In mathematics, Kan complexes and Kan fibrations are part of the theory of simplicial sets. Kan fibrations are the fibrations of the standard model category structure on simplicial sets and are therefore of fundamental importance. Kan complexes are the fibrant objects in this model category. The name is in honor of Daniel Kan.
For each n ≥ 0, recall that the standard -simplex, , is the representable simplicial set
Applying the geometric realization functor to this simplicial set gives a space homeomorphic to the topological standard -simplex: the convex subspace of consisting of all points such that the coordinates are non-negative and sum to 1.
For each k ≤ n, this has a subcomplex , the k-th horn inside , corresponding to the boundary of the n-simplex, with the k-th face removed. This may be formally defined in various ways, as for instance the union of the images of the n maps corresponding to all the other faces of . [1] Horns of the form sitting inside look like the black V at the top of the adjacent image. If is a simplicial set, then maps
correspond to collections of -simplices satisfying a compatibility condition, one for each . Explicitly, this condition can be written as follows. Write the -simplices as a list and require that
These conditions are satisfied for the -simplices of sitting inside .
A map of simplicial sets is a Kan fibration if, for any and , and for any maps and such that (where is the inclusion of in ), there exists a map such that and . Stated this way, the definition is very similar to that of fibrations in topology (see also homotopy lifting property), whence the name "fibration".
Using the correspondence between -simplices of a simplicial set and morphisms (a consequence of the Yoneda lemma), this definition can be written in terms of simplices. The image of the map can be thought of as a horn as described above. Asking that factors through corresponds to requiring that there is an -simplex in whose faces make up the horn from (together with one other face). Then the required map corresponds to a simplex in whose faces include the horn from . The diagram to the right is an example in two dimensions. Since the black V in the lower diagram is filled in by the blue -simplex, if the black V above maps down to it then the striped blue -simplex has to exist, along with the dotted blue -simplex, mapping down in the obvious way. [3]
A simplicial set is called a Kan complex if the map from , the one-point simplicial set, is a Kan fibration. In the model category for simplicial sets, is the terminal object and so a Kan complex is exactly the same as a fibrant object. Equivalently, this could be stated as: if every map from a horn has an extension to , meaning there is a lift such that
for the inclusion map , then is a Kan complex. Conversely, every Kan complex has this property, hence it gives a simple technical condition for a Kan complex.
An important example comes from the construction of singular simplices used to define singular homology, called the singular functor [4] pg 7
.
Given a space , define a singular -simplex of X to be a continuous map from the standard topological -simplex (as described above) to ,
Taking the set of these maps for all non-negative gives a graded set,
To make this into a simplicial set, define face maps by
and degeneracy maps by
Since the union of any faces of is a strong deformation retract of , any continuous function defined on these faces can be extended to , which shows that is a Kan complex. [5]
It is worth noting the singular functor is right adjoint to the geometric realization functor
giving the isomorphism
It can be shown that the simplicial set underlying a simplicial group is always fibrant [4] pg 12. In particular, for a simplicial abelian group, its geometric realization is homotopy equivalent to a product of Eilenberg-Maclane spaces
In particular, this includes classifying spaces. So the spaces , , and the infinite lens spaces are correspond to Kan complexes of some simplicial set. In fact, this set can be constructed explicitly using the Dold–Kan correspondence of a chain complex and taking the underlying simplicial set of the simplicial abelian group.
Another important source of examples are the simplicial sets associated to a small groupoid . This is defined as the geometric realization of the simplicial set and is typically denoted . We could have also replaced with an infinity groupoid. It is conjectured that the homotopy category of geometric realizations of infinity groupoids is equivalent to the homotopy category of homotopy types. This is called the homotopy hypothesis.
It turns out the standard -simplex is not a Kan complex [6] pg 38. The construction of a counter example in general can be found by looking at a low dimensional example, say . Taking the map sending
gives a counter example since it cannot be extended to a map because the maps have to be order preserving. If there was a map, it would have to send
but this isn't a map of simplicial sets.
For simplicial sets there is an associated simplicial set called the function complex, where the simplices are defined as
and for an ordinal map there is an induced map
(since the first factor of Hom is contravariant) defined by sending a map to the composition
This complex has the following exponential law of simplicial sets
which sends a map to the composite map
where for lifted to the n-simplex . ^
Given a (Kan) fibration and an inclusion of simplicial sets , there is a fibration [4] pg 21
(where is in the function complex in the category of simplicial sets) induced from the commutative diagram
where is the pull-back map given by pre-composition and is the pushforward map given by post-composition. In particular, the previous fibration implies and are fibrations.
The homotopy groups of a fibrant simplicial set may be defined combinatorially, using horns, in a way that agrees with the homotopy groups of the topological space which realizes it. For a Kan complex and a vertex , as a set is defined as the set of maps of simplicial sets fitting into a certain commutative diagram:
Notice the fact is mapped to a point is equivalent to the definition of the sphere as the quotient for the standard unit ball
Defining the group structure requires a little more work. Essentially, given two maps there is an associated -simplice such that gives their addition. This map is well-defined up to simplicial homotopy classes of maps, giving the group structure. Moreover, the groups are Abelian for . For , it is defined as the homotopy classes of vertex maps .
Using model categories, any simplicial set has a fibrant replacement which is homotopy equivalent to in the homotopy category of simplicial sets. Then, the homotopy groups of can be defined as
where is a lift of to . These fibrant replacements can be thought of a topological analogue of resolutions of a chain complex (such as a projective resolution or a flat resolution).
