Kadero (archaeological site)

Last updated
Kadero
Sudan relief map.svg
Archaeological site icon (red).svg
Location of Kadero in Sudan
LocationSudan
Coordinates 15°45′N32°33′E / 15.75°N 32.55°E / 15.75; 32.55
History
CulturesEarly Khartoum
Associated withNeolithic pastoralists
Site notes
Excavation dates1972-2003
ArchaeologistsLech Krzyżaniak, University of Warsaw
Kadero (archaeological site)
Interactive map showing location of Kadero
Example of Neolithic pottery from Central Sudan. Neolithic pottery, National Museum of Sudan, Khartoum, Sudan, North-East Africa.jpg
Example of Neolithic pottery from Central Sudan.

Kadero is an African archaeological site located in Central Sudan, northeast of Khartoum, Sudan and east of the Nile River. [1] [2] The site consists of burial grounds and two sand mounds around 1.5 meters in elevation, altogether encompassing around three hectares. [2] [3] Excavations at the site were led by Lech Krzyżaniak at the University of Warsaw. [2] Kadero was occupied during the Neolithic period, dating to the years 5960 through 5030 B.P specifically, by pastoralists. [2] [3] The inhabitants of Kadero left behind evidence of intensive pastoralism, which is the earliest evidence of such phenomena in the area. [3] Analysis of ceramics and stone artifacts have led archaeologists to consider the site as comparable to other early Neolithic sites in central Sudan, such as Ghaba and R12, placing the site in the early Khartoum culture. [2] [3] [4]

Contents

Context

Kadero is one of thousands of Neolithic sites in Sudan, which are mostly concentrated near the Nile River. [5] The economy of the people at Kadero was likely one of pastoralism, more specifically cattle husbandry, and gathering. [2] Kadero may have served as a home base for peoples that inhabited a larger area, moving to nearby sites during dry seasons. [2] [5] The peoples at Kadero are believed to have been part of the early Khartoum culture, living similar lifestyles to those in the area. [2] Human settlement at Kadero was at its highest during the early Neolithic Period, but the area was used as a burial site and a seasonal settlement up to the Late Neolithic. [2] The decrease over time in settlement of Kadero is likely explained by a transition to a more nomadic lifestyle in the Late Neolithic. [2]

Archaeological findings

History of archaeological work

H.N. Chittick was the first archaeologist to document the site in 1955, but work was only done at the surface level. [2] Excavations at Kadero were conducted from 1972 to 2003 by teams led by Lech Krzyżaniak. [2] These excavations were done with support from the Polish Center of Mediterranean Archaeology at the University of Warsaw and the Poznań Archaeological Museum throughout the project; on-site training was done with students from Khartoum University as well as students from other countries. [2] Excavations of the site stopped after the death of Krzyzaniak. [2]

Description of site

The two sand mounds, referred to as the northern and southern middens, contain much of Kadero's artifacts. [2] The northern midden is estimated to have originally had an area of around 600 square meters, and the southern midden around 250. [2] Both of these mounds contain artifacts from the same period and are considered to be part of the same site. [6] These middens were used as a waste collection area for the inhabitants of the area. [5] Erosion in the area has made the material culture and burials within the site close to the surface of the ground or only slightly underground, which has negatively affected the quality of preservation of these objects. [3] [6]

Neolithic burial with body in contracted position similar to those at Kadero. Image of a Neolithic grave, damaged, Czechoslovakia. Wellcome L0008701.jpg
Neolithic burial with body in contracted position similar to those at Kadero.

