Jonathan Crowe

Last updated

Jonathan George Crowe (born 1979) is an Australian legal philosopher. He is Professor of Law at Bond University. [1] Crowe is recognised internationally for his work on legal philosophy, ethics and public law. [2] He is a proponent of natural law theory in jurisprudence and ethics. [3] He is known in Australia for his advocacy on behalf of survivors of sexual violence. [4]

Contents

Career

Crowe commenced his academic career at the University of Queensland, before taking up a full professorship at Bond University. He is a regular visiting scholar at the University of Texas at Austin and has also held visiting positions at Georgetown University. He holds a PhD in law and philosophy from the University of Queensland. [5]

Crowe is an Honorary Life Member of the Australasian Society of Legal Philosophy, having served as its President from 2014 to 2018 (succeeding Jeffrey Goldsworthy). [6] He is also a former President of the Australian Dispute Resolution Research Network. [7] He co-edits the Journal of Legal Philosophy with Hillary Nye. [8]

Scholarship

Crowe is best known internationally for his writings on legal philosophy and ethics, particularly his interpretation of the natural law tradition. [9] He has also produced significant bodies of work on constitutional law, rape and sexual assault law, international humanitarian law and dispute resolution. [10]

Natural law theory

Crowe’s book Natural Law and the Nature of Law argues against traditional ideas of natural law as timeless and unchanging. [11] Rather, he proposes a ‘diachronic’ conception of natural law as evolving over time. [12] Crowe describes natural law as ‘socially embodied, historically extended and dependent on facts about human nature.’ [13] Natural law, on this view, is shaped by both inherent human qualities and the natural and social environments of human communities. [14] It reflects ‘the ongoing human quest to work out how best to live flourishing, fulfilling lives given the nature we have and the social worlds we inhabit.’ [15]

Artifact theory of law

Crowe defends a theory of the nature of law that focuses on law’s character as a human artifact. [16] He argues that artifacts are defined primarily by reference to their functions. [17] Law’s function is ‘to serve as a deontic marker by creating a sense of social obligation’. [18] Crowe contends that a law that is poorly suited to perform this function is defective, while a purported legal enactment that is incapable of performing this function fails to qualify as law. [19] A law that is so unjust that it is incapable of creating a sense of social obligation will therefore be no law at all. [20]

Judicial interpretation

Crowe’s work on judicial interpretation is critical of originalism. He argues that judges should give legal documents their ordinary contemporary meaning, rather than the meaning they held when first enacted. [21] This is necessary to preserve law’s function as a means of social coordination. [22] Crowe argues that judges should interpret laws in light of social practices and institutions, relying on ‘historically extended narratives’. [23] He terms this theory ‘wide contextualism’. [24] He further contends that, where the law is unjust, judges should bring it into dialogue with moral values to reach a practically reasonable outcome. [25]

Political philosophy

Crowe challenges the traditional focus of natural law theory on state institutions. [26] He highlights the important role of non-state forms of order, such as evolved social norms and practices, in securing the common good. [27] Crowe argues that justice is best understood as the outcome of ethical relations between embodied persons, rather than as a set of idealised institutions imposed on society from above. He describes this idea as ‘small justice’. [28] He criticises competing theories of justice, such as that of John Rawls, for neglecting the role of interpersonal interactions in ensuring justice at a societal level. [29]

Existentialism

Crowe’s work on legal and ethical theory is influenced by existentialism, particularly the writings of Emmanuel Levinas. His doctoral thesis examined the intersections between existentialist ethics and natural law theory. [30] Crowe draws attention to the important role of time in Levinas’s writings. He argues that the temporal (or diachronic) dimension of Levinas’s theory bridges the gap between his ethics and his political philosophy. [31]

Mediation ethics

In collaborative work with Rachael Field, Crowe has argued for a new understanding of the ethics of mediation. [32] Traditional views of mediation ethics focus on mediator neutrality or impartiality. However, Field and Crowe contend these notions are unhelpful and unrealistic when applied to mediation practice. [33] Instead, they propose a new ethical paradigm centred on party self-determination. [34] This approach is supported by ‘a focus on informed consent and an ethos of professionalism’. [35] Field and Crowe defend a contextual ethical method as the most suitable way of resolving ethical dilemmas in mediation practice. [36]

Advocacy

Crowe is a founding Co-Director with Rachael Burgin and Saxon Mullins of Rape and Sexual Assault Research and Advocacy (RASARA), an Australia-wide organisation working to shape community responses to sexual violence. [37] The organisation describes itself as ‘survivor-focused’, ‘evidence-based’ and ‘reform-orientated’. [38] He is also involved in a high-profile public advocacy campaign with author and activist Bri Lee to reform the mistake of fact excuse in Queensland rape law. [39] Crowe and Lee’s advocacy led the Queensland Attorney-General to refer this issue to the Queensland Law Reform Commission in July 2019. [40]