In geometry, a simplex is a generalization of the notion of a triangle or tetrahedron to arbitrary dimensions. The simplex is so-named because it represents the simplest possible polytope in any given dimension. For example,
In mathematics, a chain complex is an algebraic structure that consists of a sequence of abelian groups and a sequence of homomorphisms between consecutive groups such that the image of each homomorphism is included in the kernel of the next. Associated to a chain complex is its homology, which describes how the images are included in the kernels.
In mathematics, a simplicial complex is a set composed of points, line segments, triangles, and their n-dimensional counterparts. Simplicial complexes should not be confused with the more abstract notion of a simplicial set appearing in modern simplicial homotopy theory. The purely combinatorial counterpart to a simplicial complex is an abstract simplicial complex. To distinguish a simplicial complex from an abstract simplicial complex, the former is often called a geometric simplicial complex.
In algebraic topology, singular homology refers to the study of a certain set of algebraic invariants of a topological space X, the so-called homology groups Intuitively, singular homology counts, for each dimension n, the n-dimensional holes of a space. Singular homology is a particular example of a homology theory, which has now grown to be a rather broad collection of theories. Of the various theories, it is perhaps one of the simpler ones to understand, being built on fairly concrete constructions.
In mathematics, the barycentric subdivision is a standard way to subdivide a given simplex into smaller ones. Its extension on simplicial complexes is a canonical method to refine them. Therefore, the barycentric subdivision is an important tool in algebraic topology.
In mathematics, a simplicial set is an object composed of simplices in a specific way. Simplicial sets are higher-dimensional generalizations of directed graphs, partially ordered sets and categories. Formally, a simplicial set may be defined as a contravariant functor from the simplex category to the category of sets. Simplicial sets were introduced in 1950 by Samuel Eilenberg and Joseph A. Zilber.
In mathematics, triangulation describes the replacement of topological spaces by piecewise linear spaces, i.e. the choice of a homeomorphism in a suitable simplicial complex. Spaces being homeomorphic to a simplicial complex are called triangulable. Triangulation has various uses in different branches of mathematics, for instance in algebraic topology, in complex analysis or in modeling.
In mathematics, obstruction theory is a name given to two different mathematical theories, both of which yield cohomological invariants.
This is a glossary of properties and concepts in category theory in mathematics.
In category theory, a discipline within mathematics, the nerveN(C) of a small category C is a simplicial set constructed from the objects and morphisms of C. The geometric realization of this simplicial set is a topological space, called the classifying space of the categoryC. These closely related objects can provide information about some familiar and useful categories using algebraic topology, most often homotopy theory.
In algebraic geometry and algebraic topology, branches of mathematics, A1homotopy theory or motivic homotopy theory is a way to apply the techniques of algebraic topology, specifically homotopy, to algebraic varieties and, more generally, to schemes. The theory is due to Fabien Morel and Vladimir Voevodsky. The underlying idea is that it should be possible to develop a purely algebraic approach to homotopy theory by replacing the unit interval [0, 1], which is not an algebraic variety, with the affine line A1, which is. The theory has seen spectacular applications such as Voevodsky's construction of the derived category of mixed motives and the proof of the Milnor and Bloch-Kato conjectures.
In mathematics, a Δ-set, often called a Δ-complex or a semi-simplicial set, is a combinatorial object that is useful in the construction and triangulation of topological spaces, and also in the computation of related algebraic invariants of such spaces. A Δ-set is somewhat more general than a simplicial complex, yet not quite as sophisticated as a simplicial set. Simplicial sets have additional structure, so that every simplicial set is also a semi-simplicial set.
In mathematics, more specifically category theory, a quasi-category is a generalization of the notion of a category. The study of such generalizations is known as higher category theory.
In mathematics, more precisely, in the theory of simplicial sets, the Dold–Kan correspondence states that there is an equivalence between the category of chain complexes and the category of simplicial abelian groups. Moreover, under the equivalence, the th homology group of a chain complex is the th homotopy group of the corresponding simplicial abelian group, and a chain homotopy corresponds to a simplicial homotopy. The correspondence is an example of the nerve and realization paradigm.
In mathematics, more specifically in homotopy theory, a simplicial presheaf is a presheaf on a site taking values in simplicial sets. Equivalently, a simplicial presheaf is a simplicial object in the category of presheaves on a site. The notion was introduced by A. Joyal in the 1970s. Similarly, a simplicial sheaf on a site is a simplicial object in the category of sheaves on the site.
In mathematics, especially in algebraic topology, the homotopy limit and colimitpg 52 are variants of the notions of limit and colimit extended to the homotopy category . The main idea is this: if we have a diagram
This is a glossary of properties and concepts in algebraic topology in mathematics.
In mathematics, especially in homotopy theory, a left fibration of simplicial sets is a map that has the right lifting property with respect to the horn inclusions . A right fibration is one with the right lifting property with respect to the horn inclusions . A Kan fibration is one with the right lifting property with respect to every horn inclusion; hence, a Kan fibration is both a left and right fibration.
In algebraic geometry, a presheaf with transfers is, roughly, a presheaf that, like cohomology theory, comes with pushforwards, “transfer” maps. Precisely, it is, by definition, a contravariant additive functor from the category of finite correspondences to the category of abelian groups.
In mathematics, homotopy theory is a systematic study of situations in which maps can come with homotopies between them. It originated as a topic in algebraic topology, but nowadays is learned as an independent discipline.