Human remains

248 graves have been found at Kadero, 218 of them dating to the Neolithic period and the rest dating to the Meriotic and Post-Meriotic. [2] Out of the 218 Neolithic graves, only 2 date to the Late Neolithic. [2] Bodies within these graves were buried on their sides, with their hands placed close to the face and their feet close to the head. [6] This constricted, tight positioning was most drastic in Neolithic skeletons but was present throughout the site. [3] It is possible that bodies were buried in tight containers or bound in order to maintain this positioning. [6] In the Post-Meriotic or Christian graves, bodies were positioned on their right sides or on their backs. [2]

Artifacts

The burial sites in Kadero are a rich source of artifacts, as many bodies were buried with goods. [6] These include grinding stones, flaked stones, necklaces, and beads made from bone. [6] Most of the human remains were accompanied by pottery and jewelry, such as carnelian bead bracelets or necklaces, deep bowls, and marine shell necklaces. [2] Similarly to the cemeteries at Ghaba, Amazonite beads were present but rare. [4] The graves with the highest amounts of goods were located in the center of the cemetery; these graves were from both the Early and Late Neolithic. [2]

Stone tools were especially numerous at the site, most of which were made from quartz. [2] As was typical of Neolithic stone tools, the tools found at Kadero were created with flake production techniques. [2] [5] The most prevalent types of stone tools were gouges, axes, and hammers, but grindstones and hoe blades have also been found. [2]

Pottery found at Kadero has been studied extensively. Over 200,000 samples of pottery and 100 complete vessels have been found at the site. [2] Types of vessels include bowls, jars, and pots, which came in different shapes, rim shapes, and decoration styles. [2] Artwork on pottery was typically characterized by geometric patterns, such as wavy lines. [2] Pottery was typically made from quartz sand, silt, and other minerals found in the area. [7]

Animal and plant remains

Around 36,000 animal bones have been collected by archaeologists at Kadero. [2] These remains have been divided into four groups: animals that were used for food, shells originating from the Red Sea or Indian Ocean, and early or late intrusive species. [2] Most of the animal remains found at the site were that of animals that had been eaten. [8] These animals were mainly fish, birds, and mammalian game; the main mammalian food source was antelope. [8] Discarded shells from species such as Limicolaria flammata, Pila ovata, Nile mussels, and river oysters have been found at the site. [2] Remains of domesticated animals have been found at the site, including cattle, sheep, goats, and dogs. [3]

Cereal remains have not been found at Kadero, however, evidence for intensive usage of plants has been found using plant impressions in pottery. [2] [3] Wild grasses, including sorghum, were identified in these impressions. [3] The only plant remains that have been found are pieces of charcoal and charred pieces of Zizyphus and hackberry fruit stones, which have been found both in graves and in the middens. [2] This lack of preservation of plant remains can be explained by wind erosion and subsequent exposure to the elements. [2]

Interpretations

Pastoralism

This site is regarded as prominent because it has provided archaeologists with the first evidence of intensive pastoralism in its area. [3] The inhabitants of Kadero collected resources from a variety of animals, but the archaeological record shows a preference for cattle. [2] The large numbers of cattle bones found at Kadero is unusual for sites inhabited by pastoralists. [9] It is possible that the site was more of a ritualistic center than other areas the pastoralists inhabited, which could explain the prevalence of cattle bones. [9] Kadero is one of many sites that shows domestication of animals such as cattle and goats occurring at the same time as the adoption of dairying; however, this is not a universal experience across Neolithic Africa. [10]

It is possible that early farmers at the site planted wild cereals, including sorghum, as impressions of wild cereals have been identified in pottery. [2] [3] Many of the stone tools found at the site then can be explained as tools for preparing these plants, but data is limited. [2] Evidence of the usage of wild sorghum as a food source is prevalent throughout Neolithic eastern Africa, and it has been argued that the Central Sudanese during the time period could have harvested wild cereals but did not necessarily domesticate the plant. [2]

The adoption of intensive pastoralism at the site has been theorized to have come from the immigration of pastoralists to Kadero or the introduction of the livestock that pastoralism requires into the region. [2] Pastoralism would have been a way to maximize the available resources in the area, in response to a Mid-Holocene drying of the Nile Valley or the availability of land on which livestock could graze. [2] Although the explanations as to how and why the people at Kadero began to adopt pastoralism vary, the seasonal patterns of food collection are much more clear. [2] In the dry seasons, collection of freshwater snails and fishing in flood plains was likely the main foodway for inhabitants at Kadero, while fishing and grazing livestock further from the Nile were conducted during the wet season. [2]