Books

Related Research Articles

Applied ethics refers to the practical application of moral considerations. It is ethics with respect to real-world actions and their moral considerations in the areas of private and public life, the professions, health, technology, law, and leadership. For example, the bioethics community is concerned with identifying the correct approach to moral issues in the life sciences, such as euthanasia, the allocation of scarce health resources, or the use of human embryos in research. Environmental ethics is concerned with ecological issues such as the responsibility of government and corporations to clean up pollution. Business ethics includes questions regarding the duties or duty of 'whistleblowers' to the general public or their loyalty to their employers.

Ethics Branch of philosophy that discusses right and wrong conduct

Ethics or moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that "involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior". The field of ethics, along with aesthetics, concerns matters of value, and thus comprises the branch of philosophy called axiology.

Jurisprudence Theoretical study of law

Jurisprudence, or legal theory, is the theoretical study of law. Scholars of jurisprudence seek to explain the nature of law in its most general form and provide a deeper understanding of legal reasoning, legal systems, legal institutions, and the role of law in society.

Natural law System of law that purports to be determined by nature, and thus be universal

Natural law is a system of law based on a close observation of human nature, and based on values intrinsic to human nature that can be deduced and applied independent of positive law. According to natural law theory, all people have inherent rights, conferred not by act of legislation but by "God, nature, or reason." Natural law theory can also refer to "theories of ethics, theories of politics, theories of civil law, and theories of religious morality."

Political philosophy Sub-discipline of philosophy and political science

Political philosophy is the philosophical study of government, addressing questions about the nature, scope, and legitimacy of public agents and institutions and the relationships between them. Its topics include politics, liberty, justice, property, rights, law, and the enforcement of laws by authority: what they are, if they are needed, what makes a government legitimate, what rights and freedoms it should protect, what form it should take, what the law is, and what duties citizens owe to a legitimate government, if any, and when it may be legitimately overthrown, if ever.

Emmanuel Levinas French philosopher

Emmanuel Levinas was a French philosopher of Lithuanian Jewish ancestry who is known for his work related to Jewish philosophy, existentialism, ethics, phenomenology and ontology.

In environmental philosophy, environmental ethics is an established field of practical philosophy "which reconstructs the essential types of argumentation that can be made for protecting natural entities and the sustainable use of natural resources." The main competing paradigms are anthropocentrism, physiocentrism, and theocentrism. Environmmental ethics exerts influence on a large range of disciplines including environmental law, environmental sociology, ecotheology, ecological economics, ecology and environmental geography.

In the philosophy of law, virtue jurisprudence is the set of theories of law related to virtue ethics. By making the aretaic turn in legal theory, virtue jurisprudence focuses on the importance of character and human excellence or virtue to questions about the nature of law, the content of the law, and judging.

In moral philosophy, deontological ethics or deontology is the normative ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules, rather than based on the consequences of the action. It is sometimes described as duty-, obligation-, or rule-based ethics. Deontological ethics is commonly contrasted to consequentialism, virtue ethics, and pragmatic ethics. In this terminology, action is more important than the consequences.

Social philosophy

Social philosophy is the study of questions about social behavior and interpretations of society and social institutions in terms of ethical values rather than empirical relations. Social philosophers place new emphasis on understanding the social contexts for political, legal, moral, and cultural questions, and to the development of novel theoretical frameworks, from social ontology to care ethics to cosmopolitan theories of democracy, natural law, human rights, gender equity and =2021-01-10}}</ref>

Norms are concepts (sentences) of practical import, oriented to effecting an action, rather than conceptual abstractions that describe, explain, and express. Normative sentences imply "ought-to" types of statements and assertions, in distinction to sentences that provide "is" types of statements and assertions. Common normative sentences include commands, permissions, and prohibitions; common normative abstract concepts include sincerity, justification, and honesty. A popular account of norms describes them as reasons to take action, to believe, and to feel.

Philosophy and economics, also philosophy of economics, studies topics such as rational choice, the appraisal of economic outcomes, institutions and processes, the status of highly idealized economic models, the ontology of economic phenomena and the possibilities of acquiring knowledge of them.

John Finnis

John Mitchell Finnis, is an Australian legal philosopher, jurist and scholar specializing in jurisprudence and the philosophy of law. He is currently the Biolchini Family Professor of Law at Notre Dame Law School and Permanent Senior Distinguished Research Fellow at the Notre Dame Center for Ethics and Culture. He was Professor of Law & Legal Philosophy at the University of Oxford from 1989 to 2010, where he is now professor emeritus. He acted as a constitutional adviser to successive Australian Commonwealth governments in constitutional matters and bilateral relations with the United Kingdom.

