08-05.