Socioeconomic conditions at Kadero

Archaeologists believe that the artifacts at Kadero are representative of a culture with a social structure and funerary practices. [2] Kadero is considered to be a unique site because of the presence of both a settlement and a burial ground, which has allowed for a more complete understanding of the lives of the people who inhabited Kadero than is possible at many sites. [2] The cemetery shows evidence of social stratification, as some graves are much more heavily stocked with goods than others, which is considered to be atypical within Neolithic pastoralist cemeteries. [9] Contemporaneous sites to Kadero include Zakiab, Um Dereiwa, Ghaba, and R12, and archaeologists believe that Zakiab and Um Dereiwa were inhabited by the same peoples as Kadero. [4] [9] The lack of cemeteries at Zakiab and Um Dereiwa supports the archaeological belief that these three sites were interconnected. [9]

Skeletal analysis suggests that the Neolithic peoples at Kadero may have lived a more economically comfortable life than their counterparts in Europe. [6] Skeletons found in this area were older than those found in burial sites in Neolithic Europe, which is likely explained by the higher availability of food and less harsh climate in the Nile valley of Sudan as compared to burials examined in Europe. [6] However, sample sizes have been comparatively small and skeletons were poorly preserved, which limits the ability of archaeologists to definitively interpret the data left behind by these skeletons. [11]

The vast amount of objects found at Kadero has allowed archaeologists to glean details on the lives of those at Kadero, as well as draw comparisons to those in other Neolithic communities in the area. Material analysis of pottery found at Kadero and other sites has led researchers to conclude that Nile mud was a primary resource for the creation of ceramic throughout Neolithic Central Sudanese communities. [12] The artistic decorations found on the pottery are also considered to be similar to other Central Sudanese Neolithic sites such as Esh Shaheinab, suggesting that these communities were in contact. [2] [12]

Related Research Articles

The Nilotic peoples are people indigenous to the Nile Valley who speak Nilotic languages. They inhabit South Sudan, Sudan, Ethiopia, Uganda, Kenya, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, Burundi and Tanzania. Among these are the Burun-speaking peoples, Teso people also known as Iteso or people of Teso, Karo peoples, Luo peoples, Ateker peoples, Kalenjin peoples, Datooga, Dinka, Nuer, Atwot, Lotuko, and the Maa-speaking peoples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prehistoric North Africa</span> Prehistory of North African region

The prehistory of North Africa spans the period of earliest human presence in the region to gradual onset of historicity in the Maghreb during classical antiquity. Early anatomically modern humans are known to have been present at Jebel Irhoud, in what is now Morocco, approximately 300,000 years ago. The Nile Valley region, via ancient Egypt, contributed to the Neolithic, Bronze Age and Iron Age periods of the Old World, along with the ancient Near East.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C-Group culture</span> C. 2400–1550 BCE Lower Nubian archaeological culture

The C-Group culture is an archaeological culture found in Lower Nubia, which dates from c. 2400 BCE to c. 1550 BCE. It was named by George A. Reisner. With no central site and no written evidence about what these people called themselves, Reisner assigned the culture a letter. The C-Group arose after Reisner's A-Group and B-Group cultures, and around the time the Old Kingdom was ending in Ancient Egypt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nabta Playa</span> Region of archaeological sites in the Nubian Desert

Nabta Playa was once a large endorheic basin in the Nubian Desert, located approximately 800 kilometers south of modern-day Cairo or about 100 kilometers west of Abu Simbel in southern Egypt, 22.51° north, 30.73° east. Today the region is characterized by numerous archaeological sites. The Nabta Playa archaeological site, one of the earliest of the Egyptian Neolithic Period, is dated to circa 7500 BC.

Uan Muhuggiag is an archaeological site in Libya that was occupied by pastoralists between the early Holocene and mid-Holocene; the Tashwinat mummy, which was found at Uan Muhuggiag, was dated to 5600 BP and presently resides in the Assaraya Alhamra Museum in Tripoli.