Sexual ethics or sex ethics is a branch of philosophy that considers the ethics or morality or otherwise in sexual behavior. Sexual ethics seeks to understand, evaluate and critique interpersonal relationships and sexual activities from a social, cultural, and philosophical perspective. Some people consider aspects of human sexuality, such as gender identification and sexual orientation, as well as consent, sexual relations and procreation, as giving rise to issues of sexual ethics.

Kantian ethics Ethical theory of Immanuel Kant

Kantian ethics refers to a deontological ethical theory developed by German philosopher Immanuel Kant that is based on the notion that: "It is impossible to think of anything at all in the world, or indeed even beyond it, that could be considered good without limitation except a good will." The theory was developed as a result of Enlightenment rationalism, stating that an action can only be good if its maxim—the principle behind it—is duty to the moral law, and arises from a sense of duty in the actor.

Natural-rights libertarianism, also known as deontological liberalism, deontological libertarianism, libertarian moralism, natural rights-based libertarianism, philosophical libertarianism or rights-theorist libertarianism, is the theory that all individuals possess certain natural or moral rights, mainly a right of individual sovereignty and that therefore acts of initiation of force and fraud are rights-violations and that is sufficient reason to oppose those acts. This is one of the two ethical view points within right-libertarianism, the other being consequentialist libertarianism which only takes into account the consequences of actions and rules when judging them and holds that free markets and strong private property rights have good consequences.

Ethics is the branch of philosophy that examines right and wrong moral behavior, moral concepts and moral language. Ethics or moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that "involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior". The field of ethics, along with aesthetics, concerns matters of value, and thus comprises the branch of philosophy called axiology.

Matthew Henry Kramer is an American philosopher, currently Professor of Legal and Political Philosophy at the University of Cambridge and a Fellow of Churchill College, Cambridge. He writes mainly in the areas of metaethics, normative ethics, legal philosophy, and political philosophy. He is a leading proponent of legal positivism. He has been Director of the Cambridge Forum for Legal and Political Philosophy since 2000. He has been teaching at Cambridge University and at Churchill College since 1994.

<i>Political Animals and Animal Politics</i> Collection of papers about animal ethics

Political Animals and Animal Politics is a 2014 edited collection published by Palgrave Macmillan and edited by the green political theorists Marcel Wissenburg and David Schlosberg. The work addresses the emergence of academic animal ethics informed by political philosophy as opposed to moral philosophy. It was the first edited collection to be published on the topic, and the first book-length attempt to explore the breadth and boundaries of the literature. As well as a substantial introduction by the editors, it features ten sole-authored chapters split over three parts, respectively concerning institutional change for animals, the relationship between animal ethics and ecologism, and real-world laws made for the benefit of animals. The book's contributors were Wissenburg, Schlosberg, Manuel Arias-Maldonado, Chad Flanders, Christie Smith, Clemens Driessen, Simon Otjes, Kurtis Boyer, Per-Anders Svärd, and Mihnea Tanasescu. The focus of their individual chapters varies, but recurring features include discussions of human exceptionalism, exploration of ways that animal issues are or could be present in political discourse, and reflections on the relationship between theory and practice in politics.

Oscar Horta

Oscar Horta is a Spanish animal activist and moral philosopher who is currently a professor in the Department of Philosophy and Anthropology at the University of Santiago de Compostela (USC) and one of the co-founders of the organization Animal Ethics. He is known for his work in animal ethics, especially around the problem of wild animal suffering. He has also worked on the concept of speciesism and on the clarification of the arguments for the moral consideration of nonhuman animals.