Hyrax Hill is a prehistoric site near Nakuru in the Rift Valley province of Kenya. It is a rocky spur roughly half a kilometer in length, with an elevation of 1,900 meters above sea level at its summit. The site was first discovered in 1926 by Louis Leakey during excavations at the nearby Nakuru Burial Site, and Mary Leakey conducted the first major excavations between 1937 and 1938. There are two distinct areas of occupation at Hyrax Hill: one which was occupied during the Pastoral Neolithic and late Iron Age, and one which was occupied by the Sirikwa earlier in the Iron Age.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Naqa</span> Ruined ancient city in Sudan, a UNESCO World Heritage Site

Naqa or Naga'a is a ruined ancient city of the Kushitic Kingdom of Meroë in modern-day Sudan. The ancient city lies about 170 km (110 mi) north-east of Khartoum, and about 50 km (31 mi) east of the Nile River located at approximately MGRS 36QWC290629877. Here smaller wadis meet the Wadi Awateib coming from the center of the Butana plateau region, and further north at Wad ban Naqa from where it joins the Nile. Naqa was only a camel or donkey's journey from the Nile, and could serve as a trading station on the way to the east; thus it had strategic importance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nile boat</span>

The Nile River is a major resource for the people living along it, especially thousands of years ago. The El Salha Archaeological Project discovered an abundance of evidence of an ancient boat that traveled the Nile River dating back to 3,000 years ago. Pictographs and pebble carvings were uncovered, indicating a boat more advanced than a simple canoe. This evidence of a progressed Nile boat includes a steering system which may have been used in the Nile for fishing and transportation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Savanna Pastoral Neolithic</span> Archaeological cultures of the Rift Valley of East Africa

The Savanna Pastoral Neolithic is a collection of ancient societies that appeared in the Rift Valley of East Africa and surrounding areas during a time period known as the Pastoral Neolithic. They were South Cushitic speaking pastoralists who tended to bury their dead in cairns, whilst their toolkit was characterized by stone bowls, pestles, grindstones and earthenware pots.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pastoral Neolithic</span> Historic site in Tanzania

The Pastoral Neolithic refers to a period in Africa's prehistory, specifically Tanzania and Kenya, marking the beginning of food production, livestock domestication, and pottery use in the region following the Later Stone Age. The exact dates of this time period remain inexact, but early Pastoral Neolithic sites support the beginning of herding by 5000 BP. In contrast to the Neolithic in other parts of the world, which saw the development of farming societies, the first form of African food production was nomadic pastoralism, or ways of life centered on the herding and management of livestock. The shift from hunting to food production relied on livestock that had been domesticated outside of East Africa, especially North Africa. This period marks the emergence of the forms of pastoralism that are still present. The reliance on livestock herding marks the deviation from hunting-gathering but precedes major agricultural development. The exact movement tendencies of Neolithic pastoralists are not completely understood.

Ngamuriak is an archaeological site located in south-western Kenya. It has been interpreted as an Elmenteitan Pastoral Neolithic settlement. The excavation of this site produced pottery sherds, stone tools with obsidian fragments and obsidian blades, along with large amounts of animal bones.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elmenteitan</span> African Pastoral Neolithic culture

The Elmenteitan culture was a prehistoric lithic industry and pottery tradition with a distinct pattern of land use, hunting and pastoralism that appeared and developed on the western plains of Kenya, East Africa during the Pastoral Neolithic c.3300-1200 BP. It was named by archaeologist Louis Leakey after Lake Elmenteita, a soda lake located in the Great Rift Valley, about 120 km (75 mi) northwest of Nairobi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jebel Moya</span>

Jebel Moya is an archaeological site in the southern Gezira Plain, Sudan, approximately 250 km south southeast of Khartoum. Dating between 5000 BCE-500 CE and roughly 104,000 m2 in area, the site is one of the largest pastoralist cemeteries in Africa with over 3,000 burials excavated thus far. The site was first excavated by Sir Henry Wellcome from 1911 to 1914. Artifacts found at the site suggest trade routes between Jebel Moya and its surrounding areas, even as far as Egypt.

R12 is a middle Neolithic cemetery located in the Northern Dongola Reach on the banks of the Seleim Nile palaeochannel of modern-day Sudan. The site is dated to between 5000 and 4000 BC. Centro Veneto di Studi Classici e Orientali excavated the site, within the concession of the Sudan Archaeological Research Society and after an agreement with it, between 2000 and 2003 over three digging seasons. The first was in 2000 and 33 graves were discovered. The second was in 2001 and another 33 graves were discovered. The third was in 2003 and the last 100 graves were discovered. There are 166 graves total at the site. Contents of the graves include ceramics, animal bones, grinding stones, human skeletons, and plant remains.

Gebel Ramlah is a region in the Western Desert of southern Egypt that was occupied throughout the African Pastoral Neolithic. Archaeological research has focused primarily on individual burial sites and six pastoral cemeteries, including the earliest known infant cemetery in the world. The Gebel Ramlah cemeteries were active during the Final Neolithic in the fifth millennium BC. Ongoing excavation has uncovered over 200 human burials and elaborate grave goods. Research studies have been done on the pottery, mollusk shells, archaeobotanical remains, and skeletal remains found throughout the sites.

The Butana Group was a prehistoric, neolithic culture in the eastern part of modern Sudan, that flourished from the fourth to the early third millennium BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pastoral period</span> Most Common Type of Central Saharan rock art

Pastoral rock art is the most common form of Central Saharan rock art, created in painted and engraved styles depicting pastoralists and bow-wielding hunters in scenes of animal husbandry, along with various animals, spanning from 6300 BCE to 700 BCE. The Pastoral Period is preceded by the Round Head Period and followed by the Caballine Period. The Early Pastoral Period spanned from 6300 BCE to 5400 BCE. Domesticated cattle were brought to the Central Sahara, and given the opportunity for becoming socially distinguished, to develop food surplus, as well as to acquire and aggregate wealth, led to the adoption of a cattle pastoral economy by some Central Saharan hunter-gatherers of the Late Acacus. In exchange, cultural information regarding utilization of vegetation in the Central Sahara was shared by Late Acacus hunter-gatherers with incoming Early Pastoral peoples.

Esh Shaheinab is an African archaeological site that was occupied multiple times during the early Holocene. Artifacts from this site exemplify various traditions including the Early Khartoum, Neolithic, and Late Neolithic.

Ghaba is a Neolithic cemetery mound and African archaeological site located in Central Sudan in the Shendi region of the Nile Valley. The site, discovered in 1977 by the Section Française de la Direction des Antiquités du Soudan (SFDAS) while they were investigating nearby Kadada, dates to 4750–4350 and 4000–3650 cal BC. Archaeology of the site originally heavily emphasized pottery, as there were many intact or mostly intact vessels. Recent analysis has focused on study of plant material found, which indicates that Ghaba may have been domesticating cereals earlier than previously believed. Though the site is a cemetery, little analysis has taken place on the skeletons due to circumstances of the excavation and poor preservation due to the environment. The artifacts at Ghaba suggest the people who used the cemetery were part of a regionalization separating central Sudan's Neolithic from Nubia. While many traditions match with Nubia, the people represented at Ghaba had some of their own particular practices in food production and bead and pottery production, which likely occurred on a relatively small scale. They also had some distinct funerary traditions, as evidenced by their grave goods. The people at Ghaba would have likely existed at least partially in a trade network that spread through the Nile and to the Red Sea. They used agriculture, cultivation, and cattle for sustenance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prehistoric East Africa</span> Prehistory of the East African subregion of the African continent

The prehistory of East Africa spans from the earliest human presence in the region until the emergence of the Iron Age in East Africa. Between 1,600,000 BP and 1,500,000 BP, the Homo ergaster known as Nariokotome Boy resided near Nariokotome River, Kenya. Modern humans, who left behind remains, resided at Omo Kibish in 233,000 BP. Afro-Asiatic speakers and Nilo-Saharan speakers expanded in East Africa, resulting in transformation of food systems of East Africa. Prehistoric West Africans may have diverged into distinct ancestral groups of modern West Africans and Bantu-speaking peoples in Cameroon, and, subsequently, around 5000 BP, the Bantu-speaking peoples migrated into other parts of Sub-Saharan Africa.