References

  1. ↑ Jonathan Crowe. bond.edu.au. Retrieved on 1 October 2018.
  2. ↑ Lara Bullock, Bond University Appoints Trio of Academics. lawyersweekly.com.au. Retrieved on 1 October 2018.
  3. ↑ Jonathan Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law (Cambridge University Press, 2019).
  4. ↑ Jonathan Crowe, Queensland Rape Law ‘Loophole’ Could Remain After Review Ignores Concerns About Rape Myths and Consent. theconversation.com. Retrieved on 6 September 2020; Jonathan Crowe, Consent is Not a 'Romance Killer': The Mistake of Fact Defence for Rape Needs to Go. theguardian.com. Retrieved on 16 March 2019; Felicity Robinson, She Didn’t Consent. He Misunderstood. Is it Rape?. primer.com.au. Retrieved on 26 September 2019; Lydia Lynch, ‘It is Horrific': The Queensland Law Allowing Rapists Off Scot-Free. brisbanetimes.com.au. Retrieved 26 September 2019.
  5. ↑ Curriculum Vitae. academia.edu. Retrieved on 22 September 2020.
  6. ↑ About Us. aslp.org.au. Retrieved on 1 October 2018; Jonathan Crowe. academia.edu. Retrieved on 1 October 2018.
  7. ↑ Jonathan Crowe. academia.edu. Retrieved on 1 October 2018.
  8. ↑ Journal of Legal Philosophy. elgaronline.com. Retrieved on 6 September 2020.
  9. ↑ John Finnis, Natural Law Theories. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved on 6 September 2020; Mark C Murphy, The Natural Law Tradition in Ethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved on 6 September 2020.
  10. ↑ Jonathan Crowe. bond.edu.au. Retrieved on 1 October 2018.
  11. ↑ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 3-4.
  12. ↑ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 246.
  13. ↑ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 6.
  14. ↑ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 6-7.
  15. ↑ Jonathan Crowe, ‘Natural Law and the Nature of Law in a Nutshell' (2019) 44 Australasian Journal of Legal Philosophy 100, 101.
  16. ↑ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, ch 8-9.
  17. ↑ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 161.
  18. ↑ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 175.
  19. ↑ Crowe, ‘Natural Law and the Nature of Law in a Nutshell’, 103.
  20. ↑ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 176-7.
  21. ↑ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, ch 11.
  22. ↑ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 208.
  23. ↑ Jonathan Crowe, ‘The Narrative Model of Constitutional Implications: A Defence of Roach v Electoral Commissioner’ (2019) 42 University of New South Wales Law Journal 91; Jonathan Crowe, ‘Not-So-Easy Cases’ (2019) 40 Statute Law Review 75.
  24. ↑ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, 215; Jonathan Crowe, ‘The Role of Contextual Meaning in Judicial Interpretation’ (2013) 41 Federal Law Review 417.
  25. ↑ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, ch 12.
  26. ↑ Crowe, Natural Law and the Nature of Law, ch 6.
  27. ↑ Jonathan Crowe, ‘Natural Law and the Nature of Law: A Response to Commentators’ (2019) 44 Australasian Journal of Legal Philosophy 133, 138-41; Jonathan Crowe, ‘Natural Law Anarchism’ (2014) 7 Studies in Emergent Order 288.
  28. ↑ Jonathan Crowe, ‘Small Justice: The Rights of the Other Animal’ in Peter Atterton and Tamra Wright (eds), Face-to-Face with Animals: Levinas and the Animal Question (State University of New York Press, 2019); Jonathan Crowe, ‘The Idea of Small Justice’, Julius Stone Institute Seminar Series (University of Sydney, 27 June 2019).
  29. ↑ Crowe, ‘The Idea of Small Justice’.
  30. ↑ Jonathan Crowe, Existentialism, Liberty and the Ethical Foundations of Law (PhD Thesis, University of Queensland, 2006).
  31. ↑ Jonathan Crowe, ‘Levinas on Shared Ethical Judgments’ (2011) 42(3) Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 233; Jonathan Crowe, ‘Levinasian Ethics and the Concept of Law’ in Desmond Manderson (ed.), Essays on Levinas and Law: A Mosaic (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009).
  32. ↑ Rachael Field and Jonathan Crowe, Mediation Ethics: From Theory to Practice (Edward Elgar, 2020).
  33. ↑ Field and Crowe, Mediation Ethics, ch 5-6.
  34. ↑ Field and Crowe, Mediation Ethics, ch 9.
  35. ↑ Field and Crowe, Mediation Ethics, 6.
  36. ↑ Field and Crowe, Mediation Ethics, ch 10.
  37. ↑ Jonathan Crowe. jonathancrowe.org. Retrieved on 6 September 2020; Our Board. rasara.org. Retrieved on 6 September 2020.
  38. ↑ Rape and Sexual Assault Research and Advocacy. rasara.org. Retrieved on 6 September 2020.
  39. ↑ Consent Law in Queensland. consentlawqld.com. Retrieved on 6 September 2020.
  40. ↑ Josh Robertson, Queensland Will Abolish Rape Defence 'Loophole' if Law Reform Experts Recommend It. abc.net.au. Retrieved on 6 September 2020; Leanne Edmistone, Battered by Twin Traumas: When Rape Victims Say the Anguish They Suffer from the Legal System is Almost as Bad as the Crime Itself, Something Needs to be Done. QWeekend Magazine, The Courier-Mail (13 July 2019).
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.