References

  1. Krzyzaniak, Lech (1976). "The Archaeological Site of Kadero, Sudan". Current Anthropology. 17 (4): 762. doi:10.1086/201823. ISSN   0011-3204. JSTOR   2741286. S2CID   144379335.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 HerausgeberIn., Chłodnicki, Marek, HerausgeberIn. Kobusiewicz, Michał HerausgeberIn. Kröper, Karla. Kadero : the Lech Krzyżaniak excavations in the Sudan. ISBN   978-3-946654-27-8. OCLC   958023023.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Barakat, HalaNayel (1995). "Middle Holocene vegetation and human impact in central Sudan: charcoal from the neolithic site at Kadero". Vegetation History and Archaeobotany. 4 (2). doi:10.1007/bf00206918. ISSN   0939-6314. S2CID   128840141.
  4. 1 2 3 Zerboni, Andrea; Salvatori, Sandro; Vignola, Pietro; Mohammed, Abd el Rahman Ali; Usai, Donatella (2018). "The long-distance exchange of amazonite and increasing social complexity in the Sudanese Neolithic". Antiquity. 92 (365): 1195–1209. doi:10.15184/aqy.2018.196. hdl: 2434/597736 . ISSN   0003-598X. S2CID   165543217.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Garcea, Elena (September 2020). The Prehistory of the Sudan. ISBN   978-3-030-47185-9. OCLC   1237448434.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Dzierzykray-Rogalski, Tadeusz (September 1977). "Neolithic Skeletons From Kadero, Sudan". Current Anthropology. 18 (3): 585–586. doi:10.1086/201961. ISSN   0011-3204. S2CID   143172148.
  7. Michał., Przyżaniak, Lech. Kobusiewicz (1989). Late prehistory of the Nile Basin and the Sahara. Poznań Archaeological Museum. OCLC   21949989.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. 1 2 Archaeology of early Northeastern Africa : in memory of Lech Krzyżaniak. Karla Kroeper, Marek Chłodnicki, Michał. Kobusiewicz, Lech Krzyżaniak, Muzeum Archeologiczne w Poznaniu. Poznań: Poznań Archaeological Museum. 2006. ISBN   83-60109-06-0. OCLC   177291362.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Haaland, Randi (2012). "Changing food ways as indicators of emerging complexity in Sudanese Nubia: from Neolithic agropastoralists to the Meroitic civilisation". Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa. 47 (3): 327–342. doi:10.1080/0067270x.2012.708990. ISSN   0067-270X. S2CID   162246435.
  10. Dunne, J.; di Lernia, S.; Chłodnicki, M.; Kherbouche, F.; Evershed, R. P. (2018-03-25). "Timing and pace of dairying inception and animal husbandry practices across Holocene North Africa". Quaternary International. African Archaeozoology. 471: 147–159. Bibcode:2018QuInt.471..147D. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2017.06.062 . hdl: 11573/989560 . ISSN   1040-6182. S2CID   54864164.
  11. Armelagos, George J.; Greene, David L. (1978). "On the Interpretation of the Kadero (Sudan) Neolithic Population". Current Anthropology. 19 (2): 411–412. doi:10.1086/202106. ISSN   0011-3204. S2CID   143682703.
  12. 1 2 Krzyzaniak, Lech (1986). "Late Prehistory of the Nile Basin and the Sahara". Current Anthropology. 27 (2): 191. doi:10.1086/203419. ISSN   0011-3204. S2CID   143